ML20011B024
| ML20011B024 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Zimmer |
| Issue date: | 10/15/1981 |
| From: | Sylvia B CINCINNATI GAS & ELECTRIC CO. |
| To: | James Keppler NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20011B017 | List: |
| References | |
| QA-1525, NUDOCS 8111030542 | |
| Download: ML20011B024 (29) | |
Text
-
/
,A W- Ej Vg23 TIIE CINCINNATI GAS & EIECTitIC COAIPANY di##M f cisciusw.oma enaci October 15, 1981 QA-1525 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region III j 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 Attention: Mr. J. G. Keppler, Director RE: WM. H. ZIfEER NUCLEAR POWER STATION UNIT I - OPEN ITEMS (2e, 2h, 2n),
INSPECTION REPORT NO. 81-24, DOCKET NO. 50-358, CONSTRUCTION PERMIT CPPR-88, W. O. #57300, JOB E-5590 FILE NO. 957-2 Gentlemen:
This letter constitutes our response to the subject inspection report.
It is our opinion that nothing in the report or in this letter is proprietary in nature.
Our response to the requested follow-up information for these open items is provided by this letter and related enclosures.
Item 2e,openitem(50-358/77-04-07) initially identified that the radiological environmental monitoring contractor had not established a schedule for calibration of air sampling stations. The prescribed schedule for the calibration of air sampling is established in the Hazelton " Quality Assurance / Quality Control Manual for Preoperational Environmental Radiological Monitoring - Wm. H. Zimmer Nuclear Power Station". The enclosed calibration data sheets supplied by the contractor for one of the eight (8) air samplers shows that the-quarterly frequency was performed for the period for which preoperational monitoring was required. These data sheets are representative and the contractor has stated the remaining calibration data is available at his facilities. The contractor will be requested to provide assurance that this calibration frequency is maintained in subsequent reports.
Item 2h, open item (50-358/78-07-06; 79-02-13) describes the licensee's commitment to submit corrected information regarding meteorological measure-ments capability at the ridge meteorological tower in a revised Section 6.1.3.1 of the ER _0L. This Section of the ZPS ER-OL' will be revised in November,1981 and will' be~ completed by November 30, 1981.
" 00h I O 198h 8111030542 PDR ADOCK 81102905000358 PDR G
~
L J
. Mr. J. G. Keppler, Director .
Region-III QA-1525 October 15, 1981 Openitem2n(50-358/80-18-04) describes the failure of the licensee to notify a contractor of audit findings and perform a . follow-up audit to assure that corrective actions have been taken. These actions were considered to be part of the licensee's' commitment to perform a QA audit of the radiological environmental monitoring program of Hazelton Environmental Sciences Corporation.
The CG&E letter QA-1355 dated October 29, 1980 (attached) provides evidence that the licensee did in fact notify the contractor of its audit findings on October 29, 1980, following the audit of October 20, 1980. The contractor responded to these audit findings in correspondence dated October 24, 1980, which the licensee received on November 4,-1980. This correspondence is also enclosed. The follow-up audit of the contractor by Cincinnati Gas & Electric Quality Assurance is scheduled for December 1981.
We trust that the above will constitute an acceptable response to the subject inspection report.
Very truly yours, THE CINCINNATI GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY B. I VICE-PRESIDENT NUCLEAR OPERATIONS GM0/ds cc: NRC Resident Inspector J
Attn: W. F. Christianson
HAZLETC\
ENVIACNMENTAL SCIENCES CO APCA ATION eSCC saCNT AGE AC AD. NC A Tm8 ACCK.H.UNCis 60062. u s A October 24, 1980 i
Mr. W. W. Schwiers l Manager, Quality Assurance The Cincinnati Gas a Elect.ric Company P.O. Box 960 -
Cincinnati, Ohio 45201 Re: Wm. H. Zimer Nuclear Power Station - Unit 1 I Radiological Monitoring W. O. 57300-957, Job E-5590 Project No. 9014
Dear Mr. Schwiers:
Attached are Hazleten's corrective action responses to Audit Finding Report Nos. 80/02-1, 80/02-2, and 8/02-3. These findings were detected during your audit of the Huclear Sciences Department at our Northbrook '
Regional Laboratory on October 20, 1980. The audit was conducted by Mr. J. F. Weissenberg of your office.
If you have any questions or comments on the corrective action responses, please do not hesitate to contact either Mr. L. G. Huebner or me at your 1
earliest convenience. We can both be reached at (312) 564-0700.
Sincerely, wilh,34bh HOWARD J. DELINCK Quality Assurance Manager HJD:ka Attachments cc: L. G. Huebner/
C. Marucut R. Dagnall A=CNE (3*2) 564-Q700 o TELE w 29-94 83 i>= A ZE 5 NBC<1
- " ^ " ^- * - - * - - a ,_ _________,______y_ __________________,___________________x _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
. .. s ,
THE CINCINNATI GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY *
- AUDIT FINDING REPORT ,
IN0!v!CUAL/GR:'J.18ZAT!?1 C0mTAcitD ATR murc(R AW IT CAft GA A017:R 1::Mi'eRE/ATL 1.11TIAL5 5*W f4 A1.L 6 TJ U E W V
- A 0 W^16 S TA L TC t. $0lc1-0l lcf yp
$ttFERit:1
& /* A* [0 0 .
. N M< b 'L M u h~p & Ek U h it A"W4 Ap .LW hvv ~~< k u &pw su,a a
. dM~j D ^c u % u.
h &/&&fM M pw Wy L- Ak p a k A% 9 m w1 RIC::vi40LJ 0 RAI;!!71 ACTIO4 b U WA & & L 5MtllIf.13 RE5;14;E ; ATE RESPC'ISIELE FCA CCRRECTIVE ACTIC.1 10/21/80 L. G. Huebner, Director, Nuclear Sciences (1) C;nE; fist Aci;;M IA411 A:0 At5i;LT5 ACHIIvt3 (2) C;tJE;ilVE ACi!Ori IAKIM TO AVO!D FLRfhit ftC%C;"FLIA'i E (3) CATE s t.1 FL'LL COMPL! Ate:I WILL IE AC4 EVt3 Work instructions contained in the Analytical Procedures Manual are currently being reviewed by the Director of Nuclear Sciences. The review process should be com-pleted in November 1980. The Analytical Procedures Manual is expected to be approved by November 30, 1980.
sa*: ,t:x . cart x.ACcxt.r m y.Ac
[d )pg_ / 3rc 10/21/80
- 7. > l/c-//t u/ . 10/21/80
- + , = ,
m .
