ML20002D242
| ML20002D242 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 11/25/1980 |
| From: | Barnes I, Ellershaw L NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20002D239 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99900361 NUDOCS 8101200131 | |
| Download: ML20002D242 (3) | |
Text
.
g U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AMS FNFORCEMENT REGION IV Report No. 99900361/80-02 Program No. 51300 Company:
G. Dikkers and Company N. V.
Industriestraat 15, P.O. Box 12 7550AA Hengelo, Province of Overijssel THE NETHERLANDS Inspection Conducted:
October 27, 1980 Inspector:
C 1/
'Tb M. E. Ellersnaw, Contractor Inspector
/
(fate ComponentsSection II Vendor Inspection Branch 1/ /Ar/P O Approved by:
w I. Sarnes, Chief Date ComponentsSection II Venter Inspection 3 ranch Summary Inspection conducted October 27, 1980 (99900361/80-02)
Areas Insoected:
Implementation of 10 CFR 50, Appendix 9 criteria, and applicable coces ano stancards; including action on previous inspection findings.
The inspec-tion involved five inspector-hours on site.
Results:
In the one area inspected, no deviations or unresolved items were icentified.
Review of Vendor Status:
A review of G. Oikkers' contractual status relative to tneir manufacturing and supplying of nuclear safety relief valves for domestic (U.S) nuclear power plants, revealed one valve remained to be shipped whicn would complete the current contract with General Electric Company.
G. Dikkers' has no other current contracts to provide valves for U.S. nuclear power plants.
Unless this status cnanges, there will be no further inscections scheculed at G. Oikkers and Comoany.
Q.101200 gl
U.S. " NUCLEAR REGULATORY CCMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT REGION IV Report No. 99900361/80-02 Program No. 51300 Company:
G. Oikkers and Company N. V.
Industriestraat 15, P.O. Box 12 7550AA Hengelo, Province of Overijssel THE NETHERLANDS Inspection Conducted:
October 27, 1980 Inspector:
I/3%
// -2o - Po
[e L. E. Ellersnaw, Contractor Inspector Data ComponentsSection II Vendor Inspection Branch Approved by:
//-20-N I. Barnes, Chief Date ComponentsSection II Vendor Inspection Branch Summary Inspection conducted October 27, 1980 (99900361/80-02)
Areas Inscected:
Implementation of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B criteria, and applicable coaes ano stancards; including action on previous inspection findings.
The inspec-tion involved five inspector-hours on site.
Results:
In the one area inspected, no deviations or unresolved items were icentified.
2 DETAILS SECTION (Prepared by L. E. Ellershaw)
A.
Persons Contacted F. Van der Geld - Manager, Quality Assurance J. A. Grobben - Quality Assurance Consultant J. Wilts - Metallurgist and Welding Engineer R. J. Howe - Technical Manager The above listed personnel attended the exit meeting.
B.
Action on Previous Inscection Findings 1.
(Closed) Deviation (Item A, Notice of Deviation, Inscection Report No. 80-01):
This item dealt with a procedure qualification record not documenting preheat and interpass temperature essential variaoles; in that the WPS permitted an increase in maximum interpass temperature and a rgduction in minimum specified preheating temperature greater than 100 F.
G. Oikkers and Company N. V. (GD) have implemented their committed corrective action in that the particular WPS was requalified.
A review of other WPSs showed that they had been qualified as required.
2.
(Closed) Deviation (Item 8, Notice of Deviation, Inspection Report No. 80-01):
This item dealt with welding being performed in which an essential and a nonessential variable was being violated.
GD have implemented their committed corrective action in that interaass temperatures are being monitored, meetings were held, and the particular valve disc involved, has been scrapped.
3.
(Closed) Deviation (Item C, Notice of Deviation, Inspection Report No. 80-01):
This item dealt with vendor audits not assuring com-pliance to ASME Coce requirements, in that a Code violation was ac::epted ard not all aspects of the QA program were audited.
G. D. implemented their committed corrective action in that an audit report was corrected - incorrect information was recorded, and a new vendor audit has been scheduled to cover aspects of the QA program *nich had not oeen covered previously.
C.
Exit Meeting An exit meeting was held with the management recresentatives denoted in paragrapn A above.
The scope and findings of this inspection were summari::ed.
Management acknowlecged the statements relative to the inspection.
i
!