ML20011F682
| ML20011F682 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | FitzPatrick  |
| Issue date: | 02/23/1990 |
| From: | Gallo R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | Fernandez W POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK (NEW YORK |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9003070165 | |
| Download: ML20011F682 (14) | |
Text
lW' 7 a ;.,
c.
u RB23 Docket No. 50-333 Power Authority of the State of New York James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant ATTN:
Mr. William Fernandez Resident Manager P. O. Box 41 Lycoming, New York 13093 Gentlemen:
Subject:
Maintenance Program Team Inspection This letter is to inform you that the NRC intends to perform a team inspection of your maintenance program at the James A. Fitzpatrick Nuclear Power Plant,
=
Scriba, New York, on April 23, 1990 through May 11, 1990, and to request your assistance in accomplishing this task. The inspection will focus on the per-formance of maintenance and whether components, systems and structures of your plant are adequately maintained and properly repaired so that they are available to perform their intended safety function.
In orc;er for us to properly prepare for the inspection and maximize the onsite time spent in observation of maintenance in progress, we request that you furnish the reference material identified in Enclosure 1 to this letter.
To assist you in the gathering of the requested reference material, we have enclosed a Maintenance Inspection Tree (Enclosure 2) which is used by the team as guidance during the inspection. The team leader will be contacting a member of your staff shortly regarding the information that will be needed prior to the start of the inspection and to arrange a suitable date for a meeting to explain the inspection and assessment methodology.
A copy of the NRC Temporary Instruction 2515/97 " Maintenance Inspection,"
Revision 1 is enclosed for your information and to aid in the preparation for the inspection (Enclosure 3).
Thank you for your cooperation in this matte If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Peter Drysdale (Team Leader) at (215) 337-5289; Harold Gray (Asst. Team Leader) at (215) 337-5325; or Robert Gallo at (215) 337-5291.
Sincerely, Original Signed E7:
J RICHARD J. CONTE Robert M. Gallo, Chi f Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety 0FFICIAL RECORD COPY ORYSDALE/ANNOUNCE. LTR/2/20/90 -
0001.0.0 02/22 M 9003070165 900223 7g b
PDR ADOCK 05000333 P.
\\Yr s
o PDC S
\\
r*
l 4
-t
.'. t '-
g
~
1 Power Authority of the State of-2 New York.
a
Enclosures:
- 1. Request for Material' 7
2.1 Maintenance
Inspection Tree
- 3. NRC Temporary Instruction 2515/97 Maintenance Inspection
'cc w/ enc 1:
J. Phillip Bayne, President J. Brons, Executive Vice President A. Klausmann, Senior Vice President - Appraisal and Compliance Services R. Patch,. Quality Assurance Superintendent G.-Wilverding, Manager Nuclear Safety Evaluation
'G. Goldstein, Assistant General Counsel R. Beedle,'Vice President Nuclear Support S.'Zulla, Vice President Nuclear Engineering R. Burns, Vice President, Nuclear Operations J. Gray, Director Nuclear Licensing - BWR
~
Dept.'of Public Service,; State of New York State of New York, Department of. Law Public Document Room (PDR).
. Local-Public Document Room (l.PDR)
- Nuclear Safety Information Center (NSIC)
NRC Resident. Inspector State of New York, SLO, Designee bec'w/ enc 1:
Region I Docket Room (with concurrences)
Management Assistant,.DRMA (w/o enc 1)
A. Gody, NRR (w/o enc 1)
J. Chung, NRR (w/o' enc 1)
-D.
LaBarge, NRR J. Dyer, EDO P. Drysdale, DRS
.H. Gray, DRS J. Linville, DRP G. Meyer, DRP DRS Files (3)
.DRS:RI DRS:RI DRS:RI le/ajk gGray.
W6044 Gallo l.
D 4
02AR/90 02/t2/90 02/Zy90 l:
1<
1.
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY DRYSDALE/ANNOUNCE. LTR/2/20/90 -
~
0002.0.0 l
02/22/90 i
l 1
y E
'(
ENCLOSURE 1 To aid us in the preparation for the maintenance inspection, please provide us with certain documents, procedures, administrative cantrols, and information.
which are needed to prepare for the inspection.