- e# e ## e f,'j ( f(
THE CINCINNATI GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY AUDIT FINDING REPORT is:ni:wcamizArt:= c:staato era a r-tm cost c^tt ca w: r:a si::ur.svart imittats Q%m m u.c -10 2 ceuu.nw< sc . gofe2..o2.. w i u ts ,,
ann,a C At'- 2 01 kpJ .' Cut Q* "f, w,# wk, n
&& A /D Am hba 16 f /A, Ay a % v v % M i (T &y tan -t).
FIM3!M %
e4 &, h k ,
- W WU d n 9httro h r sy m mam /~t we m f~ ~ um un r +~n ehrtro pn n- p C H E.S - <A A - o*1 ) ,H w.
u-_ .-a:t: cutaret sa:a W fK
- h UK. t 4X AA-~ e t
7 z.t = c: st:r:ut art usc<:aa sa cutant aa::s 10/21/80 C. Marucut, Grouc Leader. Nuclear Sciences l m cut =:vt ea:a run u.: nsctis 2a:t.ta m curar.t 2:T :n :u n to avero n at n c.= m :r a m :Att an att cm:na witt it sa:tyta Starting 'n October 1980, the Report / Analysis Review Record forms will be used for tne raview of all reports and calculations as per Sections QAP-801 and QAP-1001 of the HES Quality Assurance Program Manual.
sa .:nt i, art .mme.: un:ixt , urt G 4.
m 40m:4::a fic M 10/21/80 j f/ 9ftafit4 t js /
10/21/80 a'.*:7:4 ATI 11 9 0 .E lg
- OA!C
- l.'./? I *ti r at ? ?"'.;t 1=v w.c . . l : .
t.
t c.
THE CINCINNATI GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY AUDIT FINDING REPORT CA ::tcA 51".u!'.atiai txtitAL5 IM !v!:uAtict:m t A7103 c:stA;fto Art w cta Aucti att 5= Ys A H A L L6 TO W !sVv'sA 0 dA1LH :4L TC (. $O f0 L = Q3 fhf'2, 0 l[-d ut. net ,4a -
R & W T-I & } & aJm A J & d< &-s e
&& pd .'
W h A d <w % b d ( &
&~ k) w m.j- 6 x xx q
. cpm 444&g ,ud ,
rtwoInc
$ D. W ~f MpA&&
./r w QgC,.yn TJ5.- H4 4 M&J ^S h W' WN Y,4 Ltd /M N m ~.74 V % 6d m a- T 4 % h a s y s e4 M M6 4 s.% M M Art:n't:4:t3 ::RII:T!vt A:T!cs ,
MW EIV @h N sO s:b 'M ' '
- & &W . .
5tht:ULED Pts;C'tSt :Att At1*CM I!tt F;a c:tattiiyt acila 10/21/80 C. Marucut, Group Leader, Nuclear Sciences m c:nt:::n ac::a run e: atsars au:tu: m c:nct:In A:: ton run to r.oto rearsa ec n :n:t m cart so rutt ::->ttact
[ d!LL 8C A:d!!VID l
The recording clerk has been instructed to note any future discrepancy on the I sample colle-tion sheet as per the Sample Receipt Procedure in Appendix T of the
! Quality Control Procedures Mtnual. Corrective action was implemented as of Octcber 20, 1980.
l l
- 2n - w ;I wir n ' m cart s w m c: ae .
C/- 2khd 10/21/80 M (/'//, n /[u j,L 10/21/80
-..~,=c=., i a l ts -*.'.E q, r.:: :# : !( P. Art-Dr :tre+,,t : Art sc:i n.t
- 3
Neis I ffl (n)
T .".
5 a.,. . .
THE CINCINNATI GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY l JR.6d 6 _
- ~ ...:.n October 29, 1980 QA-1355 g,d Hazleton Envirnnmenta' Sciences ;,
g f'.C 1500 Frontage Road a Northbrook, Illinois 60062 e /,
f Attention: Mr. Howard J. Delinck !
W . %v 3 6
. Quality Assurance Manager . .
er 4:-
RE: WM. H. ZIMMER NUCLEAR POWER STATION UNIT I - QUALITY ASSURANCE AUDIT NO. . ' 89 g@@
80/02, W. O. #57300-957, JOB E-5590 Gentlemen:
Enclosed is the subject audit report covering the audit conducted at your facility on October 20, 1980.
During this audit, certain of your activities appeared to be in noncompliance with your quality assurance procedures, as described in the Summary of Findings and Details of Audit. Please respond to this letter, indicating for each stated item of deficiency: (1) corrective action to be taken and results achieved; (2) corrective action to be taken to avoid further noncompliance; and (3) the date when full compliance will be achieved.
Your response is requested by December 1, 1980.
Very truly yours, THE CINCINNATI GAC & ELECTRIC COMPANY By W. W. SCHWIERS MANAGER, QUALITY ASSURANCE JFW:ec asr. No, b8E scT;cn /Odvd > $
000 uns caTo /J -/-Po oATE RCc'D / / ' W OO PROJ,b NlY m MA
- - im,cwM]qA,$
hcu
=-
.y .n. . - .
. .+
t
}- The Cincinnati Gas & Clectric Company
. Quality Assurance
- Audit Report No. 80/02 Facility Audited
- Hazleton Environmental Sciences Corporation Location: Northbrook, Illinois Date of Audit: October 20, 1980 CG&E Purchase Order No.: 3261 Specification No.: H-2908
^
Activity Audited: 'Preoperational Environmental
, Radiological Monitoring Program
- CG8E Auditor: 'J. F. Weissenberg l
Sumary and Findinos This audit describes a quality assurance audit conducted at Hazleton Environmental Sciences Corporation (HES) in Northbrook, Illinois on October
! 20, 1980. HES (formerly NALC0 Envirer. mental Sciences) is conducting the I preoperational environmental radiological monitoring program for the Zimer Station. .
i
! The purpose of the audit was to evaluate the implementation by HES of their Quality Assurance Program Manual dated September 9, 1980. The checklist used in this audit was based on the applicable sec-ions of the HES QA Program Manual.
