ML20009F777
| ML20009F777 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Perry  |
| Issue date: | 07/17/1981 |
| From: | Tedesco R Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Davidson D CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8108030003 | |
| Download: ML20009F777 (4) | |
Text
. ~r:1*
T n
y 7
v1 4
p
-t O-O O
j RL 17 ::
nist.
bec:
Docket Files
. TERA.
JUL f 71981 LBd2-File NSIE'
~
ASchwencer TIC
@ cket Mos. 50-440:
MService
_L PDR and '50-441 nHouston NRC PDR:
RTedesco ACRS(16) nEisenhut/RPurple Mr. Dalwyn R. Davidson Attorney, OELD Vice President - Engineering IAE(3)
Cleveland Electric Illuminatinq Company W. REqan P. O. Box 5000 A. Brauner Cleveland, Ohio 44101
~]
Dear Mr. Davidson:
SUBJECT:
REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION - SITING ANALYSIS In the performance of the Perry licensinq review, the staff has identi-fied concerns in regard to sitino analysis. The information that we reouireisidentifiedintheynclosure.
We reouest that you provide the information not later than September 15, 1081. If you reauire any clarification of this request, please contact M. D. Houston, Pro *cct Manager, ('101) 492-8593.
Sincerely,
- ^
Original signed by Babert L. Talesco Robert L. Tedesco, Assistant Director for Licensing
{
Division of Licensing
Enclosure:
Pequest for Additional Infomation
{
cc w/ enclosure:
See next paqe 8108030003 810717 )
PDR ADUCK 05000440i A
PDRi RA 01
. /0
- n..l..:..L.g.,2,<.
.,h.. :..L..B..A 2...
omer) nl
. unb.:.c2.. AS.c.hwencer, rte.d. gsco
"'>.. 7//6./31.
... 7.l. (k. /.8.1.... 7.G9../.81
[ t;RC FORM 3'8 410e80) NRCM O240 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
- = '98o-329-e2. -
s
\\
~
Mr.Dalwyn R. Davidson Vice President, Engineering _
The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company P. O. Box 5000
- Cleveland, Ohio-44101 cc: Gerald Charnoff, Esq.
Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge 1800 M Street, N. W.
Washington, D. C.
-20036 Donald H. Hauser, Esq.
Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company P. O. Box 5000 Cleveland, Ohio 44101 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Resident Inspectar's Office Parmly at Center Road Perry, Ohio 44081 Donald T. Ezzone, Esq.
Assistant Prosecuting Attorney 105 Main Street Lake County Administrativi Center Painesville, Ohio 440:
Tod J. Kenney 228 South College Apt. A Bowling Green, Ohio 43402 Daniel D. Wilt Wegman, Hesiler & Vanderberg 7301 Chippewa Road, Suite 102 Brecksville, Ohio 44141 9
Jeff Alexander 920 Wilimington Ave.-
Dayton, Ohio 45420 Terry lodge, Esq.
915 Spitzer Building Toledo, Ohio 43604
'i 4
4 E
h
PERRY QUESTIONS 311.0 SITING ANALYSIS BRANCH
!311.1 Please revise appropriate sections of the'FSAR (See Sections 2.1.1.3 &
l(2.1.1.3 l2.1.2.1) 2.1.2.1 to provide a consistent definition of the exclusion area, l311.2 Sections 2.1.1.3 and 2.1.2.1 refer to CEI's control of tha mineral l(2.1.1.3 l 2.1. 2.1 rights in the exclusion area, specifically with respect to 6il, Table 2.1-9 l
gas and salt. However, Table 2.1-9 indicates that the mineral 1
rights for land parcels 44 and 45 have been acquired for oil and gas only.
Please explain this descrepancy, and clarify the l
status of mineral rights ownership within the ex::1usion area.
l311.3 Section 2.1.3.6 and Table 2.1-8 provide cumulative population j ( 2.1. 3. 6 l Table 2.1-8 and density data for the year 2020, and reference 100 and 500 I
neople per square mile, respectively.
End of plant life data should be compared to 1000 people per square mile.
Please l
revise these figures.
311.4 Section 2.2.2.2b states that the railroad spur is presently 2
,(2.1.2.1 A 3 l2.2.1.3 being used solely by CEI, but that in the future other industries l2.2.2.2) could develop along this spur.
Section 2.1.2.1 and 2.1.2.3 I
states that only railroad cars consigned to the Perry NPP are normally brought into the plant site over this spur. Section 2.2.1.3b states that this spur is primarily for use by CEI.
Please indicate whether any railroad cars associated with present and possible future irdustries alona tnis spur could be brought in close proximity with the Perry Nuclear Power Plant,. and if so,
. what methods CEI proposes to assure that potentirlly hazardous.
l explosive or toxic materials will not unduly threaten the safe operation-of the plant.
- 11.5 Section 2.2.2.3 states that ten gas wells and five cas and oil
' 2.2.3 wells were completed in Lake County in 1978.
It also states that gas and oil exploration ay continue in the undeveloped areas of Lake County.
This presumably means that drilling may occur up to the exclusion area boundary.
If view of this situation, please provide a detailed analysis which specifically discusses potential accidents at the closest l
l point where mineral exoloration may be permitted, including effects of fire, spillage and a gas well blow out.
Your analysis should l
specifically discuss and consider the following:
j (a)
The effects of fire both with reaard to heat flux upon l
the plant as well as effects of dense smoke upon control l
room habitability.
(b)
The effects of any oil spillage, including consequences of oil runoff and f(atures to mitigate or preclude this.
l (c)
The effect of a gas well blow out which conserva-tively considers the release and delayed ignition of any non-buoyant components, such as ethane and propane, found in natural gas.
(d)
The effect of detonation of explosives which may be used l
both in mineral extraction operations as well as extin-i quishing of fires.
Picase provide an indication of the maximum quantity and type of explosives that might be used in connection with the activities identified above.
(?)
Indicate the overpressure, in psi, that the safety-related structures are designed to withstand.
(f)
Describe in detail the atmospheric dispersion models used, including assumptions =
(g)
Discuss the possibility of subsidence and its effect on safety related plant structures as a result of such exnloration.
Please state all other assumptions used.