We request that you provide your pertinent documents covering each of the elements on the Maintenance Inspection Tree (see Enclosure 2) to include your management and administrative controls, procedures, instructions and guides.
Experience-has shown that providing the requested information in accordance with the elements on the inspection tree makes the preparation for the inspec-tion less difficult for both yourself and the team.
If you do not have a document for any specific item within an element, it is not necessary to generate it to comply with this request. The blocks on this tree identified as 1.0, 2.0, etc. need not have any information provided by you.
It is recognized that some documents may be applicable to a number of elements.
For these, it is only necessary to provide the document for one element and only list it for the other elements for which it also applies. Also, to aid in the planning of the onsite portion of the inspection, please provide us with the appropriate contact for each element.
In addition to the information.provided in accordance with the elements on the inspection tree, we also request that you include the following information. Any of the below listed information provided in accordance with the tree elements need only be listed and not separately provided.-
Please pro-vide three sets of the requested documents. A member of our staff will contact a member of your staff regarding the best method of transmitting the documents to us.
Additional Requested information Description of methods by which maintenance performance is measured. Are performance indicators used? What are they? Who is informed of the reports that are used to assess maintenance performance.
Description of process for communications with vendors for technical
-services and latest technical information on equipment and systems installed at the plant, and interfaces with equipment and NSSS vendors for training, modifications, and equipment replacement.
Documents which describe the preventive maintenance and predictive maintenance programs.
Which equipment is included?
How is maintenance frequency determined?
What is done with results of these maintenance actions?
The number of craft personnel for electrical, mechanical, and I&C maintenance organizations.
Please include foremen and the foreman to craft ratio.
y
' ' ~
o Ir t
The average years of experience for each individual and the turnover-rate.
Description of shift work and work assignments.
How do you decide which cr.cft or contractor is to perform what type of work?
Identify significant equipment failures which occurred during the last two years, include those identified during the last refueling.
Describe the maintenance and testing of diesel generators and class 1E electrical equipment.
Provide-the following status concerning Maintenance Work Orders (MW0s).
Current total listing and status of MW0s, number in planning, number in final sign-off, number on hold for lack of parts, number ~on hold for engineering assistance,. number available to be worked on.
Number of corrective MW0s projected to be outstanding at startup (by priority).
j i
Rate of completion of corrective MW0s in terms of number completed per i
month and manhours expended (by craft) per month for.the past 12 months.
l I
Current number of preventive maintenance work orders overdue.
Rate of completion of preventive MW0s for the'past 12 months.
Estimated manhours required to complete current preventive maintenance i
MW0s.
Number MW0s requiring rework over the past six months.
j q
l Provide five corrective maintenance procedures for work that is scheduled j
for the outage (e.g., MOVs, PRVs, Solenoid Operated Valves, Safety / Relief l
Valves, ECS Pumps, Batteries, Switchgear, etc.)
1 Provide five preventive maintenance procedures that are scheduled prior to your next scheduled outage.
Provide your overall maintenance schedule for the outage, l
l a
f,
1 I -
l yelll! llelill _ ji j
i P
li g I'li l'jl
-fit. I I
il I !!!!!!Ic II,ill !!'!
4 t
11 li ll
,_I'IJlc. I.l.i...,\\ l-[ll
\\;l[l l4c.l.l.i.ll
.I y--
i C
I!
l 11,.l.l.I.1.1.1.,
1l l
)1
- e i
l I
,I s
1
,),fg;i \\
!, ll i.!.l...h,:l.l.l.l.,f,,.j!.!.
\\'i lN i n,
g i
1' llisl
\\
fll1 \\,jilli
\\.lil_h I
.i l'!lll\\ llll\\
H-H
-q
!!IcI!!..,
'g!)
l.ici.l.!.hl, il[.!!!, ilc.I!!!!, ilic.!!!!
f t
,iv Is.l. llll, tj !!!I!, l !!,
lIiit!I, ks!:<e-(
c i
!!,s n
i e
i
!.. l.;....,
i [ lll,, lc,,l, k
j.,II I
g Is
!!I J.
