ML20004C688
| ML20004C688 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Byron  |
| Issue date: | 05/29/1981 |
| From: | Harold Denton Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Oconnor J COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8106040506 | |
| Download: ML20004C688 (4) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:, c> .s _-{QCf [ UNITED STATES g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 2 .. e WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 g / MAY 2 91981 N E W.) N.y?,,,h F P~ Docket Nos.: 50-454/455 1 Mr. J. J. O'Connor, President JUN d 519816 v.n, mam nauwon M Connonwealth Edison i One 1st National Plaza N 8 Post Office Box 767 Chicago, Illinois 60690 ~
Dear Mr. O'Connor:
We presently have under review almost thirty applications for operating licenses. For your application, as well as most others, we are committing resources to assure that staff reviews are completed on a schedule consistent with your projected plant completion date. Preliminary schedules for facilitics projecting plant completion in late 1982 or in 1983 were provided to Congress on April 30, 1981 in connection with the "Bevill Report." Your senedule was developed using your estimated construction completion date and a set of stardard hearing assumptions. The preliminary hearing schedules assume a standard eleven-month time period from the issuance of the final Supplement to the Safety Evaluatioi Report (SSER) to the NRC decision date. This time period incorporates the efficiency measures projected to be in place in the near future. It is based on five months from issuance of the SSER to the start of hearing, five months from start of hearing to the initial decision by the Atomic Safety Licensing Board, and one conth from the initial decision to tne Commission's decision date. These assumptions, and your relative priority, will be re-examined on a case-by-case, basis after the Commission completes its consideration of proposed changes to the regulations. To assure proper internal resources allocation, it is important that you provide us a realistic and up-to-date projected construction completion date. Because of manpcwer limitations each review will be scheduled to fall in a " window" of time wherein our reviews must be completed. An unexpected change of your completion date or your ability to provide needed information in accordance with this schedule will likely haye an impact on the schedule for your review. Accordingly, you should examine your schedules in the attached Table and confirm or change you construction completion date within 14 days of receipt of this letter. You should also provide quarterly updates thereafter until iseuance of the Safety Evaluation Report for the facility. 1s10s c 405h A
?. a ~ 2-For the staff to meet these schedules, all information concerning your application identified as needed must be provided by you or your contractors at least eight weeks prior to the dats scheduled for the issuance of the Safety Evaluation Report. You should consider arranging to have members of your staff who can represent you and who can resolve any last minute open items, in residence near the NRC offices in Bethesda for a two week period starting six weeks immediately preceding the scheduled date for issuing the Safety EVEluation Report. Your staff should contact the Licensing Project Manager for specific needs related to the review of your application. Your cooperation is apprcciated. Sincerely, hY
- ==
Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation cc: See next page l l l DhM Nif" 34T $-P4Pd&= -ye w 3yq ytey-e-wear =-vp ee--- ' ave y-
- vy 9
-tem r-e-weea w w-e*
9--e-evse-v----mg g-t*N w----
wer %- + -m--am--*er--yw---- ur,eN ewT-Te' "'Te-"W
?. u Mr. J. S. Abel Director of Nuclear Licensing ~Co==enwealth Edison Company q Post Office Box 767 Chicago, Illinois 60690 CCs* Mr. William Kortier Mr. Edward R. Crass Atomic Power Distribution Nuclear Safeguards and Licencing Division Vestinghouse Electric Corporation Sargent & Lundy Engineers P. O. Box 355 55 East Monroe Street Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15230 Chicago, Illinois 60603 Paul M. Murphy, Esq. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region III Isham,- Lincoln & Beale Office of Inspection and Enforcement One First National Plaza 799 Roosevelt Road 42nd Floor Glen Ellyn, Illinoir 60137 Chicago, Illinois. 60603 Myron Cherry, Esq. Mrs. Phillip B. Johnson-Cherry, Flynn and Kanter !?07 Stratford Lane 1 IBM Plaza, Suite 4501 P. ckford, Illinois 61107 Chicago, Illinois 60611 ":. Julianne Mahler Center for Governmental Studies-Nortnern Illinois University veKalb, Illinois 60115 C. Allen Bock, Esq. P. O. F,ox 342 Urbanan, Illinois 61820 Thomas J. Garden, Esq. Waaler, Evans & Gordon 2503 S. Neil Champaign, Illinois 61820 + ~ Ms. Bridget Little Rorem Appleseed Coordinator 117 North Linden Street Essex, Illinois 60935 Kenneth F. Levin, Esq. Beatty, Levin, Holland, Basofin & Sarsany 11 South LaSalle Street Suite 2200 Chicago, Illinois 60603 e 9 - MW m. -.w-y a .p.2,aus a-w-e e-Wt--~ m gn +r- - + - - - ay ,yw-- ra-..e e--- e, .ge-ew,w g-y-
TA3LE 2 2 ^ C11_983 PLANTS DIVISION OF LICENSING - 4/16/81 Estimated ASLB . Deci sion Construction NRC Appilcant Delay issue Issue ACRS ISSUE Issue Stert of Initial (Months)_ DES SER MTG FES SSER Hearing (1). Decision (1) Date(1) . Completion Plant. Callawa'y 1/2 0 09/81 10/81 11/ 81 01/82 11/81 04/82 09/82 10/82 10/82 St. Lucie 2 0 09/81 10/81 11/81 01/82 11/81 04/82 09/82 10/82 10/82 j Palo Verde 1/2/3 0 10/81 11/81 12/81 02/82 12/S1 05/82 10/82 11/82 11/82
- Seabrook 1/2*
0 11/81 01/82 02/82 03/82 02/02 07/82 12/82 01/83 01/83 { C11nton'1 0 11/81 01/82 02/82 03/82 02/82 07/82 12/82 01/83 01/83 Wo M Creek 1 0 01/82 04/82 05/82 06/82 05/82 10/82 03/03 04/8 04/83 l 8yron 1/2 0 01/82 04/82 05/82. 06/82 05/82 10/82 03/83 04/83 04/83-Perry ?/2 0 02/82 05/82 06/82 07/82 06/82 11/82 04/83 05/83 05/83 Midland 1/2 0 04/82 07/82 08/82 09/82 08/82 01/83 06/83 07/83 07/83 l
- Catawba 1/2 0
05/82 08/82 09/82 10/82 09/82 02/83 07/83 08/83 08/83 I
- So. Texas 1/2 0
06/82 09/82 10/82 11/82 10/82 03/83 08/83 .09/83 09/83 River 8end 1/2 0 07/82 10/82 11/82 12/82 11/82 04/83 09/83 10/83 10/83 i NuTES: FSAR not tendered Schedules subject to change upon resolution of NRC and applicant construction completion differences j (1) Based on a standard eleven-month assumption from issuance of SSER to NRC Decision Date I, s -}}