ML20012A376

Performance Indicators,Jan 1990

ML20012A376
Person / Time
Site:	Fort Calhoun
Issue date:	01/31/1990
From:	OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT
To:
Shared Package
ML20012A340	List: LIC-90-0172, Forwards Fort Calhoun Station Performance Indicators,Jan 1990 ML20012A376
References
NUDOCS 9003090347
Download: ML20012A376 (108)

Text

{{#Wiki_filter:FORT CALHOUN STATION PERFORMANCE INDICATORS J ANU ARY, 1990 Prepared by: Production Engineering Division System Engineering {$03 "50$c: $>00hf5

[ l' I-l OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT 1 FORT CALHOUN STATION i PERFORMANCE INDICATORS i i i i.i i t PREPARED BY: PRODUCTION ENGINEERING DIVISION SYSTEM ENGINEERING i P JANUARY, 1989

I b F e a 4 a n a - m... a e m wns a m... a a e p, - % w... a a m m 4 ep...a a % s f a qa s p w, m w.aw - w a, a s nu4 m m, a a - - 4 a-a - - was s A wns sspn &d - M % A @ W V

m. + *% A@ %-

p - 9. o'c _

TABLE OF CONTENTS f.8E Distribution.................... iv Preface...................... 1 Purpose...................... 4 Scope....................... 5 Adverse Trend Report................ 6 Index to Performance Indicator Graphs....... 7 Performance Indicator Graphs............ 12 Escalated Enforcement History........... 79 Significant Items of Interest........... 83 Definitions.................... 84 Basis for Establishing 1989 Performance Indicator Goals................. 96 Operating Cycles and Refueling Outage Dates.... 98 Production and Operation Records.......... 99 Data Source................... 100 i References.................... 103 4 l l r

DISTRIBUTION V. W. Anderson R. E. Gray J. B. Newhouse R. L. Andrews M. J. Guinn M. W. Nichols W. R. Bateman R..H. Guy C. W. Norris K. L. Belek R. M. Hawkins J. T. O'Connor A. D. Bilau M. C. Hendrickson W. W. Orr C. N. Bloyd K. R. Henry L. L. Parent J. P. Bobba J. B. Herman T. L. Patterson C. J. Brunnert G. J. Hill G. R. Peterson M. W. Butt K. C. Holthaus R. L. Phelps R. H. Cagle L. G. Huliska T. J. Pirruccello C. A. Carlson R. L. Jaworski S. C. Presler G. S. Cary R. A. Johansen T. M. Reisdorff J. W. Chase J. W. Johnson A. W. Richard G. R. Chatfield D. W. Jones T. J. Sandene A. G. Christensen W. C. Jones F. C. Scofield R. P. Clemens J. D. Kecy L. G. Sealock R. G. Conner J. D. Keppler H. J. Seiick J. L. Connolley D. D. Kloock J. W. Shannon G. M. Cook D. M. Kobunski R. W. Short M. R. Core G. J. Krause A. L. Shrum P. J. Cotton G. A. Krieser C. F. Simmons S. R. Crites L. J. Kripal E. L. Skaggs D. W. Dale J. B. Kuhr F. K. Smith R. C. DeMeulmeester L. T. Kusek R. L. Sorenson R. D. DeYoung R. C. Learch D. E. Spires D. C. Dietz R. E. Lewis K. E. Steele D. E. Dirrim R. C. Liebentritt W. Steele K. S. Dowdy C. J. Linden H. F. Sterba J. A. Drahota B. R. Livingston R. K. Stultz R. G. Ellis J. M. Lofshult G. A. Teeple R. G. Eurich J. H. MacKinnon M. A, Tesar H. J. Faulhaber G. D. Mamoran P. L. Thompson M. A. Ferdig J. W. Marcil J. W. Tills J. J. Fluehr N. L. Marfice D. R. Trausch F. F. Franco D. J. Matthews P. R. Turner J. F. W. Friedrichsen J. M. Mattice J. M. Uhland R. M. Fussell T. J. McIvor C. F. Vanecek l S. K. Gambhir R. F. Mehaffey L. P. Walling J. K. Gasper K. A. Miller J. M. Waszak W. G. Gates R. A. Miser W. O. Weber M. O. Gautier D. C. Mueller G. R. Williams J. T. Gleason R. J. Mueller S. J. Willrett L. V. Goldberg W. L. Neal P. A. Yager D. C. Gorence iv 1 L

4 PREFACE PERFORMANCE INDICATORS REPORT IMPROVEMENTS Six indicators have been changed for the month of January,1990. Two of these indicators are in Industrial Safety Section, one of these indicators is in the Chemistry and Radiological Protection Section, two of these indicators are in the -Security Section, and one of these indicators is in the Design Engineering Section. The Disablina Iniury Freauency Rate Indicator found on page 20 has been changed for the month of January, 1990. This indicator now shows the current monthly disabling injury frequency rate in column form. This indicator also has been changed to show the 1989 disabling injury frequency rate and the Fort Calhoun i Station 5 year average disabling injury frequency rate. The Biggdable Iniyq,,$ases Freauency Rate Indicator found on page 66 has been changed for the nontr of January, 1990. This indicator now shows the current monthly recordable injury cases frequency rate in column form. This indicator also has been changed to show the 1989 recordable injury cases frequency rate and the Fort Calhoun Station 5 year average recordable injury cases frequency rate. 'The Liauid Radioactive Waste Beino Discharaed to the Environment Indicator found on page 47 has been changed to ':how the volume of liquid radioactive waste being discharged to the environment before it is diluted. Previously, this indicator showed the volume of radioactive waste after dilution. The. Locaable/ Reportable ncidents (Security) indicator found on page 48 has been changed for the month o January, 1990. This indicator now shows the number of Security System failures, as well as, the number of incidents involving Licensee Designated Vehicles (LDV's), security badges, security key control, escorting, and access control for the reporting month. The number of Security incidents involving inattentive Security Officers has been deleted from this indicator due to the fact that no incidents involving inattentive security officers have occurred for 5 l months. The Security Incident Breakdown Indicator found on page 49 has been changed for the month of January,1990. This indicator now shows the number of Security System failures, as well as, the number of incidents involving Licensee Designated Vehicles - (LDV's), security badges, security key control escorting, and access control for the reporting month. The number of Security incidents involving l inattentive Security Officers has been deleted from this indicator due to the fact l-that no incidents involving inattentive security officers have occurred for 5 l months. The Temocrary Modifications (Excludina Scaffoldino) Indicator found on page 64 has been changed for the month of January,1990. The top gra)h of this indicator now shows the total number of temporary modifications insta' led in the Fort Calhoun Station and a Fort Calhoun goal of a total of 25 temporary modifications installed in the plant at the end of May,1990. This graph still shows the breakdown of 'i electrical'and mechanical modifications. 1 PREFACE PERFORMANCE INDICATORS REPORTIMPROVEMENTS(CONTINUED) Eleven indicators have been added to the Fort Calhoun Station Performance Indicators Report for the month of January,1990. One of the new indicators is in the Security Section, nine of these indicators are in the Materials and Outside k Services Section, and one of these indicators is in the Design Engineering ' i Section. The new Security indicator is the Security System Failures Indicator found on page

50. This indicator shows the number of incidents concerning the following items q

for the reporting month. These items include: Alarm system failures, CCTV failures, security computer failures, terminal failures, door equipment failures, and card reader failures. This indicator tracks security performance for Safety - EnhancementProgram(SEP)ItemNo.58. - The Inventerv Accuracy Indicator found on page 54 has been added to the Performance Indicators Report for the month of January, 1990. This indicator shows the accuracy of the actual parts count for the warehouse compared to the counts contained in the MMIS computer system for the reporting month. The Stockout Rate Indicator found on page 55 has been added for the month of i January, 1990. This indicator shows the total number of Pick Tickets that were generated during the reporting month, the total number of Pick Tickets that were - generated with no parts available during the reportin0 month, and the total number of Pick Tickets generated that the MMIS computer system showed a sufficient parts quantity but no parts were available. The Warehouse Receiots Indicator found on page 56 has been added for the month of January,1990. This < ndicator shows the total number of warehouse receipts, the total number of non-CQE stock receipts, the total number of CQE stock receipts, i the, total number'of direct charge non-CQE receipts, and the total number of direct charge CQE receipts for the reporting month. The Warehouse Issues Indicator found on page 57 has been added for the month of ' January, 1990. This indicator-shows the total number of warehouse issues, the total number of non-CQE stock issues, the total number of CQE stock issues, the total; number of direct charge non-CQE issues, and the total number of direct charge CQE issues for the reporting month. The Warehouse Returns Indicator found on-page 58 has been added for the month of January, 1990. This indicator shows the total number of warehouse returns, the total number of CQE stock returns, and the total number of non-CQE stock returns. The Material Reouests Awaitino ADoroval Indicator found on page 59 has been added - for the month of January, 1990. This indicator shows the total number of material requests' awaiting approval at the end of the reporting month and the total number of material requests in which the Material Management Division (MMD) has been contacted to order at the end of the reporting month. __

PREFACE PERFORMANCE INDICATORS REPORTIMPROVEMENTS(CONTINUED) The l eggited Purciasos "ndicator found on page 60 has been added for the mcnth of . January,1990.- Th s nnd cator shows the number of expedited warehouse purchases which took place during the reporting month. The Invoice Breakdown Indicator found on page 61 has been added for the month of January, 1990. This indicator shows the number of invoices that are on hold at the 'end of the reporting month due to shelf life, CQE, and miscellaneous reasons. The Material Reauest Plannina Indicator found on page 62 has been added to th: Performance Indicators for the month of - January,1990. This indicator shows the percent of material requests (MR's) for issues with their request date the same as their need date compared to the total number of MR's for issues for the reporting month.~ The Enaineerina Assistance Reauest Priority Breakdown Indicator found on page 65 has been added to the Performance Indicators Report for the month of January, 1990. This indicator shows the number of open and closed Engineering Assistance Requests (EAR's)brokendownintoprioritiesattheendofthereportingmonth, i _ - - _

PURPOSE This program titled " Performance Indicators" is intended to provide selected Fort Calhoun plant performance information to OPPD's personnel responsible for optimizing unit performance. The information is presented in a way that provides ready identification of trends and a means to track progress toward reaching corporate goals. The information can be used for assessing and monitoring Fort Calhoun's plant performance, with emphasis on safety and reliability. Some performance indicators show company goals or industry information. This information can be used for comparison or as a means of promoting pride and motivation. SCOPE i In order for the Performance Indicator Program to be effective, the following guidelines were followed while. implementing this 1 program: Select the data which most effectively-monitors - Fort Calhoun's performance in key areas. l Present the data in a straight forward graphical format using averaging and smoothing techniques. Include established corporate goals and industry information for comparison. l Develop formal definitions for each performance parameter. This will ensure consistency in future reports and allow comparison with industry averages where appropriate. L l Comments and input are encouraged to ensure that this program l- .is tailored to address the areas which are most meaningful to the people using the report. 1 i ADVERSE TREND REPORT The Adverse Trend Report explains the conditions under which certain indicators are showing adverse trends. An indicator that is defined as an Adverse Trend is one in which the current month's data has more deficiencies than the data presented two months prior. Document Review Indicator - Page 24 The number of biennial document reviews that are overdue have been increasing since September,1989. Out of the 101 document reviews that were overdue at the end of January, 1990, 98 were maintenance documents. Personnel Turnover Rate Indicator - Page 68 The high turnover rate for the Nuclear Operations Division was due to five resignations during January, 1990.

'J PERFORMANCE INDICATORS i INDEX TO GRAPHS i INDUSTRY KEY PARAMETERS Forced Outage Rate.........-............... 12 1 i UnplannedLAutomat'ic Reactor. Scrams While Critical........ 13 i Unplanned Safety System Actuations................. 14 Gro s s Heat Rate.. -............... -.......... - 15 c 4 Equivalent Availability Factor................. 16 Fuel' Reliability Indicator.....................-17 . Personnel Radiation Exposure (Cumulative)............ 18' 1 Volume of Low-level Solid Radioactive Waste........... 19 I Disabling Injury Frequency Rate................. 20 [ i 6 I l. i: t i l 1 I t 1 1'

( ) n l PERFORMANCE INDICATORS l INDEX TO GRAPHS I (CONTINUED) .q OPERATIONS Forced Outage Rate....,.................. 12 l Unplanned Automatic Reactor Scrams While Critical........ 13 1 Unplanned Safety System Actuations............... 14 .\\ Gross Heat Rate......................... 15 Equivalent Availability Factor................. 16 i Fuel Reliability Indicator................... 17 Daily Thermal Output...................... 21 Equipment Forced Outages per 1000 Critical Hours.-....... 22 Operations and Maintenance Budget................ 23 Do c ume n t Re v i ew......................... 24 MAINTENANCE Diesel-Generator Reliability (100 Demands)........... 25 Diesel Generator Reliability (20 Demands) 26 Age of Outstanding Maintenance Work Orders........... 27 Maintenance Work Order Breakdown................ 28 Corrective Maintenance Backlog >3 Months Old.......... 29 Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance............. 30 Preventive' Maintenance Items Overdue.............. 31 Number of Out-of-Service Control Room Instruments........ 32 Craft Work Activity....................... 33 Maintenance Overtime...................... 34 Procedural Noncompliance Incidents (Maintenance)........ 35 Maintenance Work Order Backlog (Corrective Non-Outage)..... 36.