, The persons contacted during this audit were those who attended the pre-audit and post-audit conferences. (See Appendix B_).
As a result of this audit, all open items from the previous audit (76/26) l l were closed.
l 3
! As a result of this audit, three (3) findings were identified, which are surm:arized as follows:
- 80/02-01
- Contrary to HES QAP-501, the Analytical Procedures l Manual for the Nuclear Sciences Section did not have l i evidence of the required approvals.
80/02-02: Contrary to HES QAP-801, the Report / Analysis Re/iew Form, Figure 801-1, was not used to document the review of a report submitted for review on 9/28/80, although the HES QA Manager had issued an instruction on 8/18/80, directing
- that the new form (HES-QA-07) be used.
80/02-03: Contrary to Appendix T-1 to the HES Nuclear Sciences Section ;
QC Procedure Manual, a discrepancy in the labeling of samples
. received from the Zimer sampling stations on 5/5/80 was not properly documented. ,
e --w- m y4-vmw
- ~
. . Audit Report No. 80/02 (Cont'd)
Page #2 The.above findings are discussed further under Details of Audit.
Details of Audit Open Items frca previous audit (76/26)
- 1. Finding: Although it was determined that a quality assurance program exists at NALC0 Environmental Sciences, it has not been fully implemented on the Zimmer Project by the QA Officer.
Resolution: The QA Manager stated that project-specific audits are
, not conducted unless requested by the client. The auditor reviewed an audit of the Nuclear Sciences Division conducted in March,1980 and had no adverse corr.ent. (Closed) .
~
- 2. _
Finding: Training of NALC0 Environmental Sciences laboratory personnel ,
is not adequately dccumented, although it was demonstrated to the satisfaction of the audit team that training was being acccmplished.
Resolution: The training of laboratcry personnel was audited under QAP-901, as hereinafter described. (Closed).
- 3. Finding: The procedure for calibrating air sampl.ers should be included in the QA Manual.
Resolution: This procedure was incorporated in the centractor's QA/QC Manual for the Zimmer Project as Appendix "E", " Calibration Procedure for Air Pumps". (Closed)
- 4. Finding: The missing air sample for the week of 5/3/76 - 5/8/76 was not explained. -
- Resolution
- A corrected page for the May,1976 report, containing.the
' required explanation, was received on 1/26/77. (Closed)
- 5. Finding: The schedule and type of quality centrol activities which are performed by NALC0 Environmental Sciences should al;o be listed in the QA/QC Manual as a precedural requirement.
Resolution: The schedule and type of quality control activities are listed in the Quality Control Program for the Nuclear Sciences Section. (Closed)
- 6. Reccmmendation: The title of the Quality Assurance Evaluation Ccemittee should be changed since it is not descriptive of the Comnittee's function.
Resolution: The Quality Assurance Evaluation Comnittee no longer exists.
(Closed)
O e
L
Audit Report No. 80/02 (Cont'd)
Page #3 New' Items QAP-303 Desion Control - Periodic Review of Study Plans Has the work been reviewed for compliance with the Study Plan?
The Study Plan was contained in Hazleton's proposal to the CCD Companies dated February 23, 1979. This proposal was for a two-year program based on Sargent
& Lundy Specification H-2908.
Are changes to the work scope forwarded to the client when changes to regulatory requirements or standards occur?
There have been no changes to the Study Plan to date as the result of changes in regulatory requirements or standards.
QAP-501 Precaration, Acoroval . Presentation, and Control of Work Instructions
?
Are work instructions prepared, reviewed, and approved in accordance with this procedure?
Are all quality-related dccuments reviewed at least annually to insure that requirements of this procedure are met?
Work instructions subject to this requirement included:
Quality Control Program, Nuclear Sciences Section, Rev. 3, 5/15/78 Quality Control Procedures Field Quality Centrol Instrumentation Except as noted under QAP-603, the procedural requirements were satisfied.
The auditor examined the Dccument Review log which shcwed the annual review of Zimmer Project documents conducted in April, 1980. The previous review was conducted in April, 1979 under the requirements of the old manual.
Compliance with this procedure was judged to be satisfactory.
1 QAP-603 Cocument Control - Document Lists Is a document list prepared and maintained for the Zirmer Project in accordance with this procedure?
The Document List for the Zimmer Project was prepared by the Group Leader and conststs of:
Proposal dated 2/23/79
Audit Report No. 80/02 (Cont'd)
Pag 2 14 .
QAP-603 (Cont'd)
Study Plan Sampling Manual QA Program Manual dated 4/18/80 QC Program - Nuclear Sciences Section dated 5/15/78 QC Procedures Manual - Nuclear Sciences Section dated 5/15/78 Analytical Procedures Manual - Nuclear Sciences Section During the review of this item, it was found that the Nuclear Sciences Section Analytical Procedures Manual, Revision 1,
- dated May 15, 1978 did not have the approval of the appropriate authority (in this case, the Director, Nuclear Sciences Se'ction).
This is contrary to QAP-501 which requires that " Work Instructions
...... and changes to them shall be reviewed and approved by the Project Manager and either the Department Director.or Laboratory Director or their designees". This is identified as an audit finding (80/02-01).
QAP-801 Identification and Control of Material, Parts, and Comconents Verify the use of the Report / Analysis Review Record and Editorial Comment and Revision Form for Zimer Project reports.
The review process of the monthly report for August, .1980 was examined by the auditor. The report was reviewed by .the .
Project Manager on 9/23/80 using the Editorial Ccmment and .
Review form with comments in the text of the report. The ~
Report / Analysis Revie Record (Fonn 801-1) was not used although the QA Mana;er had issued a memorandum on 8/18/80 -
instructing that this form be used. This is identified as an.
audit finding (80/02-02). .
QAP-901 Control of Special Processes Qualified personnel Training Equipment records Every proposal contains resumes of the project personnel. This was found to be acceptable. for the Zimer Project proposal.
Training records for the Zimmer Project personnel were reviewed and found to be acceptable.
The auditor reviewed equipment records for the following items of laboratory equipment:
Ge-Li Detector TLD reader Liquid Scintillation C.ounter Records were judged to be in compliance with this procedure.
e g
4-'
L
-Audit Report 'No. 80/02'(Cont'd)
. Page RS ja , e' .