\\
1 l
~
Lll1 l\\
lil Illt.'.l1,\\
l!,!l, it' !,iil l.!.!.!.i.l.,lkl..i.l.l.,kici.i.i.l.!.
A
\\
- li.s,)ils.,)l}i
.li r-ilc!!,
.i I
[k:,ll!!!!!!l!,I!c i!!
Mi aja s
!l!jf J.ii + !!!!.!.!.!.
lit !!h!!
!i 1
1 II. 2 e
.g lt ri r
ENCLOSURE 3
- [
UNITED STATES
.!A -
I NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
~
g
-i wAsmcion. o. c. 20sss.
e t
s'
',e NRC INSPECTION MANUAL PoEs 1 TEMPORARY INSTRUCTION 2515/97, REVISION 1 MAINTENANCE INSPECTION-t 2515/97-01 PURPOSE ~
f This temporary instruction (TI) provides guidance for conducting a perfor-.
mance-based inspection of an established and implemented maintenance process at all operating nuclear power stations, J
2515/97-02 GBJECTIVES i
' The primary objective of this TI is to determine whether all components, systems, and ' structures of nuclear' power plants are adequately maintained so that they can be relied-upon to perform their intended functions. R Additionally, this TI should determine whether the maintenance process provides for the ' prompt repair of plant components, systems, and structures,
]
as appropriate to their prescribed functions.
'r 2515/97-03 BACKGROUND NRC has examined their nuclear power plant maintenance programs and has found P
a wide variation in their effectiveness.. Inadequate maintenance has been a-significant contributor to plant and system reliability problems and, thus, is a safety concern.
Analysis of operational events has shown that nuclear power plant. components are not being maintained at a level of reliability. R commensu' rate with their importance to safety.
This TI was developed to inspect and assess the effectiveness of maintenance at selected nuclear power plant sites.
A Maintenance Inspection Tree (treel' willJ be used as guidance during these inspections to collate and present' i'
inspection. findings.
The tree is intended to provide a systematic approach to the perfonnance of the inspections and to ensure a level of consistency. R 2515/97-04 CONDUCTING TEAM INSPECTIONS The maintenance team inspections will be announced when the team leader prepares for the pre-inspection visit (Section 04.01) to the site.
The full-scope inspection cycle will generally be of a 6-week duration, with the team j
leader possibly taking an additional 2 weeks to initially coordinate the inspection, gather infonnation, and issue the final inspectinn report.
Issue Date:
09/22/89 l
p I
[\\ ' The 6 weckr of' team ef fort should gererally consist of I week of preparation,
.,~
1 we'ok of-in-of fice inspection, 2; weeks 'of onsite inspection,' ond 2 weeks of L,
documentationc.The sequence of the inspection effort will be determined by
- the regional of fice, for. example, the 2 weeks-of onsite inspection may be
- consecutive or separ6ted by I week of in-office inspection.
f
. Generally, the inspection team will be composed of the following six members:
7 oneteamleader(region)
.two. reactor / project engineers (re
.one radiation specialist (region)gion)
I two engineers (HQ)
The team composition and/or the extent of effort for individual members may J
.be adjusted by the region. ~.For example, the extent of involvement of the radiation specialist may be less than 6 full weeks, as determined by the regional office.
In addition,. the regions may include involvement of the resident -inspector (RI) to the extent that is normally covered by IP-62703
-monthly examinations.
The RI should be provided training in the use' of the logic tree by the appropriate team leeder for this purpose.
The project manager (PM) will be generally involved with each inspection to' the following extent:
be available to the team leader to facilitate contacts with the licensee
=*
attend I to 2 days of the team preparation attend final pre-exit team meeting l
attend exit meetings The team will determine what failures of significant equipment (probabilistic R
)
risk assessment (PRA)-identified, safety-related, or balance of plant (B0P) that affects safety-related and special interest items) have occurred and i
l
- will inspect the licensee's trending and maintenance activities to schedule, R
_ repair, and prevent further failure of that equipment.
Other selective l
examinations of equipment failures attributed to maintenance will be examined
-to determine the adequacy of licensee corrective actions and root-cause determinations of the failures. The inspection should be performed following review of the elements of the Maintenance Inspection Tree (tree) and the additional inspection guidance provided in the Maintenance Inspection Guid-ance Volumes I and II (separately distributed).
