ML20012E683
| ML20012E683 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Perry  |
| Issue date: | 03/08/1990 |
| From: | Hiatt S OHIO CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBLE ENERGY |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20012E670 | List: |
| References | |
| OLA-2, NUDOCS 9004060108 | |
| Download: ML20012E683 (7) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:W T4% WR mo g a0 C '- r , A EC C@p[c ,M'(s Y 'j
# g
, < s a q;g y c' 'm ( ;_
.N UNITED STATES:OPlAMERICA'
-o D' C ,
w;.y $NUCLEARiREOULATORYICOMMISSION' s
~^' ~ _ . ,l '
~
_j:. ; n
- P 7 4 sthelMatter/of )' r
" 5" '
. :. .l .
- ) ~!
<!THE? CLEVELAND ELECTRICSILLUMINATING. '). . .
I w<mem .'COMPAN, Y,i ETl AL"
). Docket No.150;440 OLA -q
.' ) .
Q. JPerry:-Nuclear 7 Power? Plant, - Unit -1): :) _ y
)
.);
m ,3 . ,
) .
b , t i 4
- , 14 0 , . . . .
4 l APPIDAVIT OF SUSAN - L.? III ATT , X ; Qp <
, ,s c
. , , e - ,
~
JI;,.7 Sus'aniL',fIliatt,fdulyf sworn declare "and say: sj4 . i
,d. "" J-1.'. Iiam1a7memberLof; Ohio 1 Citizens-for= Responsible Energy, Inc. .
mA, s
'( "OCRE )i. - C- !.
"i i j c2p :ILresidesand+own real propertyoat 8275LHunson Road, Mentor,11 m
es 10hio Wabo~utt-13cmiles from'the Perry Nuclear Power! Plant. _ ,
.s 1
. ?3 . - 'I believe : that ~ the Joperating : license amendment sought 'by: '
l
. the1' Cleveland-: Electric' Illuminating Company ctoiremovej from the <
y . PerrytTechnical,SpecificationsLcycle-specificTfuel'information *
~, _-andScore; operating::: limits violates.my right under the' Atomic: ;
Energy;Actjtofmeaningful participation in changes;to pla,n't". ,
, operations..
- 14. zI-authorizerOCRE to' represent myzinterests in this #'
, _m , -yLoperating?.licenseLamendment~ proceeding.
(. J 5 ^. 3 LIshold thetoff.icefoff0CREl Representative. 1 Article:VI.C.S ; JoffOCRE'sL Regulations' empowers the OCRETRepresentativeLto act
!j '
;onjbehalf(of.sOCRE?in any proceeding.before the Nuclear l h>
ts /
- mRegulatory Commission.
- officer'of OCRE,Lempowered to represent OCRE.in'this proceeding I;am, as a. duly authorized member and ,
i' ; pursuanti to::10:CPRL2.713(b). b ' .g , I .
.[l , .
,..c y.m [ ~ c.d e b - ^
1/ ' Susan L. Hiatt 4 < < Sworn to'and subscribed before me this M Tb day of March, ' ap '1990. m 7 4 1
* ')?/L2 ' .
( !bhs l C, 5 Notary Public g, , g,yg g,.y pm q 9004060100 9003277 mum
.PDR~ ADOCK 05000440 PDH v., cm,%n g,,gtaf g / /j y A o. ~
r ' * ,. 'n 3 bl-' %
, 7.. 3 S, #
at ,
tgeweer y , , I l'OCHEIED CERTIFICATE-OP SERVICE USNRC [ . IL certify that copies of the f oregoing were servedWylEglSsRS:04 C " ' in the U.S.. Mail',.first class, postage prepaid, this d'A - day of March, 1990 t.o the following: .fflCE OF SECRETARY l NOCKf11NG & Sli(V!CE
- BRANCH
, Secretary.of the Commission f ATTN:' Docketing and Service Branch l- - U.S. Nuclear,itegulatory Commission
. Washington, DC 20555, Offico2 of the General-Counsel ,
. U.S. Nuclear: Regulatory Commission Washington, DC '20555- ,
Jay E. Silberg, Esq' . Shaw,-Pittman, Potts &-Trowbridge 2300.N Street,-NW Washington,;DC 20037 s f q$v.a.-7th/[Jz6 Sussn L'. liiatt j OCRE Representative i 1 L
i- . - 5 Feder-l Regiat:r / Vcl. 55 No. 26 /. Wednesday, Februtry 7; 2900 / N:tices . . . . 4259 i and to Bruce W. Churchill. Esquire. permit entryinto OPERATIONAll 4' Blweeldy Notle e AppilNIlims~and? *
, Shaw Pittman. Potts and Trowbridge, CONDITIONS 1,2. and 3 with an Amendments to Operatinggeeneet
. 23c0 N Street NW., Washington. DC accident monitoring instrumentation involving No Signifloent Hosards '
20037, attorney for the licensees. channel (s) inoperable, as provided in Conalderatione . m m o m1~ ' l Nontimely filing of the individual ACTION statements.The -*- to intervene, amendefetitions petitions, for leave second proposed change which corrects . I. Background '. o 'r-g
..<. '"aww .-
I supplemental petitions and/or requests a typographical error in Table 3.3.7.5-1 Pursuant to Public Law (P.L) 97-415. i for hearing will not be entertained for the "." note concerning suppression the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the I absent a determination by the pool temperature sensors spr:ified in Commission) is publishing this regular Commission, the presiding officer or the Specfication 3.8.3.t rather than biweekly notice. P.I. 97-415 revised presiding Atomic Safety and ucensing Specification 3.5.3.11s also acceptable, section 189 of the Atomic Energy Act of Board that the petition and/or request The applicaticafor the amendment 1954 as amended (the Act)lto require should be granted based upon a complies with the standards and the Commission to publish notice of any balancing of the facts specified in to