ML20010A061
| ML20010A061 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Callaway  |
| Issue date: | 08/03/1981 |
| From: | Regan W Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Ballard R Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8108110012 | |
| Download: ML20010A061 (24) | |
Text
W b.
s 9
O O
v
\\
DISTRIBUTI0t1 (DocketFiles SAB Rdg M 0 3 9 81 SAB Plant File DRMuller Docket t;o. 50-483 WHRegan f4 Eft 0RNiDUM F0tt:
Ronald L. Ballard, Chief Environmental Engineering Branch, DE FROM:
Wn. H. Regan, Jr., Chief Siting Analysis Branch, DE
SUBJECT:
REVIElf 0F Nil SOCI0EC0!;0:11C MiD CULTURAL RESOURCES Ir;PUT TO CALLAUAY 1 DES This is in response to Clarence Hickey's request to review the N;L socio-economic and cultural resources input to the Callaway 1. DES. As a result of the review.of Sections 4.2.1, 4.3.6, 4.3.7. 5.7 and 5.0 of the Callaway 1 DES, we have attached a copy of the sugges ed changes and cornents.
Suggested changes to Section 4.3.7.1 Demography and Section 4.3.7.2 Settle-ment Patterns were prepared by W. Rodak (see letter from II. Regan to R. Ballard, July 17, 1981). l e changes were discussed with, and concurred in by D. A. Brodnick, Af;L. Suggested changes prepared by Louis Bykosklein Sections 4.3.6, 5.7 and Appendix H dealing with cultural resources were discussed 1with and concurred in by, Sue Ann Curtis, NIL.
For further infomation contact Louis Bykoski, who can be reached on extension 24879.
Original signed by W. H. Regan, Jr.
Un. H. Regan, Jr., Chief Siting Analysis Branch Division of Engineering efg
Attachment:
Ps As stated cc:
D. Cleary
/Z/
dui-C. Hickey
-j
,, g () $ FAl *,$
L. Bykoski
.;,,g G. Edison
^
0108110012 810803 DR ADOCK 05000483 PDR D.E:4. g..S..AB : R I A DE,,:ETAS. AB DE ET:SAB:RIA cr,,cr y m.
"um9 ki:clc DP,,legy,
. tjHRepp,,
om>
7/31/81 8/S/81 8/3/81
, use ww_m eu wc rowu w oo em wcu c2" OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
NUREG-1981 DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT related to the operation of CALLAWAY PLANT UNIT 1 i
UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY e W- (/
,ww Docket No. STN 50-483 l
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
h#1 9, sc-c - A }.
V R'J WO^^ _ ^ ^ ^^A l
^
T-
^^
A ph!% 1:=4,*::-e
& e d e r e : l!.l a e :s a ?A v 6. u n.: A h m..
- n of-
-A w
=M4kv 9 i d = % e = Q1 ~
9 x c e M c A n 4
& a-a.p ne,a 9
V A MX %u4 L4=% n ww=ed g p
- M % eav = %wa an p 9 D
q ta
. s. o.
t i
cal.UY3/ Job A 2nd Draft.
sc-6 6 Jul $1 J.
N' r+-
^^ ': ':
.:1_.
J.,..,3
- -" ir
- ' ' M
- '^
- 'It2 M ^-^;-^-
- lLiui w A Lw, at=;s
- u p +.,.
- '" U l
- -}=44 An-s m ( adsad y $ill
- p. A.
- c
- ~.. -. v o v m m mv. 1
- 1 are also for two units; however, the conclusions pertain only to the operation of CAL-1.
- n. a n a u s 4' a y %
- p. Sc p
- ^~"
- _.,1
- - i'. ;
- .- i t ? " 4 e n-n r n t a e + # ^ - ;.,3, u m, Noti;E.;l *, 3,;to, wI.44awuric t.5-2 * '"^ ^^+
- -1i0)
- w. w n,77--
- t 1.1
- t;t: : 1 J20 fn.
- hp-**^-
- 4 increased taxes paid by the applicant to local agencies (Sec. 5.8.2), and the fact that the operational payroll income will extend over a longer period.
- w g Dece re f u% q)%, Eal*s o, nn m ove w
- B J.
- a.
