ML20005A660
| ML20005A660 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane |
| Issue date: | 06/25/1981 |
| From: | Hovey G METROPOLITAN EDISON CO. |
| To: | Barrett L Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| LL2-81-0171, LL2-81-171, NUDOCS 8106300559 | |
| Download: ML20005A660 (2) | |
Text
n'
,a o
A Metropolitan Edison Company
,4
, ~~
' f< i Post Office Box 480 1l ls ' t \\y y {
.'/ '. $A Middletown, Pennsylvania 17057 L
~J q
f.ij h h M, \\
,,, 7 h Wnter's D. rect O*al Number
., +1 9 U f
'.b,i$ '"
,pM. g CLal 6
7,,;
r" pF 4M a 25,1981
%.2-81-0171 y'w 5'O 4
m
,~
e-I E]
2'.
TMI Program Office Atta:
Mr. Lake Barrett, Deputy Director a
- r. -
M U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commiseion c/o Three Mile Island Nuclear Station
_g f
Middletown, Pennsylvania 17057
Dear Sir:
g.
Three Mile Island Fuclear Station, Unit 2 (TMI-2)
Ope::ating License No. DPR-73 Docket No. 50-320 Submerged Demineralizer System The initial water to be processed by the Submerged Demineralizer System (SDS) will be flushwatc now contained in the Reactor Coolant Bleed Tanks B and C, the Miscellaneous Waste Holdup Tank, and the Auxiliary Building Sump. This flushwater is lower in radionuclide activity and of different chemical composition than Reactor Building sump water.
Therefore, system performance during this initial processing may dif fer from the projected Reactor Building sump water processing performance. However, processing the flushwater will permit accomplishment of the following objectives:
1.
Perform initial processing with low activity water to gain operator f amiliari'.y.
2.
Peruit the collection of data to provide a realistic basis for the prediction of general area radiation levels during processing of the Reactor Building sump water and the Reactor Coolant System Water.
3.
Reduce the flushwater inventory to permit water management flexibility.
Because the flushwater is chemically different and of lower activity only two of the four zeolite positions will contain ion exchangers. The other two positions. rill be bypassed using jumpers.
This accomplishes several things.
First, the flushwater contains organics such as decon solutions, liquid scintillation fluid, and possibly oil and grease. Using only two zeolite vessels minimizes the number of liners potentially fouled by these chemicals.
Second, the lower sodium concentrations of the flushwater permits the use of mixedionicformIE95zeolge.
(The Na-form IE 95 is preferred for sump water processing because Ca replaced on the zeolite by Na from the sump water is absorbed onto the LINDE A lowering the LINDE A's capacity for stron-tium). Third, the specific activfty of the flushwater is much lower than
- t. ump water. Based on calculations and column tests, the full 100,000 gallons of flushwater could be processed through one liner. However, to increase 81063005 S 9
?
o*I t/s reco1 tan Ecson Company s a Memeer of the Gercrat Pt.buc Ut5tves S', stem hI 8
i
3 o
oL:
o-Mr. L. H. Barrett LL2-81-0171 the system decontamination factor and provide a guard bed, a second liner will be used. Fourth, processing flushwater through SDS is well within the bounds
-of the NRC Safety Evaluation Report related to the operation of the SDS (NUREG 0696) and is specified in the order dated June 18, 1981. The use of two bed system will not affect system integrity, it will not result in higher activity levels anywhere in the system then have been evaluated for sump water processing, and it will not exceed any of the bounding or accident scenarios already addressed for sump water. We intend to dispose of the two vessels produced by processing the flushwatcr in the following manner.
The first vessel in series will.contain approximately 1100 curies of cesium and 600 curies of strontium. Therefore, it will not be suitable for shallow land burial per the criteria stated in B. J. Snyder's letter to 0. K. Hovey dated June 8, 1981. This letter states that shallow land burial limits are less than 1000 curies cesium and 160 curies strontium. This vessel will be stored in the Fuel Pool until we gain more experience with Reactor Building sump water processing. We will then place the vessel back in service and load it up to 60,000 curies of activity such that it is of value to the DOE to be utilized in their zeolite vitrification program. The second vessel in series will contain less than 10 curies of activity.
It will therefore be acceptable for shallow land burial. After we have gained the experience with the first vessel in processing Reactor Building sump water, we will determine whether to use this second vessel to-sump water processing or to dispose of it by shallow land burial.
Sincerely, A
G. K. Hovey Vice-President and Director, TMI-2 GKH:JJB:djb cc:
Dr. B. J. Snyder, Program Director TMI Program Office
\\