QAP-1001 Quality Verification Are quality verification plans prepared and are the data reviewed quarterly?
i The review of the Monthly Report by the Director, Nuclear i i Sciences Section is the review of data required by this '
i procedure. This review is performed monthly for the Zimmer l Project rather than quarterly. ,
1 I Compliance with this procedure was judged to be satisfactory.
i
, QAP-1201 Control of Measurine and Test Eouitment Are records maintained which show: ,
(a) Equipment identification (b) Calibration procedures ,
(c) Calibration (d) Calibration standards (e) Calibration frequency i:
(f) Calibration status '
(g) History file . ,
(h) Use of outside calibration services a Calibrat'on records are maintained in the laboratory which show for each item of equipment the identification, date of-calibratien, and date due. The records include the actual results of calitrations and the standards used. .
Calibration sta:us is denoted by a sticker affixed to the
equipment, which is traceable to the calibration log.
Examples were:
Wide Beta Counter, Serial No. 0 100142 Date Cal. 6/7/79 , ,
Due 6/7/81 , -
Gamma Scintillation Counter, Serial No. 7400344 /
Date Cal. 1/28/80 .
Due 1/28/81 s/ -
Exceptions are certain instruments such as the liquid scint'illation counter, which is calibrated prior to counting each batch of samples.
An example of an item of equipment requiring out. !
side calibration >
services is the Packard gamma scintillation counter, which was
. calibrated by the manufacturer's- representative on 1/;5/80.
Records were appropriately dcc:=ented. , ,
. Implementation of this procedure is judged to be satisfactory.
t ?
=r
- . . _ . _ . , . g
~
, a AuditRrportNo.80/02(Cont'd)
Page f6 QAP-1301 Handling, Storage, Shioning, and Preservation Are handling, storage, shippiig, and preservation of samples
,/ accomplished by qualified individuals according to approved written work instructions?
, The auditor reviewed the sampling procedures for Zim.er (these are contained in the QA/QC Manual for Preoperational Environ-mental Radiological Monitoring - Wm. H. Zimmer Nuclear Power Station), and.the procedures for storing samples in the lab-oratory, and had no advers'e comments.
Sample collection records which were reviewed included the following:
Airparticulate(weekly) i Air iodine (weekly)
Surface water (monthly)
These records were found to be in compliance with program requirements.
QAP-1501 Nonconforming Items Are nonconformances reported and acted upon in accordance with this procedure? .
The following examples of nonconformances were reviewed:
- 1. A shipment of milk samples was received on 5/5/80 with the following discrepancies observed upcn receipt in the laboratory:
2 containers not marked with location 1 container marked with 2 locations; Z-23 on front; Z-24 on back A Telephone Conversation Record showed that a call had been placed to the field sample collector to advise him of the discrepancy. The collector replied as follows:
2 unmarked samples are from Station Z-24.
I sample marked both Z-23 and Z-24 is actually from Station Z-23.
I sample marked Z-24 is actually from Station Z-21.
Although the discrepancy was documented, the method of document-ation was ccntrary to the requirements of Appendix T-1 to the Nuclear Sciences Section QC Manual, which states in part:
"Any discrepancy is noted on the sheet (sample collection sheet) and brought to the attention of the appropriate laboratory personnel".
Thts is identified as an audit finding.(80/02-03).
, Audit Report No. f0/02 (Cont'd)
N Page #7
~
, QAP-1501 (Cont'd)
- 2. A themoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) was missing from a shipment from the Zimmer Site received on 1/4/80. The missing sample was properly documented and was received on 1/7/80. No deviations from procedurewere identified.
f
- 3. An Out-Of-Limits Report for Instrumentation was issued
' for the Ortec Ge (Li)-detector on 5/9/80. Required corrective action was to adjust the instrument. .
No " deviations from procedures were identified.
QAP 1601 Corrective Action
~ ~
~
Are corrective action measures implemented for nonconformances
- occurring on the project?
The auditor reviewed an Audit Finding Report resulting from an internal audit of the Nuclear Science Section. The finding was that NSS did not have written procedures for filing certificates and supplemental information from vendors.
As corrective action, a Document Change Notice was issued N.- 8/16/79 to add paragraphs to Section 9.0 of the NSS Quality 4
Control Program incorporating requirements for filing of purchase orders and vendor certificates and supplemental infomation. This finding was closed by the HES QA Manager on 8/21/79.
p
I Implementation of this procedure is judged to be satisfactory.
3 QAP-1801 QA Audits - Trainino and Resoonsibilities Are audits performed by persons who are trained and qualified in accordance with this procedure?
u At the present time, the Quality Assurance Manager, Mr. Howard J. Delinck, is the only member of the QA staff and thus the only individual performing audits. His qualifications and training were reviewed and judged to be satisfactory.
~:
- O The organization chart for the Northbrook Laboratory (Appendix "A") shows the independence of QA from the project management.
QAP-1802 0A Audits - Audit Schedulino_
Is an audit program scheduled and implemented in accordance with 3 s this procedure?
3 Project-specific audits are not performed unless requested by .
the client. Zimmer is one of those projects which do not require a project-specific audit, i
- e. j' ,
g-f
+ g* -
% - E
.- Audit Report No. 80/02 (Cont'd)
. .. . Page #8
.. QAP-1802(Cont'd)
A generic audit of the Nuclear Sciences Section, in which tSe Zimer Program is conducted, was performed in March,1980 This audit was conducted in accordance with the old QA Manual, which was in effect at that time This auditor reviewed the March, 1980 in-house audit and had no adverse comments.
Another audit of the Nuclear Sciences Section will be completed before _ the end of this year, encompassing the requirements of the new Corporate QA Man;al. The checklist for this audit is now being prepared.
_ QAP-1803 OA Audits - Precaration Are written audit plans and checklists prepared in accordance with this procedure?
The auditor reviewed the checklist for the March, 1980 audit of the Nuclear Sciences Division. The checklist included Procedures III through XI of the old HES QA Manual plus 'open Audit Finding Reports.
Implementation of this procedure was judged to be satisfactory.
QAP-1804 QA Audits - Performance of Audits Are audits performed it, accordance with this procedure?- -
Based on the review of the March,1980 audit of the Nuclear Sciences Section, the implementation of this procedure is judged to be satisfactory.
QAP-180S OA Audits - Audit Finding Reports Are Audit Finding Reports issued when findings are identified during audits?
The following findings were identified in the March,1980 audit of the Nuclear Sciences Section:
- 1. The Nuclear Sciences Section does not have an individual designated as Quality Control Officer.
