|
---|
Category:INTERVENTION PETITIONS
MONTHYEARML20055A3551982-07-12012 July 1982 Amended Contention 59.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20052A4541982-04-22022 April 1982 Submittal of Contention 58 Re Applicant Conduct on Reporting Violations at Plant.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20039B5721981-12-15015 December 1981 Response Opposing R Alexander 811130 Untimely Petition to Intervene.Strong Grounds Necessary to Reopen Record on Financial Qualifications Not Shown & Requirements for Untimely Intervention Not Met.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20003H8021981-04-23023 April 1981 Intervenor Jf Doherty Contention 56,stating That Reactor Trip Sys Unprotected Against Pipe Break to Scram Discharge Vols from Hydraulic Control Units.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20003A5581981-01-26026 January 1981 Contentions 50 & 55 in Response to NUREG-0470,Suppl 2, Draft Suppl to Fes Re Const of Allens Creek Nuclear Generating Station,Unit 1. Site Je-3 Superior to Applicant Choice W/Less Environ Impact ML20062L2941981-01-15015 January 1981 Contention 51 Re Designation of Site Li-3 as Superior Site, Contention 52 Re Ability of Govt to Decide Issues of Wildlife Habitat & Contentions 53 & 54 Re NUREG-470,Suppl 2. Certificate of Svc Encl ML19336A7361980-10-27027 October 1980 Response in Opposition to Jf Doherty Untimely Contention 50. Intervenor Failed to Establish Connection Between Design & Alleged Safety Concern of Coolant Circulation Degradation. Certificate of Svc Encl ML19331D9241980-08-28028 August 1980 Response in Opposition to W Schuessler,S Doggett & Tx Pirg 800813 Reworded Contention Except Portion Re Capability of Plan W/Location.Remaining Portions Do Not Comply W/Aslb 800724 Order.Certificate of Svc Encl ML19338C3861980-08-15015 August 1980 Consolidation of Contentions Re Emergency Evacuation Plans. Alleges Failure of Environ Rept,Psar,Fes & SER to Comply W/ Regulations Re Evacuation During Class 9 Accidents. Designates Wj Schuessler as Lead Party ML19323D7621980-04-22022 April 1980 Response in Opposition to Jf Doherty Contentions 48 & 49. Intervenor Failed to Justify Untimeliness & to State Good Basis for Conteniton 48.Contention 49 Is Inappropriate for Consideration Due to Class 9 Policy.W/Certificate of Svc ML19323B6961980-04-0707 April 1980 Contentions 48 & 49 Alleging That Facility Should Be Designed W/Control Rod Drive Return as Addl Safeguard & That Containment Should Have Core Ladle as Described in NUREG- 0054 ML19309G1181980-04-0707 April 1980 Brief in Response & Opposition to Fh Potthoff Appeal of ASLB 800310 Order Rejecting Contention 6 Re Biomass Farm Alternative.Intervenor Failed to Include Sufficient Bases for Allegation.Certificate of Svc Encl ML19309H6581980-04-0707 April 1980 Amend to 790525 Contention 17,adding ATWS for Consideration W/Power Excursion Accidents Re Reactivity Effect ML19305E1481980-03-31031 March 1980 Response in Support of R Potthoff Appeal Re Denial of Petition to Intervene.Potthoff Contention Should Be Regarded as Allegation That EIS Did Not Address Biomass Conversion. W/Certificate of Svc ML19309E4101980-03-27027 March 1980 Response in Opposition to Intervenor Jf Doherty 800312 Untimely Contention 47.Good Cause Re Relationship of New Info to Analyses of Turbine Missile Generation Probability & Damage to Equipment,Not Met.W/Certificate of Svc ML19294B0971980-02-10010 February 1980 Response to Applicant & NRC Briefs Re R Alexander 800206 Appeal.Restates Interests as Affected Family & Urges Aslab to Grant Intervention ML20148C9071978-10-11011 October 1978 Petition for Leave to Intervene by Houston Chapter of Natl Lawyers Guild,Inc ML20148B7651978-10-11011 October 1978 Petition to Intervene in CP Proceedings.Accident at Facility Could Cause Tremendous Loss of Life.Even Low Levels of Radiation Can Cause Cancer or Genetic Damage ML20147C6961978-09-29029 September 1978 Response to Amended Petition for Leave to Intervene Filed by W. E.Rentfro.Holds That Amended Petition Fails to Meet the Requirements of I0CFR2.7J4(b) & ASLB Order of 780814 & Should Be Denied 1982-07-12
