Text

Performance Indicators
	ML20005G708
Person / Time
Site:	Fort Calhoun
Issue date:	11/30/1989
From:	; OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT
To:	;
Shared Package
ML20005G704	List: LIC-90-0003, Forwards Monthly Fort Calhoun Station Performance Indicators Rept, Dated Nov 1989; ML20005G708;
References
	NUDOCS 9001220208
	Download: ML20005G708 (98)
	v • d • e

{{#Wiki_filter:-W b FORT CALHOUN STATION PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

NOVEMBER, 1989 Prepared by:

Production Engineering Division Special Services [8R2"i!88s 388aj"y [' I

1 I OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT' FORT CALHOUN STATION PERFORMANCE INDICATORS - 1 PREPARED BY: PRODUCTION ENGINEERING DIVISION SYSTEM ENGINEERING NOVEMBER, 1989

4 E ? n s. I t i . + a ms ywene-s - eava... i a w w a a m... ) I a a e p, - % m... j a w ~ 44 ep...a a % s;.s + sp w, m w. a w 4 W~ .?A 9 W hlt i p^ ^ %, a k m s w s & A w ha-a s p wa saq-u N d/444dOrt b f34Adon, ' rte 9 - 9. o e - e t 5 .c ,, _.i' -._,,..,_--..r. _.. _.. ~ ,,,, = -,,. ..r.

r i i i TABLE OF CONTENTS i e i f.AE. Distribution.................... iv Preface...................... 1 i i Purpose...................... 2 Scope....................... 3 Adverse Trend Report................ 4 Index to Performance Indicator Graphs....... 5 t Performance Indicator Graphs........... 10 l l Escalated Enforcement History........... 69 Significant Items of Interest........... 73 Definitions.................... 74 Basis for Establishing 1989 Performance Indicator Goals................. 86 Operating Cycles and Refueling Outage Dates.... 88 l Production and Operation Records.......... 89 Data Source.................... 90 i References.................... 93 l l r l l l

i l DISTRIBUTION V. W. Anderson R. M. Hawkins C. W. Norris R. L. Andrews M. C. Hendrickson J. T. O'Connor W. R. Bateman K. R. Henry R. G. Odden K. L. Belek J. B. Herman W. W. Orr l A. D. Bilau K. C. Holthaus L. L. Parent C. N. Bloyd L. G. Huliska T. L. Patterson J. P. Bobba R. L. Jaworski F. M. Peterson C. J. Brunnert R. A. Johansen G. R. Peterson M. W. Butt J. W. Johnson S. M. Peterson R. H. Cagle D. W. Jones R. L. Phelps l C. A. Carlson W. C. Jones T. J. Pirruccello G. S. Cary J. D. Kecy W. R. Plowman J. W. Chase J. D. Keppler S. C. Presler G. R. Chatfield D. D. Kloock T. M. Reisdorff A. G. Christensen D. M. Kobunski A. W. Richard R. P. Clemens G. J. Krause T. J. Sandene R. G. Conner G. A. Krieser F. C. Scofield J. L. Connolley L. J. Kripal L. G. Sealock G. M. Cook J. B. Kuhr H. J. Sefick M. R. Core L. T. Kusek J. W. Shannon P. J. Cotton R. C. Learch R. W. Short S. R. Crites R. E. Lewis A. L. Shrum D. W. Dale R. C. Liebentritt C. F. Simmons i R. C. DeMeulmeester C. J. Linden E. L. Skaggs W. D. Dermyer B. R. Livingston F. K. Smith R. D. DeYoung J. M. Lofshult R. L. Sorenson D. C. Dietz J. H. MacKinnon R. T. Spetman D. E. Dirrim G. D. Mamoran D. E. Spires K. S. Dowdy J. W. Marcil K. E. Steele J. A. Drahota N. L. Marfice W. Steele R. G. Eurich D. J. Matthews H. F. Sterba H. J. Faulhaber J. M. Mattice R. K. Stultz M. A. Ferdig L. K. McFadden G. A. Teeple J. J. Fluehr T. J. McIvor M. A. Tesar F. F. Franco R. E. McKay P. L. Thompson J. F. W. Friedrichsen M. L. Meador J. W. Tills R. M. Fussell R. F. Mehaffey D. R. Trausch S. K. Gambhir K. A.-Miller P. R. Turner l J. K. Gasper R. A. Miser C. F. Vanecek W. G. Gates K. J. Morris L. P. Walling M. O. Gautier D. C. Muelle-J. M. Waszak l J. T. Gleason R. J. Muei'ar W. O. Weber L. V. Goldberg W. L. Nsal G. R. Williams R. E. Gray J. B. Newhouse S. J. Willrett M. J. Guinn M. W. Nichols D. D. Wittke R. H. Guy P. A. Yager iv

l PREFACE PERFORMANCE INDICATORS REPORT IMPROVEMENTS Two indicators have been changed for the month of November,1989. i These two indicators are in the Training and Qualification Section. j i One of the indicators that has becn changed is the SRO License { Examination Pass Ratio Indicator found on page 60. This indicator i now re"lects the fact that OPPD does not administer initial exams. The other indicator.that has been changed is the R0 License i Examination Pass Ratio Indicator found on page 61. This indicator now ref'ects the fact that OPPD does not administer initial exams. i 0 l , l

1 PURPOSE This program titled " Performance Indicators" is intended to provide i selected Fort Calhoun plant performance information to OPPD's personnel responsible for optimizing unit performance. The information is presented i n a way that provides ready j identification of trends and a means to track progress toward reaching corporate goals. The information can be used for assessing and monitoring Fort Calhoun's plant performance, with emphasis on safety and reliability. Some performance indicators show company goals or industry information. This information can be used for comparison or as a means of promoting pride and motivation. t t 2-

SCOPE ] In order for the Performance Indicator Program to be effective, the following guidelines were followed while implementing this program: I Select the data which most effectively monitors Fort Calhoun's performance in key areas. Present the data in a straight forward graphical format using averaging and smoothing techniques. Include established corporate goals and industry l information for comparison. Develop formal definitions for each performance parameter. This will ensure consistency in future reports and allow comparison with industry averages where appropriate. Comments and input are encouraged to ensure that this program is tailored to address the areas which are most meaningful to the people using the report.

n ADVERSE TREND REPORT The Adverse Trend Report explains the conditions under which certain indicators are showing adverse trends. An indicator that is defined as an Adverse Trend is one in which the current month's data has more deficiencies than the data presented two months prior. Doerations and Maintenance Budaet Indicator - Page 21 The actual expenditures for operations have been above budget since March,1989. This is due to the fact that several items were not adequately included in the 1989 budget. These items include; extension of the 1988 Refueling Outage, contract security support, radiation protection support, and Design Basis support. Temocrary Modifications (Excludino Staffoldina) Indicator - Page 54 Temporary mechanical modifications continue to increase due to the age of the plant, discovery of design basis discrepancies, the length of time required to resolve design discrepancies, and the need for outage conditions to resolve many items currently being satisfied with temporary modifications. 9 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS INDEX TO GRAPHS INDUSTRY KEY PARAMETERS forced Outage Rate....................... 10 Unplanned Automatic Reactor Scrams While Critical........ 11 Unplanned Safety System Actuations............... 12 Gross Heat Rate........................ 13 Equivalent Availability Factor................. 14 Fuel Reliability Indicator................... 15 Personnel Radiation Exposure (Cumulative)............ 16 Volume of Low-level Solid Radioactive Waste........... 17 Disabling Injury Frequency Rate................. 18 . q

L PERFORMANCE INDICATORS INDEX TO GRAPHS (CONTINUED) OPERATIONS Forced Outage Rate....................... 10 Unplanned Automatic Re x tor Scrams While Critical........ 11 Unplanned Safety System Actuations............... 12 Gross Heat Rate......................... 13 Equivalent Availability Factor................. 14 Fuel Reliability Indicator........... 15 Daily Thermal Output...................... 19 Equipment Forced Outages per 1000 Critical Hours........ 20 Operations and Maintenance Budget................ 21 Document Review......................... 22 MAINTENANCE Diesel Generator Reliability (100 Demands)........... 23 Diesel Generator Reliability (20 Demands)............ 24 Age of Outstanding Maintenance Work Orders........... 25 Maintenance Work Order Breakdown................ 26 Corrective Maintenance Backlog >3 Months Old.......... 27 Ratio of Highest Priority MWO's to Total MWO's Ccmpleted.... 28 Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance............ 29 Preventive Maintenance Items Overdue.............. 30 Preventive Maintenance Backlog................. 31 Number of Out-of-3ervice Control' Room Instruments........ 32 Craf t Work Activity....................... 33 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS INDEX TO GRAPHS (CONTINUED) MAINTENANCE (CONTINUED) Maintenance Overtime...................... 34 Procedural Noncompliance Incidents (Maintenance)........ 35 Maintenance Work Order Backlog (Corrective Non-Outage)..... 36 NumberofNuclearPlantReliabilityDataSystem(NPRDS) Reportable Failures....................... 37 CHEMISTRY AND RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION Fersonnel Radiation Exposure (Cumulative)............ 16 Volume of Low-level Solid Radioactive Waste........... 17 Secondary System Chemistry................... 38 Primary System Chemistry - Percent of Hours Out of Limit.... 39 Auxiliary Systems Chemistry Hours Outside Station Limits.... 40 In-Line Chemistry Instruments Out-of-Service.......... 41 Hazardous Waste Produced.................... 42 Maximum Individual kadiation Exposure.............. 43 Total Skin and Clothing Contaminations............. 44 Decontaminated Auxiliary Building................ 45 Gaseous Radioactive Waste Being Discharged to the Environment.. 46 Liquid Radioactive Waste Being Discharged to the Environment.. 47 SEC0RITY loggable/ Reportable' Incidents (Security)............ 48 Security Incident Breakdown................... 49 l 1

[p " PERFORMANCE INDICATORS INDEX TO GRAPHS (CONTINUED) MATERIALS AND OUTSIDE SERVICtS Amount of Work On Hold Awaiting Parts.............. 50 Spare Parts Inventory Value................... 51 m 7 Spare Parts Issued....................... 52 D{ SIGN ENGINEERING i; Outstanding Modifications.................... 53 Temporary Modifications..................... 54 [ INDUSTRIAL 5!?ETY r Disabling Injury Frequency Rate................. 18 gg Recordablo Injury Cases frequency Rate............. 55 Minor Injury Cases per Month.................. 56 L HUMAN RESOURCES Numner of Personnel Errors Reported in LERs........... 57 Personnel Turnover Rate...................... ?B Staffing Level......................... 59 TRAINING AND OUAllF1 CATION SR0 License Examination Pass Ratio............... 60 R0 License Examination Pass Ratio................ 61 + R0 ot License Exams...................... 62 Hotlines............................ 63

lassroom (Instructor) Hours..................