- 2. No Study Plan for Iowa Electric Light & Power. (IEL&P)
- 3. Annual Review of QC Program, QC Procedures Manual, and Analytical Procedures Manual rat documented.
- 4. Revision number' and date required on each page of above.
- 5. Hand calculation verification not completed.
j . 6. Computer program verification not completed.
- 7. Quality Assurance Records Checklists not completed for all pr ojects".
Implementation of thi: procedure was judged to be satisfactory.
e i.
'.' Audit Report No. 80/02 (Cont'd)
Page #9
,- .QAP-1806 QA Audits - Audit Reoorts Are audit reports prepared and distributed in accordance with this procedure? ,
With respect to. the March,1980 audit:
- 1. The post-audit conference was held on 3/13/80.
- 2. Audit Finding Reports were-issued on 3/17/80.
- 3. Responses to AFR's were received 4/4/80 (due 3/24). <.
All were considered acceptable by-the QA Manager.
- 4. The audit report was issued on 4/14/80.
- The QA Maneger still must audit the irrplementation of corrective actions. This will be done in the next audit, which will be completed before the end of 1980.
Implementation of this procedure is judged to be satisfactory.
Post-Audit Conference A post-audit conference was held at the conclusion of the audit. Results of the audit were reviewed and copies of the Audit Finding Reports identified above were given to the QA Manager. All items from the previous audit (76/26) were closed as a result of this audit.
l .
l .
1' /
J (/F. WEISSENBERG v i
e
, r, -
HAZLETON LABORATORIES AMERICA INC. .
Environmental Sciences Division (Northbrook)
Director %
Dr. R. M. Dagnall R
$l 22 Administrative Secretary Personnel Quality Assurance B 5l Ms. S. Slawin R. Robinson H. J. Delinck A Vacant 'g 3 Laboratory Manager -
8 s
I o
1 "
Scientific Operations Administrative Operations Acting D.irector: Dr. K. Evans ,
Director: P. Roberts Air Sciences Accounting TActing Director: N. Keay) (Manager: W. Krasnow)
Aquatic Sciences Field Operations and Assets
[DiTe'ctor: L. Everhart) (Manager: J. Hallquist)
Aqttatic ToxicoloJy Library (I4anager: Dr. T. tiactorowski) (Ms. R. Corn)
Chemistry Cartography fDirector: Dr. L. Petrie) (fis. P. Parshall) 4a rine' Sciences Word Processing (DTr'ector: Dr. S. LeGore) (Manager: Ms. S. Altman)
- luclear Sciences Infonnation Services
[ Director: L. Huebner) (Manager: R. Johnson)
Terrestrial Sciences Purchasing & Facilities (Director: Dr. K. Evans) (Hanager: M. Ilottinger)
Client Services RMD
-7/80
e- * %
Accendix "B" Audit Report No. 80/02
~
(4 s r- Ayai 7 asPenaca O c. 70 a e n '20, t 9 VO A/A m E 11 Tc s COA 1pA yf C ~le- % A C,9 M Ass Ifes L .6. %4u h ot Diwk, N s. Hes H. T DLL Qw kwHwp 7
- Hes
/ .
0b ~
~1 L y m s x s p u J w ~y a.
A [M 10, /9fJ. .
t
,a w I
i r
i i
1
--e y*kr-- =*w-+q,rew- y- , ,e w upe--+---- - ,,---,-Wr y- - .+ y q y
___n_-u----------------- . ;- - -
,7
ylytlc-frtamp / cv ?
, , -Jws i 2-1 b
. NALCO ENVIRONMENTAL CCICNCES 5501-07664 Wm. H. Zimmer NPS ENVIRONMEINAL AIR PUIG CALIBRATION DATA SHEET Pump No.: [ Date Calibrated: h' 7 Serial No.: /K Performed by: T . 9, N Flow Meter: F-P, Model 10A-356SBS; Ser. No.: C.t Vacuum Gauge Flow Meter Reading Reading Remi.rks PSI C.F.M.
8 9
10- -
11
-- 12 0,37[ -
13 2. 2.8 14 26 15 /, 9 O i is / ,7f 17 /, I 0
~
& /, Y26
~
$ a.$ /9 tau % tu,, ,4p J 4--f 19 ~/. 2, 4 20 /. / O 21 8. 9[
22 6,86 23 6, [ ti 24 8, $,'/[
X 0, Y 0 Least squares regression line: y=ax+b Where: y=C.F.M; x= PSI b= V, / f if/ 2 ~ a= -Q,/3 3 z y ' Sy ,,, (g, g gg y i1 ,2.rog /1u. tv G-u, ta.fia oLubJ /21. E I S - /, Y 3 6 t/a.e . -9a.Sua e.dif . I2. 0 15.2 j 4 - 0,36 3 s.fdL1 ,, / 9, n _
% e m
. o
.' ,- ~
NALCO CNVIRONMZNTAL CClZ:NCEO 0"IO/ Ti-c *
, f 7 3, / ipo 40. - 4 :. / 7. 0 5501-07664 Yo- e r- .- n.k v ., c. en: 12.S set-Wm. e i3a s H. Zimer NPS
% c. ,, c w c . 1,- t3.o ENVIRONMENTAL AIR PUMP CALIBRATION DATA SHEET Pump No.: f Date Calibrated: /2-2 ? 7[
s -
Serial No.: /n 7 Performed by: W.9. '
A/
Flow Meter: F-P, Model 10A-3565BS; Ser. No.: (3 0 /
Vacuum Gauge Flow Mete? ,
Reading Reading 66 Remarks PSI C.F.M. -
8 2 , / ,1 [h7 9 dsoo 2.90 10 /. FT 2b 11 / . '7 7 _ 7' 12 / ,6 f 2,3l 13 ' / . fP 3.[b 14 /. 4 S- !,hh 15 /, 7 A / , 7[
16 I . S/ l, (p Q _
.17 f,07 l /, [b 18 0.?T f, 3 19 0,8T f, f Y 20 o. n /.o 4 -
21 c, 6Y O.hD 22 0.73 0. f~
23 o.W O . (,3 24 o.34 O,f0 w<y Y Icast squares regression line: y=ax+b Where: y=C.F..M; x= PSI b= k. Yi $^ a= ---d . l { ! Y
'/.137 - o , /% 30 6w. -
4'" -- er wg, - - - + -y y -
,%I === -. .
