ML20008F156
| ML20008F156 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Limerick  |
| Issue date: | 02/03/1981 |
| From: | Sells D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20008F153 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8103120411 | |
| Download: ML20008F156 (2) | |
Text
.
eo f..~,,
!,},
, ',0,j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
+
UNITED STATES
.s wassiNGToN. O. C. 20555 f a s's, ~ y FEB 3 1981 Docket Nos. 50-352 and 50-353 APPLICANT: Philadelphia Electric Company FACILITY:
Limerick Generating Station
SUBJECT:
SUMMARY
OF MEETING WITH ACORN, LIMERICK GENERATING STATION On Monday, January 19, 1981, a meeting was held between H. Denton and members of ACORN, Philadelphia, concerning the construction 3rd licensing of Limerick Generating Station. A list of attendees is enclosec.
A principle concern of the ACORN representatives was how to make their feeling known <ith.espect to the development of siting criteria. Specifically they asked. a public meetings / hearings be held in the Philadelphia area.
H. Denton indicated that, although actual development of the criteria would be done under the auspices of another office, he would support their request for meetings, one or more, in Philadelphia.
A memorandum to Standards is' in preparation.
C. Woodhead provided a more detailed explanation of the licensing process and the role which ACORN can play in that process. She promised to send the Cocraission's rules of practice. This has been done.
A question was asked concerning a report entitled, " Residual Fuel Oil-Cemand and Supply." An attempt will be made to identify the source.
H. Denton committed the staff to perform an analysis of the Limerick site using the illustrative examples that were provided with the recor=endations of the siting policy task force.
It was pointed out that the numbers given in those examples were necessarily for illustrative purposes and were not intended by the task force to be representative of the valves that will be established for new sites when final criteria emerge from the rulemaking process now being under-taken.
4 8103120 g
2_
Mr. Denten indicated tnat it wculd not be at all surprising c finc, using tne nur::er of :tese illustrative exa: ales as criteria, na:
Limerick wculd not conferr. o sucn illustrative criteria. A recuest for this analysis is in creparation.
7-h
//
,vihRZL Don Selis, Project.vanger Licensing 3 ranch.'io.
2 Divisi::n of Licensing
Enclosure:
List of Attendees cc w/ enclosure:
See next page O
_.