[Table view] Category:RESPONSES & CONTENTIONS
MONTHYEARML20055A3551982-07-12012 July 1982 Amended Contention 59.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20052A4541982-04-22022 April 1982 Submittal of Contention 58 Re Applicant Conduct on Reporting Violations at Plant.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20039B5721981-12-15015 December 1981 Response Opposing R Alexander 811130 Untimely Petition to Intervene.Strong Grounds Necessary to Reopen Record on Financial Qualifications Not Shown & Requirements for Untimely Intervention Not Met.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20003H8021981-04-23023 April 1981 Intervenor Jf Doherty Contention 56,stating That Reactor Trip Sys Unprotected Against Pipe Break to Scram Discharge Vols from Hydraulic Control Units.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20003A5581981-01-26026 January 1981 Contentions 50 & 55 in Response to NUREG-0470,Suppl 2, Draft Suppl to Fes Re Const of Allens Creek Nuclear Generating Station,Unit 1. Site Je-3 Superior to Applicant Choice W/Less Environ Impact ML20062L2941981-01-15015 January 1981 Contention 51 Re Designation of Site Li-3 as Superior Site, Contention 52 Re Ability of Govt to Decide Issues of Wildlife Habitat & Contentions 53 & 54 Re NUREG-470,Suppl 2. Certificate of Svc Encl ML19336A7361980-10-27027 October 1980 Response in Opposition to Jf Doherty Untimely Contention 50. Intervenor Failed to Establish Connection Between Design & Alleged Safety Concern of Coolant Circulation Degradation. Certificate of Svc Encl ML19331D9241980-08-28028 August 1980 Response in Opposition to W Schuessler,S Doggett & Tx Pirg 800813 Reworded Contention Except Portion Re Capability of Plan W/Location.Remaining Portions Do Not Comply W/Aslb 800724 Order.Certificate of Svc Encl ML19338C3861980-08-15015 August 1980 Consolidation of Contentions Re Emergency Evacuation Plans. Alleges Failure of Environ Rept,Psar,Fes & SER to Comply W/ Regulations Re Evacuation During Class 9 Accidents. Designates Wj Schuessler as Lead Party ML19323D7621980-04-22022 April 1980 Response in Opposition to Jf Doherty Contentions 48 & 49. Intervenor Failed to Justify Untimeliness & to State Good Basis for Conteniton 48.Contention 49 Is Inappropriate for Consideration Due to Class 9 Policy.W/Certificate of Svc ML19323B6961980-04-0707 April 1980 Contentions 48 & 49 Alleging That Facility Should Be Designed W/Control Rod Drive Return as Addl Safeguard & That Containment Should Have Core Ladle as Described in NUREG- 0054 ML19309G1181980-04-0707 April 1980 Brief in Response & Opposition to Fh Potthoff Appeal of ASLB 800310 Order Rejecting Contention 6 Re Biomass Farm Alternative.Intervenor Failed to Include Sufficient Bases for Allegation.Certificate of Svc Encl ML19309H6581980-04-0707 April 1980 Amend to 790525 Contention 17,adding ATWS for Consideration W/Power Excursion Accidents Re Reactivity Effect ML19305E1481980-03-31031 March 1980 Response in Support of R Potthoff Appeal Re Denial of Petition to Intervene.Potthoff Contention Should Be Regarded as Allegation That EIS Did Not Address Biomass Conversion. W/Certificate of Svc ML19309E4101980-03-27027 March 1980 Response in Opposition to Intervenor Jf Doherty 800312 Untimely Contention 47.Good Cause Re Relationship of New Info to Analyses of Turbine Missile Generation Probability & Damage to Equipment,Not Met.W/Certificate of Svc ML19294B0971980-02-10010 February 1980 Response to Applicant & NRC Briefs Re R Alexander 800206 Appeal.Restates Interests as Affected Family & Urges Aslab to Grant Intervention ML20148C9071978-10-11011 October 1978 Petition for Leave to Intervene by Houston Chapter of Natl Lawyers Guild,Inc ML20148B7651978-10-11011 October 1978 Petition to Intervene in CP Proceedings.Accident at Facility Could Cause Tremendous Loss of Life.Even Low Levels of Radiation Can Cause Cancer or Genetic Damage ML20147C6961978-09-29029 September 1978 Response to Amended Petition for Leave to Intervene Filed by W. E.Rentfro.Holds That Amended Petition Fails to Meet the Requirements of I0CFR2.7J4(b) & ASLB Order of 780814 & Should Be Denied 1982-07-12
