ML20006E555

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Forwards Safety Evaluation Accepting 890413 Proposal to Modify Boraflex Surveillance Program for Plant.Program Can Reveal Deterioration Leading to Loss of Neutron Attenuation Capability During Design Life of Fuel Storage Racks
ML20006E555
Person / Time
Site: Point Beach  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 02/21/1990
From: Swenson W
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Fay C
WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POWER CO.
Shared Package
ML20006E557 List:
References
TAC-65052, TAC-65053, NUDOCS 9002230557
Download: ML20006E555 (3)


Text

i.

February 21, 1990

.c Docket Nos. 50-266 DISTRLBUT: ON:

and 50-301

(,soce mesaNRC & Local PDRs FDIII-3 r/f JZwolinski Mr. C. W. Fay, Vice President JHannon WSwenson Nuclear Power Department PKreutzer OGC-WF1 Wisconsin Electric Power Comp 6ny EJordan ACRS(10) 231 W. Michigan Street, Room 308 PDIII-3 Gray Milwaukee, Wisc.onsin 53201

Dear Mr. Fay:

SUBJECT:

POINT BEACH UNIT NOS.1 AND 2, BORAFLEX SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM (TACNOS.65052AND65053)

On April 13, 1989, you submitted for NRC approval a revised proposal to modify the Boraflex surveillance program at the Point Beach Nuclear Plant.

In addition, by letter dated November 1,1989, you described corrective actions to be taken upon finding degraded Boraflex to ensure subcriticality of the stored fuel assemblies. Based on staff review of these responses, we conclude that the proposed surveillance program for monitoring the physical integrity of the full-length Botaflex panels in the fuel storage racks can reveal deterioration that might lead to the loss of neutron attenuation capability during the design life of the fuel storage racks. Therefore, the staff considers the revised Boraflex surveillance program to be acceptable.

The staff further concludes that if significant loss of-neutron attenuation is found in any Boraflex panel, you can take appropriate corrective actions to ensure subcriticality of the stored fuel assemblies.

Enclosed is the staff Safety Evaluation of the proposed surveillance program and corrective actions. The staff understands that if this program is modified in the future for any reasen, you have committed to inform the NRC l-promptly.

This completes our review relative to 1 AC Nos. 65052 and 65053.

Sincerely,

/s/

l Warren H. Swenson - Project flanager l

Project Directorate III-3 Division of Reactor Projects - III, IV, V and Special Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Enclosure-As-stated j

cc: See next page DOCUMENT NAME: 65052/53 SE Office:

LA/

43 P

-3 Pt P III-3 i

i Surname:

PK r

WSwenson/tg JF ngn Date:

/7f 90 1/)]/90

$ /

[/90 9002230557 900221 b) fP l

PDR -ADOCK 05000266 L$

P FDC M

\\

3 I

Yjf UNITED STATES l-NUCLEAR RESULATORY COMMISSION q

o l

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 j

. {'

.//

February 21, 1990

)

]<-

Docket Nos. 50-266 and 50-301 Mr. C. W. Fay, Vice President l

Nuclear Power Department Wisconsin Electric Power Company 231 W. Michigan Street, Room 308 Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53201

Dear Mr. Fay:

i

SUBJECT:

POINT BEACH UNIT N05, 1 AND 2, BORAFLEX SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM t

4 (TACNOS.65052AND65053) i On April 13, 1989, you submitted for NRC approval a revised proposal to modify the Boraflex surveillance program at the Point Beach Nuclear Plant.

In addition, by letter dated November 1, 1989, you described corrective actions to be taken upon: finding degraded Boraflex to ensure subcriticality of the stored fuel assemblies.

Based on staff review of these responses, we conclude that the proposed surveillance program for monitoring the physical integrity of,the. full-length Boraflex panels in the fuel storage racks can reveal deterioration that might lead to the loss of neutron attenuation capability during the design life of the fuel storage racks. Therefore, the staff considers the revised Boraflex surwillance program to be acceptable..

The staff further concludes that if significant loss of neutron attenuation is found in any Boraflex panel, you can take appropriate corrective actions to ensure subcriticality of the stored fuel assemblies.

Enclosed is the. staff Safety Evaluction of the proposed surveillance program and corrective actions. The staff enderstands that if this program is modified in the future fc7 any renon, you have committed to inform the NRC e

proinptly.

This completes our review relative to TAC Nos. 650 2 and 65053.

Sincerely, q

G Warren H. Swenson, Project Manager

/

Project Directorate III-3 Division of Reactor Projects - III, IV, V and Special Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Enclosure:

l As stated l

ec: See next page

~!

Mr. C. W. Fay Point Beach Nuclear Plant ytsconsinElectricPowerCompany Units 1 and 2 f

cc:

Mr. Bruce Churchill, Esq.

Shaw, Pittman, Potts and Trowbridge i

2300 N Street, N.W.

Washington, DC 20037 Mr. James J. Zach, Manager -

Point Beach Nuclear Plant Wisconsin Electric Power Company 6610 Nuclear Road Two Rivers, Wisconsin. 54241 Town Chairman Town of Two Creeks Route 3 Two Rivers, Wisconsin 54241 Chairman Public Service Commission of Wisconsin-Hills Farms State Office Building Madison, Wisconsin 53702 Regional Administrator, Region 111 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Executive Director for-Operations t

799. Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 Resident Inspector's Office U.S. Nuclear Regulatory. Commission l

ll 6612 Kuclear Road Two Rivers, Wisconsin 54?41 c

l l

k s,

-