ML20006E963
| ML20006E963 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Braidwood  |
| Issue date: | 02/16/1990 |
| From: | Wright G NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Reed C COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20006E964 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9002270008 | |
| Download: ML20006E963 (2) | |
See also: IR 05000456/1990002
Text
.
-
- - .
Q.
QG
j
p , ' , ' L ,, ,
t
+
,
i
FEB 16 1G
?
F
-. Docket No. 50-456
'
0ccket No. 50-457
<
Cocoonwealth Edison Company
ATTN: Mr. Cordell Reed
Senior Vice President
Post 0ffice Box 767
,
'
Chicago, IL 60690
.
Gentlemen:
,
.
.
>
This refers to the routine safety inspection conducted by P. R. Rescheske and
i
,
V.-P. Lougheed of:this office on January 16-31, 1990, of activities at the
Braidwood Nuclear Power Station Units 1 and 2, authorized by NRC Operating
w
. Licenses No. NPF-72 and NPF-77, and to the discussion of our findings with
Mr. K..L. Kofron and others of your staff at the conclusion of the inspection.
'
The-inspecti'>n focused on the modifications and design changes implemented
during the Unit 1 refuel outage. Also included in this' inspection was a review
of the program for controlling temporary plant alterations. The enclosed copy
of our inspection report identifies areas examined during the inspection.
.
Within these. areas, the-inspection consisted of a selective examination of
procedures and representative records, observations, and interviews with
personnel.
L
During this inspection, certain of your activities appeared to be in violation
-of NRC requirements, as specified in the enclosed Notice. A written response
tis required.
Violations were identified for failure to provide design control
,
!
' measures for temporary alterations, commensurate with those applied to the
i
L,
' original design;-and for failure to update a surveillance procedure affected
t
by a modification, which resulted in not satisfying a Technical Specification
surveillance requirement. Regarding the first violation,-your response-should
!
address the adequacy of your temporary alteration program in establishing and
controlling the design of all. temporary alterations, and in establishing the
suitability of materials and parts used in safety-related applications. Your
response should also include an evaluation of the acceptability of installed
Teeporary Alteration 88-1-019.
.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of
thislletter, the enclosures, and your response to this letter will be placed
in-the NRC Public Document Room.
g
The responses directed by this letter and the accompanying Notice are not
L
subject to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget
as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.
'
9002270008 900216
ADOCK 05000456
O ts s
'O
d,
} Q L) j
-
-
-
. -
-
-
-
-
. .
.
-
-
r
4,-:,-
. ..
. . .
c4
p.-
F ED 16 199]
Connonwealth Edison Company
2
We will gladly discun any questions you have concerning-this inspection.
=
'
c
->
,/
.
Geoffrey C. Wri ht, Chief
,
Operations Branch
Enclosures:.
1.
2.-
Inspection Report
No. 50-456/90002(DRS);
.No.-50-457/90002(DRS)
- cc w/ enclosures:
T. J. Maiman, Vice President.
-PWR Operations
T.-Kovach, Nuclear
Licensing Manager
S. Hunsader, Nuclear
Licensing Administrator
R. E. Querio, Station Manager
D. E. Cooper, Regulatory
DCD/DCB (RIDS)pervisor
Assurance Su
Licensing Fee Management Branch'
Resident Inspector, RIII
Braidwood
Resident Inspector, RIII Byron
'D. W. Cassel, Jr., Esq.
. Richard Hubbard
~
J. W. McCaffrey, Chief Public
Utilities Division
H. S. Taylor, Quality Assurance
Division
E. Chan, OGC
E; Reis, OGC
Stephen P. Sands, NRR
b g ,,
R
RI
11
RIII
II
t ".
es
ske/cg
L
eed
lips Clayton
t
'
2//5/90
2/t
90
2 /f/90
2/i6/90
2/ /90