ML20004E548
| ML20004E548 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | McGuire, Mcguire  |
| Issue date: | 06/05/1981 |
| From: | Parker W DUKE POWER CO. |
| To: | James O'Reilly NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8106120326 | |
| Download: ML20004E548 (1) | |
Text
!
DUKE [Oy,M.CO.MPANY t
'P3 wenBliitonio-ii ;is i
422 Sourn Cauncu Srazer, Ciuatorre. N. C. se24a
]lJ!H18 P2:0" wl L LI A.4 O. PA R M E R J R.
WCr P gseognf TELEPmCNC A.CA 704 l
src.- p.oowCrio June 5, 1981 273-4ess Mr. James F. O'Reilly, Director U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission y
f $,-}7 5 % [ [' C,.
Region II
- /
101 Marietta Street, Suite 3100 b@
Atlanta, Georgia 30303
/S, i
Subject:
. McGuire Nuclear Station
'('i
'k N
Docket Nos. 50-369 and 50-370 kY
$l A
l --
Reference:
RII:LDZ q,4 g U,b '
50-369/81-14 X /
50-370/81-06 O'/Di
Dear Mr. O'Reilly:
Duke Power Company does not consider any information contained in IE Inspection Report Nos. 50-369/81-14 and 50-370/81-06 to be proprietary.
Very truly yours,
/
William O. Parker, Jr.
l RWO:pw t
i l
1 I
' \\
810612 bN
pnre:
o UNITED STATES
~,,
8' NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION e.
I REGION 11 k
101 MARIETTA ST N.W., SUITE 3100 p
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303 MAY 181981 Ouke Power Company ATTN:
W. O. Parker, Jr.
Vice President, Steam Production P. O. Box 2178 Charlotte, NC 28242 Gentlemen:
Subject:
Report No. 50-369/81-14 and 50-370/81-06 This refers to the routine inspection conducted by Mr. L. D. Zajac of this office en April 27-30, 1981, of activities authorized by NRC Construction Permit Nos.
CPPR-83 and CPPR-84 for the McGuire facility and to the discussion of our find-ings held with Mr. J. C. Rogers, Project Manager at the conclusion of the inspec-tion.
Areas examined during the inspection and our findings are discussed in the enclosed inspection report.
Within these areas, the inspection consisted of selective examinations of procedures and representative records, interviews with personnel, and observations by the in ector.
Within the scope of this inspection, no violations or deviations were disclosed.
We have examined actions you have taken with regard to previously identified enforcement matters. These are discussed in the enclosed inspection report.
Two new unresolved items resulted from this inspection and are discussed in the enclosed report. These items will be examined during subsequent inspections.
In accordance with Section 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice", Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter and the enclosed inspec-tion report will be placed in the NRC's Public Document Room. If this report contains any information that.<ou (or your contractor) believe to be proprietary, it is necessary that you make a written application within 20 days to this office to withhold such information from public disclosure. Any such application must include a full statement of the reasons on the basis of which it is claimed that the information is proprietary, and should be prepared so that proprietary information identified in the ap)lication is contained in a separate part of the document. If we do not hear fror you within the specified period, the report will be placed in the Public Document Room.
BlDsy7O M1
./
MAY 181981 Ouke Power Company 2
Should you have any questions concerning this letter, we will be glad to discuss them with you.
Sinc ely,
/
iwis/,/Kcting 03ector Division of Resident and Reactor Project Inspection Encloture:
Inspection Report Nos. 50-369/81-14 and 50-370/81-06 cc w/ encl:
M. D. McIntosh, Plant Manager J. C. Rogers, Project Manager
1
[
UNITED STATES o
~g 8
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION o
y, REGION 11 j
g
[
101 MARIETTA ST N.W..SulTE 3100 1
g
,/
A7LANTA. GEORGIA 30303
- m. <
\\
Report Nos. 50-369/81-14 and 50-370/81-06 Licensee:
Duke Power Company 422 South Church Street Charlotte, NC 28247 Facility Name: McGuire Docket Nos. 50-369 and 50-370 License Nos. CPPR-83 and CPPR-84 Inspection at McGuire Ote ar Charlotte, NC
/
Inspector:
M,15 o
/d
/
L. O. Mfa ' '
//
Cate' Signed Approved by:
/
/
A. R. Herdt, Section Chief OatekSigned Engineering Inspection Branch Engineering and Technical Inspection Division
SUMMARY
Inspected on April 27-30, 1981 Areas Inspected This routine, unannounced inspection involved 30 inspector-hours onsite in the areas of IE Bulletin 80-08 Containment Liner Penetration Welds; Preservice Inspection - review of records and procedures; Safety Related Piping - obser-vation of liquid penetrant examination, review of qualification records, walkdown of installed systems; Containment Penetrations protection of components, review of records; Previous Noncompliance - review of correct've actions taken.
Results Of the four areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified.
no s
DUPLICATE DOCUMENT st Entire document previously entered into system under:
$ l0 $ h l 0 k fkl ANO N
N o. or pages:
9
~.
.-