J NALCO CNVIRONMTJNTAL CCICNCED 5501-07664 0
l"J,ty- h -
Wm. H. Zimmer NPS
/
ENVIRONMENTAL AIR PUMP CALIBRATION DATA SHEET Pump No.: b[ Date Calibrated: /[d-3/'2)
Serial No.: / O <s~ Performed.by: T*, <, m p ,
Flow Meter: F-P, Model 10A-3565BS; Ser. No.: e) j Vacuum Gauge Flow Meter - -
Reading Reading Remarks PSI C.F.M. ,
8
/, 97 9 /, ~) T fi(pl;L.
~
10 11 /i EO 12 /, 37 13 // ,-). 7
/s / h 14 1s /, c o
~
16 fM
'17 ,7) - -
18 ,d7 [
19 ,fk 20 , y d-21 .37 22 ,0$
23 24 Least squares regression line: y=ax+b Where: y=C.F.M; x= PSI b= h,79 k a= -(),[gy ~S y,x= .
r~s O-9 W w, ,. , ,_
v _ .m- - --,--
y- g y -
e 4 m y.,
NALCD ENVI;:tONMENTAL SCIENCES 5501-07664 hI.' E . Zimme'r NPS' EmTIRONMENTAL AIR PUMP CALIBRATION DATA SHEET
- Pump- No . :- k/d , - . " Date ' Calibrated; 3-//'28 ,
Serial No.: Performed by: hT .
Flow Meter: F-P, Model 10A-3565BS; Ser. No.: ~
of TR.w m y s* F h ro'w Vacuum Gauge Flow Meter Reading Reading [ Rem 5rks.
PSI C.F.M. x. qq q ., g , ' o t - ,
8 ), Q I,' g (
9 16R 1 71 10 -
l < ST l. &
. 11' ' I s 't ] ^ l'N %
12 l.30 *D 13 l o l[ l' \ D .
14 le d V (. S (
1s . 9a-0.99 16 , 7/ 0.33 17 ,0r 0. b 9
~18 - - -
s ST( -. . . . O
- 1~0). . _
19 .7 0.Q0 20 .37 0.39 ~
~
21 ,3o 0.3; 22 ,a .2. O.11 23 -
~
~
24 l
l Least squares regression _line: y=ax+b Where: y=C.F.M; x= PSI b= 1.7543 a= -Q.t t S S ' 4)(x= 1.o o Dgth 'h
}o li l
l l
d
s;. .
L ., . , ..
& Pm Ca/6 tM M s.b ed .. g r o j .
o <7 g p , y .. g g. ... :. .< ... g y;g y . y..y
. %.,5 =
seakIyo., ..
~
/.%. cmg. b . ;^ W
~
&& AWex.: 1-fj.kedeL/}&-35458i;.Seijo/po :_ ?.O. .
~
.i .T ' '., &,-
f ': -
u . . .
fj *f'.k y. - oc .c Q=.a, j C.?lC _-... -
, -.. . ...; .~ .
. . . . . ;; ? . . . ; . . . -
.. :....e .- . c.z.m . . :._- q (,ao ;
e-..-... . a :- e . ... ..<.: m. m .,.. .g ..
~... .
-~,
.y., .z. s .4-c j.n . .
i
. . . g . .- ', , . .
. . -: - YAc uM ' .
R o w Mekeg ? sh. :P n- W em
~
~
r-GUA R9DChN9 . (DS.. d eE N.~- .. i=.7}..~. . . Y~. _ ~ '. . ' ?:7 9l&.- . .:, ;Y '.I Q. ..-
~ . . .
.. i : ..
~ , .
a; p g L. , A.. . 4 .p.. .. F.W: . -N ,- '. .. .!
... . . . . :. ~ ..
. E......s.w
. . . , : w ...~ .
.- 2..s~ . -
. y~ -
, . . s -
r.
~ .
..~
m.; - .7;.. .
. - &jg . : .. . ' . :? . ?- ,
i.e. .. R.C.- :. L.' . :
. ~ . -
, ..: .: :....u; s.,.~;
. ~U.,'ff: :.' e:~ f'q'".')
. k >.. * ' .~
~
' ~
. : ~
'~ -
w . .,.': . * . .-
' y8....: lJ'. y~ yg ~fi t, -
. : w ....-
+-
. >- ]-Q .3: - .:.c:: . ,:;yp:, . .
.; Q. . .
.m . .
,._. , -_L ..
7.yyyy 3 ' = ~
. ..w- . ..-. . ... ..;
...r...-
-. .:. ., g. ,. w
~. .~ . . , . . . --;
. . --2 .
- c. 3., . - . s..- .,...
- - r
, ..-, s . _ .. * , . * : , - =..-
- f. . . , , , , ' *;-.-4* e -
. ..c.
- s. .
r,g g .s .
- .r,-- . < ..~ ; ;g ," : ., . .,. ..
- . --/ y , . . .
. ;- - -- I < .,-*..
.' ~ ;f 3 3 ... - t.~
_ .; . .; .c., ,
.)
,- p ./j~.,. : : ..
, - 7 ; . _;- , .,.g < . ,...., .
- ~ .:.- f
.~-.q
. . }f -
i.:. .;. .
.-.. - - , -' .u.-
[,~' ' ,
. .- ./ [ . 4 '...- - ; [ ['?.1- *-
~
jf' [
~
-':j. g . .
~
. ./ 7- . .
11.5 u0 s ...
-jg , ,.
'" . .~ .
. .g. .T . .
. ' . ,9 C;*. .;' .: g.,,,
~T
- 2. - ...... .
_-- :.g .; .
9 . ~ ~- . ' Q g.- s
- x. ;.....
,.._~ , t
., - , .Q Q ; . .- ,;- ' . 3; - -
b
..g/
3-- ;- .:. .: ^
. . [ - ;. ... ..--
- p J ..,
, . .- .~. nJ '" ~ L . .- ,
~
? , ;" g -
.x.
.- , . . . :.. ..., . . >. e .
. .- - .*.,...f,
. 3 - .
. . . . ~
=
. . .~. . - .n n: .y u . . ;-. p. .
. .. ' f. ' -
~. ., . .
' +@, ,i4,4~~"5.';. ? g..;=.