64 1 Total Hours of Student Training................. 65 + - l

i-PERFORMANCE INDICATORS-1' INDEX TO GRAPHS (CONTINVED) 7 1 i OUALITY ASSURANCE- ~ Number of Violations per 1000 Inspection Hours.......... 66 -Percent of DR/QR's Greater.Than Six Months Old......... 67 DR/QR's Issued versus Significant DR/QR's Issued versus..... 68 NRC Violations Issued versus LERs Reported-L, ( 9

b I - Forced Outage Rate-l 6 G-Fort Calhoun Goal-1 s-Industry Upper.10 Percentile ' 5-GOOD i 4-4 R a-t 3-p e 2-O'---O-~~ O'~~~O --- G----9 ---G-~~'O---- O --- ~~~O---O 1 O C C 0, 0 C C C C C C m '86 '87 '88 Dec Jan-Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep, Oct;-Nov 1988 1989 i FORCED OUTAGE RATE-There were zero forced outage hours logged for,the Fort Calhoun Station during November, 1989.- The present 12 month average forced outage rate is 1.6%. The last forced cutage at Fort Calhoun occurred in September of 1989. g The industry upper ten percentile value for -the forced outage rate is 0.0%. The 1989 goal for forced outage rate is 2.1% an' is based on seven days of forced outage time. The basis for establishing the 1989 performance goals c,an be found on page 86. Adverse Trend: None t, * + 1 l

Sr Reactor.-Scram-e-Fort Calhoun Goal-C Industry Upper 10 Percentile 4-i S 3-G000 l c r 4 a' a 2-1- 1-O---- G----e----G----e----e----e----e----e----e ----e ----e I' 00 0 C 2 O C C .C C ,86.,87 '88 -Dec 'Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov -1988 1989 UNPLANNED AU"0MATIC REACTOR SCRAMS WH::LE CRITICAL r L There were no un reactor scrams - in November. planned automatic It has been 1,247 days since the last unplanned automatic reactor scram which occurrec on July 2,1986. i, The 1989-goal for unplanned automatic reactor scrams while critical has been set at 1. L L The industry upper ' ten percentile value is i zero scrams per unit on an annual basis. The Fort Calhoun Station is currently in the upper ten percentile of nuclear plant performance in this area. Adverse Trend: None L Y, I u

e-9 4-Safety System Actuations G-Fort-Calhoun Goal s-Industry Upper 10 Percentile 3-A C' t a GOOD $2 4 o i n-s. 1-O ---G----G----0 ---e----G----e----e----e ----e----e---- e 0 0 - 0 q 0 ~ 86 '87.'88 DIc Jan. Feb MIr Apr MIy Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov 1988 1989 UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS i There were no unplanned safety system actuations:during the-month of November, 1989. The' 1989 goal for the number of unplanned safety-system actuations is zero. This goal is based on past performance at the Fort Calhoun Station. .The industry upper-ten percentile value for the. number of unplanned safety system actuations )er year is zero. The Fort Calhoun Stat on is' currently in the up)er ) ten percentile of nuclear plants for t11s indicator. Adverse Trend: None <

c: /, j = l l Monthly Gross Heat Ratt - Year to Date Gross Heat Rate G-Fort Calhoun Goal -e Industry Upper 10 Percentile GOOD 10750-4 .O 56 -&--e -- e --e----O l B 10500-Qg-u 10284 10270 l W 10250-l H y 10014 1 e o o e_e e-e-e_e O~O-B I 10000- '86 '87- '88 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989 l GROSS HEAT RATE The gross heat rate for the ' Fort Calhoun Station during November, 1989 was 10,443 BTU /KWH. The gross heat-rate values for this cycle of operation will be ' increased due to the removal of the first stage of the high pressure turbine. The 1989 year to date gross heat rate value is 10,575 BTU /KWH. The 1989 goal is 10,500 BTU /KWH. This goal value of 10,500 BTU /KWH is the theoretical best heat rate that the fort Calhoun Station can obtain in its present configuration. p-The gross heat rate industry upper ten percentile value is j 9,989 BTU /KWH. Adverse Trends: None.

e i h l IMonthly EAF ^ - 12 fionth Average EAF -G-Fort Calhoun Goal GOOD O ' Industry Upper 10 Percentile 100-85 ...s... e.... .gm,q_ 4 -_4. g_,4 4 m m, = 71 66' f -[60- / x c-r. e n _40-20-O L '86 87 '88 Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May 'Jun Jul Aug Sep ' Oct Nov j 1988 1989 1 EOUIVALENT AVAILABILITY F TOR The Equivalent Availability Factor- (EAF) was reported as 85.7% for the month of November.. The 1989-EAF goal is 84.4% while the present 12 month average EAF for Fort Calhoun is 68.9%. The EAF -industry upper ten percentile value is 83.5%. -4: Adverse Trends: None' t =

A~ ) -1 4 Si -+t-Fuel Reliability Indicator. G-Fort Calhoun Goal. -l C Industry Upper 10 Percentile -e n a n l-l 8:: 3-

16 u.

GOOD-1 r U. I 4 e 2-a m 1 - e----s---G--- e----e----s---e----e----&--- s ---e--- o. 3 -- 0 0 ?86 '871 '88 ' Dec Jan Feb - Mar ' Apr May Jun Jul A'u'g S'e'p Oc't Nov-1988 1989 1 . l 1 FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR. The' Fuel Reliability Indicator- (FRI) was reported as 0.056.nanocuries/ gram for the month.of November. This FRI-value indicates thats there have been no. fuel failures since startup-in Junuary, 1989. The-1989 fuel reliability goal has been set at 1.0 nanocuries/ gram. The fuel reliability indicator industry upper ten percentile value is 0.07 nanocuries/ gram. The Fort Calhoun Station is currently in the upper ten percentile of nuclear plants for this indicator Adverse Trend: None 1 y or

, ~. - " 3 - Parsonnel Radiation' Exposure 388 ~ 400 -e-Fort Calhoun Goal 0 1 Industry Upper ~10 Percentile y 14 300 GOOD is272-4 i co Fe R-D E ; 200-M:

O O

O O O O O O k ,...e_.. - O

74:<.'

100-9... e - p...e -9..- & -9...e ~ q l c . 0'~ g '86,-'87 88 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct-Nov Dec. 1989 1 .k PERSONNEL RADIATION EXPOSURE (CUMULATIVE) I J During November, 1989 6.4 man-rem-was recorded by pencil dosimeters worn by personnel while working at the Fort Calhoun Station. 4 The monthly cumulative exposure goal for October was -117.5 man-ren while the actual recorded exposure through October was 86.4 man-rem. The personnel radiation exposure industry upper ten percentile is 175 man-rem per unit per year. Adverse Trend: None . l

'm h Monthly Radioactive ~ Waste Shipped 12500- ~ - Cumulative Radioactive Waste Shipped G-Fort Calhoun Goal -fB-Industry Upper 10 Percentile C-GOOD c 7500-4, F L e' O---O=-- C) --- G----EF---G----G---G----&---G----G--- O 1 e t 5000- / 4454 -4096 C O O f N l 2500-

1722 E

E 0 " 86' '87 88 Jan. Feb Mar Apr. May Jun Jul Aug Sep-Oct Nov Dec-l 1989 VOLUME OF LOW-LEVEL SOLID RADI0 ACTIVE WASTE zThe ' above' graph shows the amount of low-level radiocctive waste shipped off.-site for disposal. The table below lists the amount of waste actually. shipped - off-site for disposal plus the change in

inventory of waste in on-site storage in final form ready for burial.

Thevolumeof,solidradioactivewaste-is(cubicfeet): Amount Shipped in November 0.0 Amount in Temporary Storage 300.0 1989 Cumulative Amount Shipped 5518.5 1989 Goal 6000.0 There are two reasons for the very high amount of low-level solid radioactive waste that was shipped in January, 1989. One reason is that the 1988 refueling outage produced a large volume of radioactive waste. Also, shipping of low-level solid radioactive waste stopped in October, 1988, due to samples being sent off-site for isotope analysis that could not be completed at the Fort Calhoun Station. The industry upper ten percentile value is 2,895.5 cubic feet per unit per year. The Fort Calhoun Station was in the upper ten percentile of nuclear plants for this indicator in 1986, 1987 and 1988. Adverse Trend: None -

~. i 'l j -$4-Disabling Injury Frequency Rate -G-Fort Calhoun Goal 3; Industry Upper 10 Percentile a 2-1 GOOD R a '- ' f.,

V 1.3-EI,.

1- .5' . o... 9..e....e...e.... e..g...e... 9...e...q....e - 0 .0 '86: '87 . 88 -

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Rates for 1986,~1987 1989

-and 1988 show the- -year-to-date rate for

the month of November-1 DISABLING INJURY FRE00ENCY RATE (LOST: TIME ACCIDENT RATE)

There were zero disabling injuries reported o. L at the Fort-Calhoun Station in November. L The total-number of disabling injuries in j. 1989 is two. H e. 'The 1989 disabling injury frequency rate L' goal was set at 0.31% and was based on one L disabling injury occurring in 1989. 1 The industry upper' ten percentile disabling p injury frequency rate-is 0%. L The year end disabling injury frequency L rates for 1986, 1987, and 1988 were 0.0, 0.6, and 1.6 respectively. Adverse Trend: None. J

l-.

,-,--n-

1 --+- Thermal-Output - Technical Specification Limit -& Fort Calhoun Goal 1500 M " 1490-a t t 5 1485-1480 1 7 14 21 28 November 1989 DAILY THERMAL OUTPUT The above thermal output graph displays the daily operating power level, the 1500 thermal megawatt average technical specification limit, and the 1495 thermal megawatt Fort Calhoun goal. The cross hatched area represents the difference between the maximum allowable operation and the actual plant operation. The average percent power operation of the Fort Calhoun Station was 99.6% for the month of November. Adverse Trend: None,

m v' af m 3 m ? .i- .8 + i

y n

.j l' .,~ _-)+ Equipment Forced Outage Rate l o E" .8-1 \\ i .6-GOOD j R' +- a- .' t - e 4- .i } y .2-it .12 lj b 0 H 88' .Dec L Jan - Feb Mar. - Apr May Jun Jul - Au'g Sep Oct Nov I '86 '.'87

1988 1989 l

t y M P ff&lPMENT-FORCED OUTAGES PER 1000 CRITICAL it0E $. There-were zero -forced outag urs reported -for 'the Fort Calhoun S 'on during the month of November, 1989. he current ' value for the. number of equipment forced outages per 1000 critical hours for n 1989 is 0.14. -( The last equipment forced outage occurred in September of 1989 and was due to a cable -problem with the resistive temperature detector on reactor coolant pump motor RC-3A. Adverse Trend: None, 1 . i E. 1 i i 1 -+

? ~ K4m fsf3'f L. - Actual Operaticns Expenditures .' 80 - -H-Operations Budget

,p LM f:60-i 11Id

+ j {40-Jo 1 s x, na y. sr 20-0 1Jan Feb:~ Mar: Apr May. Jun-Jul Aug Sep Oct' -Nov Dec 1989 15- - Actual Maintenance Expenditures Mj12-

Maintenance Budget

'i-OU il d L g. 1 o'- i l' .o l; 6-na s r 3- .s 'Jan Feb-Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct-Nov Dec 1989 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET o The Operations and Maintenance Budget Indicator shows the budget year to . date-as well as the actual expenditures for operations and maintenance for the Fort Calhoun Station. .The budget year to date for operations was 59.7 million dollars for November while the actual cumulative expenditures for November totaled 70.9 million dollars. 'The budget year to date for maintenance v:as 11.0 million dollars for November while the actual cumulative expenditures for November totaled 10.5 million dollars. Adverse Trends: Since March the actual expenditures for o>erations have been above budget. This is due to the fact that several tems were not adequately included for in the 1989 budget. These items include; extension of the 1988 Refueling Outage, contract security support, radiation protection support, and Design Basis support. No adverse trend associated with the maintenance budget has been observed. d

%*?q j ; 'M' ' ~ ~ ^ ^ ~ ' ' ' '" ~ ' ' l m_. "'?.'.. W 7 500i Jf'

- Documents? Scheduled for Review

~ -X-Documents Reviewed l f ' Overdue Documents: ) .j 1400-o i . N-^ DJ '\\ [ ;300-o, ' b' u ] } 'em 1 i r:e n .o:t 200-lX \\ \\ \\ (f.l s ( \\ l \\ I' '00- "' \\c \\ X .,/ Xg, / X. I t ,/ / " '--'- % Q p /,,,,- y; y,. X j l \\ s k - X_ 'v' 'N, 0 ' - - - * - ~ ~ ~ ~ 'Dec Jan Feb-Mar -- Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov l 1988-1989 t.- DOCUMENT REVIEW -This.-indicator shows the number of biennial reviews completed during thel reporting month, the number of: biennial reviews scheduled for the , reporting month, and the number of biennial reviews that.tre overdue. These: document' reviews are performed in house and include S)ecial Procedures, the Site Security Plan, Maintenance Procecures, Preventive Maintenance, and the Operating Manual. The documents L included in the Operating Manual are Standing Orders, the Technical E Data. Book, the Radiological Emergency Response Plan, Emergency Plan Implementin ' Procedures,g Procedures,.0perating Procedures, Emergency Operating Abnormal Operating Procedures, Operating Instructions, r t the Radiological Protection Manual, the Chemistry Manual, the Fuel y Management Manual, Surveillance Tests, and Calibration Procedures. 1: During November there were 88. document reviews completed while 13 p' document reviews were scheduled. At the end of November, there were -54 document reviews overdue. The overdue document reviews at the end of November consisted primarily of maintenance documents. '~ Adverse Trend: None L ,__k.,.,

I _,, '100, -+- Diesel Generator No.= 1 j -X-. Diesel Generator No. 2 l 1 7 98-G-Fort Calhoun Goal-96-e.....e.....g.... .. q..... s..... g.... q..... e.... g.. q..... g X i 94 m- "N +. -.x / ' ^ v c, s, v -m m m m m .P< 92-e- r.90-c e 88 l /\\- n t 86-GOOD f 84-82-80 Dec-Jon Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct 'Nov 3 1988-1989 DG RELIABILMTY LAST 100 DEMLNDS P Diesel generator D-1 has a 95 percent reliability factor over the last 100 valid demands. Diesel generator D-2 has a 93 percent reliability factor over the last 100 valid demands. The Fort Calhoun goal for the diesel generator - reliability is 95%. Presently D-1 meets this goal. Adverse Trend: None b v 7y,

+ 1 4 L . Diesel Generator No. 1 -X-Diesel Generator No.- 2 I -G-Fort Calhoun Goal -i 4 100-l _ l. I t 95 o

9.....