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS INDEX TO GRAPHS -(CONTINUED) MAINTENANCE (CONTINUED) Number of. Nuclear Plant Reliabilit ReportableFailures........yDataSystem(NPRDS) 37 CHEMISTRY AND RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION Personnel Radiation Exposure (Cumulative)............ 18 Volume of Low-level Solid Radioactive Waste........... 19 Secondary System Chemistry................... 38 Primary System Chemistry - Percent of Hours Out of Limit.... 39 Auxiliary Systems Chemistry Hours Outside Station Limits.... 40 In-Line Chemistry Instruments Out-of-Service.......... 41 1 Hazardous Waste Produced.................... 42 Maximum Individual Radiation Exposure.............. 43 Total Skin and Clothing Contaminations............. 44 Decontaminated Auxiliary Building................ 45 Gaseous Radioactive Waste Being Discharged to the Environment.. 46 L Liquid Radioactive Waste Being Discharged to the Environment.. 47 t SECURITY Loggable/ Reportable Incidents (Security)............. 48-Security Incident Breakdown.............-..... 49 Security System Failures.................... 50 MATERIALS AND OUTSIDE SERVICES H l -Amount of Work On Hold Awaiting Parts............... 51 a Spare Parts Inventory value................... 52 Spare Parts Issued....................... 53 Inventory Accuracy....................... 54 Stockout Rate.......................... 55 g.

qi e ..f= PERFORMANCE INDICATORS INDEX TO GRAPHS' (CONTINUED) MATERIAL AND OUTSIDE SERVICES (CONTINUED) Warehouse Receipts........................ 56.- - Warehouse Issues..._....................... 57 Warehou se ' Return s......................... 58

Material Requests Awaiting Approval...............

59 Expedited Purchases........................ ~ 60 I nvo i ce Break down......................... 61 Material Request Planning.................... 62 DESIGN ENGINEERING Outstanding Modifications..........,......... 63 Temporary Modifications..................... 64 -Engineering Assistance Request Priority Breakdown........ 65 INDUSTRIAL SAFETY Disabling Injury Frequency Rate................. 20 Recordable Injury Cases Frequency Rate............. 66 HUMAN RESOURCES -Number of Personnel Errors Reported in LERs............ 67 Personnel Turnover Rate...................... 68 Staffing Level......................... 69 TRAINING AND OUALIFICATION SR0 License Examination Pass Ratio................ 70 R0' License Examination Pass Ratio................ 71 R0 Hot License Exams...................... 72 Hotlines............................ 73 Classroom (Instructor) Hours.................. 74 Total: Hours of Student Training................. 75

• 1 P

v. ' PERFORMANCE INDICATORS-- INDEX TO GRAPHS -(CONTINUED). OUALITY ASSURANCE Numberfof Violations per 1000 Inspection Hours......... 76: Percent of DR/QR's Greater Than Six Months Old......... 77 . DR/QR's Issued versus Significant DR/QR's Issued versus...... NRC Violations Issued versus LERs Reported i ? - Forced Outage Rate '6 -e-Fort Calhoun Goal -B-Industry Upper 10 Percentile '5-GOOD 4-4 R a t-3- e-2- O~--- O ~ ~ ~ O'---O -~ ~ G- ~~-O-~~ ~ O --- - ---O ---G-~ ~-&---O 1.4 l1-E 0'

O' 0

r' r-' r-' r-' '87 '8889 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Ju1= Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan 1989 1990 FORCED OUTAGE RA_IE - There were zero forced outage hours logged - for-the Fort Calhoun Station during January, 1990..The present 12 month average forced outage. rate is 1.3%. The-last forced outage at Fort Calhoun occurred in September of 1989.- The industry upper ten percentile value for the forced. outage rate is 0.0%. The 1990 goal-for forced outage rate is 2.4% and-is based on seven days of forced outage time. The~ basis for establishing the 1990 performance goals can be found on page 96. Adverse Trend: None . l

^-e I s4 1 5-Reactor Scram -e-Fort Calhoun Goal -O. Industry Upper 10 Percentile t 4-S 3 GOOD-C 4 r 4 -) a. ~j a 2-1

1 e----.e-----e_.--G---- G---- G----O ---- O ---- O ----O----G-- --O

.- 1 0 0 0 '861'87 '88 '89- 0.Feb O O O O Mar Apr-May Jun Ju_1 Aug-Sep Oct .iov Dec Jan i 1989-1990-I s-.- UNPLANNED-AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS WHILE CRITICAL .i There were - no unplanned automatic - reactor scrams.in January. It has-been 1,309 days a since -the-last unplanned automatic reactor scram which occurreci on July'2,- 1986. - i The 1990 goal for unplanned automatic. reactor j scrams while critical has been set at 1. 4 The industry upper ten percentile value is zero scrams per unit on an annual-basis. - The Fort Calhoun Station is currently in the upper ten percentile of nuclear plant performance in this area. Adverse Trend: None

u 1 I 'i Safety System Actuations- -e-Fort Calhoun Goal -G-Industry Upper-10 Percentile H Az c-t- GOOD ) + o n s &___ e.___ e _ __ e___e__ _ _ e __.g _ __ e _ _ _ e __ __g._ _q 7 'N \\ '\\' 0-0 0 '- 87. '88 '89 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan 1989 1990 n UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS, a There were no unplanned safety system l actuations during the month of-January, L 1990. The 1990 goal for the number of unplanned-safety system actuations is-zero.~This goal is based on past performance at.the Fort Calhoun Station. The industry upper ten percentile value for the number of unplanned safety system li actuations )er year is zero. The Fort K Calhoun Stat on.is currently in the up)er ten-percentile of nuclear plants for t11s-indicator, p [ Adverse Trend: None p 1 + - I i.

I IMonthly Gross Heat Rate - Year to Datt Gross Heat Rate G-Fort Calhoun Goal O Industry Upper.10 Percentile GOOD 10750-4 10520 B 10500-l -T U i / 10270 K. IIW10250-1 H G O--- G---G---e--- G---G----e---e--- G --- G----O i -10014 10000- c o o o a a a e o a e c 9750 '87 '88 '89 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec j 1990 l GROSS HEAT RATE The. gross heat rate for the Fort Calhoun Station during January, 1990 was 10,435 BTV/KWH. .The; gross. heat rate values for this cycle of operation will be' increased due to the removal 'of the first stage of the high pressure turbine. The 1990 year to date gross heat rate value is 10,435 BTV/KWH. The 1990 goal is 10,200 BTV/KWH. This goal is based upon 10,500 BTU /KWH for the months -of January and February .and 10,075 BTU /KWH for-the months of May through December. The gross heat rate industry upper ten percentile value is 9,989 BTU /KWH. Adverse Trends: None I IMonthly EAF ^ - 12 Month Average EAF -G-Fort Calhoun Goal GOOD -B-Industry Upper 10 Percentile 100-A Y O'~~O b 77 80 O--e. -g 71 / 66 e.4...g. .e._ _ e....e__.e..e....e....e p ._~e....e 60-h r - m J C e y 40-20- '87 '88 '89 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan 1989 1990 l EOUIVALENT AVAILABILITY FACTOR The Equivalent Availability Factor (EAF) was reported as 95.58% for the month of January. The 1990 EAF goal is 65.4% while the present 12 month average EAF for Fort Calhoun is 84.8%. The EAF industry upper ten percentile value is 83.5%. Adverse Trends: None J

5-L -++- Fuel Reliability Indicator -e-Fort Calhoun Goal -EF Industry Upper 10 Percentile 4 n a n .3 g 3, .u GOOD [ 4 e 2-r L a m 1-G ---O - O---G----&---O--- G---G----O ---O---G---e h 0 P O '~ " 0 '87- '88 '89 Feb Mar Apr May Jun fu'l A'u'g S'e'p 0'c't Nov D'e'c da'n d 1989 1990 d 1 1 FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR The Fuel Reliability Indicator '(FRI) was re)orted as 0.0 nanocuries/ gram for. the month of January. T11s FRI value indicates: that' there' have been no fuel failures since: startup in' January, 1989. ' The.1990 fuel reliability goal has-been set at 1.0 nanocuries/ gram. The fuel-reliability indicator industry upper ten _ l . percentile value. is 0.07 nanocuries/ gram. The Fort Calhoun Station is currently in the upper ten percentile 1 of nuclear' plants for this indicator 1 Adverse Trend: None 4 i i m

Personnel Radiation Exposure 38 .400 e-Fort Calhoun Goal -G-Industry Upper 10' Percentile GOOD-300-272 4 O

p. -O,,,4...o

-& ~~g...e _, = .R- / E 200-P a j/ M e a O O O O O O 8 O O l d 93.4 .100- / / ,0 / '8 '88 '89 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct? Nov Dec. 1990 PERSONNEL RADIATION EXPOSURE 4! (CUMULATIVE) During January, 1990,-11.8 man-rem was recorded by pencil dosimeters worn by personnel while working at the Fort Calhoun Station. The monthly cumulative exposure goal for December was 125 man-rem while the actual recorded exposure through December was -93.4 man-rem. The personnel radiation exposure industry upper ten percentile is 175 man-rem per unit per year. Adverse Trend: None i

yy Monthly Radioactive Waste Shipped 12500- - Cumulative Radioactive Waste Shipped O-Fort Calhoun Goal -B-Industry Upper 10 Percentile C GOOD c 7500-4 6195 F - , l=1722Ie-e 4 t 5000- O --- G----e ---e---+---G---e---G----&---G----0 ----O .4454 O 2500-0 '87 '88 '89 .Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 VOLUME OF LOW-tEVEL SOLID RADI0 ACTIVE WASTE .e I; The' above graph shows the amount :of low-level radioactive waste L shipped off-site for disposal. The table below lists the amount of L waste actually shipped off-site for disposal plus - the change in inventory of< waste in on-site storage in final form ready for burial. Thevolumeofsolidradioactivewasteis(cubicfeet): i Amount Shipped in January 158.1 Amount in Temporary Storage 120.0 o 1990 Cumulative Amount Shipped 158.1 l 1990 Goal 5000.0 i L The industry upper ten percentile value is 2,895.5 cubic feet per unit per year.-The Fort Calhoun Station was in the upper ten percentile of i nuclear plants for this indicator in 1986, 1987 and 1988. Adverse Trend: None '

2-1990 Disabling Injury Frequency Rate -X-1989 Disabling Injury Frequency Rate

1.75-o' 5' Year Average Disabling Injury Frequency Rate e-Fort Calhoun Goal 1.5-Industry Upper 10 Percentile 1.25-R GOOD

a 3

q t e 4 ] 3 .75-5- X O ---- e -- G ---

---

G-----

---

G ----- 0 -----O -----e------O----- O j

.25-S a a4 0 = O C C O O O C C C C -Jan-Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep-Oct Nov Dec January 1990 DISABLING INJURY FREQUENCY RATE L (LOST TIME ACCIDENT RATE) The Disabling Injury Frecuency Rate Indicator has been changed for the month of January. 'Th's indicator now shows the current monthly ~ disabling-injury' rate in column' form..The 1989 disabling injury frequency rate and the Fort Calhoun Station 5 year. average disabling 7 injury frequency rate have been added to this indicator for the month L of January. There were zero disabling injuries reported at the Fort L Calhoun Station in January. The total number of disabling injuries in 1990-is zero. The 1990 disabling injury frequency rate goal was set at 0.31% and was based-on one disabling injury occurring in 1990. The industry upper ten percentile disabling injury frequency rate is D 0%. The year end disablin) injury frequenc 1987,.1988, and 1989 were 0.6, l'.6, anc 0.4 respectively.y rates for l 1 L This, indicator tracks personnel performance for Safety Enhancement Program (SEP).. Item 26. . Adverse Trend:.None i-p

( f 1 ? -+- Thermal Output ^ - Technical _ Specification Limit -& Fort Calhoun Goal "'T 'C'"J'G"""""G'C'%'TT7??"'%^l""""&'4r t g_1450- - e, g-k - n W a t 1400-s '1350 l' 7 14 21 28 January 1990 DAILY THERMAL OUTPUT ~ The above thermal' output - graph ' displays the daily operating power level, -the 1500 thermal megawatt - average-technical specification _ limit, and the 1495 thermal-megawatt Fort 'Calhoun goal. The cross hatched area' represents' the difference between the-maximum allowable operation and - the ' actual plant operation. The' average percent - power operation.Lof the Fort Calhoun Station was 99.2% for the month of January. The power of the Fort Calhoun Station was reduced from January 5 through January 8 to perform the Moderator Temperature Coefficient Surveillance Test (ST-MTC-1). Adverse-Trend: None t

4% I 1-k, -H-Equipment Forced Outage Rate 8- ? 6-GOOD R a Y t 4- + 0 2- .13 0-0 0 fan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul' Aug '87 ?88' '89= Sep Oct Nov,Dec 1990 E0VIPMENT FORCED OUTAGES PER 1000 CRITICAL HOURS There were zero forced outage hours reported for the. Fort. Calhoun -Station during the month of January, 1990. The l current value-for-the number of equipment - l.- forced outages per 1000 critical hours for l.. 1990 is zero. L The last. equipment forced-outage occurred j'l - problem with the resistive temperature in September of 1989 and was due to a cable l' detector on reactor ' coolant pump motor RC-3A. L Adverse Trend: None l p c 1 L, s-

'c - Actual _ Operations Expenditures '125- -M. Operations Budget gy100- <i ^ 11 d E 75-1o v

i 1 s

ol' 50-

na -

srs 25-0 Jan-.Feb Mar-Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 40- - Actual Maintenance Expenditures Mf "9 30 -1 1d _)20-o1 1 na s r 10- .s 1 0. i Jan Feb Mar Apr: May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec j 1990 1 1 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET 1 The Operations and Maintenance Budget Indicator shows the budget year to date as well as the actual expenditures for operations and maintenance for ?the Fort Calhoun. Station. 4 The budget year to date for Operations was 8.6 r.illion dollars for January L while the actual cumulative expenditures for January totaled. 5.8 million i dollars. ' The budget ' year to date for Maintenance was 1.7 million dollars for l January while the actual cumulative expenditures for January totaled 1.1 million dollars. ' Adverse Trends: None l , l l .I

