ML20003J197

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Violation from Insp on 810122-0221
ML20003J197
Person / Time
Site: Arkansas Nuclear  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 03/16/1981
From: Madsen G
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML20003J190 List:
References
50-368-81-03, 50-368-81-3, NUDOCS 8105110011
Download: ML20003J197 (2)


Text

.

r\\U EC LOSURE 1 Arkansas Power and Light Company Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit No. 2 Docket No. 50-368 License No. NPF-6 NOTICE OF VIOLATION Based on the results of an NRC inspection conducted during the period of January 22 - February 21, 1981, and in accordance with the Interim Enforcement Policy, 45 FR 66754 (October 7,1980), the following violations were identified:

1.

Technical Specification 2.2.1 "Reacter Trip Setpoints" states, in part:

"With a reactor protective instrumentation setpoint less conservative than the value shown in the Allowable Values column of Table 2.2-1, declare the channel inoperable and apply the applicable ACTION statement requirement of Specification 3.3.1.1 until the caannel is restored to OPERABLE'c,t:t= ::ith its trip adjusted consistent with the Trip Setpoint value."

Technical Specification 3.3.1.1 states, in part:

"Each reactor protective instrumentation channel shall be demonstrated OPERABLE by the performance of the CHANNEL CHECK, CHANNEL CALIBRATION and CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST operations for the MODES and at the frequencies shown in Table 4.3-1."

Contrary to the above, during the period of January 1980 through January 1981, the licensee did not demonstrate that each reactor protective instru-ment channel was OPERABLE for the MODES and at the frequencies shown in Table 4.3-1 of Technical Specification 3.3.1.1.

Specifically, during the period of January 1980 through January 1981, the licensee did not compare the reactor trip setpoints with the Allowable Values of Table 2.2-1 of l

Technical Specification 2.2.1 when performing the CHANNEL CALIBRATION and CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST operations on the reactor protective instru-mentation channels.

This constitutes a Severity Level V Violation.

(Supplement I.E.)(368/8103-01) 2.

10 CFR 20.201(b) " Surveys" states, "Each licensee shall make or cause to be made such surveys as may be necessary for him to comply with the regulations in this part."

Contrary to the above, the licensee failed to evaluate the radiation levels associated with the hioh radiation area at the 317' level of the Unit 2 auxiliary building. Specifically, an entry was made into this area (317' level) by an NRC inspector and a health physics technician on January 29, 1981.

The escort allowed access to the high radiation area without adequate knowledge of the radiological hazards in the area and without the possession of a radiation survey instrument to determine the radiological hazards.

This constitutes a Severity Level IV Violation.

(Supplement IV.D.1)

(368/8103-02) 81051100ll

2 3.

Criterion V to Appendix B of 10 CFR states:

" Activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by documented instructions, procedures, or drawings, of a type appropriate to the circumstances and shall be accomplished in accord-ance with these instructions, procedures or drawings."

Small pipe isometric drawing 2HBC-92-2 shows the locations of six seismic Class I critical pipe hangers for line number 2HBC-92-2".

Contrary to the above, on January 30, 1981, one of the required pipe supports was not installed on line 2HBC-92-2".

This line is in the loop I service water return line from 2VUC-2A, a switchgear room cooler.

This is a Severity Level IV Violation.

(Supplement I.D.3) (368/8103-03)

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Arkansas Power and Light Company is hereby required to subnit to this office within 25 days of the date of this Notice, a written statement or explanation in reply, including (1) the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved; (2) corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations; and (3) the date when full compliance will be achieved. Under.the authority of Section 182 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, this response shall be subnitted under oath or affirmation.

Dated W/b/['l

>?$WA c Casm' G. L. Madsen, Chief Reactor Projects Branch

_