.....g..... g.....g....q... 9.....g....q....q..... g. p; \\ / f L e; \\. ~/ ] N. / r h. h.90-.X k l n s L-n t k" 85- ^ GOOD i 80 Dec Jan Feb-Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug_.Sep Oct ~Nov 1988 1989 l 2 ~ DG RELIABILITY LAST 20 DEMANDS . Diesel generator D-1 has not had a failure in the last J20 demands 'on the unit. The present reliability factor for D-1 is 100% over the last 20-demands. l Diesel generator D-2 -has had one failure in-the last 20 demands. D-2 has a 95% reliability factor over the last 20 demands. The Fort Calhoun goa.1 for the diesel generator reliability for the last 20 demands is set at 95%. Diesel D-1 and diesel D-2 presently meet this goal. Adverse Trend: None 24 m +

- 500-1 E September 1989 1 E October 1989 I INoveder 1989 400-0 . ( !~ Fort Calhoun Goal a 300-(zeroMWO's>12monthsold) ) !! tr 0-3 3-6 6-9 9-12 >12 Age in Months AGE OF OUTSTAND::NG MAINTENANCE WORK ORDERS (N0N-0UTAGE) The above bar chart breaks down the maintenance work orders by their age in months. and trends each category over the previous three months. The Fort Calhoun goal is to have zero outstanding maintenance work orders greater than 12 months old. Adverse Trend: None . P s .r -w-- ~

w--

p \\ 1200- ?,, j = + October 1989 'l l l November 1989 { Fort Calhoun Goal-600-L .300- . Total. Open Total Open Open Open MW0s Open Safety High MW0s > 3 Months Safety Related Priority Old Related MW0s MW0s MW0s > 3 Months Old y MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BREAKDOWN (NON-00TAGE) This indicator shows the total number - of ' open non-outage maintenance work orders at the end of the reporting month, along with a breakdown by several key categories. The Fort Calhoun goal is to have zero WO's older than the average age of MWO's that are greater than three months old. The November goal was to have less than 485 open MW0's that are greater than three months old. Adverse Trend: None, \\- _-

n I t ' e - Corrective Maintenance. Backlog >-3 Months Old 4-Industry Upper Quartile- _] -l ! a0 J l 60-1 1 i .p e. 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O-v e n: -t: GOOD '20-t O Dec Jan Feb Mar -Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov 19881 1989 I CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE BACKLOG GREATER THAN 3 MONTHS OLD (NON-0UTAGE) This indicator shows the percentage of open non-outage corrective maintenance' work orders that + are greater than three months old at the end of the l reporting month. 4 l' The percentage of open non-outage corrective l. maintenance work orders that are greater than three months old at the end of November was reported as 53.2%' The industry upper quartile value for corrective maintenance backlog greater than 3 months old is 44.1%. Adverse Trend: None

~

i. F l 40-t - Ratio of Highest Priority M0s to Total MOs Completed i 1 1 m 3 30- -] p. N ] e-h20-f GOOD L + 1 t: i 10-l t ~

.t'.

-0 Dec. Jan .Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct' Nov 1988 1989 .i

RATIO OF: HIGHEST PRIORMTY MWO'S TO TOTAL MWO'S COMPLETED (NON-0UTAGE)

-The: purpose of this indicator is to monitor the ability. to effectively prioritize, plan, and schedule corrective maintenance, A higher ratio indicates that a comparatively greater number of emergency: type maintenance activities have been required to support plant operation. The value for the ratio of highest priority MW0's to total MWO's completed for the month of 4 November, 1989, was reported as 9.1%. The industry upper quartile for the ratio of highest )riority MWO's to total MWO's completed is - no 'onger available. This indicator was discontinued for 1989 by INP0. Adverse Trend: None 4 s s

~. _ - _ _ _ -I .i - Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance -+ Industry Upper Quartile o '90 G-Fort Calhoun Goal 80-i 70-1 p. 60-G----- --- e-----e ---

g ----- p -----p.---- p ---- g-----

--- g c e. v v v v v v V Cr'f n-O 'O O + t. 40- /\\ .20 Dec .Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov 19881 1989 f RATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTENANCE (NON-0UTAGE) The ratio of preventive to total maintenance indicator shows the ratio of completed non-outage preventive maintenance to total completed - non-outage maintenance. The ratio of preventive to total maintenance at the Fort Calhoun Station increased to 75.6% in November. The Fort Calhoun goal is to have a ratio of preventive to total maintenance greater than 60%. 4 The industry upper, quartile value for the ratio of prevent ve to total maintenance is 57.4%. The Fort Calhoun Station is currently in the upper quartile of nuclear plant performance in this area. Adverse Trend: None Fr -ig ? - Preventive Maintenance Items Overdue '20- -<>- Industry Upper _ Quartile - n p G-Fort Calhoun Goal l _ _15 - .P; e' GOOD r-c- 10- +- .e-n t-5- Oj,..O O-rAe - -- c -----e------e-e I ^ A A A A A A v ';Dec Jan Feb Mar-Apr May Jun-Jul Aug Sep' Oct-Nov 1988-1989 f i PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ITEMS OVERDUE The purpose -of this indicator is to monitor ,, c ' progress in the. administration snd execution -of e i preventive' maintenance programs. A.imall percentage -of preventive: maintenance items overdue indicates a station commitment to -the preventive maintenance program and 'an ability to plan, schedule, and i perform' tasks as programs require. preventive maintenance The preventive. maintenance items overdue value decreased to 0.0% for the month of November. There 4 were--a total of 946 preventive maintenance items i completed during the month with zero preventive maintenance items not completed within the + allowable grace period.. 4 -The. Fort Calhoun goal is to have less than 1.2% preventive maintenance items overdue. The industry upper quartile for preventive maintenance items overdue -' i s 1.5%. The Fort Calhoun Station is currently performing in the industry upper quartile for this indicator. Adverse Trend: None i, 3 L

Q / n '80-Total Backlog PM's j Old Backlog PM's } L_j New Backlog PM's G-Fort Calhoun Goal l ] N ( 60-3 u: i Di 'b. 'e.

r

.;oL40-f p -. M' 4 i 5 f .20-Io 5 J 0-o o o o o o o Aug.'. Sep; Oct-Nov^ Dec-Jan Feb Mar Apr May 'Jun Jul '1989 1990 PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE BACKLOG iThe Preventive Maintenance Backlog Indicator was added to the ~ Fort - Calhoun Station Performance Indicators Report for the month of. October, 1989. t .This indicator shows the total number of bac'klog H preventive maintenance items (PM's), the number of old .i l L . backlog.PM's (PM's that have missed their late date), and the number of new backlog PM's (overdue PM's for the reportingmonth). 1 i [-< Currently, the Fort Calhoun Station has a total of 16 "l backlog PM's,16 old backlpg PM's, and zero new backlog PM's. j The. Fort Calhoun goal is to have zero old backlog preventive maintenance items. j Adverse Trend: None O l < - -

l @$k(p l e q)yy%@h>"$> //4 f,f<p4 < b ///jg/y g$'#

+

IMAGE EVALUATION 1ss11Anos1(mi-3) xxxxxp pp p,p l.0 lf M E 5!NE i,i i m En ~ l I.8 = l_ 1.25 1.4 1.6 4 150mm 4 6" 4!$'%>///,,eg /+'b 4 b %j;gf4 bi +m

,i, _

, :; :2...'?b ') i

~;, y.y , IMAGE ,4,y ALUATION 1.0 5 In ILE 5 9 IIE !!#- En l'l ta m 1.25 1.4 1.6 1 4 150mm 4 6" 4L*'%// /a$4

gy Syf777 y

.,43),Q;g* ~ hp ; x~ =x

y. 4)k+@

+

l o .I ///// IMAGE EVALUATlON 7,, 7 1.s11-eer - + ' a tu d 1.0 y ll llin i.i [m He4 1.25 1.4 1.6 q \\ 4 150mm 4 6" 4k%///// /$ +yppffy - >,<g><f4 ob a <+ W w vg,U : .;ca A S i $N. a o

+ (> g o ////p f'#

t. +,

IMAGE EVALUATION 9 4 4)f>,l$> y g, TEST TARGET (MT-3) 6 f4

4?

'%,A l.0 EEEu 5 !_N E i,i [': EM lH i.25 i.4 i.6 4 150mm 4 6" f / zzzzf? - ((v;;[k% 7 +, .:ae ia; Jb $ - _j d2

f, ;g-. - W',', ~ ~'n ~~~ ~' A m a b ([> \\ j E Total Control l Room Instruments Out-of-Service-H. j ill, k [ _Out-of-Service Instruments'Added During-the Month ? L_J Out-of-Service Instruments ' Corrected During..the-Month q I'Y f35-4-Industry Upper Quartile' For T6tal: Out-of-Service Instruments t -G-Fort Calhoun Goal For Total Out-of-Service Instruments - y, g L30-j W GOOD -1 i ' :25- ) 4 20-j E, + Dec

Jan~

Feb Mar' Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov j 19881 1989 .t NUMFER OF OUT-OF-SERVICE ' CON" 10L ROOM INSTRUMENTS f lThis indicator shows the total number of out-of-service control room f* instruments at the end of the reporting month, the number of L out-of-service control-room instruments that were corrected during the } reporting month and the number of control room instruments that were -added to the out-of-service control room instruments list during the y reporting month. If There was a total of.11 out-of-service control room instruments at the i' end of November. During the month of November, 2 out-of-service instruments were corrected and 6 instruments were added to the out-of-service instruments list.' y' l The Fort Calhoun goal is to have less than 7 out-of-service control room instruments. l The industry upper quartile value for the number of out-of-service i control room instruments is 9. l; t - Adverse Trend: None l

EM. GM m. e :- x .+ m. l ll l ?

i

!$ii [ ki. PE I&C f Modifications (MOD) l lMaint. Work Orders (MWO) p L fj N Illi Unestimated (UNE) g i:i:!:i Preventive Maintenar.ce (PM) L \\ V Training (TRA) \\ (,' Calibration Procedures (CP) \\ ~ lo el Surveillance Tests (ST) im Maint. Work Requests (MWR) ll t l CRAFT WORK ACTIVITY l L The Craft Work Activity Indicator shows the percentage of a type of work each craft (plant personnel.only) performed during the month. The crafts that are represented in this indicator are Electrical Maintenance (EM), General Maintenance (GM), Mechanical Maintenance (MM), Pressure Equipment (PE),andInstrumentationandControl(I&C). WORK ACTIVITY (IN PERCENT) CRAFT MOD MWO _1g._, PM TRA CP ST MWR EM 9.26 26.35 4.79 20.38 20.05 0.69 7.07 11.41 GM 0.00 49.73 14.46, 0.00 5.54 0.00 0.00 30.27 m 0.11 42.98 17.79 16.50 8.83 0.00 4.26 9.53 PE 4.79 59.79 15.76 14.14 5.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 I&C 8.26 31.90 4.83 9.20 19,88 17.07 8.35 0.51 Adverse Trend: None.

-[ 9x " :6 ,1 .w, f V 5 s 4 s - 1 D - Maintenance Overtime -l r ' 60; -4 y r,. c i x P' GOOD .e e' r C e' ' ': n i t? 20-i 0 Dec .Jan. Feb-Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug' Sep-Oct Nov .1988 1989 I MAINTENANCE OVERTIME The Maintenance Overtime Indicator monitors the ability. to perform the desired maintenance activities with.the allotted resources. Excessive overtime indicates insufficient-resource allocation and can lead to errors.due to fatigue. The percent of overtime hours with respect to normal hours was reported as 5.2% during the month of November, 1989. Adverse Trend: None'. m. m.

&l ^ l gs =g , m 1 3 I IIdentified Incidentsi ] ~ Incident Reports Opened M" Incident Reports Closed f Eh80- .m' ) b- { -e. j r. 60- ) o .i - f.- 1 I' 40-1. d-e n-t.,20-O Jan Feb Mar Apr-May Jun Jul-Aug Sep-Oct Nov Dec 1 1989 m L L -i H PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS L (MAINTENANCE) p~ The-Procedural Noncompliance Indicator was changed for the month of October. This indicator shows the number of procedural noncompliance IR's closed for the reporting month. This new reporting method is due to the new process in which IR's receive category codes. IR's now receive their category code when they are being closed. The new categorization method is being used to be consistent with the process in which Deficiency Reports (DR's) and QualityReports(QR's)arebeingclosed. F During the month of November,1989, 2 procedural noncompliance IR's ' involving maintenance were closed. The data for September, 1989, is unavailable due to the fact that the new process for IR's was being E implemented. This indicator provides information on personnel performance for Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Item No. 15. Adverse Trend: None. u

.y. y.'

