ML20010B465
| ML20010B465 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Washington Public Power Supply System |
| Issue date: | 08/03/1981 |
| From: | Eisenhut D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Ferguson R WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8108170018 | |
| Download: ML20010B465 (2) | |
Text
-
N; N
\\
\\
1 DISTRIBUTION Docket File Local PDR LB#4 Reading NRC/PDR AUG 3 1331 DEisenhut NSIC-
/
EAdensam TIC Docket Nos.: ~0-410/bl3 MRushbrook ACRS (10)
SHanauer RTedesco RVollmer
,,n i O' / /h Itr. R. L. Ferguson O
Nanaging 01 rector TMurley RMattson
,d 7'
RHartfield, MPAY I$[.
Washington Public Power Supply System P.O. Box 968 OELD c;
3000 George Washington Way
'"G 0 71981 m-r Richland, Washington 99352 OIE (3) 0 bcc: TERA
'] uA gp '
9
Dear Mr. Ferguson:
7 k
SUBJECT:
WNP-1 Construction Completion Schedule w
We are developing licensing schedules for facilities projecting plant completion in 19S4. Your licensing schedule will be developed using your estimated con-struction completion date and a set of standard hearing assumptions.
The preliminary hearing scheoules will assune a standard eleven-month time period from the issuance of the final Supplement to *.he Safety Evaluation Report (SSER) to the Comission decision date. This time period incorporates the efficiency measures projected to be in place in the near future. This time period is based on five months from issuance of the SSLR to the start of hearing, five conths from start of hearing to the initial decision 'Jy the Atomic Safety Licensing Board, and one month from the initial decision by the Atomic Safety Licensing Board to the Comission decision date. These assumptions, and your relative priority, will be re-examined on a case-by-case basis after the Counission completes its consideration of proposed changes to the regulations.
To assure proper allocation of resour;es it is important that you provide us a realistic and up-to-date projer ted construction completion date.
Because of nanpower limitations earn review will be scheduled to fall in a
" window" of time wherein our reviews must be completed. an unexpected change of your completion date will likely have an impact on the schedule for your review. Accordingly, you should Examine your construction coppletion date in t:ie attached Table ano confirm or change the date within 14 days of receipt oi this letter.
You shocid also provide us quarterly updates thereaf ter until issuance of the Safety Evaluation Report for the f acility.
Sincer,ly, OMginal 31cnod by Darro11 G. Eisenhut j
Darrell G. Eisennut, Director Division of Licensing
- See previous white 4
DL LB#4T I
,,,,c, p!
Enclosure:
As stated
-DI.
.........(
DL:LB#4 ADl.L-
"""'l...cc:..Seenext.page-Rhernan:eb EAdensam co D
ut 8108170010 010803 PDR ADOCK 05000 7/,,01 /81 7/ 05 /,81 7/,,/81 7/
,/81 o.
P.RC F ORM 318 sto 80l NRCM O240 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY M 19W329 824
9 DISTRIBUTION Docket File NRC/PDR LB#4 Reading TERA DEisenhut NSIC EAdensam TIC MRushbrook ACRS (10)
Docket Hos.: 50-460/513 SHanauer RTedesco tir. G. D. Bouchey RVollmer Director, Nuclear Safety TMurley Washington Public Power Supply Systen RMattson Post Office Box 958 R. Hartfield, MPA 300 George Washington Way 0 ELD Richland, Washington 93522 OIE (3) bec: Local P
Dear ilr. Bouchey:
SUBJECT:
EP-1 Construction Completion Schecule Je tre developing licensing schedules for facj ties projecting plant cor.:pletion in 1984. Your licensing schedule will be deyeloped using your estimated con-struction completion dato and a set of staridard hearing assumptions.
/
The preliminary hearing schedules will p4sume a standard eleven-nonth time period from the issuance of the final pupplement to the Safety Evaluation Report (SSER) tt.' the Comission decision date. This tine pc
'd incorporates the ef ficiency measures projected to be,dn place in the near future. This timo period is based on five nonths fro;n issuance of the SSER to the start of hecring, five montns from start of hearing'to the initial decision by the Atomic Safety Licensing Board, and one sonth froo the initial decision by the Atomic Safety efon decision date. These assuaptions, and your Licensing Board to the Comis#exauf ned ori a case-by-case basis after the relative priority, will be rp-Comission completes its consideration of proposed changes to the regulations.
of resources it is important that you provide To assure proper allocat)date projected construction completion date.
us a realistic and up-to-Because of manpower litiitations each review will be scheduled to fall in a
" window' of tine uhersin our reviews nust be conpleted. An unexpected change of your completiun pate will likely nave an impact on the schedule for your review. AccordingJy, you should exaaine your construction cot.pletion date in the attacned T ble and confirn or change the date within 14 days of receipt of this letter.
You should als6 provide us quarterly updates tnereafter until issuance of the Safety Evaluation Report for the facility.
/
/
/
Sincerely, Darrell G. Eisennut, Director Division of Licensing DL g g4, & j L y_,
Ay_k _,,,,,,
M /pL,,,
B o mce>.g.pezesures..
kame >.As. 3.tn.ted...
P%rnan.;eb.....EM.eb.0m....RT.e.de.S.cp..... DEisenhut.....
cc: Seenetpge........
7./.. f../.81...
. 2/..h../31...
.7/... Ms..
. J./...../81...
one>
Nnc ronu ais oo-so> nacu eno OFFICIAL RECORD COPY uscaum-muo
-