) a 64 ] 500< Documents Scheduled for Review l -X-Documents Reviewed 1 l Overdue Documents-400- . N 0- [ 300-b4u 1 1 em y' [ i r ec 0 200- / ot / 'fzs / a ~ // h f,k y'~~/,/~~~,,...ax ~*---N ,,, ',, A ~~ 0 - - - * ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

• Feb

. Mar -Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan 1 1989 1990 P DOCUMENT REVIEW This indicator shows = the number of biennial reviews completed during the reporting month,.the number of biennial' reviews scheduled for'.the . reporting month, and the, number of biennial reviews that-are overdue. p' . These document - reviews are -performed in' house and include S)ecial i L- ' Procedures, _ the Site Security Plan,--Maintenance Procet ures, Preventive Maintenar.e. and the Operating-Manual. The-documents L ~ l. included in the Operating Manual are Standing Orders, the Technical Data Book,, the Radiological Emergency Response P1an, Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures, Operating Procecures, Emergency Operating L -Procedures,-' Abnormal Operating Procedures,- Operating Instructions, the-Radiological ~ Protection Manual, the. Chemistry Manual, the Fuel. Management Manual, Surveillance Tests, and Calibration Procedures. 4 4 During-January there -were 152 document reviews ccmpleted while 255- . document reviews' were ' scheduled. At the end of January, there were -101'. document reviews overdue. The overdue document reviews at the end- .of-January consisted primarily of maintenance documents. Adverse Trend: The number of overdue document reviews has - been ' increasing since September, 1989. Of the 101 document reviews that are overdue for the month of January, 1990, 98 are maintenance documents. ? l.: i

'f, 4, 100-l ' Diesel Generator No. 1 98; -X-- Diesel Generator No. 2 G-Fort Calhoun Goal k ..96- . s. .....s.....s.....9..... s....s......s..... e.....m......s..... s . X X X X X m x*X X'y X X X X 92-p e-

r. 90-c e: 88 n

A t 86-Goop 84-82-80 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan 1989 1990 DG RELI A31L::TY LAST 100 )EMNDS Diesel generator D-1 has a 95 percent reliability factor over the last 100 valid demands. Diesel generator D-2 has a 94 percent reliability factor over the last 100 valid demands. The Fort Calhoun goal for the diesel generator reliability is 95%. Presently D-1 meets this goal.. Adverse Trend: None 1 4

? i l Diesel Generator No.-1 -X-Diesel Generator No. 2 G-Fort Calhoun Goal 100-l l l l l l l l l l l [ I 95-i &---- e-----a----e---- e-----e ----e----9-----e -----&----G-----E P .e-r.

• 90-X n

n t ^ 85-GOOD 80 Feb Mar Apr. May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec -Jan 1989 1990 3* I DG RELIABTLITY LAST 20 DEMNDS Diesel generator D-1 has not had a failure in the last 20 demands on the unit. The present i reliability _ factor for D-1 is 100%-over the last b 20 demands. L Diesel generator D-2 has had one failure in the L last.20' demands. D-2 has a 95% reliability factor t over the last 20 demands. 1 The Fort Calhoun goal for' the diesel generator . reliability for the last 20 demands is set at 95%. Diesel D-1 and diesel D-2 presently meet this goal. Adverse Trend: None l > i l2 j

I 2: 2400; 1 December 1989 l se January 1990 l IFebruary 1990 O' 300- .l' 1 a 200-n 9. 0-I.* '100- _s o 0-3 3-6 6-9 9-12 >12 . Age in Months AGE OF OUTSTANDING MAINTENANCE WORK ORDERS (CORRECTIVE NON-0UTAGE) This indicator was changed for the month of December, 1989. The Age of Outstanding-Maintenance Work Orders Indicator now shows the age of corrective non-outage maintenance work orders (MW0's) remaining open at the-end of the reporting month. Previously, all open non-outage MW0's were + shown. Adverse Trend: None a a:? December-1989 e January.1990 ~ l l February 1990 400-200- ~ !!EEl iG E!lI5! 0 E

===o Total-Open Total Open Open Open MW0s Open Safety High MW0s >-3 Months Safety Related Priority Old Related MW0s MW0s MW0s > 3 Months Old l MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BREAKDOWN (CORRECTIVE NON-0UTAGE) This indicator was changed for the month of l December, 1989. The Maintenance Work Order (MW0) Breakdown-Indicator now shows the total number of corrective non-outage MWO's remaining open at the end of the reporting month, along with a ~ breakdown by several key categories. Previously, all open non-outage MW0's were shown. .I Adverse Trend: None g b s 7

1. 1

- Corrective Maintenance Backlog > 3 Months Old -O-Industry Upper Quartile 80-60- / l /o o 4-c -c 0 0 o r o o o v -- c. 40 .e n t GOOD 20-4' O Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan 1989 1990 [QRRECTIVE 4AINTENANCE BACKLOG GREATER THA> 3 MONTHS OLO (NON-0VTAGE) This indicator shows the percentage of open corrective non-outage maintenance work orders that are greater than three months old at the end of the reporting month. l The percentage of open corrective non-outage maintenance work orders that are greater than three months old at the end of January was reported as 58.5% i The industry upper quartile value for corrective l maintenance backlog greater than 3 months old is 44.1%. Adverse Trend None.E a

- Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance i + Industry Upper Quartile 90 e-Fort Calhoun Goal 80-70-P 60-0----- G--- -

---

Q----Q----Q-----Q----g---v-----Q-----g---g v

v v v v n 50-o o' ^ 40-GOOD 30-20 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan 1989 1990 t i i RATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO T0"Al MAINTENANCE (NON-0UTAGEj The ratio of preventive to total maintenance indicator shows the ratio of completed i non-outage preventive maintenance to total completed non-outage maintenance. The ratio of preventive to total maintenance at the Fort Calhoun Station decreased to 52.2% in January. The Fort Calhoun goal is to have a ratio of preventive to. total maintenance greater than 60%. The industry up>er quartile value for the I ratio of preventive to total maintenance is 57.4%. Adverse Trend None B, b

1 - Prev ntive Maintenance Items Oy:rdue j 20- -+>- Industry Upper Quartile ) G-Fort Calhoun Goal ? ) 15- ) P. e GOOD r c 10- + e n t 5-I a C O-='-O-----$-----$----O Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan l 1989 1990 l PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ITEMS OVERDilE l The purpose of this indicator is to monitor progress in the administration and execution of preventive maintenance programs. A small percentage . of preventive maintenance items overdue indicates a l station connitment to the preventive maintenance program and an ability to plan, schedule, and. perform preventive maintenance tasks as programs require. 1 i The preventive maintenance items overdue value increased to 0.7% for the month of January. There were a total of 895 preventive maintenance items l l -completed during the month with 6 preventive ) maintenance items not completed within the allowable grace period. t The Fort Calhoun goal is to have less than 1.2% preventive maintenance items overdue. The industry upper quartile for preventive maintenance items overdue is 1.5%. The Fort Calhoun Station is currently performing in the industry upper quartile for this indicator. Adverse Trend: None ' m. .m.-- m.

1 E Total CCntrol Room Instruments Out-of-Service E Out-of-Service Instruments Added During the Month R Out-of Service Instruments Corrected During the Month I 35- + Industry Upper Quartile For Total Out-of-Service Instruments e-Fort Calhoun Goal For Total Out-of-Service Instruments 'l 30-i 25-l GOOD 20- + i i 15-10-l Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan l 1989 1990 N M ER 0 OUT-OF-SERVICE -l C0N" 10L lt00M INSTRUMENTS This indicator shows the total number of out-of-service control room. instruments at the end of the reporting month, the number of L out-of-service control room instruments that were corrected during the l' reporting month and the number of control room instruments that were added to the out-of-service control room instruments list during the reporting month. There.was a total of 11 out-of-service control room instruments at the end of January. During the month of January, 6 out-of-service instruments were corrected and 6 instruments were added to the out-of-service instruments list. The Fort Calhoun goal is to have less than 7 out-of-service control room instruments. The industry upper quartile value for the number of out-of-service control room instruments is 9. Adverse Trend: None :

i EM GM M / r t PE I&C E Modifications (MOD) l / I IMaint. Work Orders (MWO) hl \\ E Unestimated (UNE) !:!8!: PreventiveMaintenance(PM) i E Training (TRA) s \\ L"J Calibration Procedures (CP) N 8 Surveillance Tests (ST) ~ E Maint. Work Requests (MWR) CRAFT WORK ACTIVITY The Craft Work Activity Indicator shows the percentage of a type of work each craft (plant personnel only)icator are Electrical Maintenance (EM), performed during the month. The crafts that are represented in this ind L General Maintenance (GM), Mechanical Maintenance (MM), Pressure L Equipment (PE),andInstrumentationandControl(180). I WORK ACTIVITY (IN PERCENT) CRAFT ,jiQQ_ .jffQ_ ._Qfil, PM TRA CP ST MWR EM-5.45 43.49 11.64 14.49 18.36 0.00 6.57 0.00 GM 0.00 81.06 13.80 0.00 5.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 MM 0.00 59.50 22.28 8.85 9.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 PE 5.40 60.50 19.64 5.76 8.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 IAC 11.24 25.56 6.03 7.27 22.25 17.75 9.90 0.00 Adverse Trend None

1 - Maint: nance Overtime y-12 Month Average G-Fort Calhoun Goal 60-GOOD P + e r 40-c e-O-- --- G ---- G ----- O -----G ----G---- G---- G ----- O -----O ---- + ---- O n t 20-X X X X X X X X X f m / 0 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan 1989 1990 MAINTENANCE OVERTIME - This indicator was changed for the month' of January, 1989. A Fort Calhoun goal and a 12 month average for maintenance overtime have been added. The Maintenance Overtime Indicator monitors the ability to perform the desired maintenance activities with the allotted resources. Excessive overtime indicates insufficient resource allocation and can lead to errors due to fatigue. The percent of overtime hours with respect to normal hours was reported as 16.7% during the month of January, 1990. The 12 month average percentage of overtime hours with respect to normal hours was reported as 16.2%. The Fort Calhoun goal for the percent of maintenance overtime hours worked has been set at 35% for non-outage months and 50% for outage months. Adverse Trend: None -

i-50-1 IIdentified Incidents E Incident Reports Opened E Incident Reports Closed 40-u O b e r 30-o f.- I 20-c 1- -d hn1I.., Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan 1989 1990 L PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS l. -(MAJNTENANCE) This indicator shows the number of procedural noncompliance IR's closed for the reporting month. This reporting method is due to the process in which IR's receive category codes. IR's receive their catogory code when the,y are h ing closed. This categorization method is being used to be consistent with -the process in which Deficiency Reports (DR's) and - Quality Reports '(QR's) are being closed. During the month of January,1990, 3 procedural noncompliance IR involving maintenance was closed. This indicator provides information on personnel performance for SafetyEnhancementProgram(SEP)ItemNo.15. Adverse Trend: None l i '900-j Open MWO's G-Fort Calhoun Goal o '700-Nf l u OM bW 600- &---e- - ---- G -----&---- e ---- &----G -----&---- e -----e ---- O e0 r* 8 ~ 500-400-T 300 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun 1989 1990 I MAlhTENANCE WORK ORDER BACKLOG 3 i (CORRECTIVENON-0UTAGEMAINTENANCE) This indicator shows the number of corrective I non-outage maintenance work orders -that are open at the end of the reporting month. The goal for this indicator is to have less than ' 600 corrective non-outage maintenance work orders remaining open. At the end of January, 1990, there were 516 corrective non-outage maintenance work orders remaining open. l~ This indicator was. added to the Performance Indicators. Report to trend Safety Enhancement 1 Program (SEP) Item No. 36. l Adverse Trend None t L L ,y -c_ w .www w

l. C} i L_J Total NPRDS Component Failures E Confirmed NPRDS Component Failures 40-4 Nuf a a 30-1 b i eI r U'r e 20-J o f5 I t 0- - I '10-Feb-Mar-Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan t 1989 -1990 NUMBER OF NUCLEAI PLANT FELIABILITY DATA SYfT emf (NPR:tS) = REPORTABLE EAILUR IS l This indicator shows the total number of NPRDS i component failures and the number of confirmed NPRDS: component - failures. The total number of NPRDS component : failures is based upon the number of failure reports sent to INPO. The number of confirmed NPRDS com>onent failures is based upon the number of fa' lure reports that have been accepted by INPO. The difference of these two figures is the number of failure reports still under review by INPO. During January, 1990, there was a total of zero confirmed NPRDS component failures. Adverse Trend: None 37 .i

1 - Secondary Systea CPI ~ 1.5-4 Industry Upper Quartile j i 1- -i----+---+---+---+--+---+---+---+---+---+---+ GOOD Y .36 1 '5-I0 [ 0 '87 '88 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989 i 800- - Hours Chemistry is Outside OG Guidelines 600-GOOD l 400- + u r* 200-0 \\ 0 '87 '88 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989 SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY The top graph, Secondary System Chemistrv Performance Index (CPI), is a calculation based on the concentration of key impurities in the secondary side of the plant. These key impurities are the most likely cause of deterioration of the steam generators. The monthly CPI is plotted relative to the EPRI chemistry limit for CPI. The CPI was reported as 0.28 for the month of December. The industry upper quartile value for this indicator is 0.20. The bottom graph, Hours Chemistry is Outside Owners Guidelines, tracks the total hours of 13 parameters exceeding guidelines during power operation. In December,1989, there were 3.7 hours outside owners group guidelines. The industry upper quartile value for this indicator is no longer available. The above two chemistry indicators are one month behind the reporting period due to the time needed for data collection and evaluation of the station chemistry data. Adverse Trends: None -

I l 10- - Primary System Chemistry Out of Limit 8-P 6-GOOD e + n t 4-i 3.0 t Io ') 2-t 0. '87 '88 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec l 1989 l PF IN ARY SYSTEM CFEMISTRY PERCIN" 0F HOURS 007 0F LI MIT The Primary System Chemistry - Percent of Hours Out of Limit indicator tracks the primary system chemistry performance by monitoring six key chemistry parameters. y The Primary System Chemistry Percent of Hours Out of Limit was reported as 0.0% for the month of December.100% equates to all six parameters being out of limit for the month. i Adverse Trend: None i .-,_,.,.,,n-.

