ML20010F579
| ML20010F579 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Yankee Rowe |
| Issue date: | 09/04/1981 |
| From: | Crutchfield D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Kay J YANKEE ATOMIC ELECTRIC CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20010F580 | List: |
| References | |
| TASK-02-04.A, TASK-02-04.C, TASK-2-4.A, TASK-2-4.C, TASK-RR LSO5-81-09-010, LSO5-81-9-10, NUDOCS 8109100373 | |
| Download: ML20010F579 (4) | |
Text
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
\\
September 4,1981 D['s@ k-@(
Docket No. 50-29 N
LS05 09-010 s
i f
g\\
Mr. James A. Kay kb
, p
~
D
~
9A S d'J V,\\ # g #
Senior Engineer - Licensing D
Yankee Atomic Electric Company
%g g y. de 1671 Worcester Road 4
\\
Framingham, mssachusetts 01701
Dear Mr. Kay:
SUBJECT:
REVIEW OF REPORT (YAEC-1263) " SEISMIC RESPONSE SPECTRA FOR
{
THE YANKEE NUCLEAR POWER STATION" (SEP TOPIC II-4.A AND II-4.C)
Our consultants have reviewed your report referenced above and have recommended that the NRC find the site specific spectra you proposed for the seismic analysis of your fac11 tty unacceptable (Enclosures 1 and 2). They have also concluded that the staff spectra transmitted to you in our letter of August 4,1980 and confirmed by our letter of June 17, 1981 is an acceptable ground motion to be used for seis-mic reevaluation. It is our position that the staff spectrum previ-ously provided to you is the appropriate level at which to perform the effluation of your facility, subject to the inclusion of the ef-fects of any local soil amplification.
Sincerely, Dennis M. Crutchfield, Chief Operating Reactors Branch No. 5 "t
Division of Licensing ghY
.f" N#
k j. d#
Enclosures:
As stated cc w/encleeures:
pg f[9 h See next page j
I
$6v
- 8109100373 810904 M
PDR ADOCK 05000029 M
P PDR 7
- SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCE onice y.. S E PB...,,, *,,
,,$ ERB...,*,,,,
..S EPS.,,*...
.0BRf.5....
.0
..AD.:S A.;DL. *
sunu us>...I.C h,en,g,,: b,],,,
,,,RH er,m,a n,n,,
WRussell,,RCaru sp,,,,,
DCru,tch,fi, el d
.,Gla i n a s,,
J,Kn i,g h t,,
../7/81.
. 8/.8../. 8.1 8/.1 2/81 8/1 3/.81 8/.11 / 81 6/14781 8/.7/81 8
o.re >
nac ronu ais oo-somacu ono OFFICIAL RECORD COPY usm mi-mv.o
f f
.a p,.
p+
st' Docket No. 50-29 L505 Mr. James A. Kay Senior Engineer - Licensing Yankee Atomic Electri;. Company 1671 Worcester Road Framingham, Massachusetts 01701
Dear Mr. Kay:
SUBJECT:
REVIEW OF REPORT (YAEC-1263), " SEISMIC RESPONSE SPECTRA FOR THE YANKEE h'JCLEAR POWER STATION" (SEP TOPIC II-4.A AND II-4.C)
Our consultants have reviewed your report referenced above and have recommended that the NRC find the site specific spectra you proposed for the seismic analysis of your facility unacceptable. They have also concluded that the staff spectra transmitted to you in our letter of Augst 4,1980 and confirmed by our letter of June 17, 1981 is an acceptable ground motion to be used for seismic reevaluation.
Although we have not completed our review of the consultants comments, they are enclosed (Enclosure 1 and 2) for your information and use.
I would like to reiterate that the staff spectrum previously provided to you is an appropriate level at which to perfom the evaluation of your facility, subject to the inclusion of tce effects of any local soil amplification.
Sincerely, Dennis M. Crutchfield, Chief Operating Reactors Branch #5 Division of Licensing Enclosures :
As stated cc w/ enclosures:
See next page
- SEE PREVIOUS TISSUE FOR CONCURRENCE i If n
"'c E > S E PB.*
,SEPB*
, S.E.P B,*.
,0RB*gf 5,
, f) h AhKA:..,D.L*.,Adh g,;,s%,,
- RCjk,
,DC,,%j f fh fi el d GL inas..
,,J,. b' Q,,
sua m t) TCheng RHermann WRussell mr > 8g/81 8/7/81 8/8/81 8/QJ81 8/f /81 8p1 y g, p,,,
NRC FORM 318 810,80b NRCM O2 40 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
' " '*"32n:4
~
i Docket No. 50-29 i
LS05 Mr. James A. Kay Senior Engineer - Licensing Yankee Atomic Electric Company 1671 Worcester Road Framingham, Mass.
07701
Dear Mr. Kay:
SUBJECT:
REVIEW OF REPORT (YAEC-1263), " SEISMIC RESPONSE SPECTRA FOR THE YANKEE NUCLEAR POWER STATION" (SEP TOPICS II-4.A NID II-4.C)
Our consultants have reviewed your report referenced above and have recoronend-ed that the HRC find the site specific spectra you proposed for the seismic analysis of your facility unacceptable. The coments of our consultants are attached as enclosures (1) and (2). While our review of our consultants re-ports are not yet complete, the staff yeiterates that the spectra transmitted to you in our letter of August 4,1980 and confirmed by our letter of June 17, 1981 is an acceptable ground motion to be used for seismic reevaluation of i
your facility, subject to the inclusion of the effects 6f any local soil amplification.
Sincerely, Dennis M. Crutchfield, Chief Operating Reactors Branch No. 5 Division of Licensing
Enclosures:
As stated cc w/encleeures:
See next'page Affi/Jerv
...S.,,B J[,g,
S.E,P B,,,
,S,EPB
,,,0 RB,# 5,,,,,,,,,
,0,RB # 5,,,,,,,,,, A[SE:,D,f,,,,,,
EP omer >
SURNAME)
.1EhOnQ1bd..
.RHerruann....
'! Russe.ll....... 80arUSD.........D.Cr.utchf.1.e.l.c..Glainas........
oan >. 8/7/81......81.7../B.1........... 22.5./ B.1....... 8/..../.S.1............ 01....l.dl.....
. 31.$1.61.......
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY usom isn-sss.seo wnc ronu ais oo-eon sacu ano
Mr. James A. Kay Mr. James E. Tribble, President Yankee Atomic Electric Conpany 25 Research Drive Westborough, Massachusetts 01581 Greenfield Community Cc11ege 1 College Drive Greenfield, Massachusetts 01301 Chairman Board of Selectmen Town of Rowe Rowe, Massachusetts 01357 Energy Facilities Siting Council 14th Floor One Ashburton Place Boston, Massachusetts 02108 U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
~
Region I Office ATTN: EIS COORDINATOR JFK Federal Building Boston, Massachusetts 02203 Resident Inspector Ytokee Rowe Nuclear Power Station c/o U.S. NRC Post Office Box 28 Monroe Bridge, Massachusetts 01350 l
/
e 9
+-
. _ _