ML20005E625
| ML20005E625 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Brunswick  |
| Issue date: | 12/29/1989 |
| From: | Verrelli D NRC Office of Inspection & Enforcement (IE Region II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20005E624 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-325-89-40, NUDOCS 9001100011 | |
| Download: ML20005E625 (2) | |
Text
7 __
u R
- 9 '.-
ENCLOSURE 1 NOTICE OF VIOLATION L
Carolina Power and' Light Company Docket No. 50-325 p
. Brunswick License No. DPR-71 During the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) inspection. conducted on November 1-31, 1989,: a violation of NRC requirements was identified.
In i
accordance with the _ " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1989), the violation is listed below:
Technical Specification 3.6.5.2 requires that the secondary containment i
automatic isolation dampers be operable ir, Operational Condition 1. With one or more dampers inoperable, the affected dampers must be isolated, as required, within eight hours.
Technical-Specification 4.6.5.2.c.2 requires that the secondary I
containment automatic isolation dampers be demonstrated OPERABLE by verifying that the-dampers actuate to their isolation positions on a secondary containment isolation test signal.
Technical Specification Table 3.3.2-1 lists high drywell pressure and low reactor vessel water level as secondary containment isolation signals.
Contrary to the above, while in Operational Condition 1, the Unit I secondary containment automatic isolation dampers were inoperable from approximately 5: 40 a.m. on-July 11, 1989, until approximately 12:10 p.m.
on July 14, 1989, due to the low reactor vessel level and high drywell pressure isolation signals to the Division I secondary containment isolation dampers logic being disabled.
During this time, tha dampers were not isolated as required.
This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I).
u Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Carolina Power and Light Company is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN:
Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555, with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region II, and a copy to the NRC Resident Inspector, Brunswick, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice. This reply should be clearly marked as a " Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include:
(1) admission or denial of the violation, (2) the reason for the violation if admitted, (3) the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved, (4) the corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations, and (5) the date when full 9001100011 891229 PDR ADOCK 05000324 Q
ri r.
. s 4
'e i-Carolina Power and Light Company 2
Docket No. 50-325 Brunswick License No. DPR-71 1
compliance will be achieved. 'Where good cause is-shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.
If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order may be issued to show cause why the license should not be-modified, suspended, or revoked or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken.
c-FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION i
l a,(
W Da id M. V rrelli, Chief iL Reactor Projects Branch 1 Division of Reactor Projects Dated at Atlanta, Georgia this g96Lday of December 1989 t
l'
-.