- b Vi h!~ ^>
SUBJECT:
REVIEW 0F Af1L DEMOGRAFHIC IfPUT TO CALLAllAY l DES As a result of our review of the Callaway 'l DES-input on Demography supplied by ANL, the enclosed changes are suggested in Sections 4.3.7.1 on demography and 4.3.7.2 on settlement pattern. These changes appear on the three attached pages of the text.
If you have any questiorPconcerning these modification please conta9 Bill Rodak at 492-4880.
Original signed by W. H. Regan, Jr.
1h. H. Regan, Jr., Chief i
Siting Analysis Branch, DE
Enclosure:
As Stated lW.Rodak cc:
s
\\ %
L d
<3 L p '] b G Y 7E:ET:SAB:RIA DE:ET:SAB:RIA DE:ET:SAS WRod,ak,,
DCie&.y WRegan 9,1! 7l} '
oue addition -unrecordad si_t R a till present.. Jhe_MissoliD artment
'num
-~
o'N4atura bsoiTr'5s"3i of Parks and~ Historic.
~ 'on, concurs w1
~ ~ ~
r t.'.a; < serv 7 T m Q C).
4.3.7 Socioeconomic Characteristics 4
Socioeconomic characteristics include demography, governmental services, housing land use, local economy, political and social structures, and recreation.
The elevant attributes for 'the region around the 'Callaway Plant have been described (FES-CP, Secs. 2.2, 4.2, 4.5, and 5.6).
Some changes have occurred since the FES-CP was issued; these are described below.
~ + S..y
.L u
, g r.
f 4.3.7.1 Demography Population projections' within an 80-km (SC-mi) radius surrounding the site j
have been revised upward since'pyblication of the FES-CP.
Preconstruction
{
data and current data provided by the applicant and reviewed by the staff are presented in Table 4.3.
Population-distribution estimates for 1970 and 2030, within 16 km (10 mi) of the site, are shown in. Figure 4.10.
f Y
seAumlh Population fluctuations will occur de44y within 8 km (5 mi)M the plant due LL l
l to changes in the transient populations of the Reform Wildlife Management Area and Lost Canyon Lakes.
The Reform, Wildlife Management Area allows hunting, fishing, and trapping, but a ban against camping will prevent people from staying in the area.
Lost Canyon Lakes i* a recreational-vehicle and trailer-l park development with about 600 people on a typical wecken$ ace 200 people on ud180*^^ L % 's.
__ =~ r ^- -r c ' : i -
L-r%
l an average weekdays Th r -
s
=
l 4-S i
f)
', l
.i
+
,n e
e R
$Becausa bn'h thase areurualative_ly. new and dewticcing, it 1.s_dl.ffid-at L*;
r x
1 th.vr ti e u catimate-sture--transient-popuhtton-near.-the-sita.
u;+ cm n,% ws W W. %+~ ~ a @
-waa m ~m&+" tv"-
L.
4.3.7.2 Settlement Patterns Eight of the original 26 residences located on the land owned by UE still remain and are being rented to tenants by UE.
When CAL-1 becomes operational, the one residence on.the plant site will not be leased but will be used for various plant activities.
UE plans to continue renting the other seven resi-dences to tenants as long as it remains profitable.
,,. t.gr
,.S htSIA 3-N g
The developer of Lost Canyon Lakes haA recently gland 110 homesites dos the
.t <
ee 4
Although this area is -prYly inhabited by transients at this time, area.
As 7)ta. M ou J M W.
the composition of the population wiTT change te bcth permanent _and-tcan:icat -
g s
TesloentC-
's s The staff expects that the area within 16 km (10 mi) of the site will expe-rience a slow growth rate and continue its rural character during the opera-tion of CAL-1.
The location and availability of land around Jefferson City N
will not require the community., grow toward the site.
Also, inasmuch as the N
site is not within commuting distance (80 km, 50 mi, or a onehopr car ride)
L of St. Louis, the development of suburban communities near the site is not L
anticipated.
4.3.7.3 Commercial and Recreatienal Fishing Comraerciabqnd recreational-fishing activities were covered.very briefly in the FES-CP (Sec.
7.1).
Updated estimates of comm$rcial anci recreational I
e g
e
Tab'le 4.3.
Projeted Population Within
'80 Kilome1ers,1970-2030 Paulation Estimates y'f Year Precontructionti Currentt2 97 3E,411..