This guidance should be used as an aid in detennining adequacy and implementation of maintenance activities and to evaluate them.
The tree is also used as a tool to provide a -level of uniformity in inspection-structure and in the preliminary recording of-the inspection results.
It is important.to stress that the tree does.not drive the inspection, but it does represent guidance in the areas of.
inspection to be considered in planning the scope of the inspection, with R inspection results recorded on the tree to the extent completed.
The tree. consists of three major sections:
(1) Overall Plant Performance, I
(2) f4anagement Support of Haintenance, and (3) flaintenance implementation.
h.
The inspection requirements for flaintenance Implementation, which focus on the plant systems, components, test and surveillance data, and related activities, will receive the major portion (at least 80 percent, including direct observations of maintenance being performed) of the inspection ef fort.
Issue Date: 09/22/89 2516/97
'1,'
l1( sheuldii be. recognized:.thate inspection.tesults f rorn - the -Maintenancer l
3 g,
,J '.. ~ Impicmentatiorn 7.rea will :also' provide input tn the. Mar.agement Support area.
It'.id Texpected that. portions ' of ' the Management Support of. Maintenance sections 1 of the : tree, especially the Panagement Cournitment and Management Organization ~ sections,- could be conducted by : a single. team nenber in.- a W
relatively~ short twe, The amount of inspection effort devoted to the individual subsections of Lthe ' tree will-be determined by the regional - office, ' taking into account inspection -- findings, time. and staf f limitations, and future inspec-recent tions' planned to cover specifR - reas.
- The inspection is' to determine the effectiveness of the total' integrated maintenance process of the power reactor ifcensees.
Therefore, the team t
inspection may be directed into areas for which explicit regulatory require-ments may not. exist..
Thus, the inspection is oriented toward analyzing
. the perfomance of maintenance activities rather than toward the _ identifi-cation of violations.
A specific example of an area not subject to explicit
. requirements-is the licensee's participation with! the Institute of Nuclear t
Power Operations (INP0).
Review of-licensee resolution of INPO activities shall be conducted in accordance with established policy and, thus, observa-P tions in, this area, when warranted, should be treated as. indicators of '
strengths or weaknesses.
Although the inspection may result in the identification of inadequacies that are not covered by explicit regulatory requirements, there is no intent to
" ratchet" licensees.
Individual findings that licensees are not following L:
published NRC guides and industry guidelines Ao not necessarily indicate that a program or area is inadequate.- The goal of the inspection effort is to emphasize the use of plant experience, test, reliability and surveillance R data, component failures, PRA insights (available to the licensee or provided.R the ' team by the Risk Applications Branch), and items of interest in to evaluating the licensee's maintenance process in terms of capabilities and L
performance, and to identify major strengths and weaknesses. as they are related to safety significance.
.l.
~
04.01 Team t.eader Preparation.
A meeting should-be held with the licensee to. describe the. scope of the inspection and to obtain preliminary review
' materials, such ~ as the licensee's procedures for planning, conducting and assessing maintenance, as well as organizational charts, work schedules.
. equipment lists, component failure and trending data, completed work orders, R and -related quality control (QC) inspection procedures.
The material obtained by the team leader from the licensee should be distributed to the team members for their review.
Following completion of the in-office review
' of the licensee's maintenance process, the team leader will discuss the results of these reviews with the team members and factor them into the plan
-for the onsite inspection.
04.02 Inspection Preparation.
In preparation for site inspections, the inspection team should review the elements of the Maintenance Inspection Tree to determine' which areas may have received recent inspections, which areas may not be applicable, and which areas will be reviewed at the plant site.
The three major parts of maintenance (i.e.,
overall plant performance, management support of maintenance, and maintenance implementation) should be inspected to the degree required to provide a valid ccoclusinn regarding the effectiveness of the licensee's maintenance program.
2515/97 Issue Date:
09/22/89
w During the ' 'p'repa ration. phase, the team should select several components
't
' aim /or systems _ for ? detailed' irspection either throuch considera tion o f-avai lab.le
'PRA insights,.
licensing trending data,1 component = failures R.
