ML20010A893
| ML20010A893 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | LaSalle  |
| Issue date: | 08/03/1981 |
| From: | Mccorkle G NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS) |
| To: | Schwencer A Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20010A892 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8108130077 | |
| Download: ML20010A893 (3) | |
Text
. _ -
b.
~
~*
-* j
' ENCLOSURE
- o UNITED STATES s
8"
- t NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g
g wash NGTON, D. C. 20656
/
~ * *
- AUG 3 1981 SGPL:RFS 50-373/374 MEMORANDUM FOR: Al Schwencer, Chief -
Licensing Branch Divisio.1 of Licensing, NRR FROM:
George W. McCorkle, Chief Physical Security Licensing Branch Division of Enfeguards, NMSS
SUBJECT:
IMPLEMENTATION OF LASALLE SECURITY PLAN This is to advise you of certain points of interest that surfaced during Mr. Robert F. Skeltor's licensing visit to the LaSalle facility during the period July 20-23, 1981.
During the visit it ~became apparent '.:iat Commonwealth Edison was making only slow progress in completing construction of their security system and in turn in accomplishing final testing of the system. This situation had previously been identified as an item of concern by the IE resident inspec-tor and by Region III personnel (James Creed). The fact that approximately 10% of security related construction is still incomplete and that no rea.listic schedule has been developed for the completion of construction, quality assurance testing, and implementation attests to the validity of these Concerns.
It was the opinion of both Mr. Skelton and IE personnel at the time of the visit that the licensee's proposed schedule for these activities was highly optimistic. These schedules projected partial completion of construction and system installation by September 15, 1981, with complete implementation of the system scheduled for November 1,1981 An exit meeting..u held by Mr. Skelton and IE representatives with the Site Superintendent, construc-tion personnel, qualf y assurance personnel, and corporate security managers-on June 22, 1981. The enclosure identifies all individuals present at this meeting. During this conference, licensee personnel assured the NRC representatives that they considered their schedule firm and workable and that the securitu system would be installed and implemented no later than November 1,1981. The licensee was infor;.ed that failure to meet the schedule would result in their being citable as of the OL issuance date (this is consistent with License Condition transmitted to your office on April 27,1981). It was noted that in the absence of approved changes to the security plan the institution of compensatory measures would not be acceptable.
' 0103130077 810805 i POR ADOCK 05000373 F
.~
~
L *. :
\\
,z Al Schwencer It wasmiso noted during the visit the licensee had failed to take action on several problems previously brought to their attention. These involved certain physical changes to the perimeter intrusion detection system and modifications to an equipment hatch related to vital area access controls.
The licensee agreed to take necessary corrective actions and no plan changes are aecessary.
h 4
Geon W. McCorkle, Chief Physical Security Licensing Branch-Division of Safeguards, NMSS
Enclosure:
As stated 1
cc:
W. Brown, DSRSI, IE J. Creed, Region III 4
J. Miller, SSPB, NRR i-
~r.
~.. ~.,-,
e..
ENCLOSURE 1.
R. D. Walker, Senior Resident Inspector, IE 2.
J. Creed, Acting Safeguards Section Chfef, Region III, IE 3.
R. D. Bishop, Assistant Superintendent for Administration, CECO 4.
S. Audirich, Assistant Superintendent for Operations, CECO S.
W. J. Mahan, Technichl Staff, CECO 6.
E. E, Spitzner, Start-up Coordinator, CECO
{
7.
F. Willaford, Security Staff, CECO i
8.
J. Grudan, Project Management, CEC 0 9.
T. Brozum, Site Security Supervisor, CECO 10.
D. H. Smith, Nuclear Security Administrator. CECO 11.
R. D. Krouac, Quality Assurance, CECO 12.
R. F. Skelton, DS, NMSS i
i t
e sw e w:
re--
- ~
w
,