ML20006G169

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-029/89-20 on 891107-900102.Corrective Actions:Procedural Requirements of Administrative Procedure AP-0206 Re Issuing & Placing Nonconforming Matl in Svc Reemphasized
ML20006G169
Person / Time
Site: Yankee Rowe
Issue date: 02/24/1990
From: St Laurent N
YANKEE ATOMIC ELECTRIC CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
BYR-90-020, BYR-90-20, NUDOCS 9003050263
Download: ML20006G169 (3)


Text

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ - - - - _ _ _ _ _ - - - -

l YANGE ATOMCEL.ECTRIC COWANY

% ?,*,(0.gg0 7e,g"**' !'***

(* W Y.

580 Main Street Bolton, Massachusetts 017401g98 Ok February 24 1990 BYR 90-020 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555

References:

(a) License No. DPR-3 (Docket No. 50-29)

(b) Letter, USNRC to YACC, dated January 26, 1990,

" Inspection Report No. 50-029/89-20"

Subject:

Reply to Notice of Violation Dear Sire Reference (b) documents a routine resident safety inspection conducted by H.

Eichenholz and M. Markley on November 7, 1989 through January 2, 1990 at the Yankee Nuclear Power Station, Rowe, Massachusetts.

The report identifies an activity that was not conducted in full compliance with the NRC requirements.

The activity was identified as a Severity Level IV violatien.

In accordance with 10CFRE.201, we hereby submit the following information:

Violation 10 CFR 50, Appendix B,

Criterion XV specifies that measures shall be established to control materials, parts, or components which do not conform to requirements in order to prevent their inadvertent use or installation.

It further specifies that nonconforming items shall be reviewed ano accepted, rejected, repaired or reworked in accordance with documented procedures.

Procedure AP-0207, Rev. 8,

" Equipment Control," specifies in step II.A.7.c.,

that in cases where required documentary evidence is not available, the associated equipment or materials shall be considered nonconforming.

Procedure AP-0212, Rev.

16. " Control of Purchased Material, Equipment and Services," requires in step II.A.4.,

that documentary evidence that items ll conform to procurement requirements shall be available prior to installation or use of such items where required by code, regulation or contract requirements. Procedure AP-0306, Rev. 10. "Nonconformance Report," requires in discussion step No. 4, nonconforming materials, that parts or components which depart from specified requirements that render the quality of an item unacceptable shall be reported under a Nonconformance Report (NCR). Procedure I

AP-0206 further specifies in step A.ll, that the Licensee may authorire the materials or services in cuestion to be placed in service, on a permanent or temporary basis, after the NCR is approved.

Contrary to the above on November 8 and 9,

1989, the licensee installed nonconforming, commercial grade A194-2H fasteners (hexagonal nuts) on the No.

2 and No. 3 charging pump strainers (Safety Class 2) without the required documentary evidence of conformance.

Further, the use of nonconforming materials was allowed to occur without the required approved NCR.

9003050263 900224, [D

/

1 goa noock 0500002 1

Pnr:

es-

\\

1

m i

l Meed 90H.

We concur with the Notice of Violation as described above and in Reference f-(b),

t On November 1, 1989,-Maintenance Request (MR) No. 09-2106, " Charging Pumps No..

1, 2 and 3 Strainers" was initiated for the performance of charging pump strainer cleaning and fastener replacement.

The charging pumps and strainers are classified as Safety Class 2 (SC-2).

p_

For.this maintenance attivity, the fasteners were obtained from the stockroom 5

" hold area" with hold tags attached.

The hold tags had been applied since the fasteners were originally purchased

_for another-application and were commercial grade, non-nuclear safety (NNS) class A194-2H hexagonal nuts._The' subject fasteners were being maintained in.the " hold area",pending testing and documentation to upgrade the safety classification from NNS to SC-1.

The materials certification process had been initiated, however, at the time of the fastener issuance and installation,- the material test results and documentation supporting ~ the classification upgrade had not been received.

On November 7, ~1n accordance with plant procedures AP-0206, "Nonconformance i

Report" -

and AP-0222

" Job Orders,"

maintenance supervision obtained authorization (signature on DC hold tags) from the Acting Plant Superintendent' to remove the fasteners from the stockroom for installation in the charging pump strainers. Contrary to the requirements of ' procedures AP-0206 and AP-0222, a nonconformance report (NCR) was not generated nor approved prior to

'the authoritation for use of the fasteners; this resulted in the issuance of material with DC hold tags that had no affiliation with an NCR, Maintenance personnel completed the installation work and the No. E and No. 3 charging pumps were returned to service with hold tags applied on November 8 and 9,

respectively.

Contrary to the requirement of procedure'AP-0212,

" Control of Purchased Material, Cquipment and Services," hardness testing of the fasteners was not conducted prior to installation.

On November 20, YAEC received material test results and documentation justifylng the safety classification upgrade to SC-1.

Gorrective Actions to Prevent Recurrence 1.-

NCR 89-21 was initiated on December 22, 1989 to address this condition.

The disposition included accepting the installed material "as is," since the fasteners were upgraded to SC-1 and were acceptable for use.

The procedural requirements of-AP-0206 concerning ' issuing cnd placing

{

nonconforming material in service has been reemphasized to appropriate plant personnel.

Additionally, the involved personnel have been retrained in the process of upgrading the safety classification of components, and reminded that adequate information and/or documentation must be obtained to justify its use prior to installation in a safety-related application.

2.

Programmatic procedures will be evaluated to determine if changes are warra"6*d to better delineate the method for controlling nonconforming materia; that is released for use.

This evaluation will consider the observations and recommendations of the surveillances conducted by the 1

i l

1

pM-m; Ea

!L 4: ;

i Quality. Services Group.

The evaluation will be complet'ed and necessary training-implemented prior to the upcoming refueling outage (6/23/90).

t fi Date of Full Compliance I

Full compliance with. plant procedures was achieved in the. preparation and disposition of NCR No.

69-21.-

Training of involved plant personnel was conducted in February,. 1990.

As stated previous)), - an evaluation of' j

programmatic procedures will be performed and necessary training implemented

. i prior'to June 23, 1990.

If you have any questions-or desire additional information, please contact us.

j i

.Very truly yours, l

'l YANKEE ATOMIC EtfCTRIC COMPANY

/ht -

G4 wen N. N. St. Laurent j

Acting Manger of Operations

. l 5

l

'l i

d i

1 i

e

~!

l

-t

]

l 1

ii

1. ;

- s; NNS/pkg

)'

CC '-

USNRC Region I USNRC Resident inspector, YNPS William V. Johnston Acting Director, Division of Reactor Safety USNRC Region I Y

-t-

t

-t

~

wn n,

s v

,c, r,n-e e

s -,,

%