requirements of the Atomic Energy Act amendments issued. or proposed to be CFR 2.714(a)(1)(IHv) and 2.714(d). of1954, as amended (the Act), and the issued, under a new provision of section If a request for a hearing is received. Commission's rules and regulations. The 189 of the Act.This provielen grants the the Commission's staff may issue the Commission has made appropriate Commission the authorfty to issue and amendment after it completes its findings as required by the Act and the make immediately effective any > "s technical review and prior to completion Commission's rules and regulations in 10 amendment to an operating license upon of any required hearing if it publishes a CFR chapter I, which are set forth in the a determination by the Comadssion that y further notice for public comment of its license amendment. such amendment involves no significant I, proposed finding of no significant Notice of Consideration ofIssuance of hazards consideration notwithstanding g hazards consideration in accordance Amendment and Opportunity for the pendency before the t'a==tasion of f with 10 CFR 50.01 and 50.02, a request for a hearing from any person. For further details with respect to this lleanns in connection with this action g, was published in the Federal Register on This biweekly notice inelades all action, see the application for February 18.1988 (53 FR 4475) and notices of amendments issued /or -
- _. February 18.1988 (53 FR 4913). No proposed to be issued from January 12, amendment which is available dated for publicDecember inspectio 21.1989' request n or petition for leave 1990 through January 26.1980.The last for hearing at the Commission s Public Document to intervene was filed following this biweekly notice was published on i
. Room. Celman Building. 2120 L Street, notice, January 24,1990 (55 FR 2430).m i l bl cument oo ppl g The Commission has prepared an NOTICE OF CONSIDERATIOO.0F ,
County Public Ubrary,301 City Hall Environraental Assessment and Finding ISSUANCE OF AMENDMWfFTO .. r. O Drive, Baxley, Georgia 31513. of No Significant impact related to the FACILITY OPERATING IJCENSE AND i g, action and has determined not to ' < PROPOSED NO SIG ..J h, Dated at Rockville. Meayland, this 31st day prepare an environmentalimpact - .i HAZARDS CONSID CAlff ' ' '.C y of January 1990, For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. statement. Based upon the Environmental Assessment, the 7- - DETERMINATION AND. OPPORTUNITY FOR H YIT/ G'
. David B. Matthews. Commission has concluded that the -- ' * -
't e
~
Director, Project Directorate 114. Division of The Commission h'as meds ap'roposed issuance of this amendment willnot Reactor Projects--l/II. Office ofNuclear have a significant effect on thequality determination that the following-neoctornegulation. of the human environment. amendment requests involve no [FR Doc. 90-2807 Filed 2-6-40: 8 45 am] significant hazards consideration. Under For further detalls with respect to the
- s u o cops m o m action see (1) the application for 50.92 this means that operation of the amendment dated October 30.1987. (2) facility in accordance with the proposed (Docket No. 50-4411 Amendment No. 29 to Ucense No. NPF-amendments would not (1) involve a
, . , , , . . , , , 62, and (3) the Environmental q.v.o . ,- . signincant heresse in the psMiHty or.
lilinole Power Co, et al.: lasuance of Assessment and Finding of No .
- consequencec of an accident previously Amendment to Facility Operating Significantimpact. Allof theseitems are evaluated; or (2) create the possibility of Ucense.
n.. available for public inspection at the a new or different kind of~ accident from. The United States Nuclear Regulatory ,j g"*gton. D(.;nd any accident previously evelanted; or (3) inv Ive a significant reductieslaa ' Commission (the Commission) has issued Amendment No. 29 to Facility tV W Publi b
. margin se y e baalaWe' w,g7;Po son S et.Clinton,11 n i l Operating Ucense No. NPF-62 lasued to proposed determination forsechs a w.i 61727. A copy ofitems (2) and(3) may amendnunt mquest is shwaMw.
the Illinois Power Conipany (IP), and d ddre d Soyland Power Cooperative. Inc. (the be the obtainfuc U.S. i Reg a ry . e Comunissionis se% c. " licensees), for operation of the CIInton Commission. Washington;DC'2055p
- Stomme'its on this pro ,
Powat Station. Unit 1. located in DeWitt attention: Director. Division of Reactcir ' determination. Any comments". received l County. Illinois. ' i'"""'
- Pro
~ ~ ~ ~ ~. within 30 days after the dateof y i This amendment includes two < .." j**t'A N'*'hho )hmwal+ll en # ' publication of this notice willbe; ' dvt changes to Technical Sp*cification .