1 F -++- Auxiliary System Chemistry Out Of Limit I -G-Industry Upper Quartile i 40-GOOD + 30-1 H-o u 20-r s F 4 3 10- ) i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0---O O O a'n F b Mar kp'r Ma'y Nn N1 ku'g Sep Oc't '87 '88 N v Dec 1989 i s AUXILIARY SYSTEM lCCW) CHEM:[STRY HOURS OUTSID-ES"ATION LIM::TS i The Auxiliary System Chemistry Hours Outside t l Station Limits indicator tracks the monthly hours that the Component Cooling. Water (CCW) L system is.outside the station chemistry limit. The above chemistry indicator is one month behind the reporting period due to the time needed for data collection and evaluation of the chemistry data for the station. The auxiliary system chemistry hours outside. station limits for the month of December, 1989 was reported as zero. The industry upper quartile value for auxiliary systems chemistry hours outside station limits is 2.6 hours. The Fort Calhoun Station is currently performing in l the industry upper quartile for this area. Adverse Trend: None k -

E Number of Out-of-Service Instruments L 2S. -G-Fort Calhoun Goal 20-N" u E D k t 15-7 e u r a 1 ge10-f t 5- ..q....e_...e.._ _e....e l 0 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun 1989 1990 IN-LINE CHEMISTRY INSTRUMENTS OUT-OF-SQEl(( This indicator shows the total number of in-line chemistry system instruments that are out-of-serv'ce at the end of the reporting month. The chemistry systems involved in this indicator include the Secondary System and the Post Accident SamplingSystem(PASS). At the end of January there were a total of 18 in-line chemistry instruments that were out-of-service. Thirteen of these instruments were from the Secondary System and five were from PASS. The Fort Calhoun goal for the number of in-line chemistry system instruments that are out-of-service is 3. Adverse Trend: None I

-i 9000-I Waste Oil Non-Halogenated Hazardous Waste 7500 Halogenated Hazardous Waste { I IOther Hazardous Waste K 6000-10 'I f i i o 'gW 4500-a r s i a t .a s' 3000 1500-Is...mm. o Feb. Mar Apr May Jun Jul-Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan 1989 1990 ? ,tigMDOUS WASTE PRODUCED This indicator shows the amount of waste oil, non-halogenated hazardous waste, halogenated - hazardous waste, and other hazardous waste produced by Fort Calhoun each month. During the month of January,193.6 kilograms of waste oil. was produced. 0.0 kilograms of s non-halogenated - hazardous waste was produced, 204.2 ki'ograms of halogenated-hazardous waste was produced, and 0.0 kilograms of other hazardous waste was produced. Adverse Trend: None' I l j:. -

I-i 5000-1 IMonth E Quarter OPPD Limit har 4000-3000-a- R E 2000-December 1989 MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL RADIATION EXPOSURE The Maximum Individual Radiation Ex1osure graph is one month behind the reporting period clue to the lag time involved with collecting and calculating the radiation exposure for the station. During December, 1989 an individual accumulated 222 mrem which was the highest individual exposure at the Fort Calhoun Station for the month. The maximum individual exposure reported for the fourth quarter of 1989 was 484 mrem. The maximum individual exposure for 1989 was 1165 mrem. The maximum accumulated 1989 individual exposure was 1,165 mrem, received by a Health Physicist. The OPPD limit for the maximum yearly individual . radiation exposure is 4,500 mrem / year. Adverse Trend: None I - i i

i h E Monthly Contaminations - Cumulative Contaminations G-Fort Calhoun Goal 400- +- Industry Upper Quartile j 357 P e r-s 300-o GOOD j n 4 n i e 200-157 I I O---- O--- G----G - -- O ---G---O -- - G --O---- O ---G---HD i I100-O O O O O O O O O O O O J 0 '88 '89 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 ) I TOTAL SKIN AND CLOTHING CONTAMINATIONS i i; There was a total of 12 skin and clothing ~ contaminations reported for the Fort Calhoun Station during January,1990. These contaminations consisted of 3 skin contaminations,10 clothing contaminations, and one combination skin and clothing contamination. l There was a. total of 157 skin and clothing contaminations in 1989. The 1990 goal for skin and clothing is 150 contaminations. This 1990 goal of 150 i contaminations includes a Fort Calhoun goal of 23 skin contaminations. The industry upper quartile value for total skin and I clothing contaminations is 129 per unit annually. I l This indicator provides information on performance for Safety Enhancement Program (personnelSEP) Item 1 No. 15. Adverse Trend: None

1 i,- 1 - Decontaminated Auxiliary Building l 100-t 80-N 60 e n t 40-h GOOD 20-i 0 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan 1989 1990 \\ DECONTAMINATED AUXILIARY BUILDING, l l This graph shows the percentage of the auxiliary building which is decontaminated (clean)basedonthetotalsquarefootage. As of January 31, 1990, 78.5% of the total square footage of the auxiliary building was decontaminated. L Adverse Trend: None s I i i q A m y -m. y ,.y...

1 I Nonthly Radioactive Gas Discharged l - Cumulative Radioactive Gas Discharged G-Cumulative Goal j 785 800-GOOD C 600-u ri 432 1s 400-I 200- &--- O ---&---G ---G----&--- O ----G----O--- GA-1 0 i l. '87 '88 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989 a ( l: GASEOUS RA)l0AC"IVE WASTE BEING )1SCHARGE ) TO "HE ENVIRONMENT The gaseous radioactive waste being i discharged to the environment is shown for e L 1989. A total of 164.4 curies have been released to the environment from January e through December of 1989. The Fort Calhoun Stat on goal is 145 curies for this c - indicator. The gaseous radioactive waste being i discharged to the environment is calculated l every six months. Adverse Trend: None 7 9 l. i. t \\ L'.

I IMonthly Radioactive Liquid Discharged - Cumulative Radioactive Liquid Discharged G-Cumulative Goal 228 231 400-s 180 C 300 &+-&- &-&-O-4-4-4-4-G--O 1u r i 200-GOOD 100- 'I I- 'I I' 0 .'86 '87 '88 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989 50-o Mf 40-i ll30-f1 20-no s n 10-8 0 'I II I' Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989 LIOUID RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARG ED TO THE ENVIRONMENT The liquid radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is shown for 1989. The liquid radioactive waste that was discharged to the environment totaled 149.1 curies from January through December 1989. The Fort Calhoun Station goal for 1989 is 320 curies. The bottom graph has been changed for the month of January, 1990. This graph now shows the volume of liquid radioactive waste before dd lution. The volume of li uid radioactive waste being discharged to the environment total 23.5 million gallons from July through December,1989. Previously this graph showed the volume of liquid radioactive waste after dilution. The liquid radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is calculated every six months. Adverse Trend: None-.. -

e L25-Number of Loggable/ Reportable Incidents N 20 v 20-0 b e t r ., 15-f l l 1 ' " 10 - 1 i d e ( 5-4 4 l 0 0 n LDV Badges-Escort System Key Access Failures Control Control s.' January 1990 LOGGABLE/ REPORTABLE INCIDENTS I (SECURITY) The Loggable/ Reportable Incidents (Security) Indicator has been changed for the month of January / reportable . This indicator now shows the total number of loggable incidents concerning Licensee Designated Vehicles (LDV's), security system f ailures, security badges, security key control. H escorting, and access control for the reporting month. The number of incidents involving inattentive security officers has been deleted from this indicator due to the fact that no incidents have occurred in the last 5 months involving 1 inattentive security officers. l' During the month of January,

1990, there were 30 L

loggable/ reportable incidents identified. This indicator provides information on security performance for Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Item No. 58. Adverse Trend None 1 _ i l

t-i ' LicenseeDesignat:dV;hiciss(LDV's) j milil Security System Failures l l Security Badges Security Key Control Escorting i A'.sss Control ] LDV 7% Escort 13 f J System Failures 67% 1 l 1 l l \\ f J" j j i SECURITY INCIDENT BREAKDOWN The Security Incident Breakdown Indicator has been changed for the month of Janua e This indicator now shows the number of security system failures instead of j number of inattentive security officers. The incidents involving inattent security officers has been deleted due to the fact that no incidents have occur i in the last 5 months involving inattentive security officers. This indicator sh i the percentage of incidents concerning the followin items for the reporting mon These items include; Licensee Designated Ve cles (LDV's), security s failures, security badges, security key control, escorting, and access control. ys Security Items Number of Incidents JAN 1990 LicenseeDesignatedVehicles(LDV's) 2 Security System Failures 20 Security Badges 4 Security Key Control 0 Escorting 4 Accers Control 0 Tota' 30 This indicator provides information on security performance for Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Item No. 58. Adverse Trend: None ;

15- . 5 N - u o b e 10-r o i I i F a-6 6 ' i i 15 u. 4 r i e s. l 2 2 0 0 Alarm System CCTV Computer Terminal Door Card Reader SECURITY SYSTEM FAILURES The Security System Failures Indicator has been added to the Performance Indicators Report for the month of January,1999. This indicator shows the number of incidents concerning the following. items for the reporting month. These items includes. alarm s failures, CCTV failures, security computer i failures,ystemterminal failures, door equipment failures, and card L reader failures. System Failures Number of Incidents Jan 90 1 Alarm Systems 4 t CCTV 0 ' Computer 6 Terminal 2 Door Equipment 6 Card Reader 2 Total 20 This indicator provides information on security performance for Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Item No.' 58. Adverse-Trend: An adverse trend for this indicator is indeterminable due to the fact that it was added to the Performance Indicators Report for the month of January, 1990. 50-P n e-- -m, -*,w-v-

15- - Amount of Work On Hold Awaiting Parts 12-GOOD P 9 + e c A t 6-3- O Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan 1989 1990 AMOUNT OF WORK ON HOLD AWAITING PARTS (NON-0UTAGE) This procurement indicator displays the amount of open, non-outage, maintenance items that are on hold awaiting parts, to the total amount of open, non-outage, maintenance items,- expressed as a percentage. The percentage of work on hold awaiting parts decreased to 5.7% in January. As of January 31, 1990, there were a total of 1,148 open, non-outage, maintenance items with 65 of these items-on hold-awaiting parts. Adverse Trend: None i.

l

---

Spare Parts Inventory Value j

4 1 9 o l 8-y D y. ) p v a r-i s-6- i 5- 'Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan I 1989 1990 2 $PABE. PARTS INVENTORY VALUE The spare parts inventory value at the Fort Calhoun Station at the end of January,1990 was reported as $7,640,964. AdygrseTrend None r l l l t 52-

i 500< _T - Spare Parts Issued h o u 400-s a n d 300-s i O.. i I 200-D O c 1 1 100-a r -s 1 0 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan 1989 1990 SPARE PARTS ISSUED + l The value of the spare parts issued during January, 1990, totaled $248,321. Adverse Trend: None s h t e '

i- - 1 .s 1 I# Inventory Accuracy 80-P 60-e i r C i 8 i " l' 20-l 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec t 1990 f i INVENTORY ACCURACY The Inventory Accuracy Indicator has been added to the Performance Indicators Report f or the month of January, 1990. This i indicator shows the accuracy of the actual -l parts count for the warehouse compared.to 3 the counts contained in the M415 computer system for the reporting month. l l During January,1,423 different line items i L were counted in the warehouse. Of the 1.423 line items counied 73 items needed count adjustments. The inventory accuracy for the month of-January was reported as 95% . Adverse Trend: An adverse trend for this indicator 's indeterminable due to the fact i that it was added to the Performance Indicators Report for the month of January,

1990, i

l i !~

i-E 15- -e. Pick Tickets With Parts Not Available -a-Pick Tickets With Zero Quantity On Hand P P 1 O 10 e c rk -c .eT .n'i-tc k o.e 5-ft s L 0 l Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec l 1990 l l STOCKOUT RATE The Stockout Rate Indicator has been added to 'the Performance Indicators Report for the month of January, 1990. This indicator shows the percentage of the number of Pick Tickets generated with no parts available and the number of Pick Tickets generated that the MIS computer system showed a sufficient parts quantity-but no parts-were available compared to the total number of Pick Tickets generated during the reporting month. During-the month of January, a total of 1,601 Pick Tickets were generated. Of the 1,601 Pick Tickets generated - 164 were generated with no parts available. and 8 Pick Tickets were generated with the MIS computer system showing a sufficient supply of parts but no parts were available. Adverse Trendt An adverse trend for this indicator is indeterminable due to the fact that it was added to the Performance Indicators Report for the month of January, 1990. j -

'M' -O-Total Receipts Non-CQE Stock Receipts 'l -O-CQE Stock Receipts i E K-Direct Charge Non-CQE Receipts j 600-l Direct Charge CQE Receipts N g .u, X ] c b s o' 400-r p l t 1 o. f" 200-l o i A g i 0 f Jan Feb~ Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 WAREHOUSE RECEIPTS The Warehouse Receipts Indicator has been added to the = Performance Indicators Report for the month of January, 1990. This indicator shows the total number _t of warehouse receipts, the total number of non-CQE . stock receipts, the total number of CQE stock receipts, the total number of direct charge non-CQE receipts, and the total number of direct charge CQE receipts for the reporting month. During January the warehouse received a total of 654 receipts. Of the 654 receipts received 105 were non-CQE stock receipts,19 were CQE stock receipts, ,487 were direct charge non-CQE receipts, and 43 were direct charge CQE receipts. Adverse Trend An adverse trend for this indicator is indeterminable due to the fact that it was added to. the Performance Indicators Report for the month .of January, 1990. - ,, -.. ~., n,.--..