. .... : .~.J ,-
j-( :. 7/n . ~ . 3.. 'f... . .
..; 2
. .- ; -- t . , ," .'.
g- '- - <.
' , u. .
. ; . u' . .
-. **~s.h.,..:-.',.-4..,J.2,.
3
. , ,. . . . -9* . . . . . c .;
, . s.
3 ; ~.: e~ ., _.. ... . ,. ?~. '.% ;1
- 4. s ,
. + . ,. . .e.
-:.4..w.. . .,._ .
- s. s . . .
. , . ,~ . ~ .. . . '.-
. . . .... .; . .., . ..te
.....-.s
.w. ,
. ,...u......
- . , , t. .
.....,-e.<:..
. , .g. .: , . -.,,~.,:.-
y .: . ..
~
- - ~. c . . - , ..
e
.; -r- - - 3 ,. - - - - , .
- 7. .. t . . gg. .: , . . .
'. * ' . .$.. .s. .- ': . l: T.: ...;. *~.sn..a.
- ..Q h .K ; <. .Q t. h... . Ny;2 *. ' :~. :.,'-lQ:Q<. y.f. . . W. .'.. : - -.., : .'.: .9 ~ -_- -
...r. . -,.......i
- ~ . . ..a; . . :. . 9 .. ..;.-,.....;.-... .. .. , . . .- ..
.. . . . c. ....-
. ,a .. .:s.-
, . - . , .a*..-
~
. . . . -v.. . .. , .-... y ... .. -r... , , ..
. . . . ..--t, 1 ..
..s s . . .-~ ..r,.
'.---'s,'"'.;,r.-*~
. : *1
. . ... .. . ,.:.
- n y ~ = . . . .: - . ;,f --;.*~~..*..'e.... - ., -
~
.J',*., ' d *- $ ' h* ', ; "* . M . ? *
- w , ,, ,*; ; :x ;.; 3 .%. ,,_.. ; y s :
- g. e 4 ,~ . .
~ .
. . . . . .: . r. ,.a . . t-
'N m
- w. .;:-..
e,e4
. . -:; S._..\,z.y@-:.o
. . <. .-...,;= -7.s*,..~. .
g . a.s
.. ag _...
a
. , .,,.,. ew,-.,i.,
. c y. . . ..
- ..,f'.a.*..
.s 1
. . , , ' . . . ..--hw._..f - ,. . .
.. . -~
.gi .w -.
NALCO CNVIRONMSNTAL, CCISNCEO
.e I
5501-08938 Wm. H.- Zimmer NPS .
l ENVIRONMENTAL AIR PUMP CALIBRATION DATA SHEET'
~
Pump'No.: 2 ~ S' Date Calibrated: 7-/'b 72.I N 3 Serial No.: / 4< Performed by: W#. :
Flow' Meter: F-P , - Model 10 A-3565BS ; Ser. No.: O c/f 77 W_,'M*C:g62**
. / .
' / ADLn v
17.2 -T 7acuum Guage Flow Meter g 9 %. % . *
- Reading Reading Remarks y
- l, g
, PSI' C.F.M. ~
8
/. sf 9
- l. V f) 10 /, 2 P 11 /, /f j' 1 /, $t) 13 ,yp 14 ,7 p 15 ,gg i -
1 16 ,yg -
17 ,]1 [ "
18 o/
. O f-19 ,p / -
20 1-1 21 22 -
^
,' 23 24 .
1 i
,2 /. ? Clmd Least squares regression line: y=ax+b
- Who.e
- y=C.F.M.; x= PSI ,
b= a= 2 r=
1
\
, . , - . . . . . . _ - - . . , ~ . . . . , - . ,....-,....-..,,_,....,_...-,,,_,.-.--,....m--.....-...,.., . , , _ . . . . . - , . . , _ , , . . ~ - . . . - , . . . . - . - . . .
N ALCO ENVIRONMEN*TAL CCI:lNCES . .
5501-08938 Wm. H. Zimmer NPS ENVIRONMENTAL AIR PUMP CALIBRATION DATA SHEET Pump No.: 2-I Date Calibrated: M'/d~7 Serial No.: /of Performed by: j yfu r Flow Meter: F-P, Model 10A-3565BS; Ser. No.: of 72 7p . ?? 'F
~
Vacuum Gauge Flow Meter '
Reading Reading Remarks PSI C.F.M. . -
4801 _ .l.%9
~ 1 8 // Ed y, S1 1 09 9 [' 3 h 1 36 1.63 10 //l[ l . "2. I 1, to 5 11 /'// \.\ 5 i.57 .
12 ,f/ .1 1. "2.to
~
13 r7[ .O t . 06 14 /[/f .b ,64 15 lb) .55\ .75 16 f y/ .4L g. ,5 7 17 iSf % .40 18 19 '
20 21 22 23 -
24 i
Least squarer, regression line: y=ax+b' Where: y=C.F.M.; x= PSI b= 3,g a= O. IT r2=g,jf e+
w-- w y e , e- -ie v. g-
NALCC ENVIRONM' ENTAL E CCNCEO .
.- 5501-08938 Wm. H. Zimmer NPS ENVIRONMENTAL AIR PUMP CALIBRATION DATA SHEET Pump No.: ,2-5 Date Calibrated : 5 ,J Y 2[
Serial No.: f3 c Performed by: C 4_ , , ~, y.
Flaw Meter: F-P, Model 10A-3565BS; Ser. No.: &
[
- Yl .
Vacuum Gauge Flow Meter .
Reading , Reading Remarks PSI C.F.M. C .
% l.4L 8 /t)7 t. %
9 /i / 0 n . s ts 10 ,97 i .3s 11 , [d 1.14 12 , /j 6 .qi 13 ,6f .T7 14 , y.l. , f, o 15 i 30 . (t3 16 -
~
17 18
~
19 -
20 21 22 23 24 Least squares regression line: y=ax+b Where: y=C.F.M.; x= PSI b= 1.d a30.19 r2= [.00 g gc)
a(t 1 -- - --
'Ie L's Ca//% 7L Dats sh eeF. .
~ '
' ^
Syof-.o 7 4 j9t
. . .. .. n .lE
'*/6T' Date Cs//buted
- 6 R o 'O
. ~
. SeR A $.NO , . e f k r,*r k b 'b 7
FlowAtetex.: F-Phode/ /M -35%F85.r' Seija/i% :. . Of
^
r ,
~
,._' '.- ~
- ~~ -
, , ,.,f...... . .
