ML20002E148

Suppl 1 to Significant Deficiency Repts SD 369/80-21 & 370/ 80-16 Re Failure to Consider Containment Vessel Dynamic Movements Due to Postulated Loca,Initially Reported 801126. Analysis Revised

ML20002E148
Person / Time
Site:	Mcguire, McGuire
Issue date:	01/09/1981
From:	Parker W DUKE POWER CO.
To:	James O'Reilly NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
References
10CFR-050.55E, NUDOCS 8101260513
Download: ML20002E148 (3)

Text

D

~

.uma ?D '

DUKE POWER COMPANY Powza Bunntwo 84-04 86- 019-403J," ' Wa2 socra caunca s=zr.camom\{.ca 33M\

5 m uu. o.maansa.sa. January 9, 1981 TELEP=ont:AmEA 704 Vict PetssetNT Srtaae Poonucnon 373-4083 Mr. James P. O'Reilly, Director U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II 101 Marietta Street, Suite 3100 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Re: McGuire Nuclear Station Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-369 and 50-370 t

Dear Mr. O'Reilly:

Pursuantto10CFR550./SepleasefindattachedSupplementNo.ItoSignificant Deficiency Report SD 369/80-21, and 370/80-16.

Very truly yours, WJ /

William O. Parker, Jr.

THH:ses Attachment cc: Director T. J. Donat U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission NRC Resident Inspector Office of Inspection and Enforcement McGuire Nuclear Station

( Washington, D. C. 20555 303 s

//

- FFICIAL COPY 610 2 e c 0543 g

l a- ,,

,e-D 'P# D

~@ N "

muE noctEna STnT1m Md SJY A d} "3 a UNITS 1 & 2 l

IEPWT No: SD-369/80-21, 370/80-16 (Supplement 1 of 1) 1 l

REPORP DME: January 9, 1981 INITIAL NuralucIm DME: n ,,amhar 17, 1980 EACILITY: M-mim Nuclear Staticn, Units 1 & 2 IDEhraluCIN & DEFICIE2CY: CanF=4= ant Vessel (CV) Dynamic Ihsmits Due

~

to Postulated Ioss of Coolant Accidant (IOCA)

Not Properly Cm sidered in Analysis of Criteria -

Analyzed Piping DESCRIPTIN T DEFTFT7NCY:

'Ihis report describes an increase in scope of a daficiancy in piping analysis Aar.u.Limi on Nuv=M 26, 1980 in Report No. SD-369/80-21, 370/80-16. 'Ihat daficiancy cmsisted of not eaideing ICCA effects in analysis of piping systems, apac4 fic=11y, pressure effects cm ha11r=-type E==-i.a.aticms. In resolving that daficiancy it was hudned that Or*=inmant vaanal dynamic movements due to IOCA were not properly ea4dared in certain criteria - analyzed piping. Criteria-analyzed piping is 4-inch di=s=i.=. and less, icw tm+rai.ure, low pressure, =4 =ic piping which is analyzed by pipe span and support an= ring rules dafinad_ by Speci-fic=+ 4 m. 'Ihe cmly dynamic input to which the criteria are applicable is a seismic event. 9 hen M m"M the analysis originally, analysts assmed that applicable IOCA effects were static cnly.

Porticms of piping affected by this daficiancy are required either to ensure Cn*=4nnent integrity (between isolaticn valves) and/or to perform necessary functicms during or after a postulated IOCA. Eleven (11) piping analysis math wvlala require partial or total reanalysis for IOCA effects. Frm these math nrrlala, t;c hundred and seventee (217) support / restraints require design review /

revisim with sme hardware ch=w expected. Most support / restraint load changes l are eaE= tial to be minor.

ANALYSIS T SAFETI IMPLICATIm Worst case safety ccnsequenm is that piping which either penetrates Centainment and/or is required to functicn during and/or after a postulated IOCA is not qualifiad_

for the Faulted Ccoditicn including IOCA effects. Support / restraints for this piping uny not be adequate for worst case inada and piping integrity for either require-ment cannot be assured ass ming inadequate support / restraint designs.

CORREITIVE ACTIm An analysis and design review pi+= has been initiated to ccmplete the following:

(1) Review the scope of criteria-analyzed piping inside of Ccntainment and identify those math =vlala ccx?=4ning piping which satisfies all of the following:

g .

. January 9, 1981 h fl D

• D Page 2 J 4e g 71]A L j

a) Pipe integrity is required to ensure Ccntainment isolation or_ pipe integrity is required to allow pipe to perform necessary fura.icn(s) during or after a postulated IOCA b) Pipe support / restraint (s) attach to the Ccntaiment Vessel (2) Perform rigorous (cmputeriTed) stress analysis of piping associated with Itan (1) to include IOCA dynamic effects pwi.e.u:ly. A pipe stress and support / restraint load factoring approach which was identifiad during initial nctific=*4m of this daficiancy was used -initially but was cmfimad by E -A ming the more accurate rigorous analysis cn all ,

affected piping. Ccnfim adequacy of existing piping and define, as naca===ry, revised support / restraint locaticms and loads and revised 1maings cn structures to which the piping a**=chaa. Ccnfim adequacy of structures to which the piping or support / restraints attach for any revised 1maima. Review and revise support / restraint designs as necessary to assure adequacy for any revised 1maings and locaticns.

(3) Make =ca===ry hardware changes to affected items.

(4) Revise the smc4f4c=ticn for criteria-analyzed piping to nere clearly dafina analysis requirements for postulated IOCA cmditicns and to avmnd the existing exclusicn of the criteria app 14c=h414ty to IOCA to require transfer to rigorous analysis scxpe analysis of piping subject to dynamic input due to IOCA or any other dynamic event other than =4=4c.

W'les for capleticn of the above Anx.i.ive actim items are as follows:

Corrective Acticn Item Ccepleticn Date Unit 1 Unit 2

1) Define Affected Piping Scope Ca plete 6/I/81 j

2) Piping and Support / Restraint Cm plete Per Unit 2 Analysis and Design Review / Ccnstruction Revisicn Sc+adula

3) Hardware N nga= 1/28/81* Per Unit 2 Ccnstruction W 31e

4) MiF4caticn Revisicn -

2/1/81 Due to restricticns asscciated with Ccntaiment cleaning activities, scue support / restraints not required to assure integrity of systems which support -

Fuel Icad will be cmpleted shortly after this date.

l

.