30,5,33d 1980 34,674 369,490 1990 3K,374 421,180 '
2000 42,435 464,820 2010 4E,591
_492,190
~
2020 55,946 518,090 4-553,370 2030 t2 From the ER-CP 6 Table 2.2-3).
u 12 From the ER-OL (t able 2.1-4).' '
T
' Total for19iD e actual ata ob-l l
, tai d by addi contrib ions fro si ividual ar of a r se format l
T e preconst ution a current sti-f matas were vahate independe ly; the diff ence het en the tw 1970 values 's a e e of the ce r-tainty in the al for t t year.
k5
%Qw % % -\\wo 1910
~
yJaSMAa k cm@*-.
N
^
u-s t
i o
i S
'e D
CALUY3/ Job D 9th Draft 4-28 30 Jun 81 7.
" Rare and Endangered Fauna of Missouri." Missouri Department of Conser-vation, 1978.
9.
" National Register of Historic Places Inventory Nomination Form."
U.S.
Department of the Interior, National Park Service, submitted for Union Electric Company Site, Missouri Archeological Survey Number 23CY20, 24 October 1978.
_r..___._.z.z,,;;__.,
u.,_
_4
,r 4--
nf Osrbe mna u4e+nrir eene-rus+4nn
+n ro utrvo 1_
',', g,-
niv4 7 N!!PI^2-1; sal:IO] C --i;,iwo, dC nu v uilluc s 1200.
11.
" Collection of Commercial Fisheries Harvest Data in Missouri; 1975, 1976, 1977, and 1978."
Final Report, National Marine Fisheries Service, Project No. 2-291-R-3, Missouri Department of Conservation, March 1980.
i i
12.
" Missouri's Commercial Fishery Harvest, 1979."
Progress Report, National l
I Marine Fisheries Service, Program No. 2-363-R-1, Missouri Department of i
Conservation, December 1980.
I 5.
(Deleted) j 8.
(Deleted) 1 13.
(Deleted) l l
14.
(Deleted)
CALWY2/ Job E 7th Draft 5-1 3 Jul 81 5.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES AND MITIGATING ACTIONS 5.1 RESUME This rssums highlights changes in the staff's evaluation of environmental effects of operating the Callaway Plant in the light of information gained since the FES-CP was issued in 1975.
No discussion is provided of those impacts for which there has been no eew information or change since the con-struction review.
The major change is a consequence of the decision to defer construction of Unit 2.
Analyses and conclusions in the FES-CP regarding environmental im acts The analyses in this section,(M' d& N'
--^T*ht]_
applied to two units.
Conclusions for operation of CAL-1 alone can be drawn from the two-unit analyses because the one-unit impacts do not exceed the two-unit impacts.
Other changes are relatively minor, and are summarized below.
Changes in land-use impacts due to operation of the sludge lagoons and revised estimates prompted by updated informatio.1 are discussed.
Water-use and hydro-
f CALWY2/ Job E 7th Oraft 5-2 3 Jul 81 logical impacts are reexamined and updated to reflect changes in plant design and operation and more recent environmental data.
Air quality impacts are reexamined using onsite meteorological data collected after 1975.
Terrestrial-istoric and aquatic-ecology impacts are reviewed and updated.
+
and archeological sites are reviewed in the light of new information gained during the site visit.
Socioeconomic impacts are reviewed and updated.
Information on radiological impacts of normal opvation has been revised to reflect updated knowledge gained since the FES-CP was issued.
The material on plant accidents now contains information that has been revised and updated to include Class 9 accidente and the lessons learned from the accident at Three Mile Island, Unit 2.
The latest information on environmental effects of the uranium fuel cycle and decommissioning has been provided.
Operational monitoring programs are to be conducted in accordance with the Environmental Protection Plan (EPP) to be issued by NRC as part of the coerat-ing license.
The EPP will require the applicant, as licensee, to (1) notify NRC if change _ in plant design or operation occur, or if tests or experiments affecting the environment are performed, provided that such changes, tests, or i
experiments involve an unreviewed environmental question; (2) maintain specific environmentally related records; (3) maintain monthly records as required by, and report violations of conditions stated in, the NPDES permit or state certification pursuant to Section 401 of the Clean Water Act; and (4) report unusual or important environmental events.