1 n
in safety-related;or 80P. systems tlut af fect safety, or selected equipment of
(
heightened Hinteres t to the Conunission, such ds check valves, motor-operated
-valves, solenoid-operated valves, and air sys terns.
The pRA insights may be. used to select components or activities whose pottetial failures are predicted.to contribute,most to the risk at that plant.
At~least one high-risk; system. should be included to veri fy that all performance-related maintenance has been accomplished, including preventive maintenance.
Equip-~ R ment failures provide a vehicle for review of various aspects of maintenance, including root-cause analysis and trending, equipment history, corrective R actions, and past. maintenance (preventive or corrective).
Inspection of failed equipment repairs or work packages will provide the opportunity to examine the adequacy of the interaction of all licensee functions. supporting maintenance, including engineering analyses and trending.
Review of performance indicator data, systematic assessment of licensee perfonnance (SALP) reports, previous inspection findings, licensee event reports (Leas), maintenance radiation exposure history, and other direct measures may -identify potential weak areas at that plant for which more detailed inspection may be-required.
Figure 1 (Inspection Flowchart) depicts the initiators that may be selected to enter the tree.
During the preparation phase, program strengths and weaknesses in certain-areas may be recorded on the Maintenance inspection Tree (working tree),
if there are sufficient data to provide an evaluation rating during the prepara-tion, the elements should be rated in accordance with the Maintenance Inspection Guidance.
However, selected items.and, in particular, identified weaknesses should be verified during the onsite inspection, even if an
(
f evaluation rating is assigned during the preparation.
04.03 Onsite Inspection.
An entrance meeting shall be held with the licen--
see tc detail the scope and schedule of the inspection, introduce the team members, and' establish the licensee's contacts for the inspection.
The team should obtain from the licensee the status of ongoing work applicable to the inspection or that may affect the performar.ce of the inspection or the inspection schedule.
Schedules and plans for the exit meetings. and the interim meetings between the team leader and licensee management should also be. establishea during the entrance' meeting.
Team members shall perform a detailed walkdown inspection of the plant on the first or second day on site to observe the overall plant and equipment material condition.
This walkdown inspection, in which the team should observe the condition of numerous valves, pumps, motors, etc., should include, but not be limited to the following:
Condition of components Significance of tagged equipment
. Housekeeping and environment Adequacy of labeling Comparisons with drawings and/or procedures Status nf annuncictors This walkdown inspection may provide indications of areas regniring further enmination during the inspection.
Issue Date: 09/22/89 2515/W
]
b *-
The onsitei inspection _ should focus on the direct observatice of work in m
- p rog ress.,
including the followinc of licersee work with cenipment in' progress - (e.g., ' tagouts, procedures, work packages, engineering support, p,
materials, consunica t ions, testing, approvals, civality control holdpoints,
=
etc.), significance of the maintenance backlog, rework, licensee assessment
'of the performance nf maintenance, ~ work control processes J control of inter-faces, post-maintenance testing, plant material condition,. and maintenance facilities.
On the basis. of the collected data, the team should determine the apparent -
cause'of any problems noted; that is, if the cause is related to the adeocacy of procedures, work packages, qualification cf personnel, management, engineering, etc.
This analysis should provide entry into specific elements of. the tree, which then becon.es a tool to eyplore the suspected causes and
- to assess ' effectiveness of the implementation of applicable elements.
All-a rea s' listed need not be used in fonning conclusions for each element.
Furthermore, other ' areas of inspection selected by the - team may be used for entry to tree elements.
04.04 Analysis.
Using the inspection findings and results noted on the Maintenance Inspection Tree, the team should determine whether each of the areas inspected has been adequately implemented by the licensee and whether there is' enough information to assign a rating.
The Maintenance or not Inspection Guidance and Criteria previously g.rovided also assists use of the Maintenance Inspection Tree.
elements identified cn the work sheets.The team will assign a rating to the applicable The team should assign an overall evaluation rating-to each of the elements inspected.
When this analysis has been completed, an overall rating can be determined in accordance with the Maintenance Inspection Guidance and Criteria.
04.05
_ Exit Meeting.