{,

,9-r, ,;W 1 8 g' \\ h j. N m - Open MWO's j 'e-Fort Calhoun Goal i f.. -800-l V1 l 4 . 5 o 700- 'l 1

Nf.

q

u OM-H v

L b W : 600-G---- G - - ---- 0 ----e.---- e ----e---- e ----e - --- e-- ---s ---- o l e O' j rI - 500-400-300 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun 1989-1990 MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BACKLOG '(CORRECTIVENON-0UTAGEMAINTENANCE) .This indicator ~ shows the number of corrective non-outage maintenance work orders that are open at-the end of the reporting month, l The' goal for:this indicator is to have less than ~ L-600 corrective non-outage maintenance work orders remaining open. At the end of November, 1989, there were-502 corrective-non-outage maintenance work orders remaining open. This indicator was added to the Performance p Indicators Report to trend Safety Enhancement Program (SEP)ItemNo.36. 1: Adverse Trend: None l. L L -

t [ { j"; _.j' ^ ^ g, k, MIN 150' j ti, I I Total. NPRDS Component: FailuresL j Confirmed NPRDS Component Failures ]

40

?.Y ) 1 i-, ' u Fi 1

o ;30-a b 11

.a eil= .'I r: u r. .,e.20-1 1 d fs 1 10-1 3b E - Em i Dec -- Jan! 'Feb-Mar Apr' May' Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov i l' L 1988-1989 p NUMBER'OF NUCLEAR PLANT RELIABILITY 1ATA SYSTEMS (NPRDS) REPORTA3LE FAILURES ( This indicator was changed for the month of October. It shows the total number of NPRDS component failures and the number of confirmed .NPRDS component failures. The number of total b NPRDS. component ~ failures is' based upon the number -i of failure reports sent to INPO. The number ' of confirmed NPRDS com)onent failures is based upon l -- the number of fa lure reports that have been L. accepted by INPO. The difference of these two figures is the number of failure reports still under review by INP0. L l-During November,1989,, there was a total of zero confirmed NPRDS component failures. Adverse Trend: None l- + - Secondary' System CPI- -+- Secondary System CPI Limit 1.5- -O-Industry Upper Quartile- ~

1

+_.+..=;...+...q....+...+...+...+...+....+...+ [ GOOD .36 1 B0 - *5-A O O O O O O O i 0 '87. '88 Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar-Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep -Oct 1988 1989 800- - Hours Chemistry is Outside OG Guidelines j 600-GOOD H 400-V r 8 200-0 0 ' 87 '88 Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct 1988 1989-SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY The top graph, Secondary System Chemistry Performance Index (CPI), L l' is-'a calculation based on the concentration of key impurities in the secondary side of the plant. These key impurities are the most likely cause of deterioration of the ~ steam generators. The monthly CPI is plotted relative to the EPRI chemistry limit for CPI. The CPI was reported as 0.34 for the month of October. The industry upper quartile value for this-indicator is 0.20. The bottom graph, Hours Chemistry is Outside Owners Guidelines, I i tracks the total hours of }3 parameters exceeding guidelines L during power operation. In October, 1989, there were zero hours outside owners grou) guidelines. The industry upper quartile value g L for this indicator s no longer available. L 1 The above two chemistry indicators are one month behind the reporting period due to the time needed for data collection and evaluation of the station chemistry data. l Adverse-Trends: None

y v.y + x.' 'l,. 8- - Primary System Chemistry Out of Limit '6-l . p -- i GOOD -Q [ 4-4 ~3.0i [ I0 nf i 0 87'- '88-Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep.0ct 1988: -1989 PRIMARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY PERCENT OF HOURS OUT OF LIMIT The Primary Sy~ stem: Chemistry - Percent of s-Hours-Out of Limit indicator tracks the primary system chemistry performance by monitoring six key chemistry parameters. The Primary System Chemistry Percent of Hours Out of Limit was reported as 0.0% for the. month of October.100% equates to all six parameters being out of limit for the month. Adverse Trend: None Lo l '. l r L L,

g$ = S*x 3 !?! g', H-Auxiliary System Chemistry. Out'Of' Limit. -) 4 Industry Upper Quartils 40; -1 i c GOOD-0 i 4 1 6 ' p H l o 1 'e u-20-r s a m .o 9 10-J \\ i 0-O' O O O O O O 0; c '87 '88-Nov - Dec' dan F'e'b M'a'r A'pr May ju'n ju'l A'u'g S'ep Oct ~ 1988 1989 AUXILIARY SYSTIEM ICCW) CHEMISTRY HOURS-0VTSIDiE STATION LIMITS 1 The Auxiliary System Chemistry Hours Outside J Station Limits indicator tracks-the monthly t hours that the Component Cooling Water (CCW) system is outside the station chemistry. . limit. The above chemistry indicator is one month behind the reporting period due to the time needed for data collection and evaluation-of the chemistry data for the station. The auxiliary system chemistry hours outside l station limits for the month of October, 1989 was reported as zero. The industry upper quartile value for auxiliary systems chemistry hours outside station limits is 2.6 hours. The Fort [ Calhoun Station is currently performing in the industry upper quartile for this area. Adverse Trend: None l,

m 4 Q' y:' g: r ,,7-, _<, , W;x1W. y Ti 9, . - Number of Out-of-Service Instruments . G _ Fort Calhoun Goal 'i 25 'gr m .20-I" p Nn>- M u s :- 1 1.- q ,1 t 15- ^ < ;W i ,.e, (:; .r a- ~q =. - 0 n <10- -e = -

mo i m 55 me s m i t T. =:9 WM s-

.; Ens E315

.5-NM $d NU$ [ m a, . =. m - i -: C = = --G-----s -- - CF----G----- e -----0------O m m== 1 [ ::? -%h ?. E5E# .Jul-Aug. Sep Oct _Nov

Dec Jan Feb Mar

-Apr May Jun l 1989' 1990 ) ~IN-LINE CHEMISTRY INSTRUMENTS OUT-0F-SERVICE This indicator shows the total number of in-line -l chemistry system instruments that are out-of-service at the end of the reporting month. The chemistry - systems involvedL in this: indicator include the Secondary System and the Post-Accident p SamplingSystem(PASS). L u l At the end of November there were a total of 10 in-line chemistry instruments that were l L out-of-service. Five of these instruments were i. from the Secondary System and five were from PASS. u p The Fort Calhoun goal for the number of in-line ' chemistry sys tem' instruments that are (; out-of-service is 3.. 1: Adverse Trend: None L.

f3 u i ,i s 'l -9000-pm. Waste Oil-; c r Non-Halogenated: Hazardous, Waste

n f.

Halogenated Hazardous Waste 7200 l IOther Hazardous Waste 'K: ,j oL fm i f 5400-Io. W g a 7 5' a F t 3600-a F e g .n. 1800-E f' .; Is...a o Jan. Feb: Mar-Apr' May' Jun. Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989 HAZARDOUS WASTE PRODUCED i This.-indicator shows the amount of waste oil, i non-halogenated hazardous. waste, halogenated ^ hazardous -waste,. and other hazardous waste ' produced by Fort Calhoun each month. j During the month of November, 69.9 kilograms of waste oil was produced, 0.0 kilograms of a non-halogenated hazardous waste was produced, 119.6 kilograms of halogenated hazardous waste was produced, and 0.0 kilograms of other l hazardous waste was produced. i Adverse Trend: None 4

r .:.c 5000; i l iMonth 1 E Quarter OPPD, Limit' y,,7= '4000- ], j 3000-1 m< i ~ R Et , f. g l. -2000-r v, 11000-October 1989 + + MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL RADIATION EXPQjl),BE The. Maximum Individual Radiation Ex)osure graph is one month behind the reporting period cue' to the lag time involved with collecting ancl calculating the radiation - exposure for the station. 1 During ' October, 1989 an individual accumulated 355 mrem which was the highest individual exposure at the Fort Calhoun Station for the month. / l The maximum individual exposure so far for the fourth quarter of 1989 was 355 mrem. The maximum individual exposure for the year so far was 1142 mrem. The maximum accumulated '1988 individual exposure was 2,371 mrem, received by a visiting contractor during the refueling outage. The OPPD limit for the maximum yearly individual radiation exposure is 4,500 mrem / year. Adverse Trend: None

~ 1

m <

N[, ~ g y s x,. r o 0 Month 1y Contaminations 1 1 500- - Cumulative' Contaminations-G-~ Fort Calhoun Goal il 1 O-Industry Upper Quartile ~ 400-357 . P '- e .t' ,.s 300-GOOD. o <n -.4 n- -161 ~l.-- 200-a1 e g 'l' O-0 O' g4 O O O O' O O O 100- ,,,g.. - & - - O' - e ~~ - -O-~~O~~~g. q - .0 '87 '88- .Jan Feb Mar Apr : May Jun Jul Aug' Sep Oct Nov Dec-1989-i TOTAL SKIN AND CLOTHING CONTAMINATIONS 1 There was a total of 3 - skin and clothing j contaminations reported for the Fort H Calhoun Station during November, 1989. -These contaminations consisted of 2 skin contaminations and 1 combination skin and -l D. clothing contamination, l .\\ l There have been a total of 117 skin and i clothing contaminations so far in 1989. The 1989 goal for skin and clothing is 110 L contaminations. L -The industry upper quartile value for tota) skin and clothing c,ontaminations is 129 per y unit annually. j 1 This indicator provides information on personnel performance for Safety EnhancementProgram(SEP)ItemNo.15. Adverse Trend: None L l ' m

w l; Vy. j '. 4 w - Decontaminated Auxiliary Building a '100; w 80-O!<- n it' d, /\\. GOOD 'O Dec LJan Feb Mar Apr May 'Jun ~Jul Aug Sep -Oct Nov 1988-1989 } DECONTAMINATED AUXILIARY BUILDING This graph shows :the percentage of the t' auxiliary building which is decontaminated (clean) based on the total square footage. As of November 30, 1989, 84.4% of the total square footage of the auxiliary building was decontaminated.- Adverse Tr.f.Dd: None

v !Jc i ', " j _t f 'Y' 't' l j ^p t i IMonthly Radioactive.. Gas-Discharged V, y - - Cumulative Radioactive Gas-Discharged G-Cumulative Goal Y . 785' ~800-GOOD: s 'C 600- - u r ti 432' e ? s. 400-l s 1 200- .t e.___ e__..e ___9.__e___.e.___ e___.e. __e___e___e___o hk ' 0 ' 87 '88 Jan Feb J Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989 l l GASEOUS RA)I0 ACTIVE WASTE-BEING 1 )ISCHARGE ) TO THE ENVIRONMENT j The gaseous radioactive: waste being-i discharged. to the ' environment is shown for 1989. A. total of 51.3 curiesJhave been released to the environment from January through - June of 1989...The Fort - Calhoun Station goal is 145 curies for this l; indicator. The gaseous' radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is calculated every six months. 1 Adverse Trend: Nons 1 lu

+ - ll _L L I 1 Monthly Radioactive Liquid Discharged ij h - Cumulative Radioactive' Liquid Discharged ~ 'e-Cumulative Goal l y ?' '228: L231; 400- &-e-e-G--G--0-+--&--+-e-e--O '180 .C _ 300 Ie uc r-GOOD i 200- + q e" k 100- ~ 'I 0 .' 86 - '87. <'88 ' Jan.Feb' Mar Apr May. Jun Jul - Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989 -192-200-B o IIo1f-100-i'f 1[E 132 il f-no1 snu 50-se o n J f t 0 I I' 'I '86 '87 '88. Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov - Dec -1 1989 LIOUID RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT The liquid radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is shown for 1989. The liquid radioactive waste that was discharged to the environment totaled 78.8 curies and 83.7 billions L. of gallons of liquid effluent (radioactive liquid I waste plus dilution water) from January through l June 1989. l~ The high amount of' waste that was discharged during the month of May was due to the dilution of coolant for the maintenance outage that occurred in May. The Fort Calhoun Station goal for 1989 is 320 curies. The liquid radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is calculated every six months. Adverse Trend: None - 1.

