ML20012B340
| ML20012B340 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Perry  |
| Issue date: | 03/01/1990 |
| From: | Colburn T Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Kaplan A CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. |
| References | |
| TAC-75333, NUDOCS 9003140222 | |
| Download: ML20012B340 (5) | |
Text
-
4q i
S,f [
' March 1,1990 t
li; V i
]
c Dqcket No.;50-440.
DISTRIBUT:ON:
f-vassasspe NRC & Local PDRs i
- "PDIll-3 r/f.
JZwolinski k-
[-
JHannon' TColburn:
PKreutzer 000-WF1
/
Mr. Alvin Kaplan, Vice President-
,EJordan ACRS(10).
' Nuclear. Group-PDIII-3 Gray LBrown-E-
The,. Cleveland Electric Illuminating LCunningham
, Company; 310. Center Road.
y.
Perry, Ohio 44081 x.
Dear Mr. Kaplan:
ye
SUBJECT:
PERRYiNUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT NO. 1 0FFSITE DOSE CALCULATION C
MANUAL (ODCM), REVISION 3,TCN-5ANDTCN-6-(TACNO.75333) t Uc have reviewed your submittal of August 29, 1989 regarding the subject changes to the' Perry Unit l'0DCM.
Based on our review,'~we have determined
- I 3
_.that the changes"are. acceptable.;
Enclosedforhourconsiderationinyournext'revisionof:theODCMare M
.commentst of our contractor,.EG&G. Idaho, Inc. 'We recommend, as stated by
,,4 ;
.our contractor,'that you consider-adding to the 0DCM comparable information i
!concerning the possible range'of dilution flows as?is contained in.Section 11.2.3.2 of the Perry Updated Safety Analysis Report'. Additionall f
~
-recommend you consider adding to-the ODCM the references (Tables) y, we cited in your August 29, 1989 submittal.for. determining-the dilution factors.' These reconnendations are' for your; consideration, and we consider your ODCM Revision 3 throiJqh changes TCN-5 and TCH-6 to be acceptable as is.
Sincerely,
/s/
?
Timothy G. Colburn, Sr. Project Manager 1
-Project Directorate III-3 Division of Reactor Projects'- III, IV, V and Special Projects Office of-Nuclear Reactor Regulation f
is
Enclosure:
As stated cc: See next page-
' DOCUMENT NAME: 75333 ODCM deYf W
,v n
Office:
LA/R,DII-3.
PM/PDIII-3
/
PU/PDIII-3
%)
Surname: PRretTtz r-.
TColburn/tg
}k JHannon J / ; /90 J/ / /90 3 / / /90
. Date:
i I
9003140222 900301 PDR ADOCK 05000440
.o P
pnu l
. +
+,
ik }, '
[a L'.
},,
?i ga mag y
. g g'(.
.. UNITED STATES s
J! '
I,-
. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g
4..
- 10 t E WASHINGTON, D, C. 20666
- k..... p March.1,1990 Docket No.-50-440 g
p
?
Mr. Alvin Kaplan, Vice President l
l Nuclear Group 1
1 The Cleveland Electric' Illuminating Company 10 Center Road l"
Perry, Ohio ' 44081
Dear Mr.cKaplan:
i
SUBJECT:
PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT NO. 1 0FFSITE DOSE CALCULATION l
K MANUAL.(0DCM), REVISION 3 TCN-5 AND TCN-6 (TAC NO. 75333)
We have reviewed your submittal of August 29, 1989 regarding the' subject.
changes to the Perry Unit 1. 0DCM. Based on our review, we have determined that the changes are acceptable.
Enclosed for your consideration in your next revision of the ODCM are i
comments of our contractor, EG&G Idaho, Inc. We recommend :as stated by-our contractor, that you consider. adding to the ODCM comparable information' concerning the possible range of dilution flows as is contained in Section-11.2.3.2 of the Perry Updated Safety Analysis Report. Additionall
~l recommendyouconsideraddingtotheODCMthereferences(Tables)y,.we cited in
'your August 29, 1989 submittal for determining the dilution factors. These-1 recommendations are for your consideration, and we consider your ODCM j
Revision 3~through changes =TCN-5 and TCN-6 to be acceptable as is.:
q
.1 Sincerely,
.l dU 1
Timo 1 burn,'Sr.
Manager j
Project Directorate III-3 Division of Reactor Projects - III, H
IV, V and Special Projects Office.of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Enclosure:
As: stated cc:.See next page l
L
A j.
,Mr. Alvin Kaplan Perry Nuclear Power Plant The Cleveland Electric Unit 1 Illuminating Company cc: Jay E. Silberg, Esq.
Mr. James W. Harris, Director Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge Division of Power Generation 2300 N Street, N.W.
Ohio Department of Industrial Washington, D.C.