[Table view] Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20063N7471982-10-0606 October 1982 Motion for Termination of Proceedings.Util Decided to Cancel Plant.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20063N7591982-10-0606 October 1982 Withdrawal of Application for CP ML20055A7221982-07-15015 July 1982 Memorandum & Order Denying Jf Doherty 820615 Submittals, Treated as Motion to Reconsider ASLB 820602 Order.Motion Untimely Filed & Failed to Show Significance or Gravity of Issues ML20055A3551982-07-12012 July 1982 Amended Contention 59.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054L4521982-07-0202 July 1982 Response Opposing J Doherty 820615 Motion to Reopen Record to Add Contention 59.Motion Fails to Establish Timeliness &/Or Significance of Issues Sought to Be Raised.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054L5531982-07-0202 July 1982 Response Opposing Doherty 820615 Motion to Reopen Record to Add Contention 59.Motion Should Be Considered Motion for Reconsideration of ASLB 820602 Order.Timeliness & Significance of Issues Not Established.W/Certificate of Svc ML20054J9371982-06-28028 June 1982 Response Opposing J Doherty 820615 Request to Reopen Record. Request Improper & Insufficient to Support Relief.Commission Rules Cannot Be Circumvented by Refiling Same Argument After ASLB Ruling Issued.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054F9861982-06-15015 June 1982 Motion to Reopen Record to Take Evidence on Contention 59. Gravity of Issues Warrants Reopening ML20054G0171982-06-15015 June 1982 Contention 50 Re Brown & Root Deficiencies in Quadrex Rept. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20053D0861982-05-24024 May 1982 Response in Opposition to Util 820519 Motion to Strike Doherty Contention 58 Re Applicant Conduct on Reporting Violations.Contention Should Be Treated as Such,Not as Motion.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20052H8621982-05-19019 May 1982 Motion to Strike J Doherty Reply to Applicant 820507 Response to Doherty 820422 Motion to Add Contention 58. Commission Rules Do Not Allow Reply.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20052H4441982-05-14014 May 1982 Reply Opposing Applicant 820507 Response to J Doherty 820422 Motion to Add Contention 58.Contention Should Be Admitted W/Amends.Aslb Should Judge Conduct of Applicants. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20052F3121982-05-0707 May 1982 Response Opposing J Doherty 820422 Motion to Add Contention Re Alleged Failure to Rept Design Defects.Substantively, Motion Is Motion to Reopen Record & Stds Have Not Been Met. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20052D1221982-04-29029 April 1982 Findings of Fact on Supplemental Issues to Tx Pirg Addl Contention 31 Re Technical Qualifications.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20052A4541982-04-22022 April 1982 Submittal of Contention 58 Re Applicant Conduct on Reporting Violations at Plant.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054E0561982-04-21021 April 1982 Supplemental Findings of Fact on Tx Pirg Addl Contention 31 Re Technical Qualifications.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20050J1111982-04-0606 April 1982 Answers to Second & Third Sets of Interrogatories,Questions 29 & 8 Respectively,Re Quadrex Rept.Certificate of Svc Encl. Related Correspondence ML20050E2961982-04-0505 April 1982 Answers & Objections to Seventh Set of Interrogatories. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20050E2891982-04-0505 April 1982 Answers & Objections to Doherty Sixth Set of Interrogatories.Related Correspondence ML20050C4211982-04-0202 April 1982 Objections to Request for Admissions.Requests Untimely, Irrelevant to Issues Before ASLB & Extremely & Unduly Burdensome.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20050C4081982-03-31031 March 1982 Answers & Objections to Fifth Set of Interrogatories. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20050C4791982-03-29029 March 1982 Answers & Objections to Jf Doherty Fourth Set of Interrogatories Re Tx Pirg Contention 31 & Quadrex Matters. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20042C6181982-03-29029 March 1982 Response Opposing J Doherty 820315 Motion for ASLB to Subpoena Quadrex Corp Employee Witnesses as ASLB Witnesses. Request Is Based on Misperception of Scope of Reopened Hearings.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20042C6431982-03-29029 March 1982 Motion for ASLB to Call DE Sells as Witness for Tx Pirg Addl Contention 31 & Quadrex-related Matters.Testimony Needed to Explain Why NRC Did Not Immediately Obtain Quadrex Rept. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20050C5091982-03-26026 March 1982 Response to Jf Doherty 20th & 21st Requests for Documents. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20050C5041982-03-26026 March 1982 Testimony of Lj Sas on Tx Pirg Addl Contention 31 Re Quadrex Rept.Rept Raises No Issue as to Whether Ebasco Can Properly Engineer Project.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20050C5011982-03-26026 March 1982 Supplemental Testimony of Jh Goldberg on Technical Qualifications.Brown & Root Terminates Due to Lack of Engineering Productivity,Not Due to Allegations in Quadrex Rept ML20042C5201982-03-25025 March 1982 Motion to Compel Discovery from Applicant & to Postpone Evidentiary Presentations at 820412 Hearings.Applicant Objections to Interrogatories Unsupported & Necessitate Hearings Be Delayed.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20049K0671982-03-25025 March 1982 Reply to Tx Pirg 820315 Addl Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20049K0801982-03-25025 March 1982 Answers & Objections to Interrogatories.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20042C5481982-03-23023 March 1982 Fourth Set of Requests for Admissions Re Quadrex Rept & Tx Pirg Contention 31.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20049K0841982-03-23023 March 1982 Answers & Objections to Third Set of Interrogatories. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20049K0941982-03-23023 March 1982 Answers & Objections to Second Set of Interrogatories. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20042A4791982-03-17017 March 1982 Response Opposing J Doherty 820310 Motion for Postponement of 820412 Hearings.Sufficient Grounds Not Provided to Justify Delay.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20042B2351982-03-17017 March 1982 Seventh Set of Interrogatories Re Tx Pirg Addl Contention 31 & Quadrex Rept Matters.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20042B2381982-03-15015 March 1982 Sixth Set of Interrogatories Re Tx Pirg Addl Contention 31 & Quadrex Rept Matters.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20042B2451982-03-15015 March 1982 Motion for Subpoena of Quadrex Corp Employees.Testimony Necessary for Clear Understanding of Brown & Root Deficiencies Despite Util Supervision & Specific Steps Needed to Correct & Prevent Problems.W/Certificate of Svc ML20041F0761982-03-10010 March 1982 Fourth Set of Interrogatories Re Tx Pirg Contention 31 & Quadrex Rept.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20041F0871982-03-10010 March 1982 Motion for Postponement of 820412 Hearing on Tx Pirg Addl Contention 31 & Quadrex-related Matters.Addl Time Needed to Complete Discovery.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20049J6571982-03-0808 March 1982 Answers to First Set of Interrogatories Re Tx Pirg Contention 31 & Quadrex Matters.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20041E1001982-03-0505 March 1982 First Set of Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20041E1071982-03-0505 March 1982 First Set of Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents Re Tx Pirg Contention 31.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20041E1181982-03-0505 March 1982 Third Set of Interrogatories Re Tx Pirg Contention 31 & Quadrex Rept Matters.Related Correspondence ML20041E1201982-03-0505 March 1982 Motion for Order Directing Applicant to Provide Forthcoming Bechtel Quadrex Rept Review.Rept Pertinent to Remaining Issue.