ML20004D163

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards IE Insp Rept 50-312/81-13 on 810406-09.No Noncompliance Noted
ML20004D163
Person / Time
Site: Rancho Seco
Issue date: 05/06/1981
From: Book H
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To: Mattimoe J
SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT
Shared Package
ML20004D164 List:
References
NUDOCS 8106080501
Download: ML20004D163 (2)


See also: IR 05000312/1981013

Text

~77C

.+*yy

.

k

UNITED STATES

[

p,

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

&

j

REGION V

  1. 4

g

1990 N. CALIFORNIA BOULEVARD

SUITE 202, WALNUT CREEK PLAZA

9 * * * * * ,d

4

WALNUT CREE K, CALIFORNIA 9459C

May 6, 1981

g

Docket No. 50-312

(

JUN 051981m

i,

Sacramento Municipal Utility District

DEE*' h

P. O. Box 15830

e

Sacramento, California 95813

h

/

Attention: Mr. John J. Mattimoe

Assistant General Manager and Chief Engineer

Gentlemen:

Subject: NRC Inspection

This refers to the inspection conducted by Mr. North of this office on April 6-9,

1981 of activities authorized by NRC License No. DPR-54, and to the discussion

of our findings held by Mr. North with Mr. Miller and other members of your

,

staff at the conclusion of the inspection.

Areas examined during this inspection are described in the enclosed inspection

report. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of selective examinations

of procedures and representative records, interviews with personnel, and

,

observations by the inspector.

'

No items of noncompliance with NRC requirements were identified within the

scope of this inspection.

In accordance with Section 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," Part 2,

Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter and the enclosed

!nspection report will be placed in the NRC's Public Document Room.

If this

report contains any information that you believe to be proprietary, it is

necessary that you submit a written application to this office, within 20

days of the date of this letter, requesting that such information be withheld

from public disclosure. The application must include a full statement of

the reasons why it is claimed that the information is proprietary. The application

should be prepared so that any proprietary information identified is contained

in an enclosure to the application, since the application without the enclosure

will also be placed in the Public Document Room.

If we do not hear from

you in this regard within the specified period, the report will be placed

in the Public Docesent Room.

8106 og ogg

-

. _ -

.

.

- ..

.

_

.

..

-.

..

_ __ .

. - _ . _

_ ___ _

.

_. .

-_ _. . -

.

.

.

Sacramento fiunicipal Utility District

2-

flay 6.1981

-

,

.,

Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be glad

to discuss them with you.

Sincerely,

s

-

H. E. Book, Chief

Radiological Safety Branch

Enclosure:

'

IE Inspection Report

No. 50-312/81-13

cc w/o enclosure:

R. J. Rodriguez, SMUD

L. G. Schwieger, SMUD

!

l

4

. , ,

- . , , -

,

-ee-_m-

gm..

,

+-m+-

4

-

. , , .-

-,,,_.e

,

- - - - --

-

_

, . ~ - ,

..