- Dated at Rockville. Marylag,this, aoth day , considered ia making any>fhielomriwcri Table 3.3.7.5-1 concerning accident *'II'""*'Y1880 hr4 iMs.wa f. determination. The Commimmien will not monitoring instrumentation.The For the NuclMr%vI@stgn;m1 Regu 9 spn:,,make normally ,, a final delarn8 nation proposed change concoming the -John B.
- 1 Miw emrdmtmmoa unless it-receives a rehuest:fgeair. @
' insertion of exceptions to Specification Pmiect Diivetornfe ll14. Division of Reactor ' hearing.Wifu p.ittibamfMt%fM 3.0.4 into the ACrlON statements .a Proi'et*-Ill,1.V .V8DdSP ecial,Pmjects ,:d 'f; Written comments mayllierabbmitted .
associated with Table 3.3.7.5-1 has been [FR DocL go-Geos Ibd 24-Oot 848 em) bOby' mall to the RegulatoryPbblications 9 i -__ accepted.These exceptions would satmo caos room 4 " ' Branch. Division of Freedom of': 3'
. 1 423e Feducal Rapt = mar / Yo!. $5{ No. 28 f Wednesday, Pabruary1; tanti Noticos _, .
Infonaatka and P=W'=*-= Seresass, which passinaarwishes to teoreene.. If theauddatanadnauerintheithe- 4 OfGoe d Adr==*=*= ann U.S. Nacseer Any pemen astro has filed a peM8ec far an==t===m $mreisesa sty =h-* Regulatory M Wsahington. leave to intersene orasks has been hazards ====t==aden anyhuessaghekt DC 20555. and should cite the adndtisd as a pasty assy amend the would take place hubie thetuosmos of publication date and page number of petula withoet requesting lesse af en anysm - h===s ' this Federal Register notice. Written Board up to Efteen 35) days prior to the NormaGy.the Commissionwillnot commente may also be delivered to first probeastos comisrunoe schad=hmt in issue the amendment tmtfl the Roara P423. Phdilps Bealdans. 7820 the proceedbig, but such an amended expirathm tpf the 30-dsy notice pened. Norfolk Avenue Bednesda, henryland petition asust auttsfy the spec 19csty ) from L30 a.rm. to 4:15 pan. Copses of However should bo.a.- change . requirements desebed above. during the notice period stich that influre wntten oomssents receirad may be Not later than fffteen (15) days prior to to act in a timely way wmddtesult,for i examamed at the NRC Public Documart the hest " _ , cerdosemos example, in derating or shutdown of the Room, the Gelman Building.2130 L ! scheduled in the proceeding a petitioner facility, the Commission tuny issue the l Stmet.NW Washington,DC. The fih.ng sheM fee a supplement to the petition to ' ' of requeste for heenna asd petitions for license amendment befure the intervene whsch useet include a list of expiration of the 30-day notitteperiod, ) leave to intervene is discussed below- the contenttees which am sought to be provided that fts final determination is ' By Mands a. Isso, the isomnsee may file litigated in the seetier. Rech contention I 2 request for a heartag with respect to that the amendment lavolves no . most noneist of a specine statement of significant hazards consideratlan.h issonnes of the amamhnent to the the issue etlow or fact to be nneed or subject facthty operating hasase and final deteuninatkm wm consider all controverted. In addition, the petitlener public and State comments received any person whose interest may be shall provide a bnef explanation of the affected by this proceedag and who before action is taken. Should the . beses of the contention and a mm== Commisalon take this action,it wm I wtshes to partidpate as a party m the statement of the alhqued Emots ar expert proceeding smet file a writsen petsoon pubfish a notice aflasuance andprovide opmion which support the contanassa for opportunity for a headsg atar for leave to intervene. Requests for a ano on whea the peatsomer maands to heanng and petitions for leave to issuance. He Commissinnaspects that I rely in provmg the contention at the the need to taka this amlon will occur ! intervene shah be filed in accordance heanng. N petitioner must mise veryinfragmeath. with the Cornavamon s " Rales of provide references to those specific A esquest for a beanes ora peasia=
)
Practice for Domestic IJcensms ; sources and docesnents of which the for leane to detervene mustheidad wdh Proceedings in 10 CFR Part 2. petitioner is aware and on which the Interested persons should consult a the Secenaary of the Comunassian, U.S. petitioner miends to rely to amanhtish Nud-Segulatory I'am-=sunt current copy of10 CPR 2521 which is those facts or expert opanian.P*== avallable at the Comminaion's Public Wasbisqrton,DC20556, Attansa=. , muma psende sufhcient infaramesan to Docketing and Service BrarxAeranny Document Room, the CelmanRuilding. show that a genusse dispace ari=*= web 2120 L Street. NW., Wanhingun DC be delivered to the Commineinn's Pubhc the apphant on a ====unt tanne oflaw Document Room,the Gelman3nading, 20555 and at the Local Pubtle Document Room for the particular facility involved. or fact. Contemaans shall be um to 2120 L Street. NW. Wehington.DC, by metiers ws&la the en=ps of the the above date.Where petitions asa If a request for a hearing or petition for leave tointemneis fund by the atmve amemkments enderconsideration.h filed during the last ten (10) days of the contention snast be one edas, if pmean. notice period, ft is requested 1haithe date, Safetythe andCanumsaum iJcenseg Board.er an
- As===" , ,~would entitle the petitioner to rebef. A petitioner promptly so infour the petitioner who fails to file such a Commission by a ioll-frae telephone call by the Cannussion or by the Osmarman