~ ~ j l g,.

s..'m

'] ,1 7 k.( W -+- Security L'oggable/ Reportable Incidents' u m ~ L50 u: i 'N. u 'm 40 b' r. e 1 r j p 30 ,i - s g - o: f-s

j 1-

) 1 n' 20 - 'C-1 'i ; l '10 W^ t, 's . i; O Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov-Dec 1989 LOGGABLE/ REPORTABLE INCIDENTS (SECURITY) t The. Loggable/ Reportable Incidents (Security) Indicator shows the total- . number 'of loggable/ reportable incidents concerning Licensee Designated-Vehicles (LDV's)', inattentive security officers, security badges, l - security key _ control, escorting, and access control for the reporting , month. During the month of November,1969, there were 16 loggable/ reportable incidents identified. Lost / unattended badges, removal of badges from site and failure to wear badges continues to be a major area of concern. - The continued rise in access control incidents is a result of the -increased emphasis placed on search techniques by Security Officers and L their ability to detect and seize' prohibited items. The key control and escort-' control indicators have risen reflecting a need for more attention in these areas. Specifically, preventing the inadvertent n removal of keys from site. l' This indicator provides information on security performance for Safety EnhancementProgram(SEP)ItemNo.58. h Adverse Trend: None.

-i n: C l lSacurity Badges: l M Licensee Designated Vehicles-(LDV) E Inattentive' Security Officer-Security _ Key Control n Escort Access Control , "l 1 j l [, i l k l 1 4 1 i SECURITY INCIDENT BREAKDOWN ] The Security Incident Breakdown Indicator was added to the Fort Calhoun -Station. Performance Indicators Report for the month of October, 1989. This indicator shows the percentage of incidents concerning the following items ' for i the reporting month. These items include; Licensee Designated Vehicles-(LDV's), inattentive security officers, security badges, security key control, escorting, and access control. Security Items Number of Incidents OCT 1989 NOV 1989 Licensee Designated Vehicles (LDV's) 2 0 Inattentive-Security Officers 0 0 Security Badges 5 4 Security Key Control 1 4 ' Escorting 2 4 Access Control 3 4 Total 13 16 This indicati<r provides information on security performance for Safety Enhancement P ogram (SEP) Item No. 58. Adverse Trent: None

n..

1 I.I. p h,,'. >y' W c10i.

Amount of Work On Hold Awaiting Parts

{ n. I t ,j j, f i l GOOD .,P 6- + . p. C-1 e n-t. 4-2- s ,,' i 0 ~ Dec Jan Feb-Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov 1988 1989 AMOUNT OF WORK ON HOLD AWAITING PARTS (NON-0UTAGE)- i This procurement indicator displays the amount of open, non-outage, maintenance items that are on hold awaiting parts, to the total' amount of open, non-outage, maintenance items, expressed as a l percentage. t. l The percentage of work on hold awaiting parts increased to 4.8% in November. As of November 30, 1989, there were a total of 1,067 open, non-outage, maintenance items with 51 of these items l: on hold awaiting pdrts. l. i Adverse Trend: None J l' ~ i a.. -.m v -n-.-w-

U Jr) ;;. c pg ~ ' + g: . - + l y,() [ t ( -[ Q ' ' -J g.' y - Spare Parts Inventory Value h < 'a - i .) k[i - ii. M? s b< ) :. p q I oi< ?7-4' n. m S. Ryf M o a

J -: .- f

.) i D-p o 1-6- 1; 1 a. r: ., s '\\ t-i

b 5.

. Apr- -May Jun.Jul Aug Sep Oct. Nov '- Dec. Jan. Feb Mar L 1988 1989 x i l SPARE PARTS INVENTORY VALUE-The ~ spare parts inventory.value at the Fort Calhoun Station at the. end of November, 1989 was reported as $7,565,900. Adverse Trend: None. u .+ r 6 9 L 1 ( ll 1 51-

v. 1% < gg; . Ti - Spare Parts Issued c g 'Lh('T 3, l0 ' D u$ ' 400-

sf e

a n d: 300-D- s t -f 200-D c. .l' -l '100- ~ al r .s 0 1 Dec Jan Feb-Mar Apr May Jun Jul' Aug Sep Oct Nov 1988 1989 SPARE PARTS ISSUED .i 3 The value of the spare parts issued during Hovember, 1989, totaled $136,359. -l Adverse Trend: None 1 t 1 ,o g, .. r W b, ,700- - Total Modification Packages Open /640i e t 7 8 500-425 1 -400 334_. 300-200 - '86 487 88: Dec-Jan ~Feb Mar -Apr May Jan Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov 1988 1989 e7 ,m l OUTSTANDING MODIFICATIONS 1 The total. number'of outstanding modifications increased by~2 during the month of November. CATEGORY SEP 89 OCT 89 NOV 89 Form FC-1133 Backlog /In' Progress 87 64 63 Mod Requests Being Reviewed 157 133 127 Design Engr. Backlog 0 0 0 Design Engr. In Pro ress 80 99 96 i Construction Backlo /In Progress 47 53 63 Desian Enar. Uodate.Backloa/In Proaress ,_jl E E Total 426 416 418 l As of the end of November, 83 additional modification requests have been issued this year. The Nuclear Projects Review Committee (NPRC) has completed 444 backlog modification request reviews this year. The Nuclear Projects Committee (NPC) has completed 342 backlog L modification request reviews this year. The number of reviews L completed is high due to the fact that some of these reviews were reviewed more than once. l. 1 Adverse Trend: None l-l-

Yr l" ~ 0-

_ Temporary Electrical Modifications 1

M /60-

'a ' Temporary Mechanical Modifications 1 o.

N d y

u:1 1 a f E 40-g q h V e t 20-g....- oi j f o-q n-0 t s Dec Jan Feb Mar. Apr-May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct -Nov- '1988-1989 l September 1989 i M:' October 1989 d _30 l l November 1989 t uj > a f ' 20-b i-ec ra r 0 5 0-3 3-6 6-9 9-12 > 12 Age in Months TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS 1 (EXCLUDING SCAFFOLDING) l The top graph, Number of Temoorary Modifications, displays a monthly trend of-installed electrical and mechanical temporary modifications. There was a total of 26 electrical jumpers and 38 temporary mechanical jum]ers existing j in the Fort Calhoun Station at the end of November,1989. The bottom graph, q 'Aae of Temoorary Modifications, displays the age of all electrical and mechanical temporary modifications by months installed in the plant. This indicator monitors performance for Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Item 71. Adverse Trend: Temporary modifications continue to increase due to the age of the plant, discovery of design basis discrepancies, the length of time P. required to resolve design discrepancies, and the need for outage conditions to resolve many items currently being satisfied with temporary modifications. The decrease in the number of temporary modifications is L expected due to greater awareness and control of the number and types of temporary modifications currently in the plant. New procedures, such as GEI-60, are also being established to decrease the number of temporary modifications.

y;

7 g),

p q, y I i;g - 3, s TS - 12', - Recordabl3 Injury Cases. Frequency Rate j n. j i 110-1 a k

F

-1 r; 1

e : 8-

q :-

s u-l' 'e i; -n 6-4 GOOD ] .y,, L R. t ? La - 4-t e . 213 9 q g j; ~'86" .'87'.'88 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec l-

Rates for'1986, 1987:

L ' and 1988 show the-1989 year-to-date rate l3 for the month of November, 3 .l RECORDABLE-IhJURY CASES FRE00ENCY RATE 'A' recordable injury. case is reported if Nuclear Production Division personnel -are injured'on the job and require corrective medical-4

treatment. - The' recordable - cases-frequency rate is computed on a year-to-date basis.

There 'were zero ' recordable injury cases reported for the month of November. There have been a total of 10 recordable injury cases so far in 1989. There were eleven recordable cases reported in 1988, eight reported in ~1987, and four reported-in 1986. The year end recordable injury frequency rates for 1986, 1987, and 1988 were 1.6, 2.5, and 2.6 respectively. ~This indicator provides information on personnel performance for SafetyEnhancementProgram(SEP)ItemNo.15. Adverse Trend: None,

n w / ( ,1 p 4 ;- o./ [ m Minor Injury Reports Filed Per' Month 30-a is .s ;

25-: g;

,0 -i_ n 20-g o r-15-I t .n p Lj. .u' N -r-i:

l 5-O Dec - 'Jan Feb. Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug-Sep Oct Nov

- 1988 -1989 4 l MINOR INJURY CASES PER MONTH q The Minor Injury Cases per ' Month indicator it shows the number of minor -injur month involving OPPD employees. y cases each l L-During the month of November,1989 there was a total of-6 minor injury cases reported. There have been a total of 85 minor injury cases reported in 1989. Adverse Trend: None g; ,~ 3

l t 9;n;,

i j o h' Licensee' Event Reports. y wl l l Personnel Errors Reported;in LERs - Cumulative Licensee Event Reports -- Cumulative Personnel Errors Reported in LERs i 50; .ic 46. 1 39 40-i- 4 30-4 6 ) 20-4 ' [! 10-

5 f

s 0 '86=87- '88 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989 L NUMBER OF PERSONNEL ERRORS REPORTED IN LER'S 1 The-Licensee Event Reports (LERs) are reported for the month that they are submitted to the NRC. In November, 1989 there was one LER submitted. There was'one LER attributable to personnel error. There have been 29 LERs reported so far in 1989 with only 11 attributable to personnel errors. This indicator provides information on personnel performance for Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) l Item No. 15. Adverse Trend: None o

th, g 4 t -< r a 1 j i:

c

-{ o i I INuclear Divisions' Turnover Rate H w '. F - OPPD Corporate Turnover Rate:- y s o ? , 5-i

.[1 i: 1

+ J .;T! 4-u 7;

n.

--o - ~ 3-

y y

e

.r 1

2-

.R: a-t. .e 1 l 1 0 NuclearcOperations Production Engineering Quality Division Division and Environmental Affairs I PERSONNEL TURNOVER RATE .c d The turnover rate for three Nuclear Divisions is shown ' for the last twelve 4 months. The personnel turnover rate is plotted against the OPPD corporate turnover rate of 4.0%. This OPPD corporate turnover rate is based.on the turnover rate over the last i three years. Adverse Trend: None' i :

~ r,, i'{ --+ i. 600 Actual Staffing I IAuthorized Staffing 537 490 i P 400-e r s 0 n n 216 203 1-200-47 45 0-Nuclear Operations Production Engineering Quality i Division Division and Environmental Affairs STAFFING LEVEL The authorized and actual staffiag levels are shown for the three Nuclear Pivisions. Adverse Trend: None

7 l f~~~l SRO Initial Exa3 4 E SRO Requalification Exam { 100-1 80-P s 60-s. .R a }40-0 i 1 20-0- 1987 1988 1989 c SRO LICENSE EXAMINATION PASS RATIO The SRO License Examination Pass Ratio Indicator has been changed for the month of November. This indicator now reflects the fact that OPPD does not administer initial exams. TherewerezeroSeniorReactorOperator(SRO)examstakenduringNovember. l OPPD ADMINISTERED NRC ADMINISTERED Requal Exam Initial Exam Requal Exam DATE % PASS RATIO % PASS RATIO % PASS RATIO March 87 100 100 June 87 100 l February 88 80 March 88 100 100 67 t April 88 100 July 88 100 i l April 89 67 i May 89 100 September 89 October 89 100 Adverse Trend: None...

l IR0 Initial Exa3 R0 Requalification Exas I 100-80-P a 60-s 1 s i R. l

a. 40-

.i o I 20-No Requal 1 Exams ) 0-- 1987-1988 1989 l R0 LICENSE EXAMINATION PASS RATIO The R0 License Examination Pass Ratio Indicator has been changed for the month of November. This indicator now reflects the fact that OPPD does not administer initial exams. l l TherewerefourteenReactorOperator(RO)examstakeninOctober. OPPD ADMINISTERED NRC ADMINISTERED Requal Exam Initial Exam Requal Exam DATE % PASS RATIA % PASS RATIO % PASS RATIO June 87 100 February 88 100 March 88 100 100 100 July 88 100 April 89 100 100 May 89 100 September 89 October 89 Adverse Trend: None -

m E R0 Hot License Exams Administered i IR0 Hot License Exams Passed i N u 15-a b u e r 3 010-l E x 1 a i a 5-5 i 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989 i R0 HOT LICENSE EXAMS The R0 Hot License Exams indicator shows the number of R0 Hot License exams or quizzes taken and passed each month. During the month of November, 1989, zero exams were administered. Adverse Trend None t 9 -

ir-1 i

!!!! Hotlines Initiated 50-Hotlines Closed i es pen n er 4 Weeks 45-i Hotlines Open Over 4 Weeks i N 40-u O-b 35- ) e 4 30-o f 25-i l' o 20-i : 15- ] I i y i' n a 0-b E Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989 i HOTLINES This indicator shows the number of Hotlines initiated during the reporting month, the number of Hotlines closed during the i reporting month, the number of Hotlines that remain open and are less than four weeks old, and the number of Hotlines that remain open and are older than four weeks old. During the month of November, 1989, there were 18 Hotlines, initiated, 16 Hotlines closed, 11 Hotlines that remained open and were less than four weeks old, and 1 Hotline that remained open and was older than four weeks old. Adverse Trend: None.