Before the final days of inspection, issues and findings should be reduced to definitive writing and then used to highlight-the. presentation version of the Maintenance Inspection Tree (the Presentation
~
~ Tree) and to complete the rating roll-up.
The exit meeting should include a brief discussicn of the preliminary inspection findings using the Presenta-tion Tree to depict inspection results in a summary fashion; however, the licensee should be informed that the findings are preliminary until they are reviewed by regional management and the inspection report is issued.
04.06 Report Preparation.
Because of the broad extent of the inspection, documentation of inspection activities should begin early in the process to minimize the time required to complete the final report.
The final report should document the assumptions used, the elements inspected, the elements that - were not applicable, licensee strengths and weaknesses, and overall conclusions consistent with IMC-0610.
The report should address elements of the tree to at least the depth of the tier with eight areas (e.9.. Direct Measures, Management Commitment and Involvement, etc.).
I 04.07 Follow Up.
Any unresolved findings identified during the inspection will be appropriately tracked ar.d resolved by the regional office.
2615/97
, Issne Date:
09/22/89
E r..
[2519/9705 jNSPECTION RfQyIRfft[HIS-c lThc-inspection-shall-include selective examinations of the ' aspects or owin.
ltenance. listed zin Sections 05.01 through 05.03, including each of the areas f
"and' related elements of litersee activities identified under the sections.
(
7To-the extent possible, selective examinations should be based on-observation
. of maintenance and equipment work activities in ' progress, review of licensee
' implementation : of maintenance procedures and controls, results of review of; s
selected do'chmchts (such'as work packages, equipment test results,-and engi-j
- neering evaluations), and interviews with personnel).
05.01 Overall plant Performance Related to Naintenance -
a.
Di rect - Mea su res,, The team shall conduct appropriate examinations of plant operability, equipment availability, and plant material i
condition that _ can be directl tion'of a maintenance process, y' related.to the effective implementa-
.Before conducting the inspection of plant performance, the inspector should t
_ review available plant information on (1) availability, (2) operability, and
.(3) reliability.
Information on these items can be obtained from the plant's.
operating history.
Other sources for obtaining the information are SALP reports, Perfonnance Indicator Da ta, AEOD-Scram Studies, ESF Actuation
- Studies, Safety System Unavailability Studies, Technical Speci fica tion.
Violations, Monthly Operating Report Data, and Capacity Factors from NUREG-0020.
Data collection.should be directed to those measures related to safety significant aspects of the maintenance process.
In addition, the inspector should conduct a. detailed-walkdown inspection of the overall plant material condition to assess the effectiveness of the licensee's maintenance process to the extent that'it is reflected in plant housekeeping and in the
(
external condition of equipment.
The scope of the inspection should include examination of direct measures by using information gleaned from plant and cquipment-for the following:
Historical data-Material condition 05.02 Management Support of Maintenance E
.a.
-Management Commitment and Involvement.
The examination of management effectiveness concerning maintenance should be directed' to deter-mining the extent of corporate and plant management awareness and support of the maintenance and resolution of maintenance problems and should include examination of:
The application of industry initiatives, i
Extent of management direct participation in maintenance and in i
l i
. corrective actions (management vigor and example),
b.
Management Organization and Administration.
The inspection of management organization and administ ration controls should be directed to determining how the organization supports maintenance activities, what maintenance activity plan has been established, how the maintenance activity plan has been implencnted, corrected, and controlled, and the control of resources.
The inspection should include examination of:
Issue Date: 09/22/89 2515/97
t
' Program coverage for maintenance
/
-r Policy,' ooals, and objectives for maintenance Allocation ~ of resources g
1 Definition of maintenance-requirements Performance measurement
- ~ Document Control System for maintenance Maintenance decision process
.s c.
Technical' Support.
The areas that are to be selectively examined for the technical support organizations with regard to maintenance are as follows:
Internal and/or corporate conmiunication channels Engineering. control Licensee acknowledgement of risk significance
^,
Quality control R
Incorporation cf radiological controls into maintenance process Safety Review Committees Regulatory documents l
Trending R
Examples of the applicable departments or organizations subject this inspection are:
to Engineering (nuclear, instrumentation and control (180),
mechanical, electrical, licensing, systems,etc.)
