ML20008D829
| ML20008D829 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fort Calhoun  |
| Issue date: | 08/28/1980 |
| From: | William Jones OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT |
| To: | Seyfrit K NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| References | |
| IEB-79-01B, IEB-79-1B, NUDOCS 8010230085 | |
| Download: ML20008D829 (1) | |
Text
TO DAC:ADM:
CENTRAL FILES
,~
PDR:HQ
-j LPDR TIC Omaha Public Power District tasTC 1623 HARNEY O M A M A, NE8RASKA 68102 TELEPHONE 536-4000 AREA CODE.
STATE August 28, 1980 Mr. K. V. Seyfrit, Director U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Inspection and Enforcement Region IV 611 Ryan Plaza Drive Suite 1000 Arlington, Texas 76011
Reference:
Docket No. 50-285
Dear Mr. Seyfrit:
During a telephone conversation on July 24, 1980, with Mr. Hickle and Mr. Mehaffey of the Omaha Public Power Dist.rict, Mr. MacDonald of the Commission's staff requested documentation of the District's quality controls for work performed in response to IE Bulletin 79-01B.
The District believes the procedures described below ensured the response to be accurate and of high quality.
The District employed consultants to perform the tasks required in developing the bulletin response.
The consultants assigned to this task were people used by the District in the past with a high level of en-gineering expertise.
The task was performed in four steps.
First, a detailed review of facility piping and instrumentation diagrams (P&ID's) was performed to develop a master list of all class IE equipment that could be exposed to a severe environment.
The second step was to identify, through purchase orders and specifications, the model and vendor of each component on the master list.
The third step was in-plant field verification of the master list and vendor /model inform-a tion.
The final step consisted of verifying the vendor specificaticro against the IEEE standard criteria and preparing the response.
Each step was completed separately and received an independent technical review by the District's engineering staff. An extensive review was conducted on the final response package.
This final review for tech-nical accuracy and completeness required sign-off approval through various levels of management in the District's engineering staff, in accordance with the District's normal review process.
Because of these measures, the District is confident thn the response to IE Bulletin 79-01B provided to the Commission is accurate and complete.
Sincerely,
'. C. Jones O
Division Manager 80102P Production Operations WCJ/KJM/BJH:jmm