&yk 9 w ' /g ji t 2000- -g. Total Issues a-Total' Issues From Non-CQE Stock -O-Total. Issues From CQC Stock -X-Total Direct Charge Non-CQE Issues 1500-O.

. Total. Direct Charge CQE Issues

-N u g. .a bs e s.1000- A u r e. = o' 8 - 'f. o.

500-K X

-c 9 Jan' Feb-Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec g 1990 q WAREHOUSE ISSUES

The WarehousecIssues Indicator has been.added-to the Performance Indicators Report. for the ' month - of

- January,1990. This indicator. shows the total number of-warehouse issues, the' total number of-non-CQE stock issues, the total' number of CQE stock issues, the total number of direct charge non-CQE issues, L, and the total number of direct charge CQE issues for the reporting month. During _ January : the warehouse completed -a - total of ' 1,468-issues. Of the 1,468 issues-completed,1,018 were non-CQE stock issues, 450 were CQE stock issues, 265 were direct charge non-CQE ' issues, and 34 were direct charge CQE-issues, i Adverse Trend: An adverse trend for this indicator is indeterminable 'due to the fact that it was added to the Performance Indicators Report for the month of January, 1990.. ,w-

if' ), f p',

.2-

--e-Total' Returns. 7 6-CQE Stock Returns -X-Non-CQE Stock Returns I e- .15- ' T.- O-i Po F et ra' i C iI b e ,1 n! i .t s-j 5 ou 'fe

• .05-s 1

X-1; i t 1 -0 l. Jan Feb Mar Apr; May.Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990' n ll' t L WAREHOUSE RETURNS .i m The Warehouse Returns Indicator has been added to the Performance Indicators Re> ort for the . month 'of January, 1990. This incicator shows -the total number of warehouse returns, the u total number of. CQE stock returns, and the E total number of non-CQE-returns. During the month of January there were a total of 215 return to stock items. 0f the 215 stock returns,.163 were CQE stock returns, and 52 were non-CQE stock returns. Adverse _TJrand: An adverse trend for this - indicator-is indeterminable-due to the fact that it was added to the Performance Indicators Report for the month of January, 1990. l 1 - 1

.i j i -25 Material Requests Awaiting Approval I E Material Management Division Contacted to Order " 20-t ' n / rR~ 10-fu 5 0 ^ l January.1990 February 1990 March 1990 l' MATERIAL REOUESTS AWAITING APPROVAL l The-Material Requests Awaiting Approval Indicator has been added to the Performance Indicators Report for. the month of. January, 1990. This -indicator shows the total number of material requests awaiting approval at the end of-the reporting month and the total number of materials requests in which the Material Management Division (MD) had been contacted to order material at the end of the reporting month. At the end of January, 9 material requests were awaiting approval and 18 material requests had been given to M D to order material. E Adverse Trend: An adverse trend for this . indicator is indeterminable due to the fact that it was added to the Performance Indicators l 1 Report for the month of January, 1990. l l I - = =

1;:

1 's! ) u;'}'. i

]

_.i--- 5-1 IExpedited Purchases q e + ,q l4-1 q N'p. ) ^' ' u'u

c 7 3-1

.b c i ~eh r a: s o e 2-

4 f s-l 1-T 0

i January 1990 February 1990-March'1990 EXPEDITED PURCHASES -The Expedited Purchases Indicator has been added to the-Performance Indicators Report for the. month of January, 1990. This indicator shows the number of expedited-purchases occurring during the reporting month. During January, there were a total of 2 expedited purchases. Adverse Trend: An' adverse trend for this indicator is indeterminable. due to the fact that it was added to the Performance Indicators Report ' for the' month of January,.1990. = - - - - - -.

t i 1 L.J January 1990 ] February 1990 March 1990' 60-I u O-bV e[ 40-3 C o*: v gs .y 20-2 = i 0 Shelf Life CQE Miscellaneous INVOICE BREAKDOWN i. The Invoice Breakdown Indicator has been .added to the Performance Indicators Report for the month of January, 1990. l This indicator shows the number of' ? invoices that - are on hold at the end of L the reporting month due to shelf life, CQE, and miscellaneous reasons. L At 'the end of January,19 invoices were on hold due to shelf life-reasons, 41 i l invoices were on hold due to CQE L-reasons, and 20 invoices were on hold I p. due to miscellaneous reasons. Adverse Trend: An adverse trend for this - indicator is -indeterminable due to the fact that it was added to the Performance Indicators Report for the month of January, 1990. ~

6 i

I# % Percentage of Material Requests for Issues-with'the_ Request Date_the same as the Need Date '80- .X-~ '60-rf C'

e i h 40-R t

i ! i j 0 'Jan Feb Mar Apr May-Jun Jul ~Aug Sep Oct -Nov Dec 1990 1 MATERIAL RE00EST PLANNING The Material Request : Planning Indicator has 1 been added-to the Performance-Indicators Report for the month of January,1990. This indicator shows the : percent of -. material requests' (MR's) for issues with their request date the. same as their need date compared.to the total number of MR's for a issues for the reporting month. During the = month of January,.a - total of I 2,046 - MR's for issues were received by the warehouse. 'Of' the 2,046 total.MR's received j .by the warehouse,1,504 MR's were for issues with; their request date the same as their need date. Adverse Trend: An adverse trend-for this . indicator -is indeterminable due to the fact that-it was added to the Performance Indicators Report for the month of January, 1990., m

i 0 n L. 700- --- Total Modification Packages Open 600-500-425 425 400- - I: 300-1 l ': i 3200 L '87 '88 '89 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan 1989 1990 y L p [ OUTSTANDING MODIFICATIONS The total number of outstanding modifications l-decreased by 18-during the month of January. l l CATEGORY NOV~ 89 DEC 89 JAN 90 . Form FC-1133 Backlog /In Progress 63 66 64 Mod Requests Being Reviewed 127 128 122 Design Engr. Backlog 0 0 0 Design Engr. In Progress 96 95 95-Construction Backlog /In' Progress 63 66 65 Desian Enar. Uodate Backloa/In Proaress ,,,.[d, 3 6.1, j Total 418 425 407 i L As of the - end of January, 5 additional. modification requests have been issued this year. The Nuclear Projects Review Committee (NPRC) i has completed 12 backlog modification request reviews this year. The Nuclear Projects Committee (NPC) has completed 5 backlog modification request reviews this year. The number of reviews completed is high due. to the fact that some of these reviews were i. reviewed more than once. Adverse Trend: None, 1

m l Temporary Electrical Modifications - -100- Temporary Mechanical Modifications M- - Total Temporary Modifications o. N d 80- .e. Fort-Calhoun Goal i 7 l ui= j 60 A e c -. ra {'40-- g,_.k _ $ _ C 4.___. 4.___.G.____.6.____. %e_; y<.6__ ___.6 ^ ^ t- + /" pg 4 n g. O f Feb Mar. Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan 1989 1990 M 30-o November 1989 _ Nf December 1989 s f. 20 I IJanuary 1990 bi L ec 0- .s 0-3 3-6 6-9 9-12 > 12 Age in Months TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS _(EXCLUDING SCAFFOLDING) The. top graph, Number of Temoorary Modifications, has been changed for the month of January. It now displays the total number of temporary modifications and a Fort Calhoun goal. This indicator.still displays a monthly trend of installed electrical and mechanical temporary modifications. There was a total of 62 jumpers installed in the plant at the end of January. Of the 62 . installed jumpers, 28. electrical jumpers and 34. temporary mechanical jumpers existed in the Fort Calhoun Station. The Fort i; Calhoun goal is to have less than 25 total temporary b modifications installed in the plant at the end of May, 1990. The bottom graph, Aae of Temporary Modifications, displays the age of all electrical and mechanical temporary modifications by ,3 months installed in the plant. This indicator monitors performance for Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Item 71. Adverse Trend: None -64 i

i ' 20-I- 10 pen EAR's-Closed EAR's - Number of EAR's > 30 Days Old ~ , 15- 'o Nf t u 'aE t bL A.10- .'r 's - 5-l7 0-- Priority 1 Priority 2 Priority.3 Priority 4 t L ENGINEER NG ASSISTANCE RE00EST. Plt.:0RITY BREAKDOWN l-The Engineering-Assistance Request Priority Breakdown Indicator has been added to the Performance Indicators -Report for - the month of January 1990. . This-indicator-shows the number of open and closed-Engineering Assistance Requests (EAR's)' broken down m v-into priorities - at - the end of the reporting month. Along: with the priority breakdown. the number of EAR's that'are greater than 30 days old are shown for each priority category. Priority Doen Closed > 30 Davs Old n Priority 1 5 3 13. k Priority 2 12 2 8 Priority 3 13 5 9 t Priority 4 5 3 4 .,fg Total-35 13 34 w ,~YY Adverse Trend: ; An adverse trend for this indicator is indeterminable due to the fact that it was added y' .to the Performance Indicators Report for the month of January, 1990. s 1, 0.

5-1990 Recordable Injury Frequency Rate-a

~ -H--1989 Recordable' Injury Frequency Rate - 4.5[ +- 5 Year Average Recordable Injury Frequency Rate 4-3.5-GOOD 3-R: h

a

2.5-e;

+,; x x 2- \\. 'g, ',, p ', ,','g,,, s 's.s ._1. 5 - +.... ..... +,,, - +.... - - + - - _ - _ + _ _ _ _ _ 1- .5-0 X m .Jan Feb -Mar-Apr May-Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec. - l January 1990 y i RECORDABLE INJURY CASES FRE0VENCY RATE The Recordable Injury Cases Frequency Rate Indicator has-been changed. for the month of January, = 1990. The monthly recordable injury cases frequency rate. is now shown-in column - form. The 1989 recordable i injury cases - frequency rate and the Fort Calhoun. Station 5 year average recordable injury cases frequency rate has been added to this indicator for the month of January. A-recordable injury case is reported if Nuclear Production Division personnel are= injured on the job and require corrective medical treatment. The recordable cases frequency rate is computed on a . year-to-date basis. There None zero recordable injury cases reported for the month of January. There have been a total of zero recordable injury cases so far in 1990. There were eleven recordable cases reported in-1989, eleven reported in.-1988, and eight reported in 1987. The year end recordable injury frequency rates - for' 1987, 1988, and 1989 were 2.5, 2.6, and 2.2 respectively. This indicator provides information on personnel performance for SafetyEnhancementProgram(SEP)ItemNo.15andSEPItem26. Adverse Trend: None i m

i Licensee Event Reports i IPersonnel Errors Reported.in LERs- - Cumulative Licensee Event Reports ~ ~ Cumulative Personnel Errors Reported in LERs 50-46-l39 40 31 ] 30-p i 20-4 12-10-j 0 I 87 -'88 '89 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct -Nov Dec j 1990 4 l ' l NUMBER OF PERSONNEL ERRORS REPORTED IN LER'S The Licensee Event-Reports (LERs) are reported for the month that they are submitted to the NRC. L In January, 1990 there were 2 LERs. submitted. - There were 2 LERS attributable to personnel ~ error. '} There have been 2 LERs reported so far in 1990 and i these 2 LERs were attributable to personnel i -errors. t This indicator provides information on personnel 4 . performance for Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Item No. 15. Adverse Trend: None I

m ,r Ha-l.- I Nuclear. Divisions Turnover Rate - OPPD Corporate. Turnover? Rate. i a 5-T- 4- -r

n' A

-o. 3-l v tr-2- R ~ . a. l t: l7 e. 1 l- - -f 'D. ~ [ 0 Nuclear Operations Production Engineering Quality Division Division and Environmental Affairs-7 E l-l- i l! U PERSONNEL TURNOVER RATE L L, The turnover rate for three. Nuclear Divisions is shown for the. last twelve-7 months. The personnel turnover rate is plotted l against the OPPD corporate turnover rate of 4.0%. This' 0 PPD corporate turnover rate is based on.the turnover rate over the last-three years. L Adverse Trend: The high personnel turnover rate: for the month of January for the i Nuclear Operations Division was due to five s resignations during the month of January. l L 1 j l -m T' -~Mu

600; E Actual Staffing 561 - l Authorized Staffing 1 P 400-e r s-o n n' 204 212 1 200-49 45 0-Nuclear Operations Production Engineering Quality Division Division and Environmental Affairs - i STAFFING LEVEL The authorized and actual staffing levels are shown for the three Nuclear Divisions. Adverse Trend: None ~ i I ISRO Ihitial Exam SRO Requalification Exam

100-80-P*.60-5

.R a j40-0 l- .20-No No Initial Requal Exams Exams 1 0 Taken _Taken l 1988 1989 1990 SR0 LICENSE EXAMINATION PASS RATIO There were zero Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) exams taken during January. L OPPD ADMINISTERED NRC ADMINISTERED Requal Exam Initial Exam Requal Exam DATE % PASS RATIO % PASS RATIO % PASS RATIO March 87 100 100 June 87 100 February 88 80 March 88 100 100 67 April 88 100 July 88 100 April 89' 67 May 89 _ 100 September 89 October 89 100 Adverse Trend: None -

I IR0 Initial Exam-E R0 Requalification Exam 100-80-P: ,a 60-s s R a.40-k l O No No Initial Requal Exams Exams 0- --- lake i 1988 1989 1990 i R0 LICENSE EXAMINATION PASS RATIO There were zero Reactor Operator (RO) exams taken in January. OPPD ADMINISTERED NRC ADMINISTERED Requal Exam Initial Exam Requal Exam DATE % PASS RATIO % PASS RATIO % PASS RATIO l June 87 100 l February 88 100 i March 88 100 100 100 July 88 100 April 89 100 100 May 89 100 September 89 October 89 Adverse Trend: None i_'< =- - i R0 Hot License Exams Administered 25; l-lR0 Hot License Exams Passed .i L i l> p L. u-g b 15-ll h 'o ' 'd > _f 10-E L x U a-1 .a 5.5-i i) Feb-Mar Apr. May Jun Jul Aug Sep-Oct Nov Dec. Jan L 1989 1990 L t L l R0 HOT LICENSE EXAMS L The R0 Hot License Exams indicator. shows the number of R0 Hot License = exams or quizzes taken and passed each month. These exams and L quizzes are administered by OPPD and are l.- part of-the R0 training program. During the month of January, 1990, 20 exams were administered and 17 exams were passed. 1 L AdverseII.1DA: None L L l' i 1 y l: t

