ML20009C086

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Requests That Order Be Issued Clarifying Status of Proceedings.Central Will Be Obliged to File Petition for Review Before Commission Decides Rehearing Question
ML20009C086
Person / Time
Site: Summer South Carolina Electric & Gas Company icon.png
Issue date: 07/14/1981
From: Beeny S
BRAND & HALL
To: Chilk S
NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
References
ISSUANCES-A, NUDOCS 8107200267
Download: ML20009C086 (1)


Text

( ..r BRAND G HALL ATTORNEYS AT LAW w^tL^ce sow ^ao sR^no July 14, 1981 - secoxo rtoon EDWARD EARL HALL f i s -

3523 L $7gggy, g,w, Q) stax natur g \h ,  !.

./ TASHINCTON, D. C. L' 3C05

.Q (202) ac-7aa

-i JU!,17 'm

<$ '![ Q[xq

~

U.S.

1717 HNuclear Street,Regulatory N.W. Commission U.\

~k %'g b D @

Washington, D.C. 20555 A e /, ,

K Samuel J. Chilk , Secretar

%riy '

Attention: '

tu /f

'I Re: South Car ~olina Electric & Gas Company, et al. fg/. j (Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station Unit No. 1) /

Docket No. 50-395A -

Gentlemen:

The recent rescheduling of responses to Central's Petition For Rehearing poses a problem that could be remedied by an order clarifying the status of the proceedings.

As we understand the Commission's action of July 10, 1981, the Commission no longer considers its order of June 26, 1981 a final order but, instead, proposes to receive additional pleadings and consider them before issuing its final order.

Because the Commission has extended the time for Staf f's response until August 18, 1981, it appears that the Commission's order disposing of the rehearing petition will likely issue subsequent to the expiration of the 60-day period allowed by 28 U.S.C. 52344 for filing of a petition for review of the June 26 order. Therefore, in order to preserve the jurisdiction of the Court of Appeals, Central will be obliged to file a petition for review before the Commission decides the rehearing question unless the Commission clarifies the status of the proceeding so as to make this unnecessary.

Counsel for the other parties .have been contacted

' ~

regarding this matter and would not object to an order, clarifying the status of the proceedings in this regard.

Respect f ully submitted ,

l . .

Sean T. Beeny //

BRAND & HALL 1523 L Street, N.W.

Suite 300 Washington, D.C. 20005 cc: All Counsel 8107200267 810714 4 PDR ADOCK 05000395 M PDR 9 *'8g g\iQ L