ML20004B216

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
IE Insp Repts 50-498/81-15 & 50-499/81-15 on 810420-24.No Noncompliance Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Response to Show Cause Order & Previous Insp Findings
ML20004B216
Person / Time
Site: South Texas  STP Nuclear Operating Company icon.png
Issue date: 05/06/1981
From: Crossman W, Hubacek W
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML20004B209 List:
References
50-498-81-15, 50-499-81-15, NUDOCS 8105270403
Download: ML20004B216 (4)


See also: IR 05000498/1981015

Text

.

.

U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT

REGION IV

Report:

50-496/81-15; 50-499/81-15

Dockets:

50-498; 50-499

Categori A2

Licensee:

Houston Lighting and Power Company

Post Office Box 1700

Houston, Texas 77001

Facility Name:

South Texas Project, Unit:,1 and 2

Inspection at:

South Texas Project, Matagorda County, Texas

Inspection conducted:

April 20-24,1981

Inspectors:ONd

f/6/7/

W. G. Hubacek, Reactor Inspector, Projects Section 3

Date

Approved: A ,99 Q L L ,,4L

9A'/T/

plW.A.C~rossman,Cnief,ProjectsSection3

Date

-

Inspection Summary

Inspection on April 20-24, 1981 (Reports 50-498/G1-15; 50-499/81-15)

Areas Inspected:

Unannounced inspection of licensee corrective action in

response co the Show Cause Order and previous inspection findings. The inspec-

l

tion involved 35 inspector hours by one NRC inspector.

Results:

No violations or deviations were identified.

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

8105270 403

n-wy

,

,.-ww

v.-r-

--y

-

e

p.

w.w

.

,-- - - -

g

-.-y

r--,

- . -

e.

y.-y

--

- - -

--c..-

_ __

.

2

DETAILS

1.

Persons Contacted

Principal Licensee Employees

  • R. A. Frazar, QA Manager
  • L. D. Wilson, Project QA Supervisor, Mechanical

T. J. Jordan, Supervisor, Quality Systems

Other Personnel

  • C. L. Harvey, Consultant to Houston Lighting and Power Company (HL&P),

Gilbert Commonwealth

0. J. Harris, Quality Engineering Manager for Brown & Root (B&R),

Management Analysis Company

T. L. Porfilio, Design Quality Engineer, B&R

The NRC inspector also contacted other licensee and contractor employees

including members of the QA and engineering staffs.

  • Denotes those attending the exit interview on April 24, 1981.

2.

Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings

-

(Closed) Unresolved Item (505498/79-19-44; 50-499/79-19-44) Review of

documentation involved with receiving documentation for some vendors.

Corrective action for this item has been incorporated into action to

correct a construction deficiency related to a breakdown in the B&R

Quality Program for the procurement cycle of purchased materials which

was reported to the NRC on June 13, 1980, in accordance with the requita-

ments of 10 CFR 50.55(e).

Future NRC review of this matter will be con-

ducted during followup inspecticos related to the construction deficiency;

therefore, this unresolved item is considered closed.

3.

Licensee Action On Show Cause Order Items

(0 pen) Show Cause Order Item V.A.(7):

The licenses shall develop and

implement a more effective system to provide for control of field

changes in order to assess the impact of the changes on design.

The NRC inspector reviewed implementation of the commitments in the

licensee's response so this Show Cause Order item by discussions with

licensee and contractor representatives and by inspection of objective

evidence related to commitments described in the attachment to HL&P

letter ST-HL-AE-533, dated September 18, 1980.

The following commit-

ments, utilizir.g the identification numbers in the attachment to the

HL&P letter, were reviewed:

.

.

.

3

(0 pen) Item A131:

Qualification and training records will be maintained

on Project Site Engineersand QEs.

Qualification records maintained on site

were incomplete.

This item will remain open pending receipt of additional

records from the Houston office of B&R Engin' sering and subsequent review

during a future NRC inspection.

(0 pen) Item A136:

Each morning, a computer printout will be provided to

users of the design documents.

The NRC inspector observed that the licensee

had not yet cicrified the requirements regarding time and frequency of issue

of the computer printouts.

Actual practice has been to distribute the

computer printouts on a daily basis during the scheduled work week.

This

matter will remain open pending issuance of the clarification and subse-

quent review during a future NRC inspection.

(0 pen) Item A137: When construction of an item has been completed, as-

built verification checklists will be prepared ano their correctness will

be verified by Design and Quality Engineering.

This checklist will be

used by the inspector for final acceptance.

The NRC inspector observed

that B&R Procedure ST-QAP-3.2 "As-Built Verification" has been developed

and submitted to HL&P for review and approval prior to issuance for site

use. This item will remain open pending issuance and implementation of

the procedure and subsequent review during a future NRC insoection.

(Closed) Item A139:

An evaluation of the program will be performed to

-

.

determine if minor changes are required.

The NRC inspector observed tnat

'

evaluation of the program has been performed and continues to be performed

as an ongoing process.

Several procedure changes have resulted from the

evaluation.

(Closed) Item A140: Any FREAs not approved by October 1, 1980 will be

treated as Field Change Requests (FCRs) and will be processed accordingly.

The NRC inspector observed that the FREAs are being processed as FCRs in

accordance with Procedure STP-0C-023.

(Closed) Item M37:

All procedures for control of field changes will be

issued by October 1, 1980.

The NRC inspector observed that the basic

procedures required for implementation of the field change system were

issued prior to October 1, 1980.

These procedures included Engineering

Procedures STP-0C-023, STP-0C-028, STP-0C-029 and Constructicn Procedure

GCP-21.

Since October 1980, revisions to Procedure STP-0C-023, STP-0C-028

and GCP-21 have been issued and Procedure STP-QAP-3.2 has been developed

and submitted to HL&P for review and approval prior to issuance for site

use.

In view of the fact that refinement of the existing procedures is

l

an ongoing process and that the basic procedures for the control of field

changes are in place, this item is closed.

l

I

(

1

.

__

_

.-

_

_

-

..

4

(Closed) Item M38:

A training seminar is being prepared and will be

presented to all B&R members of the project who will particioate in this

program.

The NRC inspector reviewed training records maintained by

Project Site Engineering (PSE) and the Site Training Department which

Indicated that the tr. tining seminar was presented in September 1980, to

B&R personnel who participate in the field change program.

Makeup

training has been provided for employees who did not attend the initial

training seminar and recently assigned employees.

In addition to the above items, the NRC inspector reviewed implementation

of Procedures STP-DC-023 " Processing Field Changes," STP-DC-028 " Design

Control" and STP-0C-029 " Change Review Board Activities" by discussions

with cognizant B&R PSE personnel and obsarvation of related activities.

The PSE activities were consistent with the requirements of these procedures.

4.

Exit Interview

The NRC inspector met with licensee representatives (denoted in paragraph 1)

on April 24, 1981.

The NRC inspector summarized the purpose and scope

'

of the inspection and the findings.

-

3

i

. _ _

_

. _ . . _ , ,