4 + ---e .em,..uname.- ..a xa ,sn-. a .- a M Hotlines Initiated

50-r/A Hotlines Closed

!:.::!: Hotlines Open,Under 4 Weeks 4

Hotlines Open Over 4 Weeks '$ ;40- ' b o 35-e .r. 30-o f. 25-H 20-l .o t i ec 1 l 1: 1- - 2 n 10-9 i in-5. I f i ilB 0 Feb: Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan L 1989 1990' E HOTLINES This indicator shows the number of Hotlines initiated. during the reporting month, the number of Hotlines closed during the reporting month, the number ~of Hotlines that remain. open and are -less than four weeks old, and the number of Hotlines that remain open and are older than four weeks old. 1- 'During the month of January, 1990, there were 20 Hotlines initiated, 8 'Hotlines closed, -15 Hotlines -that remained open and were less than four weeks old, and one Hotline that remained open and was older than four weeks old. l' Adverse Trend: None l H

L y-4 E Planned Classroom Hours I IActual Classroom Hours T 1 h u s-n Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989 a CLASSROOM (INSTRUCTOR) HOURS This indicator disp ays the number of planned q i u the For alhoun S ation. + The-planned classroom hours for February are low because Maintenance and General Employee Training were not figured into the schedule for this month. This indicator is one month behind the reporting month due to the time to collect and process the needed information. Adverse Trend: None,

I l0peraticns 25-E Maintenance @ Chemistry and Radiation Protection E Technical Support E E General Employee Training - T20-E Other h - o u-l S. a 15-l n d. sisii I . 0 iii!sii! ?!!;s l ) V V p s. O Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989 l TOTAL HOURS OF STUDENT TRAINING This indicator shows the total number of student hours for Operations, Maintenance, Chemistry and Radiation Protection. Technical Support, General Employee Training, and Other training conducted.for ' the Fort Calhoun Station. This indicator is one-month behind the reporting month due to the time l needed to collect and evaluate the data. l Total Hours ' TRAINING NOV 1989 DEC 1989 ' Operations 2,395 2,260 Maintenance 1,775 2,086 Chemistry and 2,463 1,861 Radiation Protection L Technical Support 3,714 2,251 ' General Employee Training 2,833 2,839 pihgt 426 690 1 Total 13,6')6 11,987 Adverse Trend: None egi

- Violations per 1000 Inspection Hours e-Fort Calhoun Goal 14-15-GOOD 10.6 + 9' - e.. ....e... pf..q....e. e....e....o 6-3- 0 '86 '87 '88 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989 VIOLATIONS PER 1000 INSPECTION HOURS This indicator displays the number of NRC violations cited in inspection reports per 1000 NRC inspection hours. This indicator was calculated using the number of violations and the number of inspection hours from the months of December, 1988, through December, 1989. .This indicator is one month - behind the re)orting month due to the time involved with collect ng and. i processing the data. The violations per 1000 inspection hours indicator was reported as 7.7 for the month of December, 1989. There was one violation cited for the month of December. There have been a total of 31 violations cited with 4,028 inspection hours in 1989. The goal for the number of violations per 1000 inspection hours is less than 8.6. Adverse Trend: None, ._____.m____

f ' \\ ~ g - Total Outstanding DR/QR's. Outstanding DR/QR's > Six Months Old Outstanding DR/QR's That Are Modification Related j n 200-150 1 -\\ D R 17 k100-J' Feb Mar Apr.May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan 1989 1990 l~ r l' ' OUTSTANDING DEFICIENCY AND OUALITY REPORTS This-indicator shows the total number of outstanding Deficiency and Quality Reports 4 (DR/QR's), the number of outstanding DR/QR's-that are greater than six months old,~and the t . number of. outstanding DR/QR's that are 5 modification related. Ai of the end of January, 1990-there were 151 l-outstanding DR/QR's reports, 47 DR/QR's that l' are greater than six months old, and 12 DR/QR's that are modification related. [ Adverse Trend: None i I s 6 1 U

-1989' ~ 1990 OPPD. SIGNIFICMT. IStC OPPD -SIGNIFICANT

MC-SALP FUNCTIONAL AREA lDR/OR DR/0R-

' VIOLATIONS-LER'S~ - DR/W 'DR/Gt VIOLATI(EIS 'LER'S' ? A.-Plant.0perations '11' -0 8 2 1 -- L (1) ;0 8L '0; B. Radiological Controls 30 -1 2 1 13(13) l' (1)- 2' O C.' Maintenance / 140 8 2' 10 -26'(26) 1 (1) 2 0 Surveillance .D. Emergency 8 0 0 0 0' O -0 0 Preparedness E. Security 26 2 6 10 0 0 6 2 (2) F. Engineering / 134 2 7 7 11 (11) 0 7- (1) 0 Technical Support G. Safety Assessment / 68 0 1 0 3 (3) 0 l' 0 Quality Verification h H. Other 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 i i Total 417 13 26 31 54 (54) 2 (2) 26 (1) 2 (2): DR/0R'S ISSUED VERSUS SIGNIFICANT DR/0R'S VERSUS NRC VIOLATIONS ISSUED YERSUS LER'S REPORTED The above matrix shows the number of Deficiency Reports (DR's) and Quality Reports (QR's)- issued by the Quality Assurance and Regulatory Affairs Division versus the number of Significant. DR/QR's issued by the Quality Assurance and Regulatory Affairs Division versus the number of violations issued by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) for the Fort Calhoun Station in 1989 and 1990. Included ~in this table is the number of Licensee-Event Reports (LER's) issued by the station each year. The number of NRC violations reported are one month behind the reporting month due to the time involved _ in collecting and processing'the violations. l In January, 1990, there were 54 DR/QR's issued, 2 Significant DR/QR's issued, and 2 LER's issued. During December l'NRC violation was. issued. The monthly distribution of DR/QR's, Significant DR/QR's, NRC violations, and LER'._s are shown in parentheses. This indicator monitors performance for Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Items 20 and 21. i ... - ~ - = -

m ESCALATED ENFORCEMENT HISTORY Escalated enforcement includes level III,-II, and I violations-issued by the Nuclear. Regulatory Commission for deficiencies discovered at the Fort Calhoun Station. Escalated enforcement also e includes _ civil penalties which are usually assessed with level III L and higher violations. Listed below is the escalated enforcement history for the Fort Calhoun Station. l: I-ESCALATED ENFORCEMENT Multiple Level IV and V 1.~ February 1985 Site Security . Violations that were escalated to a Level III. A civil penalty of $21,425 was assessed. p

2. April 1986 Qualification of Electrical Penetrations - Level III l

' Violation. L No civil penalty was assessed. Level III Violation.

3. May 1986 Radiological Protection No civil penalty was assessed.

4. December 1986 Physical Security - Level IV Violation.

A civil penalty of $15,000'was assessed.

5. January 1987 Lack of Adequate Safety Evaluation for Emergency Modification - Level III Violation.

A civil penalty of $50,000 was assessed. L

6. January 1988 Unlocked High Radiation Doors and Lack of Health Physics Coverage - to Very High Radiation Areas Level III Violation.

A civil penalty of $75,000 was assessed.

7. February 1988 Design Evaluation, Design Implementation and Classification / Reporting, and Corrective Action of Water Intrusion into the Instrument Air System - 3 Level III Violations.

A civil penalty of $175,000 was assessed. T 8.-May 1988 Unlocked Very High Radiation Door and deficiencies identified in the Radiological Protection Program - 2 Level III Violations. A civil penalty of $112,500 was assessed..

1 sl: j i + J j ESCALATEDENFORCEMENTHISTORY(CONTINUED) ESCALATED ENFORCEMENT

9. October 1988 A missing cap on a 3/8 inch containment line, l

SIRWT check valve test failures, and Safety Analysis for Operability - Level III violation. A civil penalty of $50,000 was assessed. ' 10. October 1988 Errors in Cycle 11 Setpoint Analysis and incorrect information submitted in a response. No civil penalty was assessed.

11. November 1989 Two instances of safeguards documents left unattended outside the plant's protected area. Instances of inadequate t

package and vehicle searches. Inadequate measures to com)ensate for degraded security systems Level III i vio'ation. A civil penalty of $25,000 was assessed.

12. November 1989 Inadequate testing of a turbine driven auxiliary feedwater pump - Level III violation. No civil penalty was assessed.

mf l I i l-l- W ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCES AND MANAGEMENT MEETINGS Enforcement conferences are held with the NRC on potential higher level violations.. Listed below are the - recent enforcement conferences and management meetings held with the NRC. RECENT ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCES AND MANAGEMENT MEETINGS

1. August 1988 Two management meetings were held with the NRC in August. One meeting was held to discuss the security program while another meeting was held on the OPPD independent appraisal results.

2. October 1988 Two management meetings were held with the NRC in October. One meeting was held concerning the security program while another meeting was held to discuss the training program and the radiation protection program.

3. November 1988 Two ' management meetings were held with the NRC in November. One meeting was held concerning the Safety' Enhancement Program while another was held to discuss Decay Heat Removal.

4. January 1989 One management meeting was held with the NRC in January.

This meeting was held concerning the new Site Security Plan.

5. February 1989 One Enforcement Conference was held with the NRC in February. This Enforcement Conference was held concerning the Radiological Protection Program.

6. February 1989 One management meeting was held with the NRC in February. This management meeting was held concerning the Safety Enhancement Program.

7. April 1989 One Enforcement Conference was held with the NRC in April. This Enforcement Conference was held concerning Security.

8. May 1989 One management meeting was held with the NRC in May.

This management moeting was held concerning the Safety Enhancement Program.

9. July 1989 One Enforcement Conference was held with the NRC in July. This Enforcement Conference was held concerning auxiliary feedwater pump FW-10 controller operability.

10. August 1989 One Enforcement Conference was held with the NRC. in August. This Enforcement Conference was held concerning various security problems.

1 ENFORCEMENTCONFERENCESANDMANAGEMENTMEETINGS(CONTINUED)

11. September'1989 Two management meetings were held with the NRC in September. One management. meeting was held i

concerning'the Safety Enhancement Program (SEP). The other management meeting concerned the Committee Reviewof.GenericRequirements(CRGR).

12. January 1990 One Enforcement Conference was held' with the NRC in January. This Conference was held concerning two topics. One topic concerned the simultaneous isolation of two Component Cooling Water-(CCW) heat exchangers. OPPD has been notified ' by the NRC that-this topic has been classified' as a Level IV violation. The other topic concerned ST-CEA-1. This Surveillance Test could have taken both diesel generators out-of service at the same time. OPPD.has l>een notified that this topic has been classified as anon-CitedViolation(NCV)

13. January 1990 One management meeting was held with the NRC in January. This management meeting was held concerning theSafetyEnhancementProgram(SEP).

L lg i 1 l t.

m f n SIGNIFICANT ITEMS OF INTEREST This section is intended to provide iniformation on events which are -{ significant to-the Fort Calhoun Station and will give--a " heads-up" look at what is scheduled.in the coming months. The 1990 refueling outage is scheduled for February, i 15, 1990 through May 14, 1990. An 'INP0 Assist Visit concerning Outage Management is -planned for March 12 through March 24, 1990. { The NRC Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) inspection 7 is scheduled for April, 1990. The 1990 INPO Plant Evaluation is scheduled to start y on June 18, 1990. 1 The 1990 INP0 Corporate Evaluation is scheduled for l-l July 9 through July 13, 1990. The.INP0 OPPD Simulator Evaluations are scheduled for l-July, 1990. The NRC Emergency Operating Procedures (EOP) Review is scheduled to start on August 21, 1990. The NRC Maintenance Inspection Team follow-up review has been rescheduled until November, 1990. , J

g 3 je FORT CALHOUN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFINITIONS AGE OF OUTSTANDING MAINTENANCE WORK ORDERS This indicator tracks the total number of outstanding corrective non-outage Maintenance Work - Orders at the Fort Calhoun Station versus their age in months. AMOUNT OF WORK ON HOLD AWAITING PARTS .This indicator is defined as the percentage of open, non-outage, maintenance work orders that are on hold awaiting parts, to the total number of open, non-outage, maintenance work orders. AUXILIARY SYSTEMS CHEMISTRY HOURS OUTSIDE STATION LIMITS The cumulative hours that the Component Cooling Water system.is outside the station chemistry limit. The. hours are accumulated from the first sample exceeding the limit until additional sampling shows the parameter to be back with'n limits. CLASSROOM (INSTRUCTOR) HOURS The number of planned classroom hours and the number of actual classroom hours for the Fort Calhoun Station. CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE BACKLOG GREATER THAN 3 MONTHS OLD The percentage of total outstanding corrective maintenance items, not requiring an outage, that are greater than three months old at the end of the period reported. CRAFT WORK "CTVITY The pere ag of a type of work performed by each craft during the reported L. Involving plant personnel. DAILY THERMAL OUTPUT-The daily core thermal output as measured from computer point XC105 in thermal megawatts. DIESEL GENERATOR RELIABILITY .A Diesel Generator (DG) unit consists of the engine, generator, combustion air system, cooling water system, fuel supply system, lubricating oil system, starting air system, autostart controls, manual controls, and diesel generator breaker. Reliability of each DG unit will be. reported for two situations, one for the last 20 demands and one for the last 100 demands. Reliability is the ratio of the number of successful runs to the number of demands, for each individual DG unit....