4 E Planned Classroom Hours l 1 Actual Classroom Hours T 3' u s n d s 2- ) f H o u 1 .s O Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989 CLASSROOM (INSTRUCTOR) HOURS This indicator displays the number of planned classroom hours and the number of actual classroom i hours for the Fort Calhoun Station. The planned classroom hours for January and February are low because Maintenance and General Employee Training were not figured into the schedule for these months. This indicator is one month behind the reporting month due to the time, to collect and process the needed information. Adverse Trend: None ---

I IOperations 25-E Maintenance @ Chemistry and Radiation Protection E Technical Support M General Employee Training i T 20-E Other h o u s a 15-r d 10-f / r 5-s O Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989 t TOTAL HOURS OF STUDENT TRAINING This indicator shows the total number of student hours for Operations, Maintenance, Chemistry and Radiation Protection, Technical Support, General Employee Training, and Other training conducted for the Fort Calhoun Station. This indicator is one month behind the reporting mouth due to the time needed to collect and evaluate the data. Total Hours TRAINING SEPTEMBER 1989 OCTOBER 1989 Operations 2,727 3,088 Maintenance 1,541 2,645 Chemistry and 920 2,993 Radiation Protection Technical Support 3,381 4,368 General Employee Training 1,969 2,330 .Q1hgr. 292 141 Tota 1 10,830 15,565 Adverse Trend: None - -

+ - Violations per 1000 Inspection Hours -G-Fort Calhoun Goal 14 15-GOOD fg,g 11.1 12-3 4 9-e.. ....e...e.. e....e. .e.....e....o 6-3- 0 '86 '87. '88 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989 VIOLATIONS PER 1000 INSPECTION HOURS This indicator displays the number of NRC violations cited in inspection reports per 1000 NRC inspection hours. This indicator was calculated using the number of violations and the number of estimated inspection hours from the months of December,1988, through October, 1989. This indicator is one month behind the re>orting month due to the time involved with collect' ng and processing the data. The violations per 1000 inspection hours indicator was reported as 7.7 for the month of October, 1989. There was one violation cited for the month of October. There have been a total of 27 violations cited with 3,489 inspection hours in 1989. The goal for the number of violations per 1000 inspection hours is less than 8.6. Adverse Trend: None !

- Total Outstanding DR/QR's .. Outstanding DR/QR's > Six Months Old-Outstanding DR/QR's That Are Modification Related 200-150-D R- / k100-Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov 1988 1989 OUTSTANDING DEFICIENCY AND OVALITY REPORTS This indicator shows the total number of outstanding Deficiency and Quality Reports (DR/QR's), the number of outstanding DR/QR's that are greater than six months old, and the number of outstanding DR/QR's that are modification related. As of the end of November, 1989 there were 152 outstanding DR/QR's reports, 57 DR/QR's that are greater than six months old, and 10 DR/QR's that are modi,fication related. Adverse Trend: None 1988 IM9 OPPD SIGNIFICANT WC OPPD SIGNIFICANT SC SALP FUNCTIONAL AREA DR/OR DR/Gt VIOLATIONS LER'S DR/Gt DR/St VIOLATIfMK LER'S A. Plant Operations 38 1 8 11 3 (1) 0 7 2 B. Radiological Controls 53 0' S 1 24-(2) 1 1 1 C. Maintenance / 58 2 3 16 123 (4) 7 1 10 (1) Surveillance D. Emergency 11 0 0 1 8 0 0 0 Preparedness E. Security 49 0 10 11 26 (1) 2 (2) 6 (1) 9 F. Engineering / 30 1 2 3 106 (22) 2 5 6-Technical Support G. Safety Assessment / 110 0 10 3 67 (1) 0 1 0 Quality Verification h H. Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Total 349 4 38 46 357(31) 12 (2) 22 (1) 29 (1) DR/0R'S ISSUED VERSUS SIGNIFICANT DR/0R'S VERSUS 95tC VIOLATIONS ISSUED VERSUS LER'S REPORTED The above matrix shows the number of Deficiency Reports (DR's) and Quality Reports (QR's) issued by the Quality Assurance and Regulatory Affairs Division versus the number of Significant DR/QR's issued by the Quality Assurance and Regulatory Affairs Division versus the number of violations issued by the Nuclear Regulatory Commiission (IWtC) for the Fort Calhoun Station in 1988 and 1989. Included in this table is the num6er of Licensee Event Reports (LER's) issued by the station each year. The number of NRC violations reported are one month behind the reporting month due to' the time involved in collecting and processing the violations. In November,1989, there were 31 DR/QR's issued, 2 Significant DR/QR's issued, and 1 LER issued. During October 1 NRC violation was issued. The monthly distribution of DR/QR's, Significant DR/QR's, NRC violations, and LER's are shown in parentheses. This indicator monitors performance for Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Items 20 and 21.

ESCALATED ENFORCEMENT HISTORY Escalated enforcement includes level III, II, and I violations issued by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission for deficiencies discovered at the Fort Calhoun Station. Escalated enforcement also includes civil penalties which are usually assessed with level III and higher violations. Listed below is the escalated enforcement history for the Fort Calhoun Station. ESCALATED ENFORCEMENT

1. February 1985 Site Security Multiple Level IV and V Violations that were escalated to a Level III.

A civil penalty of $21,425 was assessed.

2. April 1986 Qualification of Electrical Penetrations - Level III Violation.

No civil penalty was assessed.

3. May 1986 Radiological Protection - Level III Violation.

No civil penalty was assessed.

4. December 1986 Physical Security - Level IV Violation.

A civil penalty of $15,000 was assessed.

5. January 1987 Lack of Adequate Safety Evaluation for Emergency Modification - Level III Violation.

A civil penalty of $50,000 was assessed.

6. January 1988 Unlocked High Radiation Doors and Lack of Health Physics Coverage to Very High Radiation Areas -

Level III Violation. A civil penalty of $75,000 was assessed.

7. February 1988 Design Evaluation, Design Implementation and g

Classification / Reporting, and Corrective Action of Water Intrusion into the Instrument Air System - 3 Level III Violations. A civil penalty of $175,000 was assessed.

8. May 1988 Unlocked Very High Radiation Door and deficiencies < identified in the Radiological Protection Program - 2 Level III Violations.

A civil penalty of $112,500 was assessed. ESCALATED ENFORCEMENT HISTORY (CONTINUED) ESCALATED ENFORCEMENT

9. October 1988 A missing cap on a 3/8 inch containment line, SIRWT check valve test failures, and Safety Analysis for Operability - Level Ill violation.

A civil penalty of $50,000 was assessed.

10. October 1988 Errors in Cycle 11 Setpoint Analysis and incorrect information submitted in a response.

No civil penalty was assessed.

11. November 1989 Two instances of safeguards documents left unattended outside the plant's protected area. Instances of inadequate package and vehicle searches.

Inadequate measures to Level 111 compensate for degraded security systems violation. A civil penalty of $25,000 was assessed. i N l ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCES AND MANAGEMENT MEETINGS Enforcement conferences are held with the NRC on potential higher level violations. Listed below are the recent enforcement conferences and management meetings held with the NRC. RECENT ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCES AND MANAGEMENT MEETINGS

1. August 1988 Two management meetings were held with the NRC in August. One meeting was held to discuss the security program while another meeting was held on the OPPD independent appraisal results.

2. October 1988 Two management meetings were held with the NRC in October. One meeting was held concerning the security program while another meeting was held to discuss the training program and the radiation protection program.

3. November 1988 Two management meetings were held with the NRC in November. One meeting was held concerning the Safety Enhancement Program while another was held to discuss Decay Heat Removal.

4. January 1989 One management meeting was held with the NRC in January. This meeting was held concerning the new Site Security Plan.

5. February 1989 One Enforcement Conference was held with the NRC in February. This Enforcement Conference was held concerning the Radiological Protection Program.

6. February 1989 One management meeting was held with the NRC in February. This management meeting was held concerning the Safety Enhancement Program.

7. April 1989 One Enforcement Conference was held with the NRC in April. This Enforcement Conference was held concerning Security.

8. May 1989 One management meeting was held with the NRC in May.

This management meeting was held concerning the Safety Enhancement Program.

9. July 1989 One Enforcement Conference was held with the NRC in July.

This Enforcement Conference was held concerning auxiliary feedwater pump FW-lG controller operability.

10. August 1989 One Enforcement Conference was held with the NRC in August.

This Enforcement Conference was held concerning various security problems. 1 ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCES AND MANAGEMENT MEETINGS (CONTINUED) j

11. September 1989 Two management meetings were held with the NRC in September..One management meeting was held concerning the Safety Enhancement Program (SEP). The other management meeting concerned the Committee Review of Generic Requirements (CIiGR).

i i 0 SIGNIFICANT ITEMS OF INTEREST This section is intended to provide information on events which are - significant to the Fort Calhoun Station and will give a. " heads-up" look at what is scheduled in the coming months. The Fort Calhoun Station went critical on January 29, 1989 at 9:27 a.m. following the 1988 Refueling Outage. The Fort Calhoun Station went on-line on January 31, 1989 at 4:46 p.m. following the 1988 Refueling Outage. The 1990 refueling outage is scheduled for February, 15, 1990. The INP0 Assist Visit concerning the Operating Experience and Review (OER) Group has been been p,ostponed until January, 1990. The 1990 INPO Plant Assessment is scheduled to start on June 18, 1990. . \\

FORT CALHOUN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFINITIONS AGE OF OUTSTANDING MAINTENANCE WORK ORDERS f This indicator tracks the total number of outstanding non-outage Maintenance Work Orders at the Fort Calhoun Station versus their age in months. AMOUNT OF WORK ON HOLD AWAITING PARTS This indicator is defined as the percentage of open, non-outage, maintenance work orders that are on hold awaiting parts, to the total number of open, non-outage, maintenance work orders. AUXILIARY SYSTEMS CHEMISTRY HOURS OUTSIDE STATION LIMITS The cumulative hours that the Component Cooling Water system is outside the station chemistry limit. The hours are accumulated from the first sam)1e exceeding the limit until additional sampling shows the parameter to >e back with<n limits. CLASSROOM (INSTRUCTOR) HOURS The number of planned classroom hours and the number of actual classroom hours for the Fort Calhoun Station. CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE BACKLOG GREATER THAN 3 MON 1HS OLD The percentage of total outstanding corrective maintenance items, not requiring an outage, that are greater than three months old at the end of the period reported. CRAFT WORK ACTIVITY The percentage of a type of work performed by each craft during the reported month involving plant personnel. DAILY THERMAL OUTPUT The daily core thermal output as measured from computer point XC105 in thermal megawatts. DIESEL GENERATOR RELIABILITY A Diesel Generator (DG) unit consists of the engine, generator, combustion air system, cooling water system, fuel supply system, lubricating oil system, starting air s controls, and diesel generator breaker. ystem, autostart controls, manual Reliability of each DG unit will be reported for two situations, one for the last 20 demands and one for the last 100 demands. Reliability is the ratio of the number of successful runs to the number of-demands, for each -individual DG unit. FORT CALHOUN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFINITIONS (CONTINUED) DIESEL GENERATOR REllABILITY (CONTINUED) A successful run is defined as a start of a DG unit and the loading of this unit to a minimum of 50% rated load (1250 KW) for a minimum time period of 60 minutes. A failure is defined as the failure to start, accelerate, and assume the design rated load for the given time period as specified for an emergency or a valid test. The total number of demands (or valid tests) will be equal to the sum of the failures and the successful runs. This definition of DG Reliability was taken from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission " Regulatory Guide 1.108, Revision 1". This is the definition being applied in calculating the diesel generator reliability at the Fort Calhoun Station. DISABLING INJURY FRE0VENCY RATE (LOST TIME ACCIDENT RATE) This indicator is defined as the number of accidents for all utility personnel permanently assigned to the station, involving days away from work per 200,000 man-hours worked (100 man-years). This does not include contractor personnel. DOCUMENT REVIEW (BIENNIAL) The Document Review Indicator shows the number of documents reviewed during the reporting month, the nuniber of documents scheduled for review during the reporting month, and the number of document reviews that are overdue. E0VIPMENT FORCED OUTAGES PER 1000 CRITICAL HOURS Equipment forced outages per 1000 critical hours is the inverse of the mean time between forced outages caused by equipment f ailures. The mean time is equal to the number of hours the reactor is critical in a period (1000 hours) divided by the number of forced outages caused by equipment failures in that period. E0VIVALENT AVAILABILITY FACTOR This indicator is defined as the ratio of gross available generation to gross maximum gcneration, expressed as a percentage. Available generation is the energy that can be produced if the unit is operated at the maximum power level permitted by equipment and regulatory limitations. Maximum generation is the energy that can be produced by a unit in a given period if operated continuously at maximum capacity. -

