ML20004C728

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Discusses NRC Antitrust Review Re Amend 42 to OL Application Re Addl Participant in Facility Ownership.Recommends Early Submittal of 10CFR50 App L Info for Canal Electric Co
ML20004C728
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 06/02/1981
From: Toalston A
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Ritsher J
ROPES & GRAY
References
ISSUANCES-A, NUDOCS 8106050075
Download: ML20004C728 (1)


Text

.=.

d AIjr a

[

. t,NITEC STATES

.g ',~.j/f. i NUCLEAR REGULATORY CO51 MISSION

'g.

/_j.

NASHINGTON O. O,20555

*~.

f N...I./

' W M Ds- @ M a

Docket Nos. 50-443A

~

foid1%$stf 50-444A gU b. i_.- JUN 0 31981

  • T Mr. John A. Ritsher

' 4 v.s..cann e w 'l Ropes and Gray 225 Franklin Street-p Boston, Mass. 02110 4 a u

Dear Mr. Ritsher:

SEABROOK NUCLEAR STATION, UNITS 1 & 2 TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP This is in response to your amendment 42:to the license application for the Seabrook nuclear station. We believe that Appendix L of 10 CFR Part 50 applies to "each corporate parent, subsidiary _and affiliate." Separate responses are required where applicants are not under commen ownership or control; where two affiliates are applicants, the parent can respond for both of them. In' this instance, only Canal Electric' Company need respond as it is the only new participant. We have consistently applied i.he above interpretation -to our antitrust reviews of affiliates of holding companies and would encourage you to sub-~ mit the Appendix L information for Canal Electric (considering the possible exemptions under parts 2.101 and 50.33a for de minimis applicants) at an early date. Sincerely, [ ]4 heulL5 Argil Toalston, Acting Chief Utility Finance Branch Division of. Engineering. Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 4106050075}}