ML20005A481

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Ack Receipt of Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Rept 70-0371/81-17.License Requires Documentation of Results of Daily Checks.Item C of App a Is Withdrawn.Corrective Steps Taken Must Be Submitted within 25 Days
ML20005A481
Person / Time
Site: 07000371
Issue date: 06/22/1981
From: Joyner J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To: Ganley D
UNITED NUCLEAR CORP. (SUBS. OF UNC, INC.)
Shared Package
ML20005A482 List:
References
NUDOCS 8106300381
Download: ML20005A481 (2)


Text

/

UNITED STATES o,,

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION o

U :' #,,

REGION I t+

~

7 631 PARK AVENUE U

,o#

KING OF PRusstA. PEMNSYt.VANIA 1940s 2 2 Jun le81 Docket No.70-371 n

,II

/\\

/W.

/

UNC Naval Products b

\\ [

Division of United Nuclear Corporation 4

?,c) '

A UNC RESOURCES Company 7

ATTN: Mr. D. E. Ganley Ct President and General Manager F

4

~

N/

( 'f,,

A//

67 Sandy Desert Road Uncasville, Connecticut 06382 Jb ' l T,.')'\\

Gentlemen:

Subject:

Inspection 70-371/80-17 This refers to your letter dated February 21, 1981, in response to our letter dated January 20, 1981.

With reference to Appendix A, Item A, to our letter dated January 20, 1981, and Details, Item 2, of our report, please note that Section 2.7.1 of your license was identified, not Sectiont 2.7.2, 2.7.3 and 2.7.4.

Section 2.7.1 states that daily checks shall be made, and also states:

"Results of daily checks, inspections and audits shall be documented and all observed deficiencies including corrective action initiated and/or completed, shall be included in the documentation." Your license requires documentation of the results of daily checks, regardless of the findings.

Failure to document is noncompli nce.

a We shall continue to review the daily check documentation until such time as it is no longer a part of your license.

Regarding Appendix A, Item 8, and Details, Item 3, of our report, License Condition No.10 of SNM-368 specifically incorporates Part I of your c;, plication dated June 4, 1976.

Part II is not considered a license conditiorm Therefore, it is never rafererced.

Part I, Section 4.6.3, does not limit 5pscial Work Permit usage to a controlled area.

It states:

"A Special Work Permit system shall be used to guide contractor and UNC personnel in performing non-routine work operations that could cause or threaten to cause personnel exposure to uranium contamination or radiation."

Failure to provide a Special Work Permit in this case is noncompliance.

With regard to your statement that the use of radioactive material or other sources of radiation not licensed by the Commission is not subject to regu-lations, note that 10 CFR 20.1(b), in its entirety, states:

"The use of radioactive material or other sources of radiation not licensed by the T6O I I i

w E

g/ GAR 2ER i

P00R ORIGINAL

mmon,

UNC Naval Products 2

2 2 JUN 1981 Commission is not subject to the regulations in this part.

However, it is the purpose of the regulations in this part to control the possession, use, and transfer of licensed material by any licensee in such a manner that the total dose to an individual (including exposures to licensed and unlicensed radio-active material and to other unlicensed sources of radiation, whether in the possession of the licensee or any other person, but not including exposures to radiation from nacural background sources or medical diagnosis and therapy) doos not exceed the standards of radiation protection prescribed in the regu-lations in this part."

We have reexamined Item C of Appendix A, and this item of noncompliance is hereby withdrawn. Your enforcement history will be corrected accordingly.

Regarding Appendix A, Item D, the new information provided in your letter will be verified at a subsequent inspection.

With reference to Items A and 8 of Appendix A to our letter dated January 20, 1981, please submit to this office within twenty-five days of the date of this letter, a written statement of explanation in reply, including: (1) the correc -

tive steps which have been taken and the results achieved; (2) corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further noncompliance; (3) the date when full compliance will be achieved. Under the authority of Section 182 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amend,ed, this response shall be submitted under cath or affirmation.

Sincerely,

$Wij j rti f ames H. Joyner, Chief, Technical Inspection Branch, Division of Engineering and Technical Inspection P00R ORIGINAL J