ML20011E086
| ML20011E086 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cooper  |
| Issue date: | 01/30/1990 |
| From: | Oconnor P Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Trevors G NEBRASKA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT |
| References | |
| GL-89-16, TAC-74863, NUDOCS 9002070260 | |
| Download: ML20011E086 (3) | |
Text
-
January 30, 1990 Dolket 50.50-298 Mr. George A. Trevers, Division Manager - Nuclear Support t
Nebraska Public Power District Post Office Eox 499 Colureus, Nebraska 68001-0499
Dear Mr.-Trevers:
L
SUBJECT:
REVIEW OF NEBRASFA PUELIC POWER DISTRICT'S RESFONSE TO GENERIC LETTER 89-10 (TAC NO. 74803)
The NRC staff has receivtd end reviewed the Nebraska Public Power District's Response to Gencric Letter 89-16 dated October 27, 1989. Your intention to install a hardened wetwell vent at Cooper Nuclear Station under the provisions of 10 CFR 50.59 is acceptable.
Because he vit:w your stated intentions to be a firm comitment to install the requisite inodifications, we will not proceed with the backfit analyses for your facility.
If our understanding is not consistent with your intentions, please provide a detailed explanation of the comittnents tr.ade in your response supporting the deviations from our understanding.
TheuseoftheresultsoftheIndividualPlantExaminations(IPE)todevelop supplerrented criteria for the vent nodification design is acceptable to us, provided that it does not in any way af fcct the vent tr.odification schedule or your comitment to nate the requisite roodifications under provisions of 10 CFR 50.59.
Your schedule for completion of the requisite raodifications is not cor,sistent with our objectives for this activity. We prefer that all actions related to the requisite vent rnodifications be completed by January 1993. We, therefore, request that you re-evaluate and revise the tredification schedule such that all actions are completed by January 1993.
If after your re-evaluation you continue to propose a cortpletion beyond January 1993, you should provide a response to the staff within 30 days of the date of this letter that provides justification for your proposed corr.pletion date.
Sincerely, Paul W. O'Co/s/nnor, Project Manager oject WecWate W 9002070260 900130 PDR ADOCK 03000298 Division of Reactor Projects - III, P
PDC IV, V and Special Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation DISTRIBUTION f
p5ircliWN NRC POR Local PDR PD4 Reading y
i G. Holahan F. Hebdon P. Hoonan P. O'Connor OGC-Rockville E. Jordan ACRS (10)
PD4 Plant File I 9 H. Thadani
- SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCES:
DR7M71X*~~~~~ItbW*"
ITMhd
- P0'Connor:bj:FHebdd)7"T~~
IM71G
~
'I NAME :PMoonan
- MThadani n
ATE 801/25/90
- 01/25/90
- 030/90
- 01/3 0/90 0FFICIAL RECORD C OP Y
~
~_.
A
- bee's, l
4 y,*. /
k UNITE 3 STATES l
[
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION j
WASHINGTON, D. C. 2MH k*..+
January 30, 1990 1
Docket No. 50-298 Mr. George A. Trevors, Division j
. Mana9er - Nuclear Support Nebraska Public Power District l
Post Office Box 499 l
Coluebus, Nebraska 68601-0499 i
Dear Mr. Trevers:
i
$UBJECT: REVIEW OF NEBRASKA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT'S RESPONSE TO GENERICLETTER89-16(TACNO.74863)
The NRC staff has received and reviewed the Nebraska Public Power District's Response to Generic Letter 89-16 dated October 27, 1989. Your intention to install a hardened wetwell vent at Cooper Nuclear Station under the provisions j
of 10 CFR 50.59 is acceptable.
Because we view your stated intentions to be a tirm connitment to install the 1
requisite modifications, we will not proceed with the backfit analyses for your facility.
If our understanding is not consistent with your intentions, please provide a detailed explanation of the connitments made in your response i
supporting the deviations from our understanding.
TheuseoftheresultsoftheIndividualPlantExaminations(IPE)todevelop supplemented criteria for the vent modification design is acceptable to us, provided that it does not in any way affect the vent modification schedule or l
-your connitment to make the requisite modifications under provisions of 10 CFR 50.59.
L Your schedule for completion of the requisite modifications is not consistent 4
l with our objectives for this activity.
We prefer that all actions related to L
the requisite vent modifications be completed by January 1993. We, therefore, request that you re-evaluate and revise the modification schedule such that all actions are completed by January 1993.
if after your re-evaluation you continue to propose a completion beyond January you should provide a response to the staff within 30 days of the date of 1993, letter that provides justification for your proposed completion date.
L, this l
l Sincerely, s
he d \\d.
M Paul W. O'Connor, Project Manager j.
c Project Directorate IV Division of Reactor Projects - III, l-IV, V and Special Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation cc: See next page E
l
me py
[+,..
- t i
l
-Nr: 5eorge A. Trevors Nebraska Public Power District Cooper Nuclear Station i
cc:
Mr. G. D. Watson, General Counsel Nebraska Public Power District l
P. O. Box 499 -
4 Columbus, Nebraska ~ 68601 l
Cooper Nuclear Station l
. ATTN: Mr. Guy R. Horn, Division E
Manager of Nuclear Operations P. O. Box 98 Brownville, Nebraska 68321 E
F Dennis Grams, Director Nebraska Department of Environmental s
Controi P. O. Box 98922 Lincoln, Nebraska 68509-8922 l
Mr. Larry Bohlken, Chairman l
Nemaha County Board of Commissioners Nemaha County Courthouse 18?4 N Street Auburn, Nebraska 68305
{
Senior Resident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1
P. O. Box 218 Brownville,_Hebraska 68321 Pegional Aoministrator, Region IV U.S. Nuclear. Regulatory Commission i
611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 1000 Arlington, Texas 76011 Mr. Harold Dorchart, Director Division of Radiological Health Department of Health 301-Centennial Mall, South P.-0. Box 95007 f
Lincoln,-Nebraska 68509-5007 r
t
+
i l
L l.
L l