ML20004E328
| ML20004E328 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Midland |
| Issue date: | 06/09/1981 |
| From: | Harold Denton Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Selby J CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8106110553 | |
| Download: ML20004E328 (4) | |
Text
"[
' e REcq n
8 o
UNITED STATES
!}
i.
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
,g 3
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 gg,,,e/
JUN 9 1981 f
Docket Hos.:
50-329/330 l
Mr. J..D. Selby, President & Chief k
Executive Officer J/jg 73 Consumers Power Company
'6
"'4%
IS8fA
^
212 West Michigan Avenue Q'*,%g%
.7/
1 Jackson,11tcnigan 49201
)$
Dear H l}kg:
o, We presently have under review almost thirty applications for operating licenses. - For your application, as well as mor,t others, we are committing resources to assure that staff reviews are completed on a schedule consistent with your projected plant completion date. Preliminary schedules for facilities projecting plant completion in late 1982 or in 1983 were provided to Congress l
on April 30, 1981 in connection with the "Bevill Report." Your schedule l
was developed using your estimated construction completion date and a set of standard hearing assumptions.
The preliminary hearing scheduies assume a standard eleven-month time period from the issuance of the final Supplement to the Safety Evaluation Repwt l
(SSER) to the NRC decision date. This time period incorporates the efficiency l-measures projected to be in place in the near future.
It is based or, five l
months from issuance of the SSER to the start of hearing, five months fra l
start of hearing to the initial decision by the Atomic Safety Licensing Board, and one month from the initial decision to the Commission's decision date. These assumptions, and your relative priority, Mill be re-examined on l
a case-by-case basis after the Commission completes its consideration of proposed changes to the regulations.
To assure proper internal resources allocation, it is important that you provide us a realistic and up-to-date projected construction completion date. Because of manpower limitations each review will be scheduled to fall in a " window" of time wherein our reviews must be completed. An t
unexpected change of your completion date or your ability to provide needed information in accordance with this schedule will likely have an impact on the schedule for your review.
Accordingly, you should examine your schedules in the attached Table and confirm or change your construction completion date within 14 days of receipt of this letter.
l You should also provide quarterly updates thereafter until issuance of the Safety Evaluation Report for the facility.
810 6110 f{3 A
2-JUN 0 1331 For the staff to meet these schedules, all information concerning your application identified as needed must be provided by you or your contractors at least eight weeks prior to the date scheduled for the issuance of the Safety Evaluation Report. You shculd consider arranging to have members of your staff who can represent you and who can resolve any last minute open items, in residence near the NRC offices in Bethesda for a two week period starting six weeks immediately preceding,the scheduled date for issuing the Safety Evaluation Report. Your staff should contact the Licensing Project Manager for specific needs related to the review of your application.
Your cooperation is appreciated.
Sincerely, Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation cc:
See next page l
i
(
l l
y ar-
-4 g
y wg, w
e 3
w
- w
++h.
$M
@W A
- ++/
$'s's 4
TEST TARGET (MT-3)
' l.0 5 EA HM EE E I.I S1" EM q
/
l.25 1.4 1.6 I
-/
6" i
> +,,
4$ za
- +f,,,
3.$;'
3 u
J i '
P-e.%.
m.%--
<s*
\\\\\\\\
IMAGE EVALUATION TEST TARGET (MT-3) l.0 5LuEM
}
gag 7g 1.1'I"EE
+
/
J.g i.25 -l
!.4 i.6
/.
6" f
i
+ep
+%4
$ #[,)fjj gl};/b 4
j
~
u v
u
f i-N*
s egm+
r.
.'s<.
4 TEST TARGET (MT-3) l.0 E82 HA t
- in m m l-lcp.=*$N 1'
=
1.25 1.4 1.6
/
6"
=
f
- 4 4$+4 h
Ed;hyppp/
igf!)k 1
I
i s
Mr. J. D. Selby, President & Chief Executive Officer Consumers Power Company 212 West !!ichisun Avenue Jackson, Michigan 49201 cc: Mr. J. W. Cook Shelley Blum, Esq.
Vice President 1402 Vickers Avenue Consumers Power Company Durham, North Carolina 27707 1945 West Parnall Road Jackson, Michigan 49201 Robert M. Lazo, Administrative Judge Atumic. Safety and Licensing Board Mr. W. L. Porter U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Duke Power Company Washington, D. C.
20555 P.O. Box 2178 42% South Church Street Dr. Emmeth A. Luebke, Administrative Judge Charlotte, North Carolina 28242 Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Muclear Regulatory Conmission Mr. R. S. Howard Washington, D. C.
20555 Power Systems Division Westinghouse Electric Corporation Dr. Richard F. Cole, Administrative Judge P.O. Box 355 Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15230 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.
20555 Mr. E. J. Keith EDS Nuclear Incorporated 220 Montgomery Street San Francisco, California 94104 Mr. J. E. Houghtaling NUS Corparation 2536 Countryside Boulevard Clearwater, Florida 33515 Mr. Jesse L. Riley, President The Carclina Environmental Study Group 854 Henley Place Charlotte, North Carolina 28207 J. Michael McGarry, III, Esq.
Debevoise & Liberman 1200 Seventeenth Street, N.W.
Washington, D. C.
20036 Ms. M. J. Graham Resident Inspector McGuire NPS P
c/o U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission P.O. Box 216 Cornelius, North Carolina 28031
-)
e
TABLE 2 CY 1983 PLANTS DIVISION 0F LICENSING - 4/16/81 Estimated ASL8 NRC Appitcant i
Delay Issue issue ACRS ISSUE Issue Start of Initial Deci sion Construction Plant,
(Months)
DES SER MTG FES SSER Hearing (1)
Decision (1)
__Datell)
Completion Callawa'y 1/2 0
09/81 10/81 11/81 01 /82 11/81 04/82 09/82 10/82 10/82 St. Luc'ie 2 0
09/81 10/81 11/81 01/82 11/81 04/82 09/82 10/82 10/82 Palo Verde 1/2/3 0
10/81 11/81 12/81 02/82 12/81 05/82 10/82 11/82 11/82
- Stabrook 1/2*
O 11/81 01/82 02/82 03/82 02/82 07/82 12/82 01/83 01/83 j
Cli ntori 1 0
11/81 01/82 02/82 03/82 02/82 07/82 12/82 01/83 01/83 t
Wolf Creek 1 0
01/82 04/82 05/82 06/82 05/82 10/82 03/83 04/83 04/83 E
8yron 1/2 0
01/82 04/82 05/82 06/82 05/82 10/82 03/83 04/83 04/83
['
Ptrry 1/2 0
02/82 05/82-06/82 07/82 06/82 11/82 04/83 05/83 05/83 06/83 07/83 07/83 Midland 1/2 0
04/82 07/82 08/82 09/82 08/82 01/83 j
i
- Catawba 1/2 0
05/82 08/82 09/82 10/82 09/82 02/83 07/83 08/83-08/83 i!
- S3. Texas 1/2 0
06/82 09/82 10/82 11/82 10/82 03/83 08/83 09/83 09/83 f!
River 8end 1/2 0
07/82 10/82 11/82 12/82 11/82 04/83 09/83 10/83 10/83 NOTES:
- FSAR not tendered Schedules subject to change upon resolution of MRC and appilcant construction completion differences j
(1) Based on a stan tard eleven-month assumption from issuance of SSER to NRC Decision Date
's f
~
1 5
i
~