20037 Relations P. O. Box 825 David E. Burke Columbus, Ohio 43216 The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company The Honorable Lawrence Logan P.O. Box 5000 Mayor, Village of Perry 1
Cleveland, Ohio 44101 4203 Harper Street-Perry, Ohio 44081 Resident Inspector's Office U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission The Honorable Robert V. Orosz Parmly at Center Road Mayor, Village of North Perry Perry, Ohio.44081 North Perry Village Hall 4778 Lockwood Road Regional Administrator, Region III North Perry Village, Ohio 44081 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 799 Roosevelt Road Attorney General Glen Ellyn, 1111ncis 60137 Department of Attorney General 30 East Broad Street Frank P. Weiss, Esq.
Columbus, Ohio 43216 Assistant Prosecuting Attorney 105 Main Street Radiological Health Program j
Lake County Administration Center Ohio Department of Health J
Painesville, Ohio 44077 1224 Kinnear Road Columbus, Ohio 43212 Ms. Sue Histt OCRE Interim Pepresentative Ohio Environmental Protection 8275 Munson Agency Mentor, Ohio _
DERR--Compliance Unit R
44060' PO Box 1049 Terry J. Lodge, Esq.
1800 Watermark Drive 618 N. Michigan Street ATTN: Zack A. Clayton
_ Suite 105
. Columbus, Ohio 43266-0149 Toledo, Ohio 436?4 Mr. Phillip S. Haskell, Chairman John G. Cardinal, Esq.
Perry Township Board of Trustees Prosecuting Attorney Box 65 Ashtabula County Courthouse 4171 Main Street Jefferson, Ohio 44047 Perry, Ohio 44081 Robert A. Newkirk State of Ohio Cleveland Electric Public Utilities Connission Illuminating Company 180 East Broad Street Perry Nuclear Power Plant Columbus, Ohio 43266-0573 P. O. Box 97 E-210 Perry, Ohio 44081 Michael D. Lyster Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company Perry Fuclear Power Plant P. O. Box 97 SB306 Perry, Ohio 44081
n
,p 4.
t REVIEW 0F CEI RESPONSE TO NRC QUESTIONS ON PIRRY ODCM, REY. 3 In response to a request by the NRC Staff The Cleveland Electric illuminating Company (CEI) addressed items identified as
- Major Discrepancies
(#2)* and ' Additional Discrepancies (#9)" concerning the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM), Rev. 3. for Perry Nuclear Power Plant (PNPP).
]
- Major Discrepancies (#2)' recomended that the dilution flow rate (F) for radwaste effluents be given and that references or justification be added for i
the dilution factors (M in-Table 2.3 10 of PNPP ODCM Revision 3.
The response by CEI referen )d the-following as sources of the dilution factors te and data used to calculate dilution factors in Table 2.310 of the 00CM.:
(a) the PNPP Ohio Power Siting Commission application of August 1974, Appendix 1304 C 2, Table IV-A ti (b) Perry Environmental Report - Operating License Stage, Table 5.1-10; j
and (c) a letter from Michael R. Rawson, Fairport Fisheries Research_ _ _.
Station, Ohio Department of Natural Resources, to Richard Cochner (6/20/88)
These dilution factors were used in calculations of individual maximum and i
for population doces via the potable water and fish pathways.
The CEI response stated that a review will be conducted to verify the accuracy of the method used to determine the dilution factors for the potable water ingestion pathway, and that any changes will be reported in the next Semiannual
,s Radioactive Release Report.
In response to the recommendation that the dilution flow rate be given, the licensee states that 'the flow rate term, F, depends on the flow rate determined for each release and cannot be pre-specified." However, information concerning the possible range of the dilution flow is'given in Section 11.2.3.'2 of the PNPP FSAR, Am. 14(8-22-84). Comparable information should be included in the ODCM.
It was calculated from the Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Reports for 1987
.and 1988 that total dilution water volumes reported for 1987 and 1988 multiplied by:the dilution factor from Table 2.3-10[10.9) give average dilution flows of 1/2 to 3/4 of the 1000 cfs limit specified by Section 4.3 of NUREG-0133. The maximum possible dilution flows given in Section 11.2.3.2 of. the PNPP FSAR would give-more than the 1000 cfs limit, however, the dilution factors are substantiated by the references.
The information furnished in the response with respect to dilution factors (M ) addresses references that are generally considered acceptable for o
t-defining the dilution factor and are considered adequate for an ODCM review.
To fully evaluate the acceptability of the methodology would require an indepth review of the referenced documents. Therefore, in summary, the i
I a
, ' * ),J i s --
L.
es methodology is considered to be complete, referenced, and generally more extensive than is usually included in an DDCM. However, it is recommended that the references cited in the response be added to the ODCM in a future revision.
slik sampling was not identif)ied in the PNPP 00CM.* Additional Discrepancies As noted in the response by CE!, this omission is corrected by TC 006 to Revision 3 of the ODCN (Attachment 10 of the Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Report for Jan Jun 1989).
e In summary, no problem remains concerning the milk samplin locations; but it is recommended that the possible range of dilution flow (F and references for the dilution factors (%) cited in the response be add d to Section 2.3.1 of the PNPP ODCM.
This review was performed by T. E. Young.
I L
I 1
l i
I:
L i
.-