ML20009A935

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Violation from Insp on 810616-19
ML20009A935
Person / Time
Site: Fermi DTE Energy icon.png
Issue date: 06/29/1981
From: Norelius C
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML20009A931 List:
References
50-341-81-07, 50-341-81-7, NUDOCS 8107140513
Download: ML20009A935 (1)


Text

. __

Appendix A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Detroit Edison Company Docket No. 50-341 As a result of the inspection conducted on June 16-19, 1981, and in accordance with the Interim Enforcement Policy, 45 FR 66754 (October 7, 1980), the fol-lowing violation was identified:

10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion IX states in part that, " Measures shall be established to assure that special processes, including... nondestructive testing, are controlled and accompliahed by qualified personnel using quali-fied procedures in accordance with applicable codes, standards, specifica-tions, criteria, and other special requirements."

The Enrico Fermi Nuclear Power Plant Unit 2, FSAR Section B17.1.9 states in part, " Procedures and practices are established and documented to provide assurance that special processes such as... nondestructive examination (NDE) are accomplished under controlled conditions. These special processes shall be accomplished in accordance with applicable codes, standards... and other special requirements using qualified personnel, procedures and equipment."

American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASMI) Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code,Section III, 1971 Edition, Winter 1971 Addenda, Appendix IX, pararraph IX-3325 requires that radiographic penetrameters be in accordance with / STM E142.

Contrary to the above ASTM E142 penetrameters were not used to check the radiographic technique employed on shop fabricated welds.

This is a Severity Level V violation (Supplement II).

~

l l

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, you are required to submit to this I

office within thirty days of the date of this Notice a written statement or I

explanation in reply, including for each item of noncompliance:

(1) corrective action taken and the results achieved; (2) corrective action to be taken to avoid further noncompliance; and (3) the date when full compliance will be I

achieved. Under the authority of Section 182 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, this response shall be submitted under oath or affirmation.

Consideration may be given to extending your response time for good cause shown.

l 6hl4ffI Dated o

l C. E. Norelius, Acting Director Division of Engineering and Technical Inspection D107140513 810630 i

PDR ADOCK 05000341 O

PDR L