^ suppiernant which satisfies these to Western Union at 1-{B00) 325 8000 {1n f f*d $ e requirenamts wish 2espect to at asest one Missouri 1-(800) 342-6700).%e Western nunt no wiH not be pumdtted to and/m petition and the Secre er the Union operator should be given designated Atone Safety and Inumung particlPate 888 party. '
Datagram Identificatica Nemsber 375 - Those persn#ted to interessei===== and the following message addtessed to Board dliessea somcodbeenne or an ateorder parties ta the yr _ _ ~ - - subjed to any (PrwiectC'. a4pettlionss shkumeend a As to CFR 2714. a limitations in the order grunting leave to telephone membec date pe60eu was peden ed les bj to intervais shall sa intervene, and have the opportunity to mailed: plant name; and publice6en C forth wie perWcularity the intesest of arGelpeW feRy Me cen& set & date and page Mar hisW the etitioner tn the =h- and . incW ee oppM M Registernonce Acopy napeWon I how t)ist isterest nur5 be afG=d by the gnesent widence and emsannum , should also be sent to the O!Boej({he ; results of the y -- " _ De potetten """If a" hearmgis
" S / Ntequested.6 S $ N '" s'- "
shouki spedficmRy exptain the semaans C'""E*)"'"I d D_ Mt# h Regulatory - why intervenstaan should be peznittad Conunisstan will make a DC with particular sfetencetothe determination on the issu,ftral ,,, 2asu andJetheassosaenAge eofno . , , ,9 >.licansas.
..sv m y.g. @ ,a
.4
;ollowung nace===-(1) the ashme of the signfffcant hazards cons'.deru!!an. b gfes=# trash anhags of paeini==ad-Asave pstitioner's right ander the As to be final determination wff! serve to decide to intervene, amended petsisser.h . )
l made a party to the proceeding: Cal the when the hearing is held. . s Wu supplemesetal patmuna ==4arsequests ntture and outestdthepetitionds tf thef!madeterndmrtionisthatthe - for hesatog weinot beenemsni==4gnv6 P property An====i arothertmaer==* to amendmeat request involven no '~ ' '" t 1 absens a sistemmimmeba tythe%45%fsT 1 l the r.M.e. and (3) the passible significa ftherards ma..J.m the ' Commissism. sho pr==ishngsgleurer ebe sffect of any atJareshes may be Commission may issue themuendamenta presiding Atamin fhdoirami4Mmmmine i entered in the proceeding on the and snake it tusemediately eseceive. BaumL that the petitina andAar==pi==8 pstatiatur's irittenst. N i=a=*6== shondd notwfthstantRngthe tequest for a M should is gsmaand baseKapan'esettet m I also irl==tify the mp=r Ar msp-ef=9 af the hearirig; Amry41senhag hakfweedd aalien ' subject matter of the proceedung as to place after issuance of the amendment. bainnehageHisatam 2714(a)(t MiHet and 2314(d)? sperNht1dGIL
"%" l-
f.
! Federal Resister / Vcl. 55. No. 2e / W:dnead:y Fcbruary 7.1990 / Nttices. 43s1 For further details with respect to this The proposed change wgerding Axial De proposed changes to Figure 3.1 1 A and action, see the applanetaan for Shape Index (ASI) would revise 15 Tables 3.12. 3.13 and s.15 are required to
& amendment whi :b is available for public 3.2.7a. nis TS ensures that the actual ense the Technical specincetions remain l'spection at the Commission's Public value of the core average ASI. when c nsistent with the Unit 2. Cycle 3 safety l' Document Room, the Gelman Building. I COI.SS is operable,is maintained within analyses. The changes will not create the i 2120 L Street. NW.. Washangton. DC, '
the allowable values ae assumed in the [c"i ,n e 1 l and at the local public document room safety analysia.The changes are for the particular facility involeed. , necessary to ensure that the TS are erisure thEthe redits of DBEs and AOos te t bounded b the safety analyses. ' Artrona PuEc Servios Company, et al., consistent with the safety analysis Stando einvolve e signtficant reduction i Docket No. STN 50-529 Polo Verde perf rmed for the Cycle 3 core design. in a ma of safety. i Nuclear Generating Station (PVNGS). The proposed changes regarding The b es section for the t.lmiting i Unit 2. Maricopa County. Arizona DNDR margin would revree TS Figures Conditt for Operation (14013.1.1.2 states J 3.2 2 and 3.2-2A. These figures provide that th shutdown margin limits of Figum 31 l- Date of amendment requeste DNBR marginlimits for various 1A a ecenery to ensore that tfw reactor l
)
November 6.1989 configurations of COLSS and CEA rem e subcritical following a DBE or AOO. l Description of amendment requcstl Calculators (CEACs) inoperable. The Wi the proposed change to Figure 3.11A. l
- - The proposed amendment would revise changes are necessary to ensure that the ;
l the PVNGS Technical Specifications Technical Specifications am consistent U"" ' 8' 3'N * **I'4 """**' *"*"" (TS) with respect to Shutdown Margm. oun ed by tNe e ce an a$es.b l with the safety analyses performed for bases section for LCO 3.1.23 states that the (Figure 3.11A and Tables 3.12. 3.13 the Cycle 3 core design, boron monitoring frequencies ensum that
- and 3.15). Control Element Assembly Basis forProposedNo Significent baron dilution events will be detected with (CEA) Insertion Limits (Figures 3.13 and llozords Consideration Dete. minatio sufficient time for the operstar to tenniute - l 3.1-41. Axial from and Departure Shape IndexBoilin8 Nucleate (15 3.23a). \The Commission has provided the event before a convieta loss of shutdown eqandards for determining whethe a margm occurs. N revind a aultering i Ratio (DNBR) Margin (Figures 3.2 2 and sagificant hazards consideratio exists fmquacies of Table 3.12.3.13 and ua 3.2 2A) to maintain consistency between as sNted in 10 CFR 50.92. A pr osed ensure that the time enterie for theaa actions the Technical Specifications and the amenihnent to an operating li :nse for a will be consistent with the reference cycle.
