ML20023C342

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Ack Receipt of Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-266/82-17 & 50-301/82-17.Violation 1 Re Fire Signaling Sys Testing Withdrawn
ML20023C342
Person / Time
Site: Point Beach  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 05/09/1983
From: Spessard R
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To: Burstein S
WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POWER CO.
Shared Package
ML20023C343 List:
References
NUDOCS 8305170241
Download: ML20023C342 (2)


See also: IR 05000266/1982017

Text

_

d

'

. , -

t%Y 0

1933

Docket No. 50-266

Docket No. 50-301

Wisconsin Electric Power Company

ATTN:

Mr. Sol Berstein

Executive Vice President

Power Plants

231 W. Michigan

Milwaukee, WI 53201

Gentlemen:

Thank you for your letter of January 21, 1983, responding to the items

of noncompliance which we brought to your attention in Inspection Report

No. 50-266/82-17; 50-301/82-17, which was forwarded to you by our letter

dated November 30, 1982. Your corrective actions, as appropriate, will

be reviewed during subsequent inspections.

In response to your letter we have the following comments:

1.

Your response to violation #1, Item a(1), Noncompliance 2.b(1) (82-17

01A, " Fire Pump Testing") disagrees with our position that this is

an item of noncompliance and stated that the pump test results indicate

adequate pump performance.

We have asked NRR to advise us concerning

the correct fire pump test requirements in the light of your commitments

to BTP 9.5-1 and your Technical Specifications. We will address your

response in a separate letter after we receive NRR's position.

2.

Regarding your disagreement with noncompliance 2.b(2) (82-17-01B, " Fire

Signaling System Testing"), it is our position that since fire protection

systems and equipment alarm annunciators are the only means of notifying

the reactor operator that the systems are actuated, that these alarms

do have a significant impact on safe plant operation. Therefore, 10

'

CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XI is applicable to testing and verifica-

tion of alarm annunciation in TS-7 (monthly Diesel Fire Pump Functional

l

Test), TS-17 (annual Testing of Diesel Room Sprinkler Valves), TS-19

l

(Annual Fire Pump Capacity Test) and TS-26 (Fire Main Flow Test).

3.

Violation #1, Item a(2) is being withdrawn as an example of aniitem of

noncompliance.

4.

Regarding your comment on violation #1, Item b, Noncompliance 2.b(4e)

(82-17-01d, " Test Acceptance Criteria, Annual Fire Pump Capacity Tests"),

we understand your philosophy as stated in Section 1.85 of the Point

Beach FSAR, which states in part, " Supervisors may direct that data be

8305170241 830509

PDR ADOCK 05000266

0

PDR

Mo/

J

.

.

.

Wisconsin Electric Power Company

taken without the data taker being cognizant of the acceptance criteria

when it is considered that forehand knowledge of the acceptance criteria

may prejudice results." However, we could find no evidence that accept-

ance criteria had been supplied to the individual reviewing the test

results for TS-19.

This is especially of concern for tests where the

applicable Technical Specification surveillance requirements are

ambiguous as they are for fire pump testing.

5.

Regarding violation #3, Item b., it should be noted that the procedures

..

and video tape, pertaining to handling of leaks and spills of flammable

materials, were neither referred to by site personnel nor made available

to our inspectors during the inspection. This suggests to us that some

of your representatives were not aware that such procedures and video

tapes existed. We will review the material at a future inspection at

which time a decision will be made whether to withdraw this example of

an item of noncompliance.

The inconsistancy between the NFPA codes and standards and your Technical

Specification requirements for fire pump testing and your position on the

largest expected fire system flow rate, as stated in your letter (C. W. Fay

to J. G. Keppler) dated February 24, 1983, have been referred to NRR for

review. We expect to receive NRR's response to our request by May 30, 1983,

and will contact you at that time.

Your cooperation with us is appreciated.

Sincerely,

' rs rl,"

'

c.3.j,q

,

,

,

,

R. L. Spessard, Director

Division of Engineer

cc:

J. J. Zach, Plant Manager

i

cc w/1tr dtd 1/21/83:

j

DMB/ Document Control Desk (RIDS)

Resident Inspector, RIII

i.

John J. Duffy, Chief

Boiler Section

i

Peter Anderson, Wisconsin's

!

Environmental Decade

Ness Flores, Chairperson

Wisconsin Public Service

Commission

i

RIII

RIII

RIII

RII

RIII

RI

RI

M

/jp

R

ey

t

Wil a

ha e

Li;t.lg

S

isard

05/02/83

g b 'o '

h

<