ML20010B424

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Corrections to Third Set of Interrogatories Directed to Applicant.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence
ML20010B424
Person / Time
Site: Big Rock Point File:Consumers Energy icon.png
Issue date: 08/09/1981
From: Semmel H
ANTIOCH SCHOOL OF LAW, WASHINGTON, DC, BIER, MILLS, CHRISTA-MARIA, ET AL
To:
CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.)
References
NUDOCS 8108140461
Download: ML20010B424 (5)


Text

f,sv 9,

/

19 en g

0

? '.

_3 g,

+ 13193;w WMTED CORRESPONDENCH s

y

( "^ L2*fp i 1k AUG 1219813 b

'e UNITED STA7FS OF AMERICA clp,,, p,,

\\$/

  1. NUCLFAP REGULATORY COMMISSION g\\

05 '.[.; i(27 f

Q m

k:.in C

In the Matter of

)

M og

)

CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY

)

Docket No.

50-155

)

(Big Rock Point Nuclear Power

)

Station)

)

)

COPPFC7 IONS TO CFRISTA-MAPIA, E7 AL. IN7ERROGA70 RIES TO CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY (SET III)

The following corrections are hereby made to Intervenors Interrogatories dated August 9, 1981:

1.

Page 3, line ~, spelling correction, constituents.

2.

Page 3, line 10, spelling correction, amounts.

3.

Page 4, line 6, spelling correction, Intervenors.

4.

Page 4, line 7, spelling correction, piping.

5.

Page 9, line 1, spelling correction, containment.

6.

Page 10, line 1, spelling correction, analyzed.

7.

Page 15, insert d and e to interrogatory number 29 as follows:

d.

If other material (s) have been stored in the spent fuel pool, is (a re) it (they) stored there now?

Fow, when and where was (were) it (they) moved?

e.

Pas the NRC ever requested that Consumers Power remove such material from the spent fuel pool?

When?

8.

Page 17, line 6, delete reprocessing.

9.

Page 26, add interrogatories 59, 60, ano 61 as follows:

59.

In a December 19, 1975 letter from Mr.

Charles Axtel to Consumers Power, the dose rates above the spent fuel pool were described as n108140461 810B'09 j75 PDR ADOCK 05000155 jjp G

PDR 3.s_

_es..t_

2_

' being "much higher than at most reactors."

a.

What was the dose rate?

b.

How much higher than normal was it?

What steps have been taken to reduce the c.

dose rate?

d.

What caused these dose rates to be higher then those at most other reactors?.

e.

On what did Mr. Axtel base his conslusion?

60.

To what extent is the assumption that all fuel rods stored at Big Rock Point have identical enrichment, i.e. uniform or homogeneous enrichment distribution with modified G-3 fuel, used to determine criticality at Big Rock Point?

a.

Does this assumption apply to all the fuels stored at Big Rock?

b.

Please explain the existence of hot spots assuming the homogeneity of the fuel stored at Big Rock.

61.

Does Consumers Power Company have any' plans to use Big Rock Point as a storage facility for spent fuel from any other nuclear facility pursuant to 10 CFR 727 Has Consumers Power ever considered such a use of Big Rock Point?

Explain and provide all pertinent correspondence.

a.

Could Big Rock Point be used as an Indeper. dent Fuel Storage Installation?

b.

Ubat other kinds of fuel could the spent fuel pool at Big Rock Point accept?

c.

Are (can) the spent f uel racks proposed to be constructed in the Spent' Fuel Pool at Big Pock Point being (be) modified to accept other kinds of fuel assemblies?

x

. %Ss%i - fi&*E-A A.1-S41> i * ? ' A i-*#

  • A

- S= A C ~ -

-d O -*h*

. e.

'~

Respectfully submitted,

, -A W~

. 24//w Herbert Semmel Antioch-School of Law 2633 16th Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C.

20009 i

Counsel for Intervenors Christa-Maria, et al.

Dated August 9, 1981 i

+

Y \\

4

[*

g 4,g,, _.

1_.;

_ _,. u f f f__

p L_

m.

_'1'--

,w g.sw y

1

.4-

-u

.--.....-.%==

-.y--w.-

,..-m.

L

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that copies of Intervenors Interrogatories

,,...>i

  • h Ti SM -III to Licensee dated August 9, 1981 in Consumers Power Comany, Big Rock Point Nuclear Power Plant, No. 50-155, were served on all persons identified in the attached list by depositing copies in the United States mail, first class, postege prepaid, the 10th day o( August, 1981.

Scott Warner f

i l

I i

l i

e l

I

,n.

l

' i.'

._.e.

., _.x _ w. w, _

  • -4

,t M,,~

a.s = -

e.* E.imi e.e e

..,. 4 6..,.d

_. _ _ _., _ _a_ _. jC..

_,. a.3g,,,_,

_ ~

w,...

.o.

Ate.ic Safety and Licensing Jeesph Calir, Esquire 2.sha., Lfnen3n and Beale B:ard Panc3 1120 Connecticutt' Ave, N.W.

3 U.S. Nuclear Regclatory Suite 325 Cor..issien Washington, D.C.

20555 Washington, D.C. 200~*6 Philip P. Steptoe, Esquire Herbert Grossman, Esq., Chairman Isham, Lincoln and Beale Atomic Safety and Li. censing One First National Plaza suite 4200 Board Panel Chicago, Illinois 60603 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington D.C.

20555 Ater.ic Safety and Licens:.:e Appeal Board Fanel U.S. Nuclear Regulatcry Dr. Oscar H. Paris Cornission Atomic Safety and Licensing washington, D.C.

20555 Board Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Docketing and Service Section Commission Office of the Secretary Washington D.C.

20555 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Cornission Mr. Fredrick J. Shon washington, D.C.

20555 Atomic Safety and Licensing John O'Neill, II Board Panel Route 2, Box 44 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Maple City, MI 49664 Commission Washington D.C.

20555 Janice E. Moore, Esq.

Counsel for NRO Staff U.S. N :02 ear Regulatory.

3 Corrission Washington, D.C.

20555 John A. Leithauser Energy Resources Group General Delivery l

Levering, MI 49755 l

=

' ' f6,,,

,n u

..; q[.1

, ~ ~ ~ ~ *.~~.. nen~ es., *-=

.&,. s..

,,3 --- ; 3. - _ - -.

~^--5

' ~ ' '

~~ -

.m

,y.

,