L L FORTCALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED) FORCED OUTAGE RATE This indicator is defined as the percentage of time that the unit was unavailable due to forced events compared to the time planned for electrical generation. Forced events are failures or other unplanned conditions that require removing the unit from service before the end of the next weekend. Forced events include startup failures and events initiated while the unit is in reserve shutdown (i.e., the unit is available but not in service. FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR This indicator is defined as the steady-state primary coolant I-131 activity, corrected for the tramp uranium contribution and normalized to a common purification rate. Tramp uranium is fuel which has been deposited on reactor core internals from previous defective fuel or is present on the surface of fuel elements from the manufacturing process. Steady state is defined as continuous operations above 85 percent power for at least seven days. GASEOUS RADI0 ACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT This indicator displays the total number of Curies of all gaseous radioactive nuclides released from the Fort Calhoun Station. GROSS HEAT RATE Gross heat rate is defined as the ratio of total thermal energy in British Thermal Units (BTV) produced by the reactor to the total gross electricalenergyproducedbythegeneratorinkilowatt-hours (KWH). HAZARDOUS WASTE PRODUCED The amount (in Kilograms) of waste oil, non-halogenated hazardous waste, halogenated hazardous waste, and other hazardous waste produced by the Fort Calhoun Station each month. HOTLINES The number of Hotlines that are initiated, closed, overdue, and open for a given month. A Hotline is a training document sent out for immediate review. The Hotline should be reviewed and signed within 5 days of receipt of the Hotline. FORTCALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED) HOURS CHEMISTRY IS OUTSIDE OWNERS GROUP GUIDELINES Total hours for 13 secondary side chemistry parameters exceeding guidelines during power operation. Power operation is defined as greater than 30% power. The 13 parameters tracked are steam generator pH, cation conductivity, boron silica, chloride, sulfate, sodium, feed water pH, dissolved oxygen, hydrazine, iron, copper, and condensate pump discharge dissolved oxygen. IN-LINE CHEMISTRY INSTRUMENTS OUT-OF-SERVICE Yotal number of in-line chemistry instruments that are out-of-service in theSecondarySystemandthePostAccidentSamplingSystem(PASS). L10010 RADIDACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT This indicator displays both the total volume of liquid effluent (radioactive liquid waste plus dilution water) and the associated Curies discharged from the Fort Calhoun Station to the Missouri River. LOGGABLE/ REPORTABLE INCIDENTS (SECURITY 1 The total number of security incidents for the reporting month. MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BACKLOG The number of corrective non-outage maintenance work orders that remain open at the end of the reporting month. This indicator was added to the Performance Indice. tors Report to trend open corrective non-outage maintenance work orders as stated in Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Item No. 36. MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BREAKDOWN This indicator is a breakdown of all open non-outage maintenance work orders by several categories. MAINTENANCE OVERTIMF,. The percentage of overtime hours compared to normal hours for maintenance. This includes OPPD personnel as well as contract personnel. MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL RADIATION EXPOSURE The total maximum amount of Gamina and Neutron (Whole Body) radiation received by an individual person working at the Fort Calhoun Station on a monthly, quarterly, and annual basis. MINOR INJURY CASES PER MONTH The number of minor injury cases (short-form cases) involving OPPD employees. FORTCALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED) NUMBER OF NUCLEAR PL ANT REll ABILITY DATA SYSTEM (NPRDS) FAILURE REPORTS SUBMITTED The data plotted is the total number of NPRDS component failures (confirmed and possible) and the number of confirmed NPRDS component failures. The total number of NPRDS component failures are based on the number of failure reports that have been sent to the Institute of Nuclear Operations (INPO), Confirmed NPRDS component failures are based upon failure reports that have been accepted by INPO. Possible NPRDS com)onent failures are based upon failure reports that are still under revsew by INPO. NPRDS is the Nuclear Plant Reliability Data System, and is a utility industry users group program which has been outlined by INPO and implemented at the Fort Calhoun Station. NUMBER OF OUT-OF-SERVICE CONTROL ROOM INSTRUMENTS A control room instrument that cannot perform its design function is considered as out-of-service. A control room instrument which has had a Maintenance Work Order (MWO) written for it and has not been repaired by the end of the reporting period is considered out-of-service and will be counted. The duration of the out-of-service condition is not considered. Computer CRTs are not considered as control room instruments. ) LUMBER OF PERSONNEL ERRORS REPORTED IN LER'S ThecamberofLicenseeEventReports(LERs)attributedtopersonnelerror o9 he original LER submittal. This indicator trends personnel pe,4mance for SEP Item No.15. P fir OF VIOLATIONS PER 1000 INSPECTION HOURS This indicator is defined as the number of violations sited in NRC inspection reports for the Fort Calhoun Station per 1000 NRC inslection hours. The violations are reported in the year that the inspect'on was actually performed and not based on when the inspection report is received. The hours reported for each inspection report are used as the inspection hours. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET The year to date budget compared to the actual expenditures for operations and maintenance. OUTSTANDING MODIFICATIONS The number of Modification Requests (MR'S) in any state between the issuance of a Modification Number and the completion of the drawing update. l FORTCALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED) p, OUTSTANDING MODIFICATIONS (CONTINUED) L Form FC-1133 Backlog /In Progress The Form FC-1133 has not been plant approved. Modification Requests Being Reviewed This category includes: 1.) Modification Requests that are not yet reviewed 2.) ModificationRequestsbeingreviewedby)the Nuclear Projects Review Committee (NPRC 3.) Modification Requests being(reviewed by the Nuclear Projects Committee NPC) These Modification Requests may be reviewed several times before they are aparoved for accomplishment or cancelled. Some of these Modification Requests are returned to Engineering for more information, some approved for evaluation, some approved for study, and some approved for planning. Once planning is completea and-the scope of the work is clearly defined, these Modification Requests may be approved for accomplishment with a year assigned for construction or they may be cancelled. All of these different phases require review. Design Engineering Backlog Nuclear Planning has assigned a year in which construction will be completed, but PED has not started design work. Design Engineering In Progress Nuclear Planning has assigned a year in which construction will be completed and design work is in progress. Construction Backlog /In Progress The Construction Package has been issued or construction has begun but the modification has not been accepted by the System AcceptanceCommittee(SAC). Design Engineering Update Backlog /In Progress PED has received the Modification Completion Report but the drawings have not been updated. - _ _ - _ _ _ _ - - - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ = _ - - _

FORTCALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED) L PERCENT OF DR/OR'S GREATER THAN SIX MONTHS OLD This indicator displa Quality Reports (QR s)ys the percentage of Deficiency Reports (DR's) and that are greater than six months old. PERSONNEL RADIATION EXPOSURE (CUMULATIVE) Collective radiation exposure is the total external whole-body dose received by all on-site personnel (incluaing contractors and visitors duringatimeaeriod,asmeasuredbythethermoluminescentdosimeter(TLD)). Collective radLation exposure is reported in units of man-rem. PERSONNEL TURNOVER RATE The ratio of the number of turnovers to average employment. A turnover is a vacancy created by voluntary resignation from the company. Retirement, death, termination, transfers within the company, and part-time employees are not considered in turnover. PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE BACKLOG The total number of preventive maintenance backlog items, the number of old backlog preventive maintenance items, and the number of new backlog preventive maintenance items for the reporting month. Old backlog items include preventive maintenance items that have exceeded their late date. New backlog items include preventive maintenance items overdue for the reporting month. PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ITEMS OVERDUE This indicator is defined as the percentage of preventive maintenance items in the month that were not completed by the scheduled date plus a grace period equal to 25 percent of the scheduled interval. PRIMARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY - PERCENT OF HOURS OUT OF LIMIT The percent of hours out of limit are for six primary chemistry parameters divided by the total number of hours possible for the month. The key parameters used are: Lithium, Chloride, Hydrogen, Dissolved Oxygen, Fluoride, and Suspended Solids. EPRI limits are used. PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS (MAINTENANCE) The number of identified incidents, the number of opened incidents, and the number of closed incidents each month involving maintenance. This indicator trends personnel performance for SEP Item No. 15. l

m. l FORTCALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED) l RATIO OF HIGHEST PRIORITY MWO'S TO TOTAL MWO'S COMPLETED This indicator is defined as the ratio of the number of highest priority, non-outage, corrective maintenance work orders (priority 4 or 5) to the total number of non-outage, corrective maintenance work orders completed, expressed as a percentage. RATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTENANCE The ratio-of preventive maintenance (including surveillance testing and calibration procedures) to the sum of non-outage corrective maintenance and preventive maintenance completed over the reportin The ratio, expressed as a percentage, is calculated based on man g period. hours. RECORDABLE INJURY CASES FRE0VENCY RATE (RECORDABLE INJURY RATEl The number of injuries requiring more than normal first aid per 200,000 manhours worked. This indicator trends personnel performance for SEP Item No. 15. R0 HOT LICENSE EXAMS This indicator shows the number of R0 Hot License exams or quizzes taken and passed for the month they were taken. R0 LICENSE EXAMINATION PASS RATIO The ratio of station candidates passing both the oral and written NRC Reactor Operator (RO) license examination to the total number of candidates taking examinations. SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY PERFORMANCE INDEX The Chemistry Performance Index (CPI) is a calculation based on the concentration of key impurities in the secondary side of the plant. These key impurities are the most likely cause of deterioration of the steam generators. The chemistry parameters are reported only for the period of time greater than 30 percent power. The following equation is how the CPI is calculated: CPI =((Ka/1.2)+(Na/20)+(C1/20)+(50/20)+(0/10))/5 4 2 Where the following parameters are monthly averages of; Ka = Steam Generator Blowdown Cation Conductivity Na = Steam Generator Blowdown Sodium Concentration C1 = Steam Generator Blowdown Chloride Concentration 50 Steam Generator Blowdown Sulfate Concentration 4 = Condensate Pump Discharge Dissolved Oxygen Concentration 02 = FORTCALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED) I SECURITY INCIDENT BREAKDOWN This indicator shows a percentile breakdown of the types of Security' incidents for the reporting month. The following items are the types of Security incidents represented in this indicator. LicenseeDesignatedVehicles(LDV's) Incidents related to the use of LDV's, e.g. keys left in the vehicle, loss of keys, or failure to return keys. Security Badges Incidents involving lost / unattended badges, badges removed from site, or failure to wear badges. Escorting Incidents involving escort responsibilities, e.g. improper controlorescortofavisitor(s). Inattentive Security Officers Incidents involved with the inattentiveness of Security officers. Security Key Control Incidents involving Security key control, e.g. lost Security keys, Security keys removed from site, or failure to return Security keys. This type of incident does not reflect incidents concerning LDV keys. Access Control Incidents involving the inspection and control of personnel, packages, and vehicles, e.g. failure to properly search personnel, packages, and vehicles. This item also includes the introduction of contraband or prohibited items into the Protected Area, or the attempted introduction of such items. SPARE PARTS INVENTORY VALUE The dollar value of the spare parts inventory at the end of the reporting period.