5.2 LAND USE Much of the discussion in the FES-CP of operational impacts on land use (FES-CP, Secs. 5.3.4, 5.4.4, 5.5.4, and 5.6.1) remains valid.
The following analyses
6 l k'f fa. y T
'b I A %L r., paroea nas Asarauwe s>ra.
n>A-AW e=)liwake g f4
-A !!=Li
%.~L w
a W+ J arl Ah x
hA 4 2M, &=-Al 4 p04 kW a u-q m\\'
q
&w A ~J au: ~
ki
%: E 4 k, & g w. s_A Q Vf44.a e ~ & - d &&
NJ kJA A w n m m % Alf,4 A A
t QLAv w
tw==1A q iket+f4 J.: A J Ae d k a. L & w'M=s t w'
J a.
o_ e e h d p u - e e n pe:=w9,a%Aq%%d?w w pu V9s a=A 14M 9m.s. LL 1M nr '--
A. c '
a mA f 2%
6,d W4 o
)p k M A 6 & ; M <) fay':.!9 aus.
.
A s 4A Any %a +
-A
,m aw-w Agn Ac :9 O
a
,:A_w a as
!f QA
^
A & % 6 w s.-. 3
CALWY2/ Job E 7th Oraft 5-31 3 Jul 81 The staff has also considered the impacts of CAL-1 operation on rare and endangered animal and plant species from the state list that have been observed near the plant (Sec. 4.3.5).
They are the marsh hawk (Circus cyaneus), sharp-shinned hawk (Accipter striatus), brown bullhead (Ictalurus furcatus), long-tailed weasel (Mustela fenata), bald eagle (Haliaectus leucocephalus alascensis),
j ruffed grouse (Bonasa umbelies), and American elm (Ulmus americana) (Sec. 4.3.5).
l The staff has determined that operation of CAL-1 will not have an adverse t
l effect on any of these species.
5.7 HISTCRIC AND ARCHEOLOGICAL SITES A
...y--.
_.ws e6 DOC pi ca
.A, bwi I^ :. I 2*
w iw,vwi ww,
L th;
--en r+y
.. t a;v:.,:t'; +'- ;r:::t ' :t't +--
" i_
a
^#
" #^: $.ww I ; --.,
7 p.3
^h,.......!
2'.
C_I 0^
-. s 3
& :h,,m.
e y;
e :
,,u,.<,,,
__ ~,.
.s:-
.,,,4,3
.m_
.m_
mi T;.
.:':+'-~
On+o-mine-what
<4+--
o, e gw wc u w. o.,,
,3.m s
fn
+bg Mm+4mmm1 QPOiStPP of hic +n D,7 77, 4,
,,ssesu wv pivvcu.,,,,, ;,, t h p l ;,. t' p
.y s, ;f
?
C' # ^ # II; #;.,,,o9 a a 4 v u in
remy
_q
, g3 7go,__,i.-...
^
^
.., ~ y i..... ;,
oua a
ac a ww. ww a
. c a v i. vs
.m_
-.,n.
.m_
- A
,om.<#_,m4-xx _-
n.-,-,_
-~.,. ~. ~ < =
-w w r y7 j
- 7...
kqpf7 r
n - oo,.#- e n +
m. 7 ' ' b '
+km wi. a c o v 61 u a.. 6c o wa.
^
sh;
^d IcquaFU cppIVVai Uy ons
... -,3,,
mn
.ww4vo w.6.
picso.
]##4-a,
+sa W 4 r -.. 4 C+
+~ uf t
m-1 S##fra 3
i
CALWY2/ Job E 72h Draft 5-33 3 Jul 81 operation (ER-OL, Rev. 2, p. 310.6-1 and Table 8.1-8).
The staff concurs that this level of secondary employment could be achieved.
Many of these positions will be filled by local residents, attracting only a few people to move into the area for these jobs.
The transition from construction to operation will result in a net loss of payroll income.
The construction payroll reached a maximum of about 2000 workers u
with a gross annual payroll of about $80 million per year during 1979 to 1981, E
and will drop rapidly to about 100 construction workers and 53 million per year p
6 in 1983 (ER-CP, Sec. 8.1. 3.1.1).
