ML20009G885
| ML20009G885 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Perry  |
| Issue date: | 07/24/1981 |
| From: | Norelius C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20009G884 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-440-81-09, 50-440-81-9, 50-441-81-09, 50-441-81-9, NUDOCS 8108050182 | |
| Download: ML20009G885 (1) | |
Text
.
Appendix A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Cleveland Electric Docket No. 50-440 Illuminating Company Docket No. 50-441 As a result of the inspection conducted on June 4, and July 14, 1981, and in accordance with the Interim Enforcement Policy, 45 FR 66754 (October 7, 1980), the following violation was identified:
10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion IX states in part that, " Measures shall be established to assure that special processes, including.
. nonde-structive testing, ete controlled and accomplished by qualified personnel using qualified procedures in accordance with applicable codes, standards, specificatious, criteria, and other special requirements."
The Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2, PSAR Section 17.1.9.2, stated in pa'rt that "CEI requires contractors to establish and document measures that will assure that special processes will be accomplished
... in accordance with the applicable codes American Societj of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code,Section V, 1974 Edition, Winter 1975 Addenda, Article 2, Paragraph T-2624 requires that the shim thickness shall be selected so the total thickness being radiographed under the penetrameter is essen-tially the sam as the total weld thickness.
Contrary to the above, for several radiographs the shim thickness was not selected so the total thickness being radiographed under the pene-trameter was essentially the same as the total weld thickness.
This is a Severity Level V violat' ion (Supplement II).
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, you are required to submit to this office within thirty days of the date of this Notice a written state-ment or explanation in reply, including for each item of noncompliance:
(1) corrective action taken and the results achieved; (2) corrective action to be taken to avoid further noncompliance; and (3) the date when full compliance will be achieved. Under the authority of Section 182 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, this response shall be submitted under oath or affirmation. Consideration may be given to extending your response time for good cause shown.
JUL 2 41981 f, T. \\'lA Dated C. E. Norelius, Acting Director Division of Engineering and Technical Inspection fp h.00 4
G