safety anrJysis performed for the Unit 2, facility i h **'8" I ***
- d*b"*U" ves no sigmfi t hazards C)cle 3 core desi considera
*"I s'ec*tions the bases of the Techru'*al c
More specifica ly, the propose e if operatio f the facility Specifications, will be maintained. changes regarding Shutdown Margm. in accortlane,gwith a pro ed CEA Insers/on Limits involve the revision of13 Figure 3.11 A amendment woqld not: ) Involve a Standad t: Involve a sismficant increase and Tables 3.1-2,3.13 and 3.15. Figure s gnificant incre 'e in e probability or in the probability or consequences of an consequences of a cident previously accident previously evalumind. 3.11A provides shutdown margm evaluated:(2) Crea e postibility of a Technical Specificanon Figures 3.14 and requirements versus RCS cold leg 3.u are meteed to be conmassa with the new or different d o ccident from temperature for the case where any full-length CEA is withdrawn. Tables 3.12. any accident p lously usted; or (3) Unit 2. Cycle 3 safety analyses. The Involn a sig ' cant reduc probability or the consequenons of an 3.13 and 3.15 provide required boron in a occident previously evaluated in the Updated
*" g sa monitoring frequencies in the event that .
e as evaguated th FinalSafety Analysis Report (UFSAR)will one or both startup charmel high neutron The lice not increase becaue the ruells of the Cycle flux alarms are inoperable. The propose mendment against these 3 safety analyses, using the unsed CEA standar s and has provided the Insertion umits of Figures M4 and 3.H. proposed revision.s are required to follo ' g discussion: tefleet cycle spectfic requirements. The assure that there is sufficient martpa for the Sh downMargin ost luniting DIAE. The analysse performed revisions result in more restrictive andartf t Invotee a significantincrease operating limits. i lude an evaluatma of all safety enelyses I the probebility or consequences of an for which the CEA insertion haut cerves are The proposed changes regarding ccident previonely eval ****d. used as an initial condition. nsrefore, the
. Control Rod Insertion Limits would The proposed Teewamii S dention proposed Technical Specification changes r revise 1S Figures 3.13 and 3.1-4.These changu em regasedto makethe uniu will not incesase the probabdity se
- Technical Specifications senastent with the figures provide regulating group CEA consequences of any =reutee pavelously insertion limits. Figure 3.13 provide Cycle 3 safety analyses. Figure 3.11A evaluated.
pmndu shWdownimpasmaats venne RCS CEA insertion limits when tha Co Standadr Create the possibiRty of a new OperatingIJmitSupervisorySys m h, h["** ,,"*'on en or different kind of =--=i=at iros:any t pmnausf st (COI.SS)is fn service and Fi 3.1-4 a RCS cold leg temperature of 350 degrees F. provides the insertion limits en the shutdown margin must be increased from propaed a mguisal to COLSS is out of service. The following 3.5 to 40% daIta K/K.'11 tis ensures that the ma tha T "*'*"'
]. g gru @ Ae 1 e p opo ed ve Figure 3.13 ^ F 8" p ""
(COLSS in service) would not permit
, that A P Des monitoring frequencies when oes or both I.imits (SAFDLa) will not be susseded during f insertion of reguleting groep 3 CEAs startup channel high neutron flux alarms are the ancet hauing Antietpeted Operemonal above 20 percent of rated thermal inoperable. In some cases the required Occurrences ( AOO). Since the Cyets a figurve 7, power. This is more restricties than the monitoring fmqueneise omst be incremed. were based on smeeting the sense erewrie se current specificatiors which does allow nis ensures that the nas senarte see the Cyt.le 2 figures, the pose 6bnAy of an -
{ for regulating group 3 insertion above 20 detection and cerroeten of a heren dJntse accident of a different then previously E percent of rated thermal power. event remain the same se the safety analysee evaivated le not cre "W d a f 2. The proposed revisad Ffgure 3.14 I" cord Th' Proposed changes do not affect Standad & Involve a e6gnflicent redvetion the robability of occurrence ofpreviously in a margin of safety. - o"- (COLSS out of service) would permit eva usted events. Technical Specification figume 3.14 and Ji slightly increased insertion of regulating Standad b create the posetbility of a new 3.H require revieton to ensere eeneistency ' A k group 3 CEAs between 15 percent and 20 or different kind of accident fmm any between the Technicat Specificettens and the percent of rated thermal power. previouery evaluated. Unit 2. Cycle 3 safety analyses.The Cycle 3 4 A K -.
