ML20003D896
| ML20003D896 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 02/04/1981 |
| From: | Sutton J, Whitesell D NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20003D889 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99900114 NUDOCS 8104010348 | |
| Download: ML20003D896 (5) | |
Text
.
s O
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY CCMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT REGION IV Repcrt No. 99900114/81-01 Program No. 51300 Company:
Lamco Industries Inc.
1596 North Johnson El Cajon, California 92020 Inspection Conducted:
January 19-23, 1981 Inscector:
., s) h
-u-N 4
- k. Sutton, Contractor Inspector Cate omeonentsSection I Vendor Inscection Branch
.1
',,, //
.,:' -M-8/
Acproved by
- 0. E. Whitesell, Chief Qate ComponentsSection I Vendor Inspection Branch Summary Inspection on January 19-23, 1981 (99900114/81-01)
Areas Inscected:
Implementation of 10 CFR 50, Acpendix B and Applicable Coces anc Standards including action on previous inspection findings, Design Occument Control, Procurement Control and Review of Vendors activities.
The inspection involved twenty-nine (29) inspection hours on site by one (1) NRC inspector.
Results:
In the four (1) areas inspected, no apparent nonconformance or unresolved items were identified.
81040103N
t 2
DETAILS SECTION A.
Persons Contacted
- L. Kerr, Director Quality Assurance
- R. R. Laser, President "L.
L. Lindahl, Director, Material Control
- L. Logan, Director Estimating "L. MacFadeau, Director, Contracts
- T. A. Mcdonald, Director, Engineering
- R. Mathias, Director, Manufacturing
- B. Smith, Director, Special Projects.
Royal Gloce Insurance Comcany A. Ladd, Authorized Nuclear Insoector (ANI)
" Denotes those persons who attended the exit interview.
S.
Action on Previous Inscection Findincs (Closed) Inspection (Report No. 80-02) Perry Airlock, a (3).
The inscector reviewed W. W. Woolleys' Discosition Recuest No.1066, dated 9/30/80 to Lamco, documenting the accectance of the cuestionaole materials used in Perry's air locks as reported in Inspection Recor No. 80-01.
The disposition request bac teen signed oy all required parties.
The material was found to meet specification requirements, and to be acceptable for the intended service.
C.
Procurement Control 1.
Objectives The objectives of this area of the inspection were to ascertain that:
a.
A system for procurement document control had been prepared and implemented, which was consistent with regulatory, code and contract requirements.
b.
Source selection was made in accordance with QA Program commi tments.
c.
Provisions were made in the QA ?rogram for the evaluation of supplier performance.
2.
Method of Accomolisnment The preceding objectives were acc:molisned Oy:
+
3 a.
-Review of the QA manual, Section N-3, dated November 2, 1979, titled, " Control of Purchase Material, Equipment and Services."
b.
Review of the QA manual, Section N5, dated Novemcer 2, 1979, titled, " Procurement Document Control."
c.
Review of the Qualified Vendor list, dated Decemoer 21, 1980.
d.
Review of Ccmmercial Nuclear Purchase Work Orders (WO)/ Purchase Order (PO) Nos., 030062-5820, WO 7410-31, 15-30-6.
7433AS, AC, 7434 AD, AK, 7434 AN, AC, 7410-31-18, 741.0-31-8., and 5820-2-14.
e.
Review of the manufacturer's Plan and Quality Record.
f.
Review of the suppliers material mechanical and chemical tests (mill certs).
g.
Review of Lamco's customer contract review summary.
h.
Review of contract cnange notices.
i.
Review of LAMCO's P.O. attachment No. III.
j.
Review of P.O.s and specifications to determine if tne tecn-nical code and customer requirements have been indicated in the vendors P.O.
k.
Discussions witn cognizant personnel.
3.
Findings It was determined that the system prescribed for the evaluation of Purchase Orders, specification and suppliers is consistent with the NRC rules and code requirements.
Within the area reviewed, no nonconformance or unresolved items were identified.
O.
Design and Document Control 1.
Objectives The objectives of this area of the inspection were to verify that:
a.
Procedures have been orepared and approved by the vendor or contractor to prescrice a system for design cocument control which is in accordance with the QA Program, NRC, A5ME Coce, and contract requirements.
4 b.
The design document control proceduras are being effectively implemented.
2.
Method cf Accomolishment The preceding ocjectives were accomplished by:
a.
Review of Lamco's QA manual, Section N4, dated Novemoer 2. 1979, titled " Design Control."
b.
Review of Design Specification P815-1144.13-00-002 dated July 3, 1978, for fabricating and furnishing containment vessei personnel locks.
Review of Verification of Design Specification by a Registered c.
Professional Engineer, dated March 5, 1979.
d.
Review of Lamco's design definition document for the above specifi-cation.
Review of QA's supplier Audit / Survey.
e.
f.
Review of the Design Engineer's analysis of Penetrations Occ. #FA/RD S179-6.
g.
Review of the Stress Report Cartification datec 9-26-30.
h.
Review of an internal QA Audit of Design Control dated 4-4-80.
i.
Review of Preliminary drawings.
j.
Discussions wich cognizant personnel.
3.
Findings a.
General The inspector reviewed the preliminary design activities conducted by the vendor to date.
The design drawings are out for final customer's aporoval.
Fabrication has not started.
The inspector will conduct a followup review of the design area as the job progresses.
In the areas examined, Lamco's QA System for Control of Design activities has been followed and is being properly implemented.
No conconformance or unresolved items were identified in the areas reviewed.
C.
Review of Vendors Activities 1.
Obiectives l
p
__m_
A j
The objectives of this area of the inspection were:
a.
To update the Vencors Activities to assess their impact on future IE inspections.
t b.
Review of the current workload.
2.
Method of Accomplishment The foregoing objectives were accomplished by discussions with the vendors management personnel and a review of future nuclear orders and nuclear orders in process.
3.
Results Nuclear contIracts for the manufacture of equipment and personnel air locks and component sucports, constitutes apcroximately sixty-five percent (65) of Lamco's work load presently in house.
F.
Exit Interview The inspector met with management representatives (denotad in paragraph A.) at the conclusion of the inscection.
The inspector summarized the scoce and findings of the inscection.
The management representatives had no comment in resconse to the items discussed by the inspector.
...