ML20009G989

Package of Six Ltrs Opposing Licensing of Facilities

ML20009G989
Person / Time
Site:	Diablo Canyon
Issue date:	07/28/1981
From:	Cutter D, Russell F, Steele D, Swartz J, Swartz N, Walker A, Walker E AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To:	NRC
References
NUDOCS 8108050334
Download: ML20009G989 (6)

Text

.__ __. __ _ . _ _ . _ - . . _ - . - __

'7

/D D eor::5T"[*Mdd Fr'.30.&hgr ,g,]f 3 r

o s CCde ut US:sfa 7

-,- JUL ES 1931?

• 5 ~

C Offk: eof theSec.

t & S*'- l DQeft c'

v lh

%"_3mmmWamindmannansmagassh3e!

e p .. . .

w.: .s

[g : 1

. WREASONABli[E .

Ir; s l . COMPROMISE SOLUTION ~ ,,;

,,[.

I I

j feIABLO CARYON CONVEBf , []

f!

b b

' (3 U.S. Nuclear Plants Have Been Convert -d) f

{ A." Nuclear ** Diablo is unacceptable to me.

[1 I- -

s is not II Diablo's projected life. span of 3s yea {s g; g ,

reasonable when considering the rislas associated c' . , ! l+

!~ / with the plant's location (3 miles from the active If

$. sgri Fault), nuclear wiste disposal problerns, and ~

I lj

{' inadequate evacuation routes.  !

y ,l

. I support the blockad @nse is ed. E E

1 a'

s t - v -e E '

,,e to pa , ..g,..

N amasse *.a 4.4 .

i

].

/ l [ %,y~

n

,3 s v- c I

r = _ = : = =- =. .::- = . . . . . . . . .. .___

g gG.4,,

l we tpie,se peine) L QM S. A dl* --

g -[,ycm [M (N . S $t'- -

S m,m' lt "Y b l

' '/

S j

~. ~ F 3 ,, , .. , , , e mig,

-I#% p i

cry SM WI . sc,, d , 7e$

etw.yo kON -E

_pf x

Qrgg}r/ '

t l

... ..:.=. .

j l '*

, N.R.C. .

lE psa I

,.- Nuclear R.egulatory Commission 3 g

p'_

.,  : r .. .. .; E J  ;

." 1717 H. Street N.W. . $ s  ; lpr m

'.a TD

~,... .

E l ' washinston, oc zosss - g E . ,, a ,  ; .~. ) l

.g g- -- .

y::c ,

. > .. p F.- _. . t . _ ,,, ..- ...!.-_....._,, _ .y ar.' - m - .s - - a '

M 8 M 2 BE E M 51 W W IEE R 23 lug a tss II :st um IIR.Jue m en -a$

I 0108050334

@Fo)R ADOC h [gg5

m.1hE&,54.W.24,;.&23

_~

,[^

h Decfe, tea ,

y US"*

.,. ,i

c. ,, 35' *;

' 'b a Qi, C' f N'q.,) g f/

Q l

8 1 2O O'31 >

e{ dd

,i .f [.h r C.15>.f 4 # p_-_

6ffice cf the See. +_ Y '. .Y ,dif Doevet.ne & Ser. / '

Oranc 9',# <

c + g, /

i \

- e c; s

's , ,

mamasemmannammans/Istumasa D_ G,/ /

E' A REASONABLE u s'

E COMPROMISE SOLUTION .

g E

E E

E E (3 u.S. Nuclear Plants Have Been Cooverted) E E

b

- i A " Nuclear" Diablo is unacceptab!e to me.

g L.J Diablo's projected hfe-span of 35 years is not 5 reasonable when considering the tisks as3oc:ated E E

with the plant's location (3 miles from the active E Hosgri Fault). nuclear waste disposal problems, and E E inadequat,: evacuation routes.

E E I support the blocade if a license is c,t.vited. E l .

f  !

E

, , j' ? Q 54dd !;c's#2dLL_ g 5 $ "'_"*! . . _ _ _ _E g _ ~.,~,~,,,.e.,

5 _ _ _ _ _ _ b?b D o-RU Sfed l

~

I

__.___ g a

4,,.

dr' % S ON O Ju: 24 "

- . ' g= k ~

D G

c.'y 9 %l\saal l

N r --

k %~nT ' '~~~

& "^*?,

li g s. .- s, (y C>

8 a N.R.C. C

, to 5 Nuclear Regulatory Commission

{

0 1717 H. Street N.W. D E Washington DC 20555 C E O' E -

E B ,,.,, ,,,,. 0 g . . . ,. v.

MummmmmmmMMm5mEGGUGCD3

r nm nn .,,

• ^

~ "*

9 ~3 i noa.:. ::m T,u.]Q.-g,]fp ,

l0f $ Q tj p*** . v. .s s .,,

, * ,Y

, ' , \\ '. \

, h. '

.n >nf!S[9pS.y -3 1. s .

t >

.- , pq<

.s . :,

t.

p.m, ..

y; a~ r

. .; e g.9 g/

,A

,i . ,

c

_ _ i _

f"'.h=6, ~ ,._ _ _ _ _~ _ .

m . -- , ]'

I- A REASONABLE .E COMPROMISE SOLUTION .

I 3 I I I d. .

