ML20009D718

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Analysis & Evaluation Status in Response to IE Bulletin 80-11, Masonry Wall Design. Specified Walls Are Safe in Existing Configuration.Added Margin of Safety Will Be Provided by Upgrades
ML20009D718
Person / Time
Site: Oconee  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 06/30/1981
From: Parker W
DUKE POWER CO.
To: James O'Reilly
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
References
IEB-80-11, NUDOCS 8107240289
Download: ML20009D718 (2)


Text

f

' OFFICIAL COPY l

's DUKE POWER COhiPANY Powra Butt.oxxo 422 SouTu Cut:acu SrazzT, Caunt.oTTE, N. C. 28242 a

WI LLI AM O. PAR K E R, J R.

w

,cc,oc,

retc.-o c:4ac 704 src.- eaoouct o June 30, 1981 a n-4osa Mr. James P. O'Reilly, Director U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission m

Region II Q'

101 Marietta Street, Suite 3100 v

d

g-1 N w u L. l }D Atlanta, Georgia 30303 ti JUL 2 31981

Docket Nos. 50-269, -270, -287' b

/6 Tj.O

/,.

Co /

/

Dear Sir:

Your letter of March 13, 1981 requested interim progress reports during the analysis and evaluation phase of IE Bulletin 80-11 work. Attachment 1 details the present status of analysis.

A program of repairs has been initiated on selected walls at Oconee. The walls chosen are generally taller (approximately 18' to 19') than the typical walls at the station (approximately 12' to 14') and/or are located in areas anticipated to experience greater seismic accelerations. Analysis has not shown these walls to be unsafe in their existing configuration, tut an added margin of safety will be provided by the upgra'es.

We are presently responding to a series of detailed questions from the Struc-tural Engineering Branch of the NRR staff concerning masonry wall re-evaluation techniques. You will he provided a copy of our response when it is submitted.

Ve truly yours, f

,/

L e.t.

L$)

w William O. Parker, Jr.

RLG/php g((

Attachment

/

I 0107240289 810630 PDR ADOCK 05000269 0

PDR k

f ' q ig.

OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION UNITS 1-3 ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION STATUS JUNE 30, 1981 Number of Qualified

. Percent Walls By Analysis Complete Priority I 175 174 98%

Priority II 266 21 7 60%

Priority III 42

_7 10%

TOTAL 483 398

~

j