ML20002D682
| ML20002D682 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fermi  |
| Issue date: | 12/09/1980 |
| From: | Fiorelli G NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20002D680 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-341-80-20, NUDOCS 8101210659 | |
| Download: ML20002D682 (2) | |
Text
}~,)
i Appendix A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Detroit Edison Company Docket No. 50-341 As a result of the inspection conducted on November 12 - 14, 1980, and in accordance with the Interim Enforcement Policy, 45 FR 66754 (October 7, 1980),
the following violations were identified:
1.
10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion II, states in part that the quality assurance program shall be carried out throughout plant life, in accord-ance with policies, procedures, or instructions.
The Enrico Fermi Unit 2 Quality Assurance Manual, Section 1.0.1 states in part that it is Edison's policy to implement a Quality Assurance Program, either directly or through its vendors and contractors to meet the applic-able requirements of Appendix B of 10 CFR 50.
Contrary to the above, quality control personnel of a contractor to the licensee permitted instrument cable installation activities to continue before correcting a known deficiency in the pulling activities. One cable had already been broken by these deficient activities.
This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement II).
2.
10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criteria XVIII, states in part that a comprehen-sive system of planned and periodic audits shall be carried out to verify compliance with all aspects of the quality assurance program and to deter-mine the effectiveness of the program.
The Enrico Fermi Unit 2 Quality Assurance Manual, Section 19.0.1 states in part that a comprehensive system of planned and periodic audits shall be carried out to verify compliance with all aspects of the QA program and to assess the effectivensee of the program.
Contrary to the above, the licensee has not carried out a comprehensive audit of the in-plant construction activities of the electrical contractor from August, 1979 to the present (November, 1980). The licensee has per-formed surveillances of the electrical in plant activities.
This a Severity Level VI violation (Supplement II).
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Detroit Edison Company is hereby required to submit to this office within twenty-five days of the date of this b101210 $$ll?6l
Apptndix A -,
Notice, a written statement or explanation in reply, including:
(1) admission or denial of the alleged items of noncompliance; (2) the reasons for the items of noncompliance if admitted; (3) the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved; (4) corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further items of noncompliance; and (5) the date when full compliance will be achieved. I!nder the authority of Section 182 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, this response shall be submitted under oath or affirmation.
dated D.,,_ L_ 9, / 9 8-fly 7
-- ~
G. Fiorelli, Chief Reactor Construction and Engineering Support Branch I
L
.m