FORT CALHOUN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFlh.?!ONS (',0NTihCEO) I DIESEL GENERATOR RELIMillTY (CONTINUED) A successful run is defined as a start of a DG unit and the loading of this unit to a minimum of 50% rated load (1250 KW) for a minimum time period of 60 minutes. A failure is defined as the failure to start, accelerate, and assume the design rated load for the given time period as specified for an emergene,y or a valid test. The total number of demands (or valid tests) bill be equal to the sum of the failures and the successful runs. This definition of DG Reliability was taken from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission " Regulatory Guide 1.108, Revision 1*. This is the definition being applied in calculating the diesel generator reliability at the Fort Calhoun Station. DISABLING INJURY FRE0VENCY RATE (LOST TIME ACCIDENT RATE) This indicator is defined as the number of accidents for all utility personnel permanently assigned to the station, involving days away from work per 200,000 man-hours worked (100 man-years). This does not include contractor personnel. This indicator tracks personnel performance for Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Item 26. DOCUMEN1 REVIEW (BIENNIAL) The Document Review Indicator shows the number of documents reviewed during the reporting month, the number of documents scheduled for review during the reporting month, and the number of document reviews that are overdue. ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE RE0 VEST (EAR's) PRIORITY BREAKDOWN The number of open and closed EAR's broken down into priorities at the end of the reporting month. E0VIPMENT FORCED OUTAGES,PER 1000 CRITICAL HOURS Equipment forced outages per 1000 critical hours is the inverse of the mean time between forced outages caused by equipment failures. The mean time is equal to the number of hours the reactor is critical in a period (1000 hours) divided by the number of forced outages caused by equipment failures in that period.._.

FORTCALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED) EOUIVALENT AVAILABILITYJElQg This indicator is defined as the ratio of gross available generation to gross maximum generation, expressed as a percentage. Available generation is the energy that can be produced if the unit is operated at the maximum power level permitted by equipment and regulatory limitations. Maximum generation is the enemy that can be produced by a unit in a given period if operated continuous'y at maximum capacity. EXPEDITED PURCHASES The number of expedited purchases which occurred during the reporting month. FORCED OUTAGE RATE This indicator is defined as the percentage of time that the unit was unavailable due to forced events compared to the time planned for electrical generation. Forced events are failures or other unplanned conditions that require removing the unit from service before the end of the next weekend. Forced events include startup failures and events initiated while the unit is in reserve shutdown (i.e., the unit is available but not in service. FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR This indicator is defined as the steady-state primary coolant I-131 activity, corrected for the tramp uranium contribution and normalized to a common purificat kn rate. Tramp uranium is tw1 which has been deposited on reactor core internals from previous defective fuel or is present on the surface of fuel elements from the manufacturing process. Steady state is defined as continuous operations above 85 percent power for at least seven days. SASEOUS RADI0 ACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT This indicator displays the total number of Curies of all gaseous radioactive nuclides released from the Fort Calhoun Station. GROSS HEAT RATE Gross heat rate is defined as the ratio of total thermal energy in i British Thermal Units (BTV) produced by the reactor to the total gross electricalenergyproducedbythegeneratorinkilowatt-hours (KWH). l

l FORTCALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED) HAZARDOUS WASTE PRODUCED The amount (in Kilograms) of waste oil, non-halogenated hazardous waste, halogenated hazardous waste, and other hazardous waste produced by the Fort Calhoun Station each month. I HOTLINES The number of Hotlines that are initiated, closed, overdue, and opsn for a given month. A Hotline is a training document sent out for immediate review. The Hotline should be reviewed and signed within 5 days of-i receipt of the Hotline. HOURS CHEMISTRY IS OUTSIDE OWNER 5 GROUP GUIDELINES Total hours for 13 secondary side chemistry parameters exceeding guidelines during power operation. Power operation is defined as greater than 30% poer. The 13 parameters tracked are steam generator pH, cation conductivity, boron silica, chloride, sulfate, sodium, feed water pH, dissolved oxygen, hydrazine, iron, copper, and condensate pump d'? charge dissolved oxygen. IN-LINE CHEMISTRY INSTRUMENTS OUT-OF-SERVICE Total number of in-line chemistry instruments that are out-of-service in the Secondary System and the Post Accident Sampling System (PASS). INVOICE BREAKDOWN The number of invoices that are on hold due to shelf life, CQE, and miscellaneous reasons. l LIOUID RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT This indicator displays both the total volume of liquid effluent (radioactive liquid waste plus dilution water) and the associated Curies discharged from the Fort Calhoun Station to the Missouri River. LOGGABLE/ REPORTABLE INCIDENTS (SECURITY) The total number of security incidents for the reporting month. l MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BACKLOG The number of corrective non-outage maintenance work orders that remain open at the end of the reporting month. This indicator was added to the Performance Indicators Report to trend open corrective non-outage maintenance work orders as stated in Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Item No. 36. L i

FORTCALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED) MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BREAKDOWN This indicator is a breakdown of corrective non-outage maintenance work orders by several categories that remain open at the end of the reporting month. MAINTENANCE OVERTIME The percentage of overtime hours compared to ncrmal hours for maintenance. This includes OPPD personnel as well u contract personnel. MATERIAL REOUESTS AWAITING APPROVAL The number of material requests swaiting approval at the esd of the reporting month and the number of material requests in which the Material Management Division (M4D) has been contacted to order the material for the material requests. MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL RADIATION EXPOSURE The total maximum amount of Gamma and Neutron (Whols Body} radiation received by an individual person working at the fort Calhoun Station on a monthly, quarterly, and annual basis. NUMBER OF NUCLEAR PLANT RELI ABILITY DATA SYSTEM (NPiiDS) FAlj,RE REPORTS SUBMIT 1ED The data plotted is the total number of WPRDS component failures (confirmed and possible) and the number of confirined NPRDS component failures. The total number of NPRDS component failures are based on the number of failure reports that have been sent to the Institute of Nuclear Operations (INPO). Confirmed NPRDS component failurer are based upon failure reports that have been accepted by INP0. Possible NPRDS com)onent failures are based upon f ailure reports that are still under rev ew by INPO. NPRDS is the Nuclear Plant Reliability Data System, and is a utility industry users group program which has been outlined by INP0 and implemented at the Fort Calhoun Station. NUMBER OF OUT-OF-SERVICE CONTROL ROOM INSTRUMENTS A control room instrument that cannot perform its design function is considered as out-of-service. A control room instrument which has had a Maintenance Work Order (MWO) written for it and has not been repaired by the end of the reporting aeriod is considered out-of-service and will be counted. The duration of tie out-of-service condition is not considered. Computer CRTs are not considered as control room instruments. NUMBER OF PERSONNEL ERRORS REPORTED IN LER'S The number of Licensee Event Reports (LERs) attributed to personnel error on the original LER submittal. This indicator trends personnel performance for SEP Item No. 15. _____ _ - _ _ _ _- _ _ - __ ___ - -__

FORT CALHOUN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFINITIONS (CONTINUED) NUMBER OF VIOLATIONS PER 1000 INSPECTION HOURS This indicator is defined as the number of violations sited in NRC inspection reports for the Fort Calhoun Station per 1000 NRC ins >ection hours. The violations are reported in the year that the inspect'on was actually performed and not based on when the inspection report is received. The hours reported for each inspection report are used as the inspection hours. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET The year to date budget compared to the actual expenditures for operations and maintenance. DUTSTANDING MODIFICATIONS The number of Modification Requests (Mt'S) in any state between the issuance of a Modification Number and the completion of the drawing update. Form FC-1133 Backlog /In Progress The Form FC-1133 has not been plant approved. Modification Requests Being Reviewed This category includes: 1.) Modification Requests that are not yet reviewed 2.) ModificationRequestsbeingreviewedby)the Nuclear Projects Review Committee (NPRC 3.) Modification Requests being(reviewed by the Nuclear Projects Committee NPC) These Modification Requests may be reviewed several times before they are ap) roved for accomplishment or cancelled. Some of these Modificatton Requests are returned to Engineering for more information, some approved for evaluation, some approved for study, and some approved for planning. Once planning is completed and the scope of the work is clearly defined, these Modification Requests may be approved for accomplishment with a year assigned for construction or they may be cancelled. All of these different phases require review. Design Engineering Backlog Nuclear Planning has assigned a year in which construction will be completed, but PED has not started design work..

FORTCALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED) DUTSTANDING MODIFICATIONS (CONTINUED 1 Design Engineering In Progress Nuclear Planning has assigned a year in which construction will be completed and design work is in progress. Construction Backlog /In Progress The Construction Package has been issued or construction has begun but the modification has not been accepted by the System Acceptance Comittee (SAC). Design Engineering Update Backlog /In Progress PED has received the Modification Completion Report but the drawings have not been updated. PERCENT OF DR/0R'S GREATER THAN SIX MONTHS OLD Quality Reports (QR's)ys the percentage of Deficiency Re) orts (DR's) and This indicator displa that are greater than six months o'd. PERSONNEL RADIATION EXPOSURE (CUMULATIVE 1 Collective radiation exposure is the total external whole-body dose received by all on-site personnel (including contractors and visitors) during a time period, as measured by the thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) Collective radiation exposure is reported in units of man-rem. PERSONNEL TURNOVER RATE The ratio of the number of turnovers to average employment. A turnover is death, termination, y voluntary resignation from the company. Retirement, a vacancy created b transfers within the company, and part-time employees are not considered in turnover. PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ITEMS OVERDUE This indicator is defined as the percenta e of preventive maintenance items in the month that were not completed the scheduled date plus a grace period equal to 25 percent of the schedu d interval. PRIMARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY - PERCENT OF HOURS OUT OF LIMIT The percent of hours out of limit are for six primary chemistry parameters divided by the total number of hours possible for the month. The key parameters used are: Lithium, Chloride, Hydrogen, Dissolved Oxygen, Fluoride, and Suspended Solids. EPRI limits are used. FORTCALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED) PROCEDURALNONCOMPLIANCEINCIDENTS(MAINTENANCE), The number of identified incidents, the number of opened incidents, and the number of closed incidents each month involving maintenance. This indicator trends personnel performance for SEP ltem No. 15. RATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTENANCE The ratio of preventive maintenance (including surveillance testing and calibration procedures) to the sum of non-outage corrective maintenance and preventive maintenance completed over the reporting period. The ratio, expressed as a percentage, is calculated based on man-hours. RECORDABLE INJURY CASES FRE00ENCY RATE (RECORDABLE INJURY RATE) The number of injuries requiring more than normal first aid per 200,000 manhours worked. This indicator trends personnel performance for SEP ltem No. 15 and SEP ltem 26. R0 HOT LICENSE EXAMS This indicator shows the number of R0 Hot License exams or quizzes taken and passed for the month they were taken. R0 LICENSE EXAMINATION PASS RATIO The ratio of station candidates passing both the oral and written NRC Reactor Operator (RO) license examination to the total number of candidates taking examinations. SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY PERFORMANCE INDEX The Chemistry Performance Index (CPI) is a calculation based on the concentration of key impurities in the secondary side of the plant. These key impurities are the most likely cause of deterioration of the steam generators. The chemistry parameters are reported only for the period of time greater than 30 percent power. The following equation is how the CPI is calculated: CPI =((Ka/1.2)+(Na/20)+(C1/20)+(50/20)+(0/10))/5 4 2 Where the following parameters are monthly averages of; Ka = Steam Generator Blowdown Cation Conductivity Na = Steam Generator Blowdown Sodium Concentration C1 = Steam Generator Blowdown Chloride Concentration 504 = Steam Generator Blowdown Sulfate Concentration 02 = Condensate Pump Discharge Dissolved Oxygen Concentration u FORTCALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIDNS(CONTINUED) SECURITY INCIDENTS This indicator shows a percentile breakdown of the types of' Security incidents for the reporting month. The following items are the types of Security incidents represented i in this indicator. LicenseeDesignatedVehicles(LDV's) Incidents related to the use of LDV's, e.g. keys lef t in the vehicle, loss of keys, or failure to return keys. Security Badges 1 Incidents involving lost / unattended badges, badges removed from + site, or failure to wear badges. Escorting Incidents involving escort responsibilities, e.g. improper controlorescortofavisitor(s). Security System Failures Incidents involving alarm system failures, CCTV failures, security com) uter failures, terminal failures, door equipment failures, anc card reader failures. Security Key Control Incidents involving Security key control, e.g. lost Security i keys, Security keys removed from site, or failure to return Security keys. This type of incident does not reflect incidents concerning LDV keys. Access Control Incidents involving the inspection and control of personnel, packages, and vehicles, e.g. failure to properly search personnel, packages, and vehicles. This item also includes the introduction or contraband or prohibited items into the Protected Area, or the attempted introduction of such items. SECURITY SYSTEM FAILURES The number of Security incidents concerning alarm systems failures, CCTV failures, security computer failures, terminal failures, door equipment failures, and card reader failures. l l

FORT Caul 0VN PERFORMANCF PARAMETER DEFINITIONS (CONTINUED) l l SPARE PARTS INVENTORY VALUE, .The dollar value of the spare parts inventory at the end of the reporting period. Sf38E PARTS ISSUEE The dollar value of the saare parts issued for the Fort Calhoun Station during the reporting perioc. 380 OPERATOR LICENSE EXAMINATION PASS RATIO The ratio of station candidates passing both the oral and written NRC Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) license examination to the total number of randidates taking examinations. STOCK 00T RATE The total number of Pick Tickets that were generated during the re)orting month, the total number of Pick Tickets that were generated dur'ng the reporting month with no parts available, and the total number of Pick Tickets that were generated during the reporting month in which the MMIS available.ystem showed a sufficient supply of parts but no parts were computer s TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS The number of temporary mechanical and electrical configurations to the plant's systems. Temporary configurations are defined as electrical jumpers, electrical blocks, mechanical jumpers, or mechanical blocks which are installed in the plant operating systems and are not shown on the latest revision of the P&lD, schematic, connection, wiring, or flow diagrams. Jumpers and blocks which are installed for Surveillance Tests, < Maintenance Procedures, Calibration Procedures, Special Procedures, or 0)erating Procedures are not considered as temporary modifications unless t1e jumper or block remains in place after the test or procedure is complete. Jumpers and blocks installed in test or lab inst 6anents are not considered as temporary modifications. Scaffolding is not considered a tem)orary modification. Jumpers and blocks which are installed and for whici EEAR's have been submitted, will be considered as a tempor>ry modifications until final resolution of the EEAR and the jumper or block is removed or is permanently recorded on the drawings. _

