ML20003F371
| ML20003F371 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Rancho Seco |
| Issue date: | 02/11/1981 |
| From: | Faulkenberry B NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20003F356 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-312-81-01, 50-312-81-1, NUDOCS 8104200659 | |
| Download: ML20003F371 (1) | |
Text
.
h APPENDIX e I
NOTICE OF VIOLATION Docket No. 50-312 Sacramento Municipal Utility District As a result of the inspection conducted on January 12-15, 1981, and in accordance with the Interim Enforcement Policy, 45 FR 66754 (October 7,1980),
the following violation was identified:
Section 6.8.1 of the Rancho Seco Technical Specifications states, in part:
" Written procedures shall be established, implemented and maintained cover lng the activities referenced below:
The applicable procedures recommended in Appendix "A" of Regulatory a.
Guide 1.33, November 1972."
Section I.1 of Appendix "A" of Regulatory Guide 1.33 (Safety Guide 33),
November 1972 states in part, " Maintenance which can affect the performance of safety-related equipment should be properly preplanned and perfonned in accordance with written procedures, documented instructions, or drawings appropriate to the circumstances."
Section 6.8.2 of the Rancho Seco Technical Specifications states, in part:
"Each procedure...of 6.8.1 above, and changes thereto, shall be reviewed Those matters pertaining to items 6.8.1 a, b and c, above by the PRC.
shall be approved by the Plant Superintendent prior to implementation..."
Contrary to the above, on February 2,1980, a defective seal on the "A" Decay Heat Pump was replaced (Work Request No. 44953) without the use of a written procedure that had been reviewed by the PRC and approved by the Plant Superintendent.
This is a Severity Level V violation (Supplement I).
Purusant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201 the Sacramento Municipal Utility District is required to submit to this office within twenty-five days of the date of this Notice, a written statement or explanation in reply, including:
(1) the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved; (2) corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further items of noncompliance; Under the authority and (3) the date when full compliance will be achieved.
of action 182 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, this response st all be submitted under oath or affirmation.
.Z M /6 f.$ ] - -
?,
.x B. H. FauTkenberry, Chief Dated Reactor Projects Se
- 2 810420 0 to%
-