ML20002B693

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Requests Plans for Participation in Effort to Further Hardware & Procedural Changes to Assure Long Term Scram Sys Reliability.Response Requested within 25 Days
ML20002B693
Person / Time
Site: Browns Ferry Tennessee Valley Authority icon.png
Issue date: 10/01/1980
From: Eisenhut D
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20002B695 List:
References
NUDOCS 8012220491
Download: ML20002B693 (2)


Text

D A

LW11 I D Distribution

'0CT t1980 Docket RAClark PMs ORB d2 RReid OELD (5)

NRC PDR DCrutchfield IE (7)

EstlaXN SVarga RDiggs Local PCR Norris (2)

JWetmore DEisenhut HSmith Gray Files

,.0 ALL CbR LICENSEES TNovak CParrish 8

he f

SUEJECT:

C'.R SCRAll SYSTEM o

E to TIpoolito PKreut::er On June 23, 1980, during a rcutine shutdcwn of the 3rewns Ferry 3 reacter, a manual scram f ailed to insert all centrol reds.

I!E Sulletin 80-17 uith subsequent supplements 1, 2 and 3 has been issutJ whicn has required system modifications, precedural and design verificaticr.s, additicnal surveillance and tests, and analyses to assure adequate short-term performance of existing scram systems en operating plants.

However, we believe further hardware and prccccural changes will be required to assure adequate icng-term scram system reliability. We are aware that the Sk2 cwners have formed a Sub-Group of the BWR Cuners Grcup to address this matter and are in tne process of develcping design and perfcrmance criteria.

Therefore, in order to determine wnether or not ycur license shculd be modified, please provide us in writing, under oath cr affirmation, within 25 days cf the date of this letter your plans for participation in this effort.

In acotticn, ycur respense should include:

(1) The results of any reassessment of your present scram system to confirm confernance with the General Design Criteria (Appendix A to 10 CFR 50).

(2) Whether you intend to reevaluate your present scra:a system and modify it as necessary to met the additional design and perfor-mance criteria developed by the Owners Sub-Group.

If not, what criteria will be used to judge the adequacy of your present scram system?

(3) Whether you intend to provide by December 15, 1980, the results of the above reevaluation (including required modifications) along with a schedule for inplementation.

If net, why not.

This information is requested under the authority of 10 CFR 50.54(f) of the Cccraission's regulations.

If ycu have any questions concerning this matter, please call your Project

p'y s

<anager.

g Sincerely,

{/ N

/

Original signed b7 n1 Darre 1;.Zuenhut p-;p.

g h ()] ~o o 2 ()

&/

r r/

Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director i

Division of Licensing OFFICE suaNaC4.. Service Lists.

. CONCURRENCES k!!$ PREVIOUS hAGE-cat E >j.

[.

.I.

..f tl..

i, NAc FORM 318 (9 76) NRCV 0240 C'U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1979 289 369

  • D'T

}D "

D o A._13

och Distribution Docket RReid OI&E(7)

ORB 12 DCrutchfield RDiggs NRC pDR SVarga JWetmore Local PCR SNorris (2)

Gray Files DEisenhut HSmith TNovak CParrish TO ALL Ek2 LICENSEES SUMB RIngram GLainas EHylton S&'ECT: BWR SCRM SYSTEM RTedesco PKreutzer TIppolito.

PMs RAClark CELD (5)

On June 28, 1980, during a routine shutdcwn of the Brcuns Ferry 3 reacter, a manual scram f ailed to insert all control rods.

ISE Sulletin 50-17 with subsequent supplements 1, 2 and 3 has been issued which has required system modifications, ::recedural and design verifications, additional surveillance and tests, and analyses to assure adequate shcrt-term performance of existing scram systems en operating plants.

However, we believe further hardware and procedural changes will be required to assure adequate long-term scra:n system reliability. We are aware that the SLR owners have formed a Sub-Grcup of the SWR Owners Group to address this matter and are in the process of developing des 1Sn and perferrance criteria.

Within 20 days of the date of receipt of this letter, pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f), provice us with ycur plans for participation in this effort. In additien, your response should include:

(1) The results of any reassessment of your present scram system to confirm conforrance with the General Design Criteria (Appendix A to 10 CFR 50).

(2) A cemitment to reevaluate your present scram system and modify it as necessary to meet the additional design and performance cr.iteria developed by the Owners Sub-Group.

(3) A cocinit:nent to provide by December 15, 1980, the results of the above reevaluation (including required modifications) along with a schedule for iglementation.

If you have any questions concerning this matter, please call your Project Manager.

Sincerely, Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director

-r>

Division of Licensing cc: Service Lists

,J n

ORB #2b 033,d2 cAfkOR

  1. D:DL ora OFriCc).. N8R.'

1'Ndva "DE'i s e'nht" E,

2 Miknan:mj,i T

i suRNauc)...V.h

.e.ra

~

~

'80 "

9 & /80 9/b/30 9/ 2./80 9/[/80 '

Care ).

NXC FORM 318 (9 76) NRCM O240 NU.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1979-289 369