1 FORTCALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED) TOTAL HOURS OF STUDENT TRAINING The total number of student hours of training for Operations, Maintenance, Chemistry and Radiation Protection, Technical Support, General Employee Training,.and Other training conducted for the Fort Calhoun Station. TOTAL SKIN AND CLOTHING CONTAMINATIONS Reportable skin and clothing contaminations above background levels greater than 5000 dpm/100 cm squared. This indicator trends personnel performance for SEP Item No. 15. UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS WHILE CRITICAL This indicator is defined as the nt:mber of unplanned automatic scrams (reactor protection system logic actuations) that occur while the reactor is critical. The indicator is further defined as follows: Unplanned means that the scram was not part of a planned test or evolution. Scram means the automatic shutdown of the reactor by a rapid insertion of all control rods that is caused by actuation of the reactor protection system. The scram signal may have resulted from exceeding a setpoint or may have been spurious. Automatic means that the initial signal that caused actuation of the reactor protection system logic was provided from one of the sensors monitoring plant parameters and conditions, rather than the manual scram switches (or pushbuttons) in the main control room. Critical means that during the steady-state condition of the reactor prior to the scram, the effective multiplication factor (keff)wasequaltoone. UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS This indicator is defined as the sum of the following safety system actuations: the number of unplanned Emergency Core Cooling System (ECCS) actuations that result from reaching an ECCS actuation setpoint or from a spurious / inadvertent ECCS signal the number of unplanned emergency AC power system actuations that result from a loss of power to a safeguards bus,

FORTCALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED) UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS (CONTINUED 1 An unplanned safety system actuation occurs when an actuation setpoint for a safety (system is reached or when a spurious or inadvertent signal is generated ECCS only), and major equipment in the system is actuated. Unplanned means that the system actuation was not part of a planned test or evolution. The ECCS actuations to be counted are actuations of the high pressure injection system, the low pressure injection system, or the safety injection tanks. VOLUME OF LOW-LEVEL SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE This indicator is defined as the volume of low-level solid radioactive waste produced, in final form ready for burial, during a given period. It is calculated using the amount of waste actually shipped for disposal, plus the change in inventory of waste in on-site storage in final form ready for burial. The volume of radioactive waste that is not yet in final form ready for shipment is not included. Low-level solid radioactive waste consists of dry active waste, sludges, resins, and evaporator bottoms generated as a result of nuclear power plant operation and maintenance. Dry active waste includes contaminated rags, cleaning materials, disposable protective clothing, plastic containers, and any other material to be disposed of at a low-level radioactive waste disposal site, except resin, sludge, or evaporator bottoms. Low-level refers to all radioactive waste that is not spent fuel or a by-product of spent fuel processing. WAREHOUSE ISSUES The total number of warehouse issues, the number of non-CQE stock issues, the number of CQE stock issues, the number of direct charge non-CQE issues, and the number of direct charge CQE issues which occurred during the reporting month. WAREHOUSE RECEIPTS The total number of warehouse receipts, the number of non-CQE stock receipts, the number of CQE stock receipts, the number of direct charge non-CQE receipts, and the number of direct charge CQE receipts which occurred during the reporting month. WAREHOUSE RETURNS The total number of warehouse returns, the total number of CQE stock returns. and the total number of non-CQE stock returns which occurred during the reporting month. 1 _

BASIS FOR ESTABLISHING 1990 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR GOALS L, This section will explain the basis used in establishing the 1990 performance goals. FORCED OUTAGE RATE AND E001 VALENT AVAILABILITY FACTOR The Forced Outage Rate (FOR) and Equivalent Availability Factor (EAF) goals have been established from 1990 to 1992. The following table is a breakdown of the hours allotted for each category over the next three years. STARTUP GENERATOR FORCED OUTAGE PLANNED ON LINE OUTAGE TIME OUTAGE PERIOD EAF FOR .Y16E (HOURS) (HOURS) (HOURS) (HOURS) (HOURS} ,(,il ,(.il 1990(*) 7036 168 172 2064 8760 65.4 2.4 1991(*) 7036 168 172 1464 8760 75.9 2.3 1992 8520 240 0 0 8760 92.9 2.7 (*) Refueling Outage Years UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS WHILE CRITICAL The 1990 goal for Unplanned Automatic Reactor Scrams While Critical has been set at one. The Fort Calhoun Station has had one unplanned automatic reactor scram in the past four years of operation. UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS The Unplanned Safety System Actuations goal for 1990 has been established at zero. The Fort Calhoun Station has not had an unplanned safety system actuation in the last six years. GROSS HEAT RATE The 1990 Gross Heat Rate goal for the Fort Calhoun Station has been set at 10,200 BTU /KWH. This heat rate goal is based on 10,500 BTU /KWH for the months of January through February, 1990 and 10,075 BTU /KWH for the months of May through December, 1990. The high heat rate for January and February is based on 10,075 BTU /KWH less 20.6 MW(e) stated in memo TS-FC-83-233H, written on July 17, 1983. This states that operation without the governing (stage of the turbine results in a gross electrical outputlossof20.6MWe)..

BASIS FOR ESTABLISHING 1990 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR GOALS (CONTINUED) FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR The 1990 Fuel Reliability. Indicator (FRI) goal has been set at 1.0 nanocuries/ gram. This level allows for ap)roximately one to two fuel pin failures. Although Cycle 11 was completec without any apparent fuel pin failures, there are a number of ANF assemblies entering into a third or fourth cycle of operation. When a fuel pin has been used for three or four fuel cycles there is an increased probability of fuel failure. The Failed Fuel Action Plan, Standing Order 0-43, allows for approximately four fuel pin failures prior to implementing any increased action levels. PERSONNEL RADIATION EXPOSURE (CUMULATIVE) The 1990 Personnel Radiation Exposure (Cumulative) goal is 287 man-rem. This goal was based on 234 man-rem of cumulative exposure for the 1990 j Refueling Outage and approximately R.9 man-rem of cumulative exposure for each non-outage month. l VOLUME OF LOW-LEVEL SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE The 1990 Volume of Low-Level Solid Radioactive Waste goal is 5,000 cubic feet. This goal was based on a recomendation made by the Fort Calhoun ALARA Comittee and approved by the Division Manager of the Nuclear Production Division. l DISABLING INJURY FREOUENCY RATE i The Disabling Injury Frequency Rate 1990 goal has been set at 0.31. This goal allows for one lost time accident in the Nuclear Production Division I during 1990, i.

FORT CALHOUN STATION OPERATING CYCLES AND REFUELING OUTAGE DATES PRODUCTION CUMULATIVE TO (MWH) (MWH) EVENT FROM Cycle 1 09/26/73.- 02/01/75 3,299,639 3,299,639 First Refueling 02/01/75 - 05/09/75 Cycle 2 05/09/75 - 10/01/76 .3,853,322 7,152,961 Second Refueling 10/01/76 - 12/13/76 Cycle _3 12/13/76 - 09/30/77 2,805,927 9,958,888 Third Refueling 09/30/77 - 12/09/77 Cycle 4 12/09/77 - 10/14/78 3,026,832 12,985,720 Fourth Refueling 10/14/78 - 12/24/78 Cycle 5 12/24/78 - 01/18/80 3,882,734 16,868,454 Fifth Refueling 01/18/80 - 06/11/80 Cycle 6-06/11/80 - 09/18/81 3,899,714 20,768,168 Sixth Refueling 09/18/81 - 12/21/81 Cycle 7 12/21/81 - 12/06/82 3,561,866 24,330,034 Seventh Refueling 12/06/82 - 04/07/83 Cycle 8 04/07/83 - 03/03/84 3,406,371 27,736,405 Eighth Refueling 03/03/84 - 07/12/84 Cycle 9 07/12/84 - 09/28/85 4,741,488 32,477,893 Ninth Refueling 09/28/85 - 01/16/86 Cycle 10 01/16/86 - 03/07/87 4,356,753 36,834,646 Tenth Refueling 03/07/87 - 06/08/87 Cycle 11 06/08/87 - 09/27/88 4,936,859 41,771,505 Eleventh Refueling 09/27/88 - 01/31/89 Cycle 12' 01/31/89 - 02/15/90* Twelfth Refueling 02/15/90*- 05/11/90* Cycle 13 05/11/90*-09/14/91*

• - Planned Dates :__-_--__--__------__-------_----_-_.

FORT CALHOUN STATION PRODUCTION AND OPERATION RECORDS l The following seven items are the current production and operation " records" for the Fort Calhoun Station.

1. First Sustained Reaction............. August 5,1973(5:47p.m.)

2. First Electricity Supplied to the System..... August 25, 1973 3.CommercialOperation(180,000 KWH)........ September 26, 1973 4.AchievedFullPower(100%)............May4,1974 5.LongestRun(477 days).-............. June 8,1987-Sept.27,1988 6.HighestMonthlyNetGeneration(364,468,800KWH).0ctober1987 7.MostProductiveFuelCycle(4,936,859 MWH).... June 8, 1987 - Sept, 27, 1988 (Cycle 11)

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DATA SOURCES PERFORMANCE INDICATOR MANAGER / INDIVIDUAL ' Age of Outstanding Maintenance Work Orders Peterson/Shrum 1 Amount of Work On Hold Awaiting Parts Peterson/McCormick Auxiliary Systems Chemistry Hours Outside Station Limits Jaworski/Henning Classroom (Instructor) Hours Gasper /Newhouse Corrective Maintenance Backlog > 3 Months Old Peterson/Shrum Craft Work Activity-Peterson/Shrum Daily Thermal Output Holthaus/ Gray Decontaminated Auxiliary Building Peterson/Christensen Diesel Generator Reliability DG Log DisablingInjuryFrequencyRate Sorenson/Skaggs Document Review Peterson/McKay DR/QRs Issued Versus NRC Violations Issued Orr/Krieser Engineering Assistance Requests Priority Breakdown Jaworski/Middaugh. Equipment Forced Outages per 1000 Critical Hours Holthaus/ Gray Equivalent Availability Factor Dietz/Kulisek L Expedited Purchases Willrett/Fraser Forced Outage Rate Holthaus/ Gray Fuel Reliability Indicator Holthaus/Lofshult l Gaseous Radioactive Waste Discharged to the Environment Jaworski/Stultz Gross Heat Rate Holthaus/ Gray Hazardous Waste Produced Schmidt/Sayre Hotlines Gasper /Kobunski In-Line Chemistry Instruments Out-of-Service Schmidt/Renaud i Invoice Breakdown Willrett/Fussel Liquid Radioactive Waste Discharged to the Environment Jaworski/Stultz l Loggable/ Reportable Security Incidents Sefick/Woerner MaintenanceWorkOrderBacklog(CorrectiveNon-Outage) Peterson/Shrum -100- + ..m.i.- .,.w.... g, ..g.- _..-p.. .y ,weg-

I_ i t PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DATA SOURCE (CONTINUED) i Maintenance Work Order Breakdown Peterson/Shrum Maintenance Overtime Peterson/Shrum Material Requests Awaiting Approval Willrett/Fraser Maximum Individual Radiation Exposure Peterson/Mattice Number of NPRDS Reportable Failures Jaworski/ Dowdy Number of Out-of-Service Control Room Instruments Peterson/Trausch Number of Personnel Errors Reported in LERs LER File l Number of Violations per 1000 Inspection Hours Orr/Krieser l Operations and Maintenance Budget Gleason/ Parent L l Outstanding Modifications Jaworski/ Turner e Percent of DR/QR's Greater Than Six Months Old Orr/Krieser PersonnelRadiationExposure(Cumulative) Peterson/Mattice i Personnel Turnover Rate Jaworski/Yager Preventive Maintenance Items Overdue Peterson/ Linden Primary System Chemistry - Percent Hours Out of Limits Jaworski/Henning ProceduralNon.complianceIncidents(Maintenance) Peterson/ Smith Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance Peterson/Shrum L Recordable Injury Cases Frequency Rate Sorenson/Skaggs R0 Hot License Exams Gasper / Herman L R0 License Examination Pass Ratio Gasper / Herman f , Secondary System Chemistry Jaworski/Henning ] Security Incident Breakdown Sefick/Woerner 1 Security System Failures Sefick/Woerner Spare Parts Inventory Turnover Ratio Steele/ Miser -101- )

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DATA SOURCE (CONTINUED) i Spare Parts Inventory Value Steele/Huliska SRO License Examination Pass Ratio Gasper / Herman 8 Staffing Level Jaworski/Yager Stockout Rate Willrett/Fussell { Temporary Modifications Jumper Log ' Total Hours of Student Training Gasper /Newhouse i Total Skin and Clothing Contaminations Peterson/Christensen Unplanned Automatic Reactor Scrams While Critical Holthaus/ Gray Unplanned Safety System Actuations Holthaus/ Gray . Volume of Low-level Solid Radioactive Waste Peterson/Bilau Warehouse Issues Willrett/Fussell I Warehouse Receipts Willrett/Fussell Warehouse Returns Willrett/Fussell L l l 4 L L ) ) l -102-i

REFERENCES 'INPO Good Practices OA-102, " Performance Monitoring - Management i information" 'IEEE Standard 762, "IEEE Trial Use Standard Definitions for Use in Reporting Generating Unit Rel.iability, Availability and Productivity" INPO Report Dated November 1984, " Nuclear Power Plant Operational Data" U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission " Regulatory Guide 1.108 -103-}}