ML20003D058
| ML20003D058 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 12/22/1980 |
| From: | Barnes I, Roberds H NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20003D053 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99900701 NUDOCS 8103190005 | |
| Download: ML20003D058 (3) | |
Text
I O.
4
'1 s
9,.
.. p g:.7 NUCl. EAR" REGULATORY > COMMISSION -
' " ~
^*
~
OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT REGION IV' Report No. 99900701/80-02 Program No. 51300 Company:
Power Piping Company 829 Beaver Avenue Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15233 Inspection at:
Danora Plant Inspection Conducted: October 28-29, 1980 A
Inspector:
e/M/ -M,,&
4::/;,c. /M H. W. Roberos, Contractor Inspector
/ Dape Component Section II Vendor Inspection Branch App.oved by:
&,e e A 2 /h I. Barnes, Chief Date Component Sei: tion II Vendor Inspection Branch Summarv Inspection on October 28-29, 1980 (99900701/80-02).
Areas Insoected:
Implementation of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B criteria and appli-caole codes and standards; including actions on previous inspection findings.
The inspection involved sixteen (16) inspector hours on site by one (1) NRC inspector.
Results:
In the one area-inspected the following deviation was identified.
Deviation:
Actions on Previous Inspection Findings - Temporary attachment wela not documented on IPC sheet 1079 128 21 Fab Mark No. ISO 107924 as required.
8103190005 L
. %.. _ y y x..,
- w. G..,
..s,-
..~ ;~.
- CETAILS SECTION A.
Persons Contacted "A. J. McGlynn - Assistant to the Chairman of the Board
- W. R. Patterson, Executive Vice President "H. R. Good, Corporate Director of Quality Assurance
- A. L. Bradshaw, Quality Engineer "G. L. Cole, Welding Engineer "G. L. Charley, Quality Control Manager
- J. A. Pero::i, Shop Superintendent "A. Laneve, QC Documentation Section Supervisor
- M. Kulp, Receiving Section Supervisor R. Hernandez, Radiography
- R. F. Blake, Piping Engineer, Stone & Webster
- Denotes those present at the exit interview.
B.
Actions on Previous Inscection Findings 1.
(Closed) Deviation (Notice of Deviation, Item A, Report No. 80-01):
QC did not verify that preheat was acceptable for certain tack welding operations.
The inspector verified that a nonconformance and cisposition report had been issued for the subject fabrication on 3/26/80 and that additional training had been given to Inspection Section personnel on 1/24/80 and 1/29/80 relative to specific preheat and documenta-tion requirements.
The section supervisor monitored the in process fit up and welding operations for a three (3) month period to verify compliance with QA program requirements.
2.
(Closed) Deviation (Notice of Deviation, Item 3, Report No. 80-01):
Incorrect use of a film side penetrameter.
The inspector verified that the subject weld joint had been re-radio-graphed using a source side penetrameter and NDE personnel had been
- given additional training on procedure TP-4 with emphasis on place-ment of penetrameters.
In addition, tne NDE Level III reviewed the radiographic technique for period of approximately four months to assure that similar discrepancies cic not occur.
3.
(Closed) Deviation (Notice of Deviation, Item C, Report No. 80-01):
A copy of the welding electrode requisition did not accompany issued material observed in a portable oven as required.
The inspector verified from records that additional training had been given to the Weld Material Clerks and QC Inscectors in the
a,
......a 3.
..,.. n.
as, ;..,. :. -;..
p., u.. :.
- . ;....~. 3.
- a
, q.a.
,. c.,..
.~
proper execution and handling of weld electrode requisition slips.
It was noted that the use of tne welding electrode requisition slip had been revised.
4.
(Closed) Deviation (Notice of Deviation, Item 0, Report No. 80-01):
The welder number or filler metal LCN had not been recorded on the shop fabrication sheet as required.
The inspector verified from records that a nonconformance and disposition report was issued for the weld in question and records indicate that the weld was removed and the area inspected as required.
It was also noted that inspection personnel had been given additional training relative to documentation and recording of the required inspection.
During review of implementation of committed corrective actions a further deviation from commitments was identified.
(See Notice of Deviation).
C.
Exit Meeting A post inspection exit meeting was held on October 29, 1980, with the management representatives denoted in paragraph A. above.
The inspec-tor summarized the scope and findings of the inspection.
Management acknowledged the statements of the inspector with respect to the findings as presented to them and affirmed their commitments to the Quality Assurance Program.
6
_