7 4388 Fedesel Coslatec / vel &A N::344 Wedneestsy . February P. tempfNte6een 8 ._ . esi. tad be se sua and is was asi ne imeissed shessedess,ses the - has hemm emusionised and sessrsaime a medied such as no aeslems sho diumseems possibihty at aaser er denssa af Core M A& mets Aspart.% - a bstwaan the salory 1.sud and she iasset accident.Premous evahsatanes se as the inslure pesad of a faseems pasuhist addressed potennalcontrol va fenure . Furthermore. the shufuntam ed Cass . boundary.Thereinse the mwans thw >ese Ormamame LJamils Ihpart smies tut es - modes and their eflects: the v has osoumedin the escadess ansdoens term the passesadima he taas valaes d essesych>eppe$spasameter bounchne for the proposed abasema, intervalin part to reduce plant sa m mets M 8" h b h 'M m
- The staff hee revicwed the 's resulting ime the anester puesr/inetumelang accordance with TS 6.9.1A This *IB. ' '- '
no 6igraficant haamseis esa reductaums nesseepy to i this last. requires est the care opereGug thefts be determinatum and aerese the m proped change does t involve a determined forwech reloedeyefete licensee's analysis. Therefo , the ensif eigmbean edueson to se W aatety. acW wie he MinnandNitC. proposes u detersums tbat ^'"'*d** * * " approved methodolog for thtee BmRs . applanles ter assed lussu6ses no $g"* ,, g(g,, - m I' and conalatent with the applicabialinits ' sigrufacent looserde tions. .alecleted vetseessessady lur DI O' N report and any @metsimsshat
' OE" # !
Loco /PublicDocu Room perry or in mammmand location:Chatten Hermitan Cmmty Bened am the h the be provided to the NRC apes tesmeses. f Library,2001 Bros et. Chettanooga. licensee ceasha peepened Generte latter 8546, de led Ostaber 4.
- Tennessee 374W amendeset sequest d met hevaeve a IW'8Jrom en E preded geldseee ,
Attornerfyhemrce:Ceneral significant massessein psehehsissy er tollcesees emmiuntsfor temmt of the values d cyM paan==aar Cosmoel.T consequensee ed as provanne6y
- 400 Werd. ..-..Hill ummtt Valley Drtvs.Anthority, Ett B33, evaluated does not to the limits from TSn De heemasa's gespeeed .
Knomf!e.Termessee F? pot. possibility of a new different L6nst of amm.dment is is eespamme to $da - j VRC Asrittant Directar:Saranne accident from any a cident previously O'""' ' " ' Illack evaluated;and does not involve a 80'N ** 8MM ~ ' . 80 M The Cleveland Elessne iired matase of , Company, Deguesse Campmay. n(uction in the re , , Ohle Echaue t'=npany,
**Tb, taff W re owed the hannsee. amendment and datermined thatlt
$rema involves no alan $ cant hanamis . i ,
PowerCampsey Talede no significant h de comederehan determinatnee an agrees with the considerations. Accordag to nG Cm ,- Company Docket No. perry Nuclear power piant. No.1, Lake M92(ch a proposed amendssent toem County, Ohio licensee's no detanalys k .TheM h staff, h' therefore's operating knumse inve6ses as sigus request does no' involve a sism6 cent hazards consderat6on of spesettemet the Date ofomandmeat harards setion. '- , December 14.1989 Desenpuas of -- Mege**C jaaol M hc locatiamPerry mentRoom, 1.ibrary, m abisin facility in accordance with 9te amendment would notr * ".( , LInvolve a slanificant namens,e e The propened a weald StreeL, perry, binMeet probability or r=maaeana=* af an., ,, mercase the turbane salue Asterapy hasness Joy Seiberg, accident promeenly evenented6 er m,m surveillance test inte al trean weaMy to Esq., Shaw, tsuna, pasta a, 2.Csente the pombddy of a mas er morrthly. N Street,NW., different ided er ansadset dessa esp - - Trs>whndes. Bosie ferprcier.ed .!. 4 =d Wa DC 200BF. accident 'f eestostedter' hatords considerot' detenninctiore NRCPm tDhesent:joka N. s. InvoQ e signtftcent reducttan In e The Commission providad llannen. margin of safety. standardsIer de ~ leg whethera The proposed revision to the15sla ha significant hasards 4cesidsanaian enieta h ClevelandIBeatr6c19eadnating accordance with the andames pseuided as atated in is CFil/taat. A peoptang Canpeny, Degueuse Ught Company, in Generacimuer abas derbasenese amendment to en innemme iur a Ohno Fares Campemy, pennsyleania requestag semeselsithesolemsof
- facility inwo&ves essnetsomt beswds PowerQwesy.Tehude Edisse cycle spesshe pasumeter timatte einest3C '
considerstian if _ J' i ef the forfl6ty Com , h Ips. M peerF ' ne cosebushunutof teseitsdestsM" in acennience ' a proposed Nuclear plast, Unit fee. l. Lake accordance wtth en PGtC-spproved ' ' *l' amendment wou not f:llavolve a County.Olde . significant increase la the probabmty or
,,, . methodology and the ties of ,.,.
