ML20006E625

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Requests Determination That 10CFR26 App a Section 2.7(0)(3)(ii) Does Not Require That Alcohol Breath Analysis Equipment Conform to Both Natl Safety Highway Traffic Safety Admin Stds & State Statutes or Exemptions to 10CFR26
ML20006E625
Person / Time
Site: Oyster Creek, 05000000, Crane
Issue date: 02/15/1990
From: Long R
GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITIES CORP.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
4410-90L-0010, 4410-90L-10, C-90-872, C000-90-0872, C311-90-2015, NUDOCS 9002260148
Download: ML20006E625 (3)


Text

e le g'

o

() - i OPU Nueleet Corporation Sr One Upper Pond Road is Parsippany, New Jersey 07054 t

201 316-7000 i

TELEX 136-482 I

Februtry 15, 1990Writer's Direct Dia! Number, C311-90-2015 (201) 316 7484 I

4410-90L-0010 C000-90-0872 l

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention:

Document Control Desk Washington, D.C.

20555 i

t Gentlem?n i

Subiect: Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1 (THI-1)

DPR-50/50-289 Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 2 (TMI-2)

DPR-73/70-320 Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station (OC)

'?

DPR-16/50-219 Fitness-For-Duty Program 10 CFR 26.6 Exemption Request From 20 CFR 26.24(g) Requirements of Section 2.7(O)(3) of Appendix A to Part 26

_c By this letter, CPU Nuclear Corporation (GPUN) requests (1) a determination that 10 CFR Part 26 Appendix A Section 2.7(O)(3)(11) does not require that alcohol breath analysis equipment conform to both National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) standards Ansi Stato statutes ( h, conforming with NHTSA is sufficient whether or not a State has standards), or, in the' alternative, (2) an exemption from the applicability of State statutes as referred to in Section 2.7(O)(3)(11) of Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 26.

'10 CFR Part 26, Appendix A, Section 2.7(O)(3)(11) states:

L

" Alcohol breath analysis equipment shall be an evidential-grade breath alcohol analysis device of a brand and model that conforms to National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) standards (49 FR 48855)

Ansi to any applicable State statutes."

(Emphasis added.)

GPUN destces to use the following alcohol breath analysis instruments which are N-

-on-the NHTSA's " Conforming Products List of Evidential Breath Measurement Devices:"

os 1350 (1) Intoximeter 3000 manufactured by Intoximeters, Inc.

(

.Nf (2) Alco Sensor III manufactured by Intoximeters, Inc.

f' Sof, V

'These NHTSA approved devices provide sufficient sensitivity, reliability, and operability to satisfy the regulatory requirements of 10 CFR Part 26 for p2

$g analyses of breath alcohol content. Additionally, the excellent operational oc characteristics and ease of use of both Intoximimeters, Inc. devices support

'0<

the high volume of testing required by the 10 CFR Part 26.

N OCC '

[

Q. _

' GPU Nuclear Corporation is a subsidiary of General Public Utilities Corporation 1 0

s.

.U. S. Nu;1 ear Regu1Ctory Commic71:n j

February 15, 1990 Page 2 GPUN facilities subject to 10 CPR Part 26 are located in both Pennsylvania and l

New Jersey. The Intoximaters, Inc. devices GPUN intends to use are currently l

approved by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's Department of Health as

[

" Equipment to Determine Blood Alcohol content under the Vehicle Code and..." (Pa B. Doc 89-827) for evidentiary purposes. However, State of New Jersey statutes, l

which do provide for the State Attorney General to approve a device or instrument to be used in the chemical analysis of the breath of a person j

arrested pursuant to the State traffic regulations concerning operation of motor vehicles and power vessels, do not list the Intoximeters, Inc. devices in the New Jersey Administrative Code 13:51-3.5: " Approved instruments for performing chemical analysis of a person's breath". The State of New Jersey doce not have statutes for use of breath alcohol devices in employee / employer matters.

Thus,

~

the devices proposed by GPUN are either not covered by "any applicable State statutes," and/or are not currently approved in the State of New Jersey for i'

violations of traffic and navigation laws. The manufacturer has indicated that the State of New Jersey has evaluated the Intoximeter 3000; but, the State has not yet signed the approval form.

6 GPUN requests this determination or exemption since the use of State approved devices in New Jersey is not necessary to achieve the underlying purpose of the rule, LL,, that of providing a "... credible test result" (NUREG-1385 Paragraph 4.18).

The testing instruments proposed by GPUN for use in breath alcohol analyses are approved and listed by the DOT's NHTSA as evidential grade

[

devices (23 U.S.C. 402, FR Doc 89-15534), and thus would provide credible test results when used to confirm blood alcohol concentration (DAC) levels.

At the same time, the interest of the individual is protected by use of these federally approved devices, and there is no elimination of the option for the individual to request a blood specimen. Also, it would allow GPUN to avoid the need to use different equipment in the two different states.

GPUN further requests this determination or exemption since compliance with New Jersey State statutes would result in increased costs of waste disposal, which does not appear to have been recognized or considered when the federal j

regulations were being formulated. The use of New Jersey State approved l-devices, such as the Breathalyzer Model 900 manufactured by National Dreger, l

l Inc., requires the disposal of varying quantities (over plant life) of sulfuric l

acid, a hazardous waste. Therefore, approval of this exemption request would eliminate the costs associated with such waste disposal and would be in the public interest by minimizing adverse impacts on the environment resulting from wasts disposal of this hazardous substance.

l l

CPUN believes the intent of 10 CFR Part 26 is such that the NRC expects utilities to use modern, reliable, and accurate breath analysis equipment. The NHTSA approved instruments manufactured by Intoximeters, Inc. clearly meet this

(

intent. Therefore, CPUN requests your expedited review and the providing of a f

determination or approval of this exemption request.

l l

Vary truly yours, f.

4?

t '

R. L. Long Vice President-Corporate Services l

GMG/RLL/gjy l

3112015 c

a o

-.'p,

I;'

UL s. Nu31 ear Reg:lttory Commi::siin j

g j-February 13, 1990 ll[

Page 3

=

i 2

1 K20FE390 cca W. T. Russell - Administrator Region I NRC

'J.

Stols - Director, Project Directorate-I-4 NRC A. Dromerick.- OC NRC Project Manager L

.R. Mornan - TMI-1 NRC Project Manager M. Masnik - TMI-2 NRC Project Manager F. Young.- NRC Sr. Resident Inspector TMI 152 E. Collins - NRC Sr. Resident' Inspector OC

-n - 4

.5 -

i t

9-

[

l^

4,,

s

.. J g..

m.

-