o l-FORTCALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED) SPARE PARTS ISSUED The dollar value of the saare parts issued for the Fort Calhoun Station during the reporting perioc. SRO OPERATOR LICENSE EXAMINATION PASS RATIO The ratio of station candidates passing both the oral and written NRC Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) license examination to the total number of candidates taking examinations. TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS The number of temporary mechanical and electrical configurations to the plant's systems. Temporary configurations are defined as electrical jumpers, electrical blocks, mechanical jumpers, or mechanical blocks which are installed in the plant operating systems and are not shown on the latest revision of the P&lD, schematic, connection, wiring, or flow diagrams. Jumpers and blocks which are installed for Surveillance Tests, Maintenance Procedures, Calibration Procedures, Special Procedures, or Operating Procedures are not considered as temporary modifications unless the jumper or block remains in place after the test or procedure is complete. Jumpers and blocks installed in test or lab instruments are not considered as temporary modifications. Scaffolding is not considered a tem >orary modification. Jumpers and blocks which are installed and for whici EEAR's have been submitted, will be considered as a temporary modifications until final resolution of the EEAR and the jumper or block is removed or is permanently recorded on the drawings. TOTAL HOURS OF STUDENT TRAINING The total number of student hours of training for Operations, Maintenance, Chemistry and Radiation Protection, Technical Support, General Employee Training, and Other training conducted for the Fort Calhoun Station. TOTAL SKIN AND CLOTHING CONTAMINATIONS Reportable skin and clothing contaminations above background levels greater than 5000 dpm/100 cm squared. This indicator trends personnel performance for SEP Item No. 15. L FORTCALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED) L UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS WHILE CRITICAL This indicator-is defined as the number of unplanned automatic scrams l (reactor protection system logic actuations) that occur while the reactor is critical. The indicator is further defined as follows: Unplanned means that the scram was not part of a planned test or evolution. Scram means the automatic shutdown of the reactor by a rapid insertion of all control rods that is caused by actuation of the reactor protection system. The scram signal may have resulted from exceeding a setpoint or may have been spurious. Automatic means that the initial signal that caused actuation of the reactor protection system logic was provided from one of the sensors monitoring plant parameters and conditions, rather than the manual scram switches (or pushbuttons) in the main control room. Critical means that during the steady-state condition of the reactor prior to the scram, the effective multiplication factor (keff)wasequaltoone. UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS This indicator is defined as the sum of the following safety system actuations: the number of unplanned Emergency Core Cooling System (ECCS) actuations that result from reaching an ECCS actuation setpoint or from a spurious / inadvertent ECCS signal the number of unplanned emergency AC power system actuations that result from a loss of power to a safeguards bus An unplanned safety system actuation occurs when an actuation setpoint I for a safety (system is reached or when a spurious or inadvertent signal is generated ECCS only), and major equipment in the system is actuated. Unplanned means that the system actuation was not part of a planned test or evolution. The - ECCS actuations to be counted are actuations of the high pressure injection system, the low pressure injection system, or the safety injection tanks. FORTCALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED) j VOLUME OF LOW-LEVEL SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE This indicator is defined as the volume of low-level solid radioactive waste produced, in final form ready for burial, during a given period. It is calculated using the amount of waste actually shipped for disaosal, plus the change in inventory of waste in on-site storage in final form ready for burial. The volume of radioactive waste that is not yet in final form ready for shipment is not included. Low-level solid radioactive waste consists of dry active waste, sludges, resins, and evaporator bottoms generated as a result of nuclear power plant operation and maintenance. Dry active waste includes contaminated rags, cleaning materials, disposable protective clothing, plastic containers, and any other material to be disposed of at a low-level radioactive waste disposal site, except resin, sludge, or evaporator bottoms. Low-level refers to all radioactive waste that is not spent fuel or a by-product of -spent fuel processing. l

BASIS FOR ESTABLISHING 1989 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR GOALS This section will explain the basis used in establishing the 1989 performance goals. FORCED OUTAGE RATE AND E0VIVALENT AVAll ABillTY FACTOR The Forced Outage Rate (FOR) and Equivalent Availability Factor (EAF) goals have been established from 1989 to 1992. The following table is a breakdown of the hours allotted for each category over the next five years. STARTUP GENERATOR FORCED OUTAGE PLANNED ON LINE OUTAGE TIME OUTAGE PERIOD EAF FOR YEAR (HOURS) (HOURS) (HOURS) (HOURS} (HOURS) .(11 .(1), 1989(**) 7783 168 172 737 8760 84.4 2.1 1990(*) 7036 168 172 1464 8760 75.9 2.3 1991(*) 7036 168 172 1464 8760 75.9 2.3 1992 8520 240 0 0 8760 92.9 2.7 (**))The1988RefuelingOutagecontinuedintoJanuary,1989 (* Refueling Outage Years UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS WHILE CRITICAL The 1989 goal for Unplanned Automatic Reactor Scrams While Critical has been set at one. The Fort Calhoun Station has had one unplanned automatic reactor scram in the past three years of operation. UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS The Unplanned Safety System Actuations goal for 1989 has been established at zero. The Fort Calhoun Station has not had an unplanned safety system actuation in the last five years. GROSS HEAT RATE The 1989 Gross Heat Rate goal for the Fort Calhoun Station has been set at 10,500 BTU /KWH. This heat rate goal is based on the 1988 goal of 10,075 BTU /KWH less 20.6 MW(e) stated in memo TS-FC-83-233H, written on July 17, 1983. This states that operation without the governing stage of the turbine results in a gross electrical output loss of 20.6 MW(e). BASIS FOR ESTABtISHING 1989 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR GOALS i (CONTINUED) FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR The 1989 Fuel Reliability Indicator (FRI) goal has been set at 1.0 nanocuries/ gram. This level allows for ap>roximately one to two fuel pin failures. Although Cycle 11 was completec without any apparent fuel pin failures, there are a number of ANF assemblies entering into a third or fourth cycle of operetion. When a fuel pin has been used for three or four fuel cycles there is an increased probability of fuel failure. The Failed Fuel Action Plan, Standing Order 0-43, allows for approximatel four fuel pin failures prior to implementing any increased action levels.y PERSONNEL RADI ATION EXPOSURE (CUMUL ATIVE1 The 1989 Personnel Radiation Exposure (Cumulative) goal is 130 man rem. This goal was based on 50 man-rem of cumulative exposure for the month of January,1989, and approximately 7.5 man-rem of cumulative exposure for the months of February, 1989, through December, 1989. VOLUME OF LOW-LEVEL SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE The 1989 Volume of Low-Level Solid Radioactive Waste goal is 6,000 cubic feet. This goal was based on a recommendation made by the Fort Calhoun ALARA Committee and approved by the Division Manager of the Nuclear Production Division. vaSABLING INJURY FREOUENCY RATE The Disabling Injury Frequency Rate 1989 goal has been set at 0.31. This goal allows for one lost time accident in the Nuclear Production Division during 1989. 4 ~ - FORT CALHOUN STATION l OPERATING CYCLES'AND REFUELING OUTAGE DATES PRODUCTION CUMULATIVE TO (MWH) (MWH) EVENT FROM -Cycle 1-. 09/26/73 '02/01/75 3,299,639' 3,299,639-First Refueling -02/01/75 - 05/09/75-l ' Cycle 2- -05/09/75 -'10/01/76 3,853,322 7,152,961 1Second Refueling: .10/01/76 - 12/13/76 Cycle-31 12/13/76 09/30/77-2,805,927 9,958,888 { Third Refueling 09/30/77 - 12/09/77 Cycle 4-12/09/77 - 10/14/78 3,026,832 12,985,720-Fourth Refueling 10/14/78.- 12/M/76 Cycle 5 12/24/78 01/18/80 3,882,734 16,868,454 -Fifth Refueling 01/18/80 - 06/11/80 Cycle 6 06/11/80 - 09/18/81 3,899.714 20,768,168 Sixth Refueling 09/18/81 - 12/21/81 Cycle'7-12/21/81 - 12/06/82 3,561,866 24,330,034 Seventh Refueling 12/06/82 - 04/07/83 Cycle 8. 04/07/83 - 03/03/84 3,406,371 27,736,405 Eighth Refu ilng 03/03/84 - 07/12/84 Cycle 9 07/12/84 - 09/28/85 4,741,488 32,477,893 Ninth Refueling 09/28/85 - 01/16/86 Cycle 10 01/16/86 - 03/07/87 4,356,753 36,834,646 Tenth Refueling 03/07/87 - 06/08/87 Cycle 11 06/08/87 - 09/27/88 4,936,859 41,771,505 Eleventh Refueling 09/27/88 - 01/31/89 Cycle 12 01/31/89 - 02/15/90* Twelfth Refueling 02/15/90*- 05/11/90* Cycle 13 05/11/90*- 09/01/91*

- Planned Dates.

+ q j FORT CALHOUN STATION PRODUCTION AND OPERATION RECORDS The following seven ' items: are the: current-production and ~ operation- " records" for.the Fort Calhoun Station.

11. First Sustained Reaction..,........... August 5,1973(5:47p.m.)

-2. First Electricity Supplied to the System..... August _25, 1973

3. : Connercial,0peration (180,000 KWH)....

... September 26, 1973-4.AchievedFullPower(100%).............-.May-4~,1974 5 Longest Run _ (477 ' days)-............. June 8,1987 - Sept. 27,1988 ~6.HighestMonthlyNetGeneration(364,468,800KWH).0ctober1987 7.-MostProductiveFuel' Cycle (4,936,859 MWH)... June 8, 1987 - Sept. 27, 1988 (Cycle 11) i i r, i I l l i l l l PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DATA SOURCES r PERFORMANCE INDICATOR MANAGER / INDIVIDUAL- -Age of Outstanding Maintenance Work Orders Peterson/Shrum Amount'of Work On-Hold Awaiting Parts Peterson/McCormick Auxiliary Systems Chemist 7 riours Outside Station Limits Jaworski/Henning Classroom (Instructor) Hour: Gasper /Newhouse Corrective Maintenance Backlog > 3 Months Old Peterson/Shrum Craft Work Activity Peterson/Shrum Daily Thermal Output Holthaus/ Gray Decontaminated' Auxiliary Building Peterson/Christensen Diesel Generator Reliability DG Log Disabling' Injury Frequency Rate Sorenson/Skaggs Document Review Peterson/McKay DR/QRs Issued Versus NRC Violations Issued-Orr/Krieser Equipment Forced Outages per 1000 Critical Hours Holthaus/ Gray Equivalent Availability Factor Dietz/Kulisek Forced Outage Rate Holthaus/ Gray 7 Fuel Reliability Indicator Holthaus/Lofshult Gaseous Radioactive Waste Discharged to the Environment Jaworski/Stultz Gross Heat Rate Holthaus/ Gray -Hazardous Waste Produced Schmidt/Sayre Hotlines Gasper /Kobunski In-Line Chemistry Instruments Out-of-Service Schmidt/Renaud Liquid Radioactive Waste Discharged to the Environment Jaworski/Stultz MaintenanceWorkOrderBacklog(CorrectiveNon-Outage) Peterson/Shrum Maintenance Work Order Breakdown Peterson/Shrum Maintenance Overtime Peterson/Shrum l l

. /[c-PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DATA SOURCE (CONTINUED) Maximum Individual Radiation Exposure Peterson/Mattice Minor Injury Cases per Month Peterson/McFadden Number of NPRDS Reportable Failures Jaworski/ Dowdy Number of Out-of-Service Control Room Instruments Peterson/Trausch Number of Personnel Errors Reported in LERs LER File Number of Violations per 1000 Inspection Hours Orr/Krieser I Operations and Maintenance Budget Gleason/ Parent Outstanding Modifications Jaworski/ Turner Percent of DR/QR's Greater Than Six Months Old Orr/Krieser PersonnelRadiationExposure(Cumulative) Peterson/Mattice Personnel Turnover Rate Jaworski/Yager Preventive Maintenance Items Overdue Peterson/Cagle Primary System Chemistry - Percent Hours Out of Limits Jaworski/Henning ProceduralNoncomplianceIncidents(Maintenance) Peterson/ Smith Ratio of Highest Priority MW0s to Total MW0s Completed Peterson/Shrum Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance Peterson/Shrum Recordable Injury Cases Frequency Rate Sorenson/Skaggs-R0 Hot License Exams Gasper / Herman R0 License Examination Pass Ratio Gasper / Herman Secondary System Chemistry Jaworski/Henning Spare Parts Inventory Turnover Ratio Steele/ Miser Spare Parts Inventory Value Steele/Huliska SRO License Examination Pass Ratio Gasper / Herman Staffing Level Jaworski/Yager -

x 7;, 3 u I 'i PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DATA SOURCE l (CONTINUED) l7 ' Temporary Modifications Jumper Log. -q (? -Total Hours of Student Training- , Gasper /Newhouse . Total Skin and Clothing Contaminations Peterson/Christensen' 1 Unplanned Automatic Reactor Scrams-While' Critical-Holthaus/ Gray L i Unplanned Safety System Actuations Holthaus/ Gray I Volume of Low-level Solid Radioactive Waste Peterson/Bilau- .i J s I t t i e

j uj 5

REFERENCES -l INPO Good Practices ' 0A-102, "Perf ormance:. Monitoring Management Information" q IEEE Standard 762, "IEEE Trial Use Standard Definitions for Use in Reporting Generating Unit Reliability, Availability and Productivity" l L.INPO Report Dated November 1984,' " Nuclear Power Plant Operational. Data" U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission " Regulatory Guide 1.108 1 i l \\ l: { l L -}}

ML20005G708

Text

Navigation menu

Search