I E I (3 U.S. Nuclear Plants Have Been Cooverted)

I E A " Nuclear" Olat,. :: :nacceptable to me.

g Diablo's projected life. span of 35 years is not g reasonable when considering the risks associated I with the plant's location (3 miles from the active I Hosgri Fault). nuclear waste disposal problems, and I l inadequate evacuation routes. l I -

I suppo,rt the blocade if a license is granted. I l * *b.

g (signature) i l __..m..

i E

l wme (p.e.w, pon,, Jt/3sutT EvtMs VAL.t:.E4, (

[

y zss n n.s eaadC.C"Gr*C, E

,,,,,,, *:~ M} g

.-- -... -],g.... .C .ej n

c.iy S*u l-* 5 Ob'S *o si.ne M . N~ ~ b Y 5 5 ~~ ~~ ~ " '

'p AA 3 K e

]

- ;' usAtac [ O I E 5 I

N.R.C.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission j fa g g

[ 1717 H. Street N.W. g l Washington, DC 20555 E I E I <

I s. . s..... s. _ , . E L.______ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ r.r

0vMIT nut?.01.t y PROD. & UTIL FAdd. ~@g G '

O R$h 63 4 G% 6 p@

e @ogT;.

v , #

?~S V~ <?/

/Ad '

_. _ de sa s sh 62 Alado f xs&sawa ;gde ge Ale Acar' P4 olizas h~54kMlQl- N ' c' hffg' b{ -

D I d'4 G d,'

74t&.'7 .

-f Md e.skw am

I W( .J$l 4W dA/ZYMz/

0lt$b'16 0 27 ( ,j'e7 i) M sLW s s-/,a,a M

-.- _ ]1Er>ttd Vf$b iO24. .

W]

Il $ 2 . A A S M tz % ' K Gk da_

cl<51 h It A/' A t/d u &(!& x6 d L.u4k2 W f,$b4f W d ?.d4 __

=

a6Maxk .A hisu sy aGdM _

Ab B.as-9 /ddiditri, Ad ~

i eh /nw sb%44 a-L 2st /an ,

dz#1/andA. J A d V f' a a , d '

Y, .-

kun5x- Aset . ' '

_.f _ . AYY >

i W.Ah 'kkhud I/ -

131vxg, m Rs%% \W,9gzff/ ! au,,/hy;g 7[ sx (.y j;,

pg " 7

/~ 9 -

)

w o , _ .s -

~:. _

pn:::. % tT:L ac.a. .&g C M MET!!U?.O IR

...,e.g g

~

5 m

1. / \

canwa s USNRG Cib'- - b e }) W - Qr w.%\)

, V, g

J'JL 281981

• d-3 -'i'4'b h *v ,

h f 'a ome,dtw sse.

Deontine & Ser.

Branca u

,,.4', O>/ 1' ,

/.-

ld

& T j

\w G $'erp ;.

Xe

/%

m tr M%i gy/,

1 - ~

_ _ _, _ _ _ _A REASd'N ABLE_______________l

g. ~ ,

I COMPROMISE SOLUTION (

I \ I

CANY h I I

% (3 U.S. % clear Plants Have Been Converted)

N A " Nuclear" D. ' slo is unacceptable to me.

E Diablo's projected life-span of 35 years is not reasonable when considering the risks associated with the plant's location (3 miles from the active I 'Hosgri Fault), nuclear waste dispcsal problems, and I l inadeque,te evacuation routes. [

I I support the blocade if a !! cense is grantec. 'I g

(signaiueel d l g

l hM 4 -

3 I s < pie,s, n, m. > NO f - 3 4 V @g ...-- ---1w 3

I m,,,,6 Mmar 5tDTT , ,

hQRST",'A--'TMil

.. 2~ w, f' h h c., y bM M N Dhe.u.6 /.n Ib ~.

[

g - usa tee. X -

g 'e- ,

g go $

' ^

N.R.C. g s i

s g Nuclear Regulatory Commission g /g

[ 1717 H. Street N.W. g l

] Washington, DC 20555 $

I l

(

l e t

I . s._,,. m,-.... I

__ --- --- 3 .

emw v:.v. un-. .=,demyk. :.

s

, w N

& ws.t.

gSh$ g

}

fjt 2G W

• _

sa-s ome.a

• gS* ' m '"' ,

v N c, L pummmmmmmmmanammmmuaar.om 3

. . A REASONABLE .. .

E Ej COMPROMISE SOLUTION E!

E E DI CA k  ?

E (3 u.S. Nucrear Plants Have Been Converted)

E I A " Nuclear" Diablo is unacceptable to me.

g 4 Diablo's projected life-span of 35 years is not g reasonable when considering the risks associated with the plant's location (3 miles from the active I Hossri rauit), nuciear waste disposai probiems, and <

E Inadequate evacuation routes. '

E @ i support tne bioct . it a ii e is grani (d.

E E

,  ?

E

(S""'"

_____J

/ %,-

l Name (picase peino

' 1 .7 I , . -

[.

6 ..

o -

m ,e,, @ "7 4 U ; / 3 v G ~rt"t8 T i c 'e

• L) e gig.

t I pa_ g( 3pe

[

2,o cit y -

m: .,- -

'I

-I MW - stac f/ ) '.

, 'y' ' g',

6,7 & A '

N.R.C.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission g

[h w b[e,IU,..'g Q'O c 1 ;,

1717 H. Street N.W.

d s .,f' ] f 4/ $

/

r QQ ' '.y$3,l f.

Washington, DC 10555 .

i i- lo 4g, _ , -

4 1 I u. .. . .

I____ - - _ _bummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmener__ _ . - _ _ _-- -