ML20010B971
| ML20010B971 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Midland |
| Issue date: | 08/12/1981 |
| From: | Norelius C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Jackie Cook CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20010B972 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8108180559 | |
| Download: ML20010B971 (2) | |
See also: IR 05000329/1981011
Text
_
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_
.,
f
.
'AUG 121981
.
.
/ \\ .\\ $1.?)
$
f(.
s 't
-
Docket No. 50-329
y g= 7
i
Docket No. 50-330
9f
'
.
b
I.UG 171981> T
Consumers Power Company
4
g ) "*"
6
ATTN:
Mr. James W. Cook
Vice President
\\,
Midland Project
\\v1
/
1945 West Parnall Road
g
g
Jackson, MI 49201
Gentlemen:
Thank you for your letter dated July 16, 1981, informing us of the steps
you have taken to correct the four items of noncompliance which we brought
to your attention in Inspection Reports No. 50-329/81-11; 50-330/81-11
forwarded by our letter dated June 16, 1981.
With respect to Items 1 and 2, your actions will be reviewed during a
subsequent inspection.
With respect to Item 3, we reiterate our position that NCR M-01-4-9-048
did not specifically identify and control the numerous instances in which
required separation barriers were removed from raceway drawings. To the
extent that cable pulling activities continued unrestrained without this
identification and control, we view this as an itee of noncompliance.
However, we conclude that the measures delineated in your response will
be adequate in providing the necessary corrective action, thus no further
response to this item is required.
With respect to Item 4, we disagree with your position that the instru-
ment impulse lines are not required to be identified distinctively as
being in the protection system. This requirement, as stated in Appendix A
of the report, is delineated in IEEE 279-1971, Section 4.22.
It is our
position that the impulse lines constitute part of an instrument component
and thus shall be distinctively identified as indicated in the subject
standard.
f
Suh
8108180559 810812
PDR ADOCK 05000329
O
.--
_
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _
,
-
.
f,.
M I 2 OSI
Consumers Power Company
-2-
Therefore, we request that you submit a second letter to this office
within 30 days of the date of this letter to respond to our concerns
regarding Item 4.
You response should be submitted under oath or
affirmation.
i
Your cooperation with us is appreciated.
Sincerely,
,
i '
a
f
[. $.)leb
!
C. E. Norelius, Director
Division of Engineering and
1
Technical Inspection
cc w/ltr dtd 7/16/81:
DMB/ Document Control Desk (RIDS)
Resident Inspector, RIII
J
Ronald Callen, Michigan
j
.Public Service Commission
Myron M. Cherry
,
. .
1
4
e
1
i
i
I
I
i
!
1
RI
.j
III I
JTII
RIII
RI
RIII
G rdner/so
L ve
W l iams.
Boyd
S essard
N6
.i
f
-8/4/81
$H
B\\
. 6 ,4
i
L
--
.
-
-
-
-
-
.