ML20010C026

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Confirms Telcons Re Review & Implementation of Security Plan.Nrc Visit Would Be Extremely Productive in Developing Interim Plan
ML20010C026
Person / Time
Site: 07000025
Issue date: 07/22/1981
From: Remley M
ROCKWELL INTERNATIONAL CORP.
To: Burnett R
NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS)
References
19463, NUDOCS 8108190019
Download: ML20010C026 (3)


Text

'

90.-2f m

f s

g, f //

g p

['

\\ g sygm.,og 6

RockwelV,j usuc Internadona y

ggg 1 1 gggg y

$<ma Park.cattorria siaos 2

,S Tekwone:(2 33 3411000 (4;ilt j, [) h g n,a

/0 T u m 4 m 237 w-g-

witstcnou f, gg E

Ne uoau cun 7

9,9

/

ESG CNPK A f

70 Ju y 22, '"al In reply refer to 81ESG-6714

)

Mr. Robert F. Burnett, Director N

Division of Safeguards

' ' ~ '

O Office of Nuclear Material

%C[*.N Safety & Safeguards f

l U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 9ggggy Washington, DC 20555 t

3 3L 1 p at 7I e.s.ty$$$s#

y

Dear Mr. Burnett:

ocs e s # **

/p

Subject:

Upgrade Security Plan for Protectio Special Nuclear Material, Docket 70-2$M,j. '

This will confirm recent telephone conversations with Messrs. Russell l

Rentschler and Odell Smith of your staff concerning the review and imple-mentation of the security plan for the protection of special nuclear material at Energy Systems Group headquarters facility authorized by NRC License SNM-21.

As indicated in those discussions, recent changes in the Energy Systems Group business situation indicate that it is no longer cost effective or practical to proceed with development and implementation of an approved security plan to meet the requirements of the NRC Security Upgrade Rule. Therefore, it is now unnecessary for the NRC Licensing Staff to continue their review of the Energy Systems Group upgrade security plan, ESG-80-28, as revised and submitted in March 1981.

Rather, it is far more reasonable and cost effective during the remaining period that our inven-tory of highly enriched material exceeds strategic quantities for us to develop interim security requirements directed to meeting the necessary physical protection of the special nuclear material as required by the Security Upgrade Rule without significant physical modifications to our facility and the consequent major capital expenditures.

As I stated to Messrs. Rentschler and Smith, I will be on vacation from July 27 through August 14, 1981.

Imediately following my return, I plan to work with your staf: to develop a satisfactory interim plan for the protection of special nuclear material here at Energy Systems Group.

As discussed in our telephone conversations, I suggest that a visit to ESG by Messrs. Rentschler and Smith at that time would be extremely productive F,E ESPI 4seM p%8Fe!8?fh g # /"/

g 1%G3

g %

Jw Rockwell Mr. Robert F. Burnett July 22, 1981 Page 2 in developing the appropriate interim security plan.

I shall be contacting l

Mr. Rentschler during the week of August U to continue development of that plan.

l Sincerely yours, l

3 w (i. y' I

(.#.-q I

u l

M. E. Remley, Dire d

Health, Safety and Radiation Services gt M r. George W. McCorkle, Chief Physical Security Licensing Branch Division of Safeguards NMSS U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Washington, DC 20555

Docket No.

76-2 5

" SAFEGUARDS AMEN 0MENTS" 11C 0 SG h William 0. Miller License Fee Management Branch fiCL#,

Office of Administration PSLR MATERIALS SAFEGUARDS AMENDMENT CLASSIFICATI0M

,_ b -

Applicant w

License No:

6 A)n? - 2/

Fee Category:

Application Dated:

7/22/8/ Received:

7/Zfh/

Applicant's Fee Classification:

The above application for amendment has been reviewed by the fiMSS' Division of Safeguards in accordance with Section 170.31 of Part 170 and is classified as follows:

1.

Safeguard amendments to licenses _ _in fee Categories IA through 1H (a)

Major Safeguards (b) flinor Safeguards (c)

Safeguards (Categories 10 through 1G only)

(d) "

Administrative 2.

Justification for reclassification:

~

3.

The application was filed (a) pursuant to written MRC request and the amendment is beliig issued for the convenience of the Commission, or (b)

Other (State reason):

/les w b l//krsk 4

/d n 1 wl'tLede/

,as e

m Signature:

l' d

Division of Safegujrds, hMSS Date: __ 7/2.gfQ 1'"'" c3

'Vf C Q /4 h