ML20009B053

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards IE Insp Rept 50-312/81-17 on 810501-31.No Noncompliance Noted
ML20009B053
Person / Time
Site: Rancho Seco
Issue date: 06/23/1981
From: Crews J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To: Mattimoe J
SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT
Shared Package
ML20009B054 List:
References
NUDOCS 8107140716
Download: ML20009B053 (2)


See also: IR 05000312/1981017

Text

FOR DCS PROCESSING

.

.

,

,.

Originaldocumen,tnot.ava'ilatd[etoNC

[p no

'k

UNITED STATES

Certified by

[

[',

'j

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

'

REGION V

y

g.

gi

g

1990 N. CALIFORNIA BOULEVARD

%e,,,e[

Sulf E 202, WALNUT CREEK PLAZA

WALNUT CREE K, CALIFORNI A 94596

June 23, 1981

Docket No. 50-312

=

s'o

g

e

'ff'.

M[ D

N

Sacramento Municipal Utility District

4

6

P. O. Box 15830

/

dO

T

Q

Sacramento, California 95813

1

f j Os

b

s%

Attention: Mr. John Mattimoe

s4 L )

'

% /(J/

Assistant General Manager & Chief Enginee-

>

n

@ b m [ s2

Gentlemen:

y

Subject: NRC Inspection of Rancho Seco

This refers to the inspection conducted by Messrs. H. Canter & J. O'Brien

of this office on May 1 - 31, 1981 of activities authorized by NRC License

No. OPR-54, and to the discussion of our findings held by Messrs. Canter

and O'Brien with Mr. R. Rodriguez and other members of your staff at the

conclusion of the inspection.

Areas examined during this inspection are described in the enclosed inspection

reoort. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of selective examinations

of procedures and representative records, interviews with personnel and observa-

tions by the inspector.

No items of noncompliance with NRC requirements were identified within the

scope of this inspection.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of

this letter and the enclosed inspection report will be placed in the NRC's

Public Document Room.

If this report contains any information that you be-

lieve to be exempt from disclosure under 10 CFR 9.5(a)(4), it is necessary

that you (a) votify this office by telephone within ten (10) days from the

date of this letter of your intention to file a request for withholding; and

(b) submit within 25 days from the date of this letter a written application

to this office to withhold such information.

If your receipt of this letter

has been delayed such that less than seven (7) days are available for your

review, please notify this office promptly so that a new due date may be

established.

Consistent with section 2.790(b)(1), any such application must

be accompanied by an affidavit exe.;ted by the owner of the information which

identifies the document or part sought to be withheld, and which contains a

full statement of the reasons on the basis which it is claimed that the in-

formation shculd be withheld from public disclosure. This section further

requires the statement to address with specificity the considerations listed

in 10 CFR 2.790(b)(4). The information sought to be withheld shall be in-

corporated as far as possible into a separate part of the affidavit.

If we

8107140716 010623

DR ADOCK 0D000

's

,

.

.

.-

.

..

.

Sacramento Muncipal Utility District

-2-

June 23, 1981

do not hear from you in this regard within the specified periods noted above,

the report will be placed in the Public Document Room.

Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be glad

to discuss them with you.

Sinc rely.

J

L.

re

acto Operations

rojects Branch

Enclosure:

IE Inspection Report

No. 50-312/81-17

cc w/o enclosure:

R. J. Rodriquaz, SMUD

L. G. Schwieger, SMUD

i

'

.

t

i

l

i

..