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20041E1741982-03-0505 March 1982 Brief Opposing R Alexander Appeal from ASLB 820112 Order Denying Petition to Intervene.Aslb Did Not Abuse Discretion in Denying Petition.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20041E0711982-03-0404 March 1982 Second Set of Interrogatories Re Tx Pirg Contention 21 & Quadrex Rept Matters.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20049H8881982-03-0101 March 1982 Response Opposing D Marrack 820213 Motion for Review of Dates for Reopening Hearings & Continuance.No Commission Regulations or Atomic Energy Act Provisions Require Applicant Irrevocable Commitment.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20041B5381982-02-22022 February 1982 Reply to Intervenors Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20041C0671982-02-22022 February 1982 Response Opposing Tx Pirg 820209 Motion for Addl Time to File Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusion of Law.Motion Mooted by Tx Pirg Filing Proposed Findings on 820212. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20041B5421982-02-17017 February 1982 First Set of Interrogatories Re Tx Pirg Contention 31 & Quadrex Matters.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence 1982-07-02
[Table view] |
Text
'
UUITED STATES OF AMERICA
, EUOLEAR RE3ULATORY COMMISSION APRIL 23,1981 BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY & LICEUSING BOARD In the Matter of: 98 -
HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER CO.
Allens Creek Nuclear Gener- Docket No. 50-466 CP' 4' ating Station, Unit 1) Docg '
Q 01- up -
PR 2 71981 e IHTERVENOR J0FN F. DOHERTY'S CONTENTION #56 6 r WhMcfof(*"H9, Dxku;g !"
John F. Doherty, intervenor pro-se in the above p O
&2 ,.
t ceedings now files the below Contention #56. ,g g()
Intervenor contends Applicant's reactor trip system is not protected againd a pipe break to the scram discharge volumis~ff6i:1'thT hy'dfaulic contiol' units. Sudden breakage of one or more of these pipes would impair public safety because the water would continue *come out of the reactor and possibly drown out, short or otherwise stop the recir-cultion cooling pumps which are located below them, and there is no valve upstream of such break locations to per-mit stopping the loss of coolant., A plausible physical mechanism for pipe break in this part of the control rod hydraulic system would be thermal shock to the non-safety grade piping. Such thermal shock results on a reactor scram.
This Contention-is based on the results of the investi-gation of the June 28, 1980, partial scram failure at the Brown's Ferrv, Unit 3, by the NRC Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data, authored by Carlyle Michael-son. T_he report was sent to the Commissioners on April 7, 1981, as recorted in the Washington Post, of April 8, 1981 on page A-9 (attached).
To the best of this Intervenor's knowledge the report was the first publication of discovery of the problem in -
the contention. IEtervenor believes the requirements of
.- - s-10 CFR 2.714 (i) and'(iv) are met by him at the threshold, that is, the timing of the report lays good cause for a late filing, and that there is indeed no other party rep-resenting his interest on this issue. In 10 CFR 2.714 (10 Intervenor believes it cannot be shown there is available (O at this time other means by which his interest will be ,
s dg6d protected on this issue. Under 10 CFR 2.714 (v), this 810 507 0 $ff
s . .
Intervenor would point out the final schedule for hearing sefety issues is not determined. Indeed, discovery on issues, while others are in litigation is permissible in
, a multi-issue administrative hearing, although not desir-able. In acy case it is not reasonable to deny an Inter-venor the ri-ht to hear an issue, because he won't have time to do discovery on the issue. Under 10 CFR 2.714 (iii) this Intervenor 1ould ou 7 urge that a record which does
~
not cover an issue cannot be complete as one that does even if the Intervening party does not present expert Ve'stimony.