The operating work force started with an initial contingent of 40 workers and an estimated payroll income of $1 million
]
in 1979, and is projected by the applicant to reach 281 workers with an esti-mated payroll income (in current dollars) of about $8 million in 1982 (ER-OL, j
Rev. 2, Table 8.1-9).
The staff believes that this loss will be mitigated by y
the gradual nature of the transition from construction to operation, the greater stability of the operating work fo?ce and a tendency for the operating y
workers to invest and spend a greater fraction of their income locally, the f
)$
The applicant estirntes that retail purchases by plant operating employees j
5 j7 will be about $2.7 million in 1982 (ER-OL, Rev. 2, Table 8.1-11).
S h Y l3
& (&) Uh V W
N h M 6 he-y eg - $ h * : f v & m $
d U) b s f. /.12.1 A FR-o L d
d 5.8.2 Tax Benefits 15 s.l-7.
UE, which is a privately owned utility, has begun to pay large tax revenues tc the local area and the state.
The property taxes collected from UE for CAL-1
l
~~ -... - nnanmer, e--
APPENDIX H.
IN O
h NO d ygg3 g HISTORIC AND PREHISTORIC SITES 1
l l
l l
H-1
G RffeNDt y h.
WtsToRec.
AA/O PREl4tSToRic.
%Tes
6
<c.
A w/
'b 1.1.} 4 A,uc n p n-s,y J s.
($ T sic L v b IET a q @
h
% /m % 6 DL 5. r. s p,nnes y%
p%I o
h.sfi ts
=A a.
w A4 i
~
A W
to y % h S.,% 4 -
h=&x.%)NB/.
t,l i
t 1
$YOY$
/
~
UNION El.ECTMIC COMPANY seen saatsov smiest sv. Lovse. Missousie
[ er. m ee m sk earme r.
j January 30, 1981 l
Mr. B. J. Youngblood, inf e
Licensing Branch No. 1
~
Division of Licensing U.S. Nuclear Regulatory C ssion Washington, D.C.
20555 cuc -411 Dear Mr. Yot.ngbloods CUL K RESOURCES CALLAWAY PIX:T
\\
In response to ycur letter datei December 24, 1960, we have taken the
\\
following actions:
j
\\
1.
Our Real Estate Department has been instructed to assure the protet. tion of the original structures on the plant site until a physical structure survey and an'alysis has been completed and the results evtluated.
'\\
\\
2.
We will continue to protect Site 23CY20 by maintaining the s
fence around the site and prohibiting any access to the site.
Our transmission line construction supervis' ors have been in-3.
structed to survey the areas around the remaining transmission tower bases to determine if any archaeological sites exist.
If *Mre is any doubt as to the existence of such,a site, the Misscuri State Historical preservation Office will\\be notified.
4.
Mr. Michael S. Weichman of the Missouri Department of' Natural Resources has besn contacted egarding protection of the mound referred to in Iter * % your letter.
Mr. Weichma)tsad-vised that praetection of asunds (and other unidentified cuk-i tural resources) could be accomplished by having plant secu sty
\\
note and discourage any activity during norr.al rounds, such as digging, etc., which could potentially affect a cultural resovsce. We have, therefore, instructed our security force to isoisment the t.bove suggestion.
H-4
- (M 4
Nr. 3. J. Y gblood, Chief
,,/ ^
Page 2 January 28, 1981 we are currentk discussing a cultural resources survey in-5, This survey ciuding a mound survey with various consultants.
will be done in cortsultation with the Missouri state Historical Preservation Office 'and a proposal sukunitted to NRC prior to implementation. Our cuksent plans are to complete this survey prior to the spring plantiqq season.
/\\
i No will keep you informed of rour pitogress in this area.
\\
sincargly, q
N N '"
t L-John K.
\\,
,fw NGS/111
\\,
cc See Next Pags
\\,
H-5
gblood, ottet Page 3 January 28, 19e ocs Mr. Nicholas A. Pe ick Mr. William Bansen Executive Director--
PS Desident Inspector /Callaway NPS 5 Choke Cherry Road
\\
c/o t3SNRC mochrille, Marylari 20850s steadman, Missou:1 65077 Gerald Charnoff, Esq.
1er. Jordan Tannenbaum Shaw, Pittman, Potts t, s
1522 K Street, N. W.
Trowbridge
\\.
Washington, D.C.
