ML20010E898

Notice of Violation from Insp on 810609-12

ML20010E898
Person / Time
Site:	Rancho Seco
Issue date:	08/07/1981
From:	Hernandez G NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML20010E896	List: ML20010E895 ML20010E898 ML20010E901
References
50-312-81-24, NUDOCS 8109090060
Download: ML20010E898 (2)

Text

-

i Appendix A NOTICE OF VIOLATION

'acramento Municipal Utility District Docket No.60-312 P. O. Box 15830 License No. DPR-54 Sacramento, California 95.",13 As a result of the inspection conducted on June 9-12, 1981, and in accordance I

with the Interim Enforcement Policy, 45 FR 66754 (October 7, 1980), the following violation was identified:

Appendix 1B of the Quality Assurance Procram as documented in Volume TV of the Ra'ncho Seco FSAR, paraqraph 1B.1.1 states in part that:

"All Class I structures, systems, and components must neet the applicable provisions of the Atomic Energy Commission Quality Assurance Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants, as set forth in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Part 50, Appendix B."

10 CFR50, Appendix B, Criterion V, states:

" Activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by documented instructions, procedures, or drawings of a type appropriate to the circunstances and shall be accomplished in accordance with these instructions, procedures, or d rawi ng s.

Instructions, procedures, or drawings shall include appropriate quantitative or qualitative acceptance criteria for detemining that important activities have been satisfactorily accomplished."

Quality Assucance Procedure Number 20, Revision 1, of the SMUD Quality Assurance Malual states under iten 2 of the general requirements that:

"The Quality Control Instruction shall be reviewed and approved by the Manager of Generation, Quality Assurance Director, and the Manager of Nuclear Operations."

2 Contract Specification C22.2, Section 6, paragraph SC-12. " Quality Assurance" s tates in part that:

"Ucrk on this project which is identified as having a Ouality Assurance Class 1...is to be perfomed under a written Ouality Assurance Progran prepared by the involved contractor...and approved by the District's Quality Assurance Director prior to comencement of work."

a Centrary to the above, on June 12, 1981, the inspector identified the following:

(1) Bechtel Ouality Control was found to be utilizing a set of procedures entitled " Engineering Inspection Instructions" (EII) to perform their quality control function.

The ETI's were found to be neither described in the SMUD Ouality Assurance Manual nor reviewed and approved by SMUD's District Quality Assurance Director.

3 (2)

U.S. Testing Company, the onsite testing laboratory, has been onsite since April 1981 perfoming quality related activities hoil. concrete sampling, testino, and inspection) without a H1090900eO B 1080 '

PD9 ADOCK 0500031.

G PDR r

s

' A.

7

.9.-

p,:..

. 4 Appendix A.,

e+

Quality Assurance Manual and quality control proceduras approved

'.,l, l.,.

by StiUD's District Ouality Assurance Director.

ig s

This is a Severity Level V Violation (Supplement II).

( - :^. '-

l,J,M Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, the Stc.anento Municipal Utility District is hereby required to submit to this office within

h...

thirty (30) days of the date of this Notice, a written statenent or

'.b '

T explanation in reply, includino:

(1) the corrective steps which have heen taken and the results achieved; (2) corrective steps which will be

?#

~

taken to avoid fu 'ther itens of noncompliance; and (3) the date when full compliance will be achieved. Under the authority of Section 18? Of A

the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, this response shall be subnitted b',

under oath or affirmation.

Consideration nay be given to extending your i

-R response time for good cause shown.

4 The responses directed by this Notice are not subject to the clearance n. '

procedures of the Office of Manaqenent and Budlet as reouired by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.

,s

~

5-i Original signed by o

dated G. Hernandez 3'.-

G. Hernandez, Reactor Inspector P ;. 7,

s l$

s1 - ys

.h

.e

. :q.g.

t.

ff ) n...-r

. -. ee 1

~$ m f

A.'p ri

(

4 hA T(i

• y.t ?

f 'k_ -

q

' S.p.5 -

E[h k.

M I

f $

d.

4 "I

'J k. ' *

.' b. : ' '.

..c..

..h.,

Di(.^.

- U 6 $. [g; A p K..,v-$.f. M. k_..[g,., -

E a,7 ; 9 Q,'.[ ' V.

.\\,. j

..)

?4

.V ( j, " EiA g :.f7.f[

.' _S L."

J

,) y..

1

.-~n n.

,