Therefore, this Intervenor requests the Board admit into controversy his Contention #56, with discovery to begin at once.
Respectfully Submitted,
, I
( John F. Doherty, J. D.
Intervanor
('
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2
~
Copies of "INTERVENOR JOHN F. DOEERTY'S CONTENTION #56" were served on the below partie's'via First Class U. S Postal Service, this o23 April, 1981.
Sheldon J. Wolfe Esq. , Gustave A. Linenberger, Dr. E.
Leonard Cheatum,, Administrative Judges J.- Gregory -Copeland,"Esqr and' JackTTe~wman~, Esq. , Applicant Richard A. Black, Esq. Staff Jocketing & Service, URC Atomic Safety Licensing & Appeal Board The Several Intervening Parties
=
~~ ~ ' '
L suncresses.cvesngloews. F.coricmos in j
'5 . . . . sc3 21.99111.99 L reg S28-5140. rec SiSO. i s - e - m ene - ewcm soe Cain,' Sn' A7RC Eyes Prob <7emsi '
eng rigntgow's.eng
- S39-578 . . sou 18.7139.71
- )Ih Reactor P?umbina 22,=2 *** *** '""*- M Dehe
. . !ofe 15.99-85.99 f//gl'/ [M" gadM w/m y. ' eng .
r
M.s ,es'sncrt-s e eve peplen cnd ennk'e-cotton [* '.
trouses. reg S12 . . . . . sole 12.99 g De Nuden Regulatory am mim is d.6iiEl sses' Act A tex *unzed oc! yester coordnctes for bee sett:rg.
two *potentially serious" problems of pkmh6; : .d ; senng. req S32-SS3. . . . . . scle 23.99-60.99 stnsss that could lead to mehdowns in any ci .he . orq 66.75 ",,.
M sses' Kns Howc 0 cump-shrts in many prints. ,
nation's operaths nudear power plants and a re- ;
sulting disasuous explosion of radioactivity.
reg $22. . . ... . .......... soles 17 m ct cc -
h3' ors'iom Boy seperctes incluces ocstel pents.
One imdves pressurbed-water reacters, d.ich 'vrat Ts.stnts.more.org
- S13-S26. . sole 8.9918.99 HOUSEV# l comprise about two-thirds of the nation's 74 cucieg Fcnc:fulcoc.
Entre stocx et ;rs' Stctus jecns. shorts and toos plants. It is ponrdbie, accordir4 to Harold Denton, Woodenkeg <
NRC's c. rector of reactor regu'ation, that socie have eom Cchnn Ke.Jorocche. Scsson cnd Son Jour.
wtnwooden J
brittle wads that could crack if they recched a sud- ong
- S30-542 . . scle 22.4h31.51 den high-pressure burst of cold water when they are - Yourchoice c f'ASHION ACCESSORIES '
3-sa hord m-very her. A jet cf cold water might be inp:ted dur- Save on a soecci group of woven cna ccsuct ing a malfunction or acddent, cack the reactor ves. ,*@ g' "*
. sel, and cause a mehdown. shoes from 9 West for women cndJuniors. . #
reg S32-S38. . . . . . scie 23.99 27.99 I ne other problem imuhis the 23 boiEng-nter ~
Ccmfortcole esoccees for summer stror.s.3 styles
'9 reactors. P there is a break or leak. in me cf the ; #"O pipes that carry waterW of the .etor after a f oc!ucc.g tne ocs c. req S24-S25. . . sofe 15.9917.99 '
t
- Entre stock of very scec:ct sterfrg s#ver chaos sudden shutdown, it wouEbe hard to stop the leak I
and prevent all the water from escaping the reactor, : cnd broce:ets. reg S20-570. . . . . . scle 8.99 29.99 ' =. p
, cc N
l Foshion riercec ecrnngs wth surgicci steel studs.