Dates (amendmentasynsas: .these Raits into iba Come "U, consequences o(an aos& dant pavionely December 1s 1999 Limits Report wf!! ensure at proper . evaluated. (2) apate the pasabtLity el a Desar4&aofamendmeatanpassa- . steps have bees takaa to andRahee v - new or differen; kind of assadestfseen The proposed e===d==na nuenid seules yvalues of theseilmus.Festhesseekee any esadama seutusted.or t8l Technical Specifications sit,312, involve a e reduselonla e i. , submittalaf theGeseOpasatiashiedte.2q. 3.2.s. of AppsedLa A to shalicense to Repcot win allow the stat ts eenstems to , margin of 7eplace the wahamsof speitspedBa The licenegir e peneedsd the t.Wtrend the volese of &ame limitsathemt m parameter limMa eraha soferemme is'tha athe ased der psies eta 5.appsessi ef tigene ,, following en6trole of so air =mant ' ' Core Oposaatse usails Repert, whiah il and weshaus *- " elen ua
- T mits hazarda cardiderattaan sala 6 the Commisalon's standaada. :
- contains tha weiesaf these timits and'"! . unreviewed esist queuism.m@88 ==*fpr.a.
ne proposedshoessdoesaosinvolvea t whichisenneminedimaaestlesaf the De psepenedasuudunest==
. Plant ihase Seekde =ddamb=a thecase u etter the segulusment that thege'sma ha "h
'4 significamunnssaan is ths pinbahdesy or
. opersign,gange,esport has boom ' ' m?feperated within the limits luropel>.92 C8"*lunees d an accades assumanis' m dncluded in the Buttnieuse Seetten of the o n eYr' mh.a ' Techatout SpeedRes9one fTSs) to pate * %pectficya===8=a serthe ange ,
calculated for PNPP t enesile that It!s tiaamR documentthat w ben these flates ase estimme.h4 e ,pp,, , probabelity semains atasalana. ; "providestheon previously acceptedhet the As tha
- opetaling sekhedsgeERe fuel .- fee tha ausrsal%.
' .. ..,.cla 'd,p.ced thatsahagedemmetsam
.essentialbgWauW.$seMM c **- jp colbum to Kaplan latter et Aups :a. test asse.nbhas descrapesos in Sauben L3.1 limits can be determined in accordance
.- .a.
~^
- - - . . . - - - , ~ , - - - - _ . . . - - . - - . - . . . _ - - __ -__. - . .
- Fedesel / Vd 55. Naso-/ Wednesda . F 7, tees @otiese + 428' NRCLa methods without On May as.tseslthe'taff s published ae been ocwillbeladuced on the piping ting a er safety. Concurrent : " Notice of Considerstlos of t===== ef. ' systems that ano sffected by octtlement th the removalof the values of these Amendments to Facility Operettag ' - of thesestructures.
halts from the 111s. they weald be Licenses and C; i Jty for Hearing" For those structures that have looorporeted into the Core Operating in the Federal Register (68 FR 18364). experienced nament and may unite Report thatis submitted to the ' his notice related to the licensee's '~ continue to tde in the future, the NRC. Hence, appropriate measures exist Marth 10.19ee application to delete require to continue the setdement f ~ components which were replaced during monit programin accordance with hO control
- Becane the values the values of these the of cycle-specific limits.
Service Water Reservoir - 11i 3/4.y. wiu be maintained.For
~" parameter limits will continue to be improvement Project and to change the ~
pipinga tems affected by setuement.
' determined in accordance with an NRC. allowable differential settlement new a weble setdement limits were l approved methodology and remain hetween the NA g Main Steam Valve estab based on pipe stress sensistent with the applicable limits of House and the Service Building.De V,a ano sie of these piping systems without
.the safety analysle these changes would October 1.1983 opplication has . ch the original piping model or superseded this previous application. d ign inputs.The only change was to
[notincrease consequences ofthe probability an accident previously or Therefore, the staff has decided to . ,' ase the prescribed setdementin the renotice the licensee's requested athematicalmodelof the ptping (evaluated.. N revised spom'fications. including changes se decribed below, ystem to allow the pipe stros to the removal of the vahies of cycle. De NA 1&E settlement monitoring approach,but not exceed, the code.