20005
\\'Mr. Michael S. Weichman 1900 M Street, N. W.
Washington, D.C.
20036 Sedior Archaeologist Dr. Vern Starks Misso'uti Department of Natural Assour'ces Route 1, Box 863 P. O. Box 17(
s Estchikan, Alaska,<99901
/
Jefferson CityiWasouri 65102 Ms. Trevaneary,' Assistant General
'N'N 1
Counsel Ms. Sue Ann Curtis Missouri lic Service M asion Argonne National I.aboratg P. Q.
360 9700 South Cass Avenue
'\\
Jeffer n City, Missouri 65102 Argonne, Illicois 60439
)
l l
(
'e UNITED STATES
}
![T,,eq*j
+
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON. D. C. 20555
%;..v.../
JUL 211981 Docket Nos. :
50-483 and 50-486 Mr. John K. Bryan Vice President Union Electric Company Post Office Box 149 St. Louis, Missouri 63166
Dear Mr. Bryan:
Subject:
Cultural Resources - Callaway Plant Since receiving your May 4,1981 request to review your proposal of the cultural resources survey and assessment for Callaway Nuclear Power Plant, the NRC has received the Missouri Department of Natural Resources coments on that Research Design and your subsequent response to those coments.
As part of its review of the Research Design, the NRC requested the Interagency Archeological Service (IAS), National Park Service, United States Department of The Interior in Denver, Colorado to review and coment on the Research Design.
IAS coments are provided in the attached letter.
NRC concurs with these coments and request that you consider them in your final design.
A map cleariy defin'ing the survey ares snculd be sent to the NRC as soon as it has The survey area should include the area of potential environmental been prepared.
impact related to the operation and maintenance of the nuclear power plant and associated facilities.
Suitable buffer zones and identifiable secondary or indirect impact areas should be included in the survey area (see paragraph two of the attached IAS letter). The map should be accompanied by a discussion and justification of the boundary line determination.
Your May 4,1981 proposal with your June 23, 1981 response to the Missouri Department of Natural Resources satisfies our request that you provide NRC your program prior to proceeding with tne survey.
We believe your consultation with the state as you finalize the Research Design, conclude the survey, evaluate resources found and prepare a cultural resources management plan is necessary to achieving a quality cultural resources survey and assessment.
A copy of the final Research Design should be sent to the NRC upon its completion and we should be kept apprised of the survey effort as it continues.
Sincerelyh, hf,ll
B. J: Yo ngblood, Chief Lice'nsing Branch No. 1 Dupc of $/073/007 9 Division of Licensing
Enclosure:
As stated
.;;r. C. K. Bryan Vice President - Nuclear Union Electric Company P. O. Box 149 St. Louis, Missouri 63166 Mr. Nicholas A. Petrick Mr. William Hansen cc:
Executive Director - SNUPPS Resident Inscector/Callaway NPS 5 Choke Cherry Road c/o USNRC -
Rockville, Maryland 20850 Steedman, Missouri 65077 Gerald Charnoff, Esq.
Mr. Michael S. Weichman Shaw, Pittman, Potts &
Chief, Review and Compliance Trowbridge Missouri Dept. of'Hatural Resources 1800 M Street, N. W.
Division of Parks & Historic Preservatic Washington, D. C.
20036 P. O. Box 176 Jefferson City, Missouri 65102 Mr. J. E. Birk Assistant to the General Counsel Dr. Sue Anr. Curtis Union Electric Company Argonne National Laboratory P. O. Box 149 9700 South Cass Avenue St. Louis, Missouri 63166 Argonne, Illinois 60439 Dr. Vern Starks Mr. Jordan Tannenbaum Route 1, Box 863 Advisory Council on Historic Preservati(>
Ketchikan, Alaska 99901 1522 X Street, N. W.
~
Washington, D. C.
20005 Ms. TrevaHearn, Assistant General Mr. Jack R. Rudy Counsel Missouri Public Service Commission Chief, Interagency Archeological Services Brarch P. O. Box 360 Jefferson City, Missouri 65102 National Park s9.' ice U. S. Department of the Interior 655 Parfet Street Mr. D. F. Schnell P. O. Box 25287 Manager-Nuclear Engineering Union Electric Company Der.ver, Colorado 80225 P. O. Box 149 St. Louis, Missouri 63166 O
_ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _