ML20010H648
| ML20010H648 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 09/14/1981 |
| From: | Donoghue D, Tracy Scott NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20010H645 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8109290011 | |
| Download: ML20010H648 (5) | |
Text
...
RECUEST FOR OMB REVIEW (Undtr th3 Papstwork R: duction Act and Extcutiva Ord:r 12291)
ImNrtant - Aead instructions (SF-83 A) before completing this Office of Information and Regulatory Aff airs form. Submrt the recuorea number of copies of SF-83.together Office of Management and Budget with the material for which review is requested to:
Washington. D.C. 20503
- 1. Department / Agency rnd Bureau / Office originating request 3.Name(s) and telephone number (s) of person (s) who can best answer Questions regarding request Nuclear Regulatory C' omission W. H. Koo (301) 492-7357 2.6 digit Agency / Bureau number (forstpart of 11-digot Treasury
- 4. 3 digit functuonal code (last part of 11-digit Treasury Account Account No.)
No.)
3 1
0 2 0 0
2 7 6
- 5. Titts of Information Cotiection or Rutemaking C. Is tnis a tutemaning suom ssion under Section 3504 tn) of P.L 96 511? (Check one)
Monitoring of Fatigue Transient Limits for 15 Noisection sso7.ubmiss.on)
Reactor Coolant System 2C ves.NPAM. Expected date of publication:
- 6. A. Is any ontormatton vollectson (reportong or recordkeepong) 3 C Yes.tinalrule. Expected date of pucincatson:
involved ? (Check one)
Ettectuve date-15 Yes ar'd proposal 6s attached for re' view D. At what phase of rulemaking is this submission made?
2 O Yes but Droposalis not attached - soup to question D.
M No' applicable 3 C No - skip to owestion o.
t B. Are the respondents primartly educational agencies or 2 0 Maior rule, at NPRM stage onstituttoets or is the purpose rela ted to Federal education 3 0 Manor Fina1 rule for which no NPRM was oubisshed programs ?
4 C Major Final rule, after publication of NPAM O Yes R No 5 C Nonmajor rule, a't NPAM stage 6 C Nonmaior rule. at Final stage COMPLETE SHADED PORTION IF INFORM ATION COLLECTION PflOPOs AL IS ATTACHED
- 7. Current (or former) OMB Number 8, Requested'-.,; g f. Agency repo,rt,fo_rm,n, umber (s) _j-A,,3;jg.,gjQ 1
,ha D. ate
'l Expiration Date, fb,dg, Liv,A
'13. Are respondents only Federal agencies 7g g.M Muh,. gag _;
4 7gy ~f;;r n
September 30,-
1983 d O Yes D No h * >
'~ % -d-M
- 9. ls proposed information collection isstodin -g N.'. r.r -g 14 Typeof reguest (Check one)-
9-r....- + p t;,z O
g Nh. [1 C g[rediminary plarr,,
-[.g th2 information Collection budget 7h,' '.
1 o. Will this proposeo eformation collectrons m 2 M new (notprerrously sporoved or erpired more than 6 monms' U collection budget allowance? (If yes, attach : "
3'C revision '
's.'. /
I ctuse the agency 1o uceeditsinformatiorP 6.'.Tfp i agoh 5!.
cmendment request from scencyheattJ';,, 0 Ye[R No l:
49 ggg gy
- s,.
.. - ~
- 11. Number of report forms submitted for approvat_,
5 C entension (no change)
None OC reinstatement texpired wrthin 6 monttus) ~
..t'.
- 16. C.assifscation ot Change in Burden:{ explain on supporting stetement),.
.. \\.:.-
15.
" ' ~ ~
i[.,. '. ? * ' f ~ p N.4 $ 4,.
r,
'f 4
{,
aoo,. ce.,re o,
'l.:' 4
' - L.ein~esoonses. No. o, seporting sours cost to the Pute
-.e.,e u.* ** '
46 46 itninventorf' %. R 0
l 0
5 6 Sr'o' a-o*
~'$eproo$sek.
e es cea net,e,o, b.
j 46 l
920 s
mo e.,,, or
- c record keepe,, per yes' 46 C.DifferenC'e (b-4) ' ','
46 l
g2Q e neoo,in e-uen, o, nen Explanation of difference (indicate as many as apply)
'" ***"""* 2 5' 1 - (one time}djustments-
~-
~
e To,c e.,oc,,,,,o Recurring
- d. Correction-error l_..
l_,,. s o.m :3c, r5c' Recordkeep-inW (5ee
- e. Correction-reestimate '.
f l* s 1 Estimated eve,ep Supp
- State.)-
j *_ s
"."."*.*n*'o# **""
- f. Change in use
?.
I' oe.'
20 Program changes (
a Estimeice toic hours e',aaaue t-ma 'a g.Incrosse 46 h
920 l+ s
- v. ea vn,
- '" ' 5 " ' 5 "
920
- h. Decrease l-s Stancarc Form 831Aev 3-81) 8109290011 810915 PDR ORO EUSOMB For use seeinning 4/u81 P D R..
- 17. Austract-Needs cnd Uzcs (50 words ort:ss)
Requirement that 46 cperating reactor plants that have be::n identificd as lacking tectinical specifications to monitor the actual transient occurrences that could significantly affect the fatigue life of the reactor coolant system develop tech specs and submit them to NRC.
NRC further requires that records of said occurrences be maintained for the duration of the ricense. normally 40 years.
- 18. Retated report formts) (gtve OMB numberfsk/RCN(s); - - -
2o. Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Number in temst agency report tornt number (s) orspenbo6(s/kQ..
.M
- 21. Smais business or organization C Yes U No he
- 19. Type of atiected public (Chec# as many as apply).
- 22. Type of activity of attected public-indicate 3-digit Standard
'"0**
(**'*
~ "*'*'
10 indsvsduals orhouseholds 10, chect E Multiple or O All 2C stateorlocalgovemments 3 C farms A
9~ ' 3 40 busonesses or otherinstitutions (eJrcept farrros).
- 23. Snet descreption of affected pub \\bc leug..~retailgrocery stores.'." State education agencies.".* households in 50 largest SMSA s")
x 1
46 operating nuclear power plants '
' 24. Purpose (Check as many as apply. ltmoro than one, indicate '
2t Conections teethod (Check asorenyssappryY?"'h;.
'M.
~.M' i.-[.,' D.m'ailaetf.administeret, - [.7, "."; J;.M,
, s.redominant by an astensk) -
- .. 2.c'otheis.etf.administe.reo. WE.~.'.r;
.y 2 O program evaluatton
.. ? ' ' '.'
. s t a application fortenents 3D telepthw.triterviews._ " '9 f? gya.q.. g,_l,.rf f
4C personaliriterview
.c -
. +
yK.R 3 0 general purpose statistics
~
SC recordkeepingrequirement,
,1.~
i~. '.
40 regulatory or compliance 5 C program planning or management
, Requiredretention'penod; yearsv;..l...(
C C researen s O other-describe:
- 27. Collection egent (Check one).
- 25. Frecuency of Use
. n
- .: 9. _ ;c, m.
tH Nonrecurrinsi(Reporting { 4.?-W(RecordkeepiHI )i.;,, k[' ';'. - 3 jtl rec==='in9 Department / Agency ~f @ p.: W,f E
l, Recurring (check asmeny as apph 9
y 20 otnes FederalDepartment/ Agency,'yAid@T
- t.50 prwatecoAractorb ', O '.
- M.', '
'[.Ti - t.
. 2.3 on occasion de O.s.ermanm.se.try7,,:.ld1...F "~~O.,u.i#
~
,.s..
...-. 7 r- -.
n.n s
as gpg; g 4 0,recordhesping requeremenQ;%, y J. ';,;.Q-A 3 0 *eedY';..,.$. 7U.annue1Pyr"j l.
- C montniy-l
- sO.tweimial6y -;g.3 3q. p. f 5C~other-desenber l
N-5 0 Quarterly
'JD otheW-describet
- 20. Autnonty for agency for information collection or -
3o. Do yoe promisecortfldentiality?
rulemaking-indicate statute. regulation. judicial decree..
(If yes, empfeistbasis forpledg'r...
- + -
+w; l
. Etc.
'iresuppornagstatemenf} -
.C Yes N No *: '
7' Atomic Energy Act of 1954e as amended 3,. win the proposeeinformation conection creataene or.
become part of an existmg Pnvacy Act system of records?-
- 29. R esconcent s obligat>on to repty Check as sneny as apoly)-
(It yes, stisch Federal Register notice or proposed drott of.
t C voluntary
.-[. A:.h 7,ce.
norrcek
-Q Yes U No
"~i -
23 required to obtain or retain benefit '. ?"-. i l,"
- 32. Cost to Federal G sernment of 3C mandatory-citrrstatvte,notCFR(attachcopyof -
information collection or rulemaking s 124.000 statutory autttonty)
COMPT.ETE ITEMS 33 THRU 35 ONLY lF RULEMaKING SUBMIS9 TON 310cmpuance costs to the Duche
- 34. ls there a regulatory impact
- 35. Is there a statutory or judicial analysis attached?
deadhne affectmg issuance?
0 Yes O No-C Yes. Enter date-3 l',
O No CE?TWICATION BY AUTHORIZED Cl FICI ALS SUSMITTING REQUEST-We certify tnat the mtbr,mation conection or rulematung suomettoo for i
rsv.e s necessary for the proper performance of the agency's functions, that the proposal reoresents the mmimum puDbc Durcen and Federal cast I
Consistent eth need and is Consistent ein apobcabov OMB and agency oobey directives. S4gnature anc titie of; speencv G Poti v omCiat Fost AGE **CY
~ oATE susassrTDeG OFFiC4AL l T.,
b '
//
J/
W
_... _ ~
O SUPPORTING STATEMENT 1.