? specific parameterlimits and the program has been in effect for 13 years allowable strees. In addition, the
' addition of the Core Operating Limits and has been performed by optical methods used to monitor the future
> Report for these limits, would not create surveys to second order Class 11 setdement of the affected structures will the possibility of a new or different kind accuracy. A detailed evaluation of the be such that the maximum calculated i of accident from those previously settlement data from1976 to the pre t random errorin the measurement will
- evaluated.ne changes also would not. hos uncovered two systematic surv result in a pipe strns of 5% or less of the
_- Involve a significant reduction in the erors which account for the appa t code-allowable stress. Continuous margin of safety since the changes upward movement of rock.found monitoring of the structures that 5 - would not alter the methods used to structures. When these two syst stic experienced settlement in the past and i establish the cycle specific limits. The sumy errors are accounted fo the which may contihue to settle will
. NRC staff conshloro these proposed setdement data clearly demo trate that provide assurance that the margin of the rock. founded structures te stable sMety as defined in lli 3/4.7.121s
^i ' changes to be administrative in nature with no trend of settlemen occurring
_ c and that they would not affect the maintained for the safety related piping operation of the facility ter a manner th'at over the 18 years that th structures systeam that are affected by settlement
." involves significant basards have been monitored. F r those a structures that have e rienced some .of these structures.
ndifican't
- - considerations. pitlement; the criti piping systems a +
BosisM hosords
-v Based on the preceding assessment, ration determinotion E the staff proposes to determine that the wm paluated in w 2increau ee . De Commission has provided amentiment involves no significant allowable setde nt limit while still standards for determining whether a
,. maintaining allowable stremes in
_, " hasards consideration. ., signifloant hasards consideration exista y LocalPublic Document Room O'g@,7 g$1s comprehensive (10 CFR 30.9a(c)). A proposed location: Perry Pubtle 1.lbrary. 3753 Main 1. review of a settlement monitoring amendment 2 an opneung Hoense for a Street. Perry. Ohio 44081; f. program NA.ta2, only the following involves no significant hasards Attorneyforlicensed: Jay Silberg, facilitgwouca const if opwouon W es fac.dity monito is Esq., Shaw. Pittman. Potts & a. t 2 MaSutred, in accordance with the proposed-
~ Trowbridge 2300 N Street. NW., poln 13 Stea.m Valve House: amendment would not:(1) involve a Washington.DC 20037 b evice Building: points 114.116. significant increase in the probability or NRCProjectDhectorrJolin'N. .YJ .' m "~ m P"b consequences of an aooidet.t previously j u c. Servloe 4
Hannon.
"'w*ir'gilgilrls at M thi S'ervic? evaluated: or (2) create the possibility of ater House at the north side of a new or different kind of accident from Virginia Seetric and Power Company' any accident previously evaluated: or (3)
- DockW Noa.58 383 and 30 82.Norg , expansion a..(. t m e points SM47 and SM..r wp; w e m. 5. t4 involve e algMaaant reductissain -
a. A"
- tadenmg, and No . gg,. d.4 Servic's Wate'r Pum House. Servios margin of niety,The lices has . .
1
~
. ~ I'. g",,g Y'8
- n.e
- . _. Water Valve House, anf Service Water . evaluated the proposed changes in light
- Date of amendment seguset:Ma 10. .Tle4n Vaultw cartmew hm nu of these'standarda, as followe.'. i41g M
_+, 1988, as superseded October 2.1 . ^t%i' 11avbive s'elsnificant increase in the
. Description n 'z atseg t
_.s ne deletion'of monitorias programfoe certaladthe"seitleinent"NO p
' robability or eenseq D De proposed would re se the . structures end.tn turn the assbolet'ed / W accident pnfy evaluated.W f.D. North Anna totion. 1and2 piping systema.ilo' e s nondversely'. %A8N De change to 15 3/4.7.12 does not M
~
sf (NA 162)T calSpecifica ns ('!11). affect the pl tems nor reduos any ' involve' a signiReant increase in the
-3,48pecifically, the adianges in e:(t) M margins of . A)^omprehensive x W probabRity seconsequences of an ' u "
;.. deledon of settir---- - yfor "T review of the t data that have 23 accident prot 4ausly pvaluated.no ... %
y structures which hav,; pot, ited 5? beenobtained thie 18 years of % pettlement of 6tructures is monitored in
-1 . settlement during the 13 that the t setdement hafs demonstrated accordaoco sirith'the requirements of'!S T settlemoni monitoring gioogram has been1 that theaFotriptufes vo' riot:%93 3/4.7.13 le'otder to ensure that thh stress 1 in effect, and (2) increase allowable .Tc' experiehood '
j differential settlemingllinits for selected strucWee are 'outtlement.%e; ble hbd willociritin **'Tse de"daLinduce4in(otDe settlement safety-related of structurespiping systems
. ' structures Based eineWalsation of the "I'to be stab %E f6tiiM:aWseigdlintly.Trenia ~ ~ thld'libde allowohles.%e W affected piping eystems?"i ~" ' ' " ' Yno setdemeht-related pipe stress has ""* change M *!S 3/4.7.12 contains two basic
- s. . .
6}}