ML20009A192
| ML20009A192 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Dresden  |
| Issue date: | 06/23/1981 |
| From: | Crutchfield D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Abel J COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| References | |
| LSO5-81-06-088, LSO5-81-6-88, NUDOCS 8107090173 | |
| Download: ML20009A192 (2) | |
Text
9 e
c.
DISIRIBVUON:
June 23 1981. # tiocket__ >
OELD NRC PDR 01&E (3)
Docket No. 50-237 LPDR ACRS (10) cn HSmith '
D O(V LS05 06-088 TERA g
s.} 4
\\
ORB #5 RF CMiles, OPJ g
Mr. J. S. Abel DEisenhut RDiggs /u n-L-
V CHarwood. !
Gray File,j g o gjgg} d.'
Director of Nuclear Licensing Glainas
-!2 Coaaonwealth Edison Conpany WRussell Post Office Box 767 EMcKenna Xtra Cy (4)\\ "'ToEMP Chicago, Illinois 60690 CBerlinger 3
7
Dear Mr. Abel:
g SUDJECT: SEP TOPIC FORMAT FOR DESIGN BASIS EVENT REVIEWS - DRESDEN UNIT 2 In March 1981, the NRC issued a draft evaluation of plant transients and accidents (DBEs) for the Palisades Plant. Based on this report, each licensee of a SEP facility was to provide safety assessments of the DBE topics for staff review.
The staff prepared an integrated report of all of the events for Palisades for our convenience in performing the integrated assessment.
It was not our intent to require that such a report format be strictly followed for the remaining plants.
Individual topic reviews are an equally acceptable format.
In some cases, you may elect to group related topics together to denonstrate that one topic is bounded by others or that the plant systems respond similarly.
The topic assessacnts that you submit should clearly identify how acceptance criteria are net and justification or planned resolution of deviations.
Results from FSARs or other documents which support your conclusions should be included in the evaluation.
Information on the analysis methods and codes, such as whether the code has been approved by the staff, is also needed.
i Coaplete topic assessments will enable the staff to issue final SLRs on the l
DBE topics with minimal demands on the licensee for additional information.
l The guidance provided by this letter is given only to allow more flexibility i
in submittal of DBE topic reviews. No change in schedule should result.
Sincerely, Original S18ned W Deonis L crutchf181 Dennis M. Crutchfield, Chief Operating Reactors Branch #5 Division of Licensing cc:
See next page
@107M0173 810623 0 1
PDR ADOCK 05000237 P
PDR' 00 -
omcc > 0..
!!!M...D,L,,:,QR,B',4hgM,...,D,C.,,,,,,,,,,,,
suan=ellr ih -
...P.Q.'.Connor.......QC f.ie 1.d....................
..l.........6..chal.,,,,,b.,
om>
NRC FORM 318 (10-80) NRCM 024o OFFICIAL RECORD COPY usaeoo n,_ m.,eo
A_
1
,,!oarr o
UNITED STATES y} s,(( g g
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASH'INGTON D. C. 20S55 3h;\\, %,f...i E
June 23, 1981 Docket No. 50-237 LS05-81 088 Mr. J. S. Abel Director of Nuclear Licensing Commonwealth Edison Comany Post Office Box 767 Chicago, Illinois 60690
Dear Mr. Abel:
SUBJECT:
SEP TOPIC FORMAT FOR DESIGN BASIS EVENT REVIEWS - DRESDEN UNIT 2 In March 1981, the NRC issued a draft evaluation of plant transients and accidents (DBEs) for the Palisades Plant. Based on this report, each licensee of a SEP facility was to provide safety assessments of the DBE topics for staff review.
The staff prepared an integrated report of all of the events for Palisades for our convenience in performing the integrated assessment.
It was not our intent to require that such a report format be strictly followed for the remaining plants.
Individual topic reviews are an equally acceptable format.
In some cases, you may elect to group related topics together to demonstrate that one topic is bounded by others or that the plant systems respond similarly.
q The topic assessments that you submit should clearly identify how acceptance I
criteria are met and justification or planned resolution of deviations.
Results from FSARs or other documents which support your conclusions should f
be included in the evaluation.
Information on the analysis methods and codes, such as whether the code has been approved by the staff, is also needed.
Coglete topic assessments will enable the staff to issue final SERs on the DBE topics with minimal demands on the licensee for additional information.
The guidance provided by this letter is given only to allow more flexibility in submittal of DBE topic reviews. No change in schedule should result.
Sincerely, Dennis M. Crutchfield, C ef Operating Reactors Bran
- 5 Division of Licensing cc: See next page
i 1
4-9
, Mr. J. S. Abel 2-June 23, 1981 cc:
Isham, Lincoln & Beale Illinois Departnent of Nuclear Safety Counselors at Law 1035 Outer Park Drive, 5th Floor One First National Plaza, 42nd Floor Springfield, Illinois 62704 Chicago, Illinois 60C03 U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Mr. 8. B. Stephenson Federal Activities Branch Plant Superintendent Region V Office Dresden Nuclear Power Station ATTN: EIS COORDINATOR Rural Route #1 230 South Dearborn Street Morris, Illinois 60450 Chicago, Illinois 60604 Dr. Forrest J. Remick Natural Resources Defense Council 304 East Hamilton Avenue 91715th Street, N. W.
Chicago, Illinois 60604 Washington, D. C.
20005 i
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Resident Inspectors Office Dresden Station RR #1 Morris, Illinois 60450 Mary Jo Murray Assistant Attorney General Environmental Control Division 188 W. Randolph Street Suite 2315 Chicago, Illinois 60601 Morris Public Library 604 Liberty Streat Morris, Illinois 60451 Chairman Board of Superviscrs of Grundy County Grundy County Courthouse Morris, Illinois 60450 John F. Wolfe, Esquire 3409 Shepherd Street Chevy Chase, Maryland 20015 Dr. Linda W. Little 500 Hermitage Drive Raleigh, North Carolina 27612
, ~ -
e-e a--
a--m, g-
.,,-y-
,-.y,-
r,- - -c-,,ey4 g-,-----
4 - -, - - -. -