~'
again causing a mehdom Scientists have long known that neutron radiatim oc!ucas. hoccs. reg $4-8.50 . . . . . . sole 3.016.31 /'9N""
Wcmen's felt ncts in c venety of styies for c i from the reactor core makes the msel walls britde eg O.
over time, but recent research has found it occurnng Wbok,ong
- S15-S25. . . . . sole 6.99-11.99 CARPETS faster than expected. ney haw also known thatl cold water m het metal causes thermal sness, and E0"*
. ac w cy.tw 1
cocts. reg S14-520. .. . . . . . . . sc!e 8.9911.99 buUt reactors to mix mcommg cold water with hot 2-for-1 scie on many Wcmer brcs and body gar-:.. instoc ed. fro-r-m water to cusha the impact. But Denton told reac. cfter sole S2C ments, org
- S9-23.50 . . soie 2 for $9 to 2 for 23.50
- ;P tor owners last week that research had also foundDeecte 2 Eurekc ueng-r fut sFo for s; rect oresses.
-f quite severe thermal shocka in more or less normal octustments.
orig 513 . , , , , , , , , , , ,., , r,4 sage g,99
- T operation" with rela *ively amall accdents, ,,
smye ste ec
! Y Ironicany, new rules in effect sina the accident at E4 sovrgs on misses' wcirm rebes for snDogie, comfort, orig. * $24-538 . . . . . . . sole 9.9915.99 just 5. reg SL
- 3. Three MUe Island two years ago could make things aorse. The rules require operators to leave high- Entre stock of ct'Jcren's cocts. trned for ecster Mcgncver 2t, J-4 cressrq gris 414. todd:ers cnd infcnts too, cokxleveh g M pressure water pumps nmning if they come en au- Teknikc19"c
- Y tornaticaty because operators at TMI turned them off and the reactor core overheated as a result. But req 515-S62 . . . . . . .
Chacrens ecstsc
.. . . . . . . scle 11.21-46.41 esstmenystymW - . reg S400.
l ,
leaving them on, it turns out, incieses pressure on t .fW S15-S30. . sch 11.99-21.99 FNic12
- cmsumpnce
~
the hot waUs at the worst possible moment-just MEN'S AND BOYS' WEAR
%.F as the cold wa-ter hits.
Men's necicuecr. reg 7.50-511. . . . . . . . . . . scle $6 Sb RCA25 rer-goce m [_. 'Ibe bo!!!ng-water reactor problem invohes several Men'slong s'eeve heavy-we+ght ,hirts. ~ Gusdorf Tu-6 2 pipes rarps irilla. gter from d4-mcn to 6 mer.e*
. . . . . . . . . . . . . scie 9.99 - reg $40.
9 that carry _ab_o_ut 600 gaSms or water out of tif or;g
z, _ reactor core to afp tang wnen taere is an au- Emerson /4.'
Men',s Vcn Heusen iong s'eeve sport shirtsc
% tomanc shutdown. ine pipes also undergo "signifi-O'O E - " "' . scle 10.99 7 ' cesseMede:
cant thermal shock" and apparently are used so Men's Levis Achon slocks ct grect scmngs.
little that, they do not fa!! under the STIC's regula. FURNITUR
$2 '
. . . . scle lo.99 tions for routine inspection, said Stuart D. Rubin. I regS25. . .. .. ' 4-pc. conte-(lead reactor estems engineer at the NRC.
Boys'three-pecevestedsurtsof textvt Wy-estaE2O n thwoup.org S60c. scie 39.99 6-cwN ong* $910/
If one' or more should break, highly radicc.cthe f
water would spill into the reactor buildin;; where it h.4-- yQgQ%
wou'd threaten tne plant's safety estems cc!'Amy ' '~*"*"* " '** *"" 'a"'* *
- MN'"So" water w-.= dtect!v below. and the f*2cw migid: ~"*"~'"*"'"'~"""'"""C""
c%c Eue until the core as udcowred. Ruiin uid. i ,7 Y Y NAc5 fgq:j f -
)DDR 01BK i
' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ _ _ . _ , _ _ _ _ _ _ .