Quality Assurance (0A) x-Quality Control (QC)
- }
- Health Physics (HP)
Safety Fire Protection Operations
-.05.03 Maintenance Implementation a.
Work Control.
The inspection of the work control process should be directed to' work order documentation, equipment history, observation of' testing in progress,' planning and scheduling, and document review.
The inspection should incluce selective examination of:
Review of maintenance in progress Work order control Maintenance of equipment records and history Job planning Work prioritization tlaintenar ce work scheduling Backlog controls Maintenance procedures Post-maintenance testino Review of completed work control documents b,
Plant Maintenance Orcanization.
The inspection of the plant mainte-nance organiza t ion should be directed to how the creanization
-)-
supports mairstenance activities, how the maintenance activities are controlled, implemented, and corrected, how personnel are controlled, how the orgariirat ion establishes documentatinn, thc effectiveness of 2515/97 Issue Date: 09/22/89
ff i
- =
'(.
'thle coordination and feedback lines of ~ comunication between plait nianagement ar.d craf t personnel, and the effectiveness of interfaces with other departments, especially operations.
The inspectinn shculd include selective examination of:
Control' of plant niaintenance activities -
f-Control of contracted maintenance Deficiency. identification', control, and corrective action system Maintenance trending 1
Support interfaces Maintenance Facilities, Equipment, and Materials Control.
c.
The fol-i Ewing are to be selectively examined for. the area of facilities, equipment, and material controls, as well as for their suppcrt the maintenance process:
of Maintenance facilities and equipment
- Material controls Maintenance tool and equipment control Control and' calibration of measurement and test equipment d.
Personnel Control.
The following areas of personnel control are to be selectively
- examined, including. consideration - of
- staffing, training, and qualification:
Staffing control-Personnel training Test and qualification process Assessment of the current personnel control status I
g I
2515/97 REPORTING RE0tlIREMENTS p
[
The appropriate regional office will document the findings and the actions
- i taken in an inspection report and, in addition to the nonnal distribution, L
.will forward one. copy to the Director, Division of Licensee Performance and 1
Quality Evaluation, Office of NRR, and one copy to the' Director, Division of Reactor. Safety, in each of the other ' regional of fices. A copy of the R i
. Maintenance Inspection Tree colored to reflect the inspection results for R each inspection conducted should be sent to the Chief of PQEB at mail stop R 10-A-19 R
2515/97-07 COMPLETION SCHEDULE
-Inspections-should be scheduled so that they are completed prior to April, R
1991.
l 2515/97-08 EXPIRATION This tempora ry instruction shall remain in effect until April 1991 or R until the inspections have been completed.
l
-issue Date: 09/22/89 2515/97
p f
&~ ;
L"
, 2515/97-09 NRR CONTACl g.
' Any (;uestions _' regarding this temporery instruction shnold be addressed.' to p
'A. T. Gody (301-492-1117).
L 2515/97-10 Sl ATISTICAL 0ATA REPORTING 4
Record' the actual time spent to perform. this inspection against inspection procedure number 25597 for the 766 system and 2515/097 for RITS.
2515/97-11 -ORIGINATING ORGANIZATION INFORMATION 11.01 Organization Responsibilities.
The Performance and cuality Evaluation Branch of hRR will provide support and overall guidance for these inspec-tions.
11.02 Estimated Resources._
Each inspection is planned for 6 weeks for 6 persons with 2 of the 6 weeks being direct onsite inspection (12 staff weeks) and I week in-office inspection, with expected additional. effort by the team leader (a total of 38 staff weeks).
This total includes prepara-tion, inspection and report writing, t
11.03 Parallel inspection Procedures The inspection procedures that this Tl may satisfy totally or in part are listed below.
Where credit is taken, the inspection report should note the inspection procedure number per IHC-0610.
The region should make final-determinations based on the scope and documentation of the inspection, 37701 56700 62704 i
37702 61700 62705 j
37828 CIP 61725-72701
-38701' 62700 83000 series 38702 62702 92700 CIP i
)
1 i
i i
l l
g-l 2515/97 Issuc Nte: 09/22/C9 r
A