Justification The Standard Technical Specification (STS) issued with all new operating licensescrequires licensees to keep account of the number of transient occurrences of interest to assure the -
transient limi;s based on design assumptions are not exceeded.
Some early operating reactor plants' having detailed fatigue analysis performed on ASME Class 1 (reactor coolant system pressure boundary) components do not have technical specification l.
requirements to monitor the actual transient occurrences, which could significantly affect the fatigue life of the reactor coolant system.
To assure the safety marp5 and adequate perfomar;e of.those early plants, the Nucler Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff has f
determined that all licensees of plants for which fatigue analyses l
were performed will be req'ign life ~of all cla_ss,1 components has not_ _. _ _
Jired to monitor the plant transients the~ der, and to verity tna)ity-six'(46) operating reactor plants are been exceeded. Fo idantified which require such monitoring. Letters will be sent 1.o the licensees of those plants requesting submittal of proposed technical specification for monitoring of design basis transient fatigue limits of the reactor coolant system and retention of records of transients or operational cycles for the duration of the Unit Operating License nomally at least 40 years. The availability of records is essential for the perfomance of
- verificat. ion to assure that the transient limits are not exceeded.
The informatico requested in the letters can only be provided by the intended licensees as the operating transient records,.which are needed to derive the remaining allowable transient cycles..are I
not available elsewhere.
2..
Description of Information Co_1_lection (1) The request for infomation (proposed technical specification) will be in the fom of a letter addressed to licensees of forty-six (46) operating. reactors. The forwarded letters will also include a model technical specification in the attachment.
The information requested will be reviewed for its accuracy and completeness with respect to the FSAR and other relevent documents. Finally, a technical specification will be issued to amend the operating license after completion of the Safety Evaluation Report (SER).
In the event that the infomation provided by the licensees is considered not accurste or adequat.e, request for additional information will be issued on ai case-by-case basis.
(2) and (3) This is not a survey. Therefore, there is no survey olan or survey design.
e r-,, - -. -,., - -
---,~r.,
.,,,._,.--,,-,o-,,,y_
,-,___~_m,
_-_-,s---
y
.~
u (4) Franklin Research Center (FRC) is a contractor assigned to technically assist NRC in reviewing the infonna' tion provided l
by the affected licensees. The Technical Evaluation Report (TER) completed by FRC will be forwarded to the respondent as an attachment in NRC's -Safety Evaluation Report.(SER).
No confidential or proprietary information will be collected i
in the letters.
3.
Tabulation and Publication Plans The infonnation collected will not be tabulated for the purpose of p,
publication..The.internation provided by each respondent will be i.
reviewed for its' accuracy and adequacy with respect to the FSAR i-F and other relevent documents. After' completion of the Safety Evaluation Report (SER), a technical specification will be issued c
. to amend the operating, license, when appropriate.
4.
Time Schedule for Infonnation Collection and Publication The infonnation requested will not be tabulated for the punose of publication. Each addressee is requested to provide the requested infonnation within eight (8) weeks after receipt of the letter.
If no additional infonnation is requested, each Safety Evaluation Report is scheduled to be completed from six to twelve weeks after receipt of the infonnation depending on the staff's work load.
The technical specification is expected to be issued within four weeks after completion of the SER.
5.
Consultation Outside the Agency None 6.
Estimation of Respondent Reporting Burden Buad on NRC experience with requests of this nature, the reporting burden on each respondent is estimated to be 20 man-hours. The above estimation is based on the availa' 'lity of orderly records being kept on the operating transients.
The total one-time burden is estimated to be 920 hours0.0106 days <br />0.256 hours <br />0.00152 weeks <br />3.5006e-4 months <br />.
It is estimated that each ' facility will monitor its transient fatigue limits at least weekly. The estimated time for the inspec-
~
tion and recording of infonnation for each activity is 15 minutes or 13 hours1.50463e-4 days <br />0.00361 hours <br />2.149471e-5 weeks <br />4.9465e-6 months <br /> annually per facility. The total estimated annual recordkeeping burden for all respondents (46) is 600 hours0.00694 days <br />0.167 hours <br />9.920635e-4 weeks <br />2.283e-4 months <br />.
The total average annual respondent burden for the one time reporting requirement and the recurring recordkeeping requirement is 920 hours0.0106 days <br />0.256 hours <br />0.00152 weeks <br />3.5006e-4 months <br />.
l l
l l
t 7.
Sensitive Questions None 8.
Estimate of Cost to Federal Government The estimated cost for technical assistance from FRC is approxi-mately $84,000. The NRC staff time is estimated to be-appmximately 1000 man-hours' on $40,000. The total estimated
.cost to the govemment is $124,000.
9 e
e 4
, _ -, _.,, _. ~, - _,,., _, _, _,,,,,,
-