, - . , ,.... .- .- 3 .
- -? ~. ;-, ,K. .n..v,a *_ , . _ _
U }.-
~ - .
. ~. ; . .3,;r .
r,..;., ..~.. ..- . *- ,;
,r.,.. c_.: b.;:.- . ,;
i
' , . . . '..., r. .
^
Yous udM F$ow le% w[& *
~
. .. ' fes,,0g,;_
G UA}Q $QDU G fRAOt - ' . . I. ;
, CF n - '
P S~f. - . C . F. in , . ~ ~
- - g i, BL.
~
s r .'
L '. , e.%. .
~ 'q. ^ ,
,-~,
"'sl.,,.-y
- / , ..
. . , .c . ...
7, _ .- " s '~ l' A'.'.
- t '
, .: . ._ ~.
- ' . A ..g .. . :: - ' -
-..f -
J ---;-=-, *
. . . , f,.- -y, ;
, ,y,,,
,* ~.
.. ~
- /O *';.'..' '~.
- ^.
,. . .. , ~ ' .,
ll &o. .sf f , ),k '
/p ~
' Di] c/. 1,q s - -
O
- I *
- it' . /, f3 .am is' ^ /. & T .
- 2. u -
_ _ _ _ /6 JL2- i.e
-)7-- - /,3% g,su
/F-h/7
\ 59 - -
/F 7' 6 0 ~ ' l.%
~ ~
Do &&
~
I,n -
g s pg . - .;$g,. .
, - .g ,
M
- w aan I W , ' 3h M^
7w . -
m 9 *
. ' ~
~~. .
eso e +e D e .m . . -
e .W.A h.
b
- =
, * . **:.'y:.,..,',~ ,__,N
~ *
' * ' ' - . - ~~ , * ' = ,~
g
~, .
- .~ ,,. - e t .
~ ~ '
e
"*4
, - - - - ~- v p- .a - -
--mm-. , m e.-e
A
. : l. : -
t NALCO ENVIRONMENTAL. SCIENCES i
5501-08938 Wm. H. Zimmer NPS
_j Pump No.: b~f ENVIRONMENTAL AIR PUMP CALIBRATION DATA SHEET 2
Serial No.: /d r Date Calibrated: f"M 1-7/
Flow Meter: F-P, Model 10 A-3565BS; Performed by: fewA:P
.I Q Ser. No.:
t *
,, f -
( T= 50# P 7acuum Guage Flow Meter Reading i Reading PSI C.F.M. Remarks g -
t 9 .
y t.n 10 9,% 3 35' 11
- p,34 3, 4 "
?
$1}h 3.94#
/r(( 3 . b 'l
- 14 f, Q 3 , q.g ,
15 j, gf 2. w 16 f, gf 7 , g q. .
17 ff 3f/ g, g9 18 j,3p ;. g 19
/,0 /, 1.94-20
,Q g ,g E
ilf \ . 0% '
22 IO} g4 23
, flf '
73-24
,37 ,ss
' Least squares rcgression line: y=ax+b
'Where: y=C.F.M.; x= PSI b= ,
a= r= 2 i
-, -- - ,y , , , , - , - , - - - - ,m ,- - - - - . . . - - - -
p l ll:
I alll l )
O f$$Ell/ Yq\
s A_
f r
3 y /
a )f sf b fs ]>
3 T h 7
&g l
s 8 &;
F
. - }D .
t rw s7,jy $ s
~
E F 1 3 9 D G A G 9 F O 11 h
/ '
C A V N O lg 2 F $2 m ar 3 H. p. 8 v. l5 x y 7 9 y Q
, S pes
)
u e ] EMr g, y e 6 u LIh y ET( S d
/ 1 i [/{s f, l g '
u{*) of [2 y9 F .- O F '
- O E i -
M ' I , S T 9; m "f[g y '*1"1 % P N . N O . r e m ' i z m F i e - xo aa i i e s) H E T F O s u m 7- n 2 m 7 - l d/ A W m D N ri e a ri3- mi / 4 t a a O m 3> n 7 7 x S 3 . d _ s E e t . 9 s V _N O E l i t a u c PN M U . PR O E w p io o i o
& ;o 0 l
~
r S s .O a p - p. k O a
- r. . , 2 , < , . 7
- TO 8 m 1 - -
,- - - - - e '
A .- SN z z z z R 2 ~z
?
~Lv:
)
.yf (C ,
j i! { i j
g I U O O . Air particulates data. Wm. II . Zimmer NPS i ST PUMP DATE TIME ELEPS. VAC.' GAGE k NO. SER. NO. TIME FT 3 l I ON OFF ON OFF (hrs) ON OFFh j k i r Z-1 i O 2 1 m Z-2 f s O
- Z-3 2 m
~4
) l l (4 Z-5 U g
2 Z-6 n
\M.7 , y
(
@, /// IkJ "!!Dfql I;oS?!h IolANk$))%
v Y5 e o n1 Z-8 nemaruo: p u rp m zikreiir $ /?tin y .s y a 4 iiiso sieps. 7&i?e is aco eaecr
&irx'r ove ,o 7-ime.e ivo7 usomein'D
~
ma it coupa ofonyr xcweuex ir is ac to woinxia -
, driawl NdYy 7 -IO ~W .
' ##" } ,c7,ygjp. '
4 NALCO GNYlRCNMCNTAL RCIENCEO (]Wm. H. Zi:=er NPS V CG&E SAMPLE COLLECTION DATA SHEET Date Collected [ " Collector m /c Location _ Time Quantity Remarks 2=/ /b/ f lia 52 //O . //
,}
G /d 3 // 2Y 10 9 // l 'Y
" MF 't -
h /bh If G S] /?'/ 't
& /OY t' 3Aut /o 2.- a v
l TLD - TLD BO - Bottom Org. M - Milk ** SW - Surface Water BS - Bottom Sediments S - Soil WW - Well water F - Fish * - G - Grass l SL - Slime & Aq. Veg.* ME - Meat
- WL - Wildlife (animals) *
- State type. VE - Vegetables or
** State time of milking . Leafy Field Veg.
- ANY MISSED COLLEC* IONS OR LOCATION SUBSTITUTIONS SHOULD BE EXPLAINED.
USE IVERSE SIDE IF NECESSARY. .. e}}