ML20004E719
| ML20004E719 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 05/13/1981 |
| From: | Eisenhut D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20004E720 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8106150106 | |
| Download: ML20004E719 (3) | |
Text
_
O SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY,ET.AL.
SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3 DOCKET NOS. 50-361 AND 50-362 ORDER EXTENDING CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION DATES Southern California Edison, Company, San Diego Gas and Electric Company, the City of Riverside, California and the City of Anaheim, California are the holders of Construction Permit Nos. CPPR-97 and CPPR-98 issued by the Atomic Energy Commission
- on October 18, 1973 for the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station. These facilities are presently under construction at the applicants' site at Camp Pendleton, San Diego County, California.
By letters dated March 31, 1978, and April 23, 1980, Southern California Edison Company filed requests for extension of the latest construction completion dates for the facilities. The requests were granted by the Commission's Orders dated December 28, 1978, and August 5,1980, respectively.
On March 16, 1981, Southern California Edison Company filed a request for another extension of the latest construction completion dates for the San Onofre 2 and 3 facilities. This request is to extend the latest completion dates to l
l
- Effective January 20, 1975, the Atomic Enargy Commission became the Nuclear i
Regulatory Commission and permits in effect on that day continued under the authority of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
l 8196156106
. October 15, 1981 for Unit 2 and November 15, 1982 for Unit 3.
Southern California stated that this extension was requested because construction has been delayed due to (1) regulatory and licensing delays following the TMI incident, (2) changes and/or additions to the facility design associated with TMI modifica-tions, and (3) a strike by the boilermakers.
~~
This action involves no sign 1ficant hazards consideration, good cause has been shown for the delay, and the requested extension is for a reasonable period, the bases for which are set forth in the staff evaluation.
The prepara-tion of an environmental impact statement for this particular action is not warranted because there will be no significant environmental impact attribut-able to the Order other than that which has already been predicted and described in the Commission's Final Environmental Statement-Construction Perm Stage (FES-CP) for the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3, published in March 1973.
A Negative Declaration and an Environmental Impact Appraisal have been prepared and are available, as is the FES-CP for public inspection at the Commission's Public Document Room,1717 H Street, N.
W.,
Washington, D. C. 20555 and at the local pubite document room established for the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3 at the Mission Viejo Branch Library, 24851 Chrisanta Drive, Mission Viejo, California 92676.
3-It is HEREBY ORDERED THAT the latest completion date for CPPR-97 be extended from April 15, 1981 to October 15, 1981 and the latest date for CPPR-98 i
be extended from June 15, 1982 to November 15, 1982.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (M4 Darrell G.
isenhut, Director Division o Licensing Date of Issuance: MAY 131981 n
-me-.--
r
.-v
..,...---,--v.,
r,
---,,--.,-waw-y__
,--,-r--
